The stylebook no longer sanctions the term “illegal immigrant” or the use of “illegal” to describe a person. Instead, it tells users that “illegal” should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally.
Why did we make the change? The discussions on this topic have been wide-ranging and include many people from many walks of life. (Earlier, they led us to reject descriptions such as “undocumented,” despite ardent support from some quarters, because it is not precise. A person may have plenty of documents, just not the ones required for legal residence.)
(116 comments, 837 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
I generally believe - as the son of one immigrant and the spouse of another - that anyone who wants to come here and make a better life for themselves is welcome here. I also believe that nothing occurs in a vacuum; where there are results, there must be causes. If people are risking everything for the slim opportunity to do what amounts to scut work here in the US, then their options in their own country must be severely limited.
(912 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
(248 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
American tourists with old misdemeanor records are being turned away at the Canadian border -- after a stop at secondary immigration checks.
Take the case of 55-year-old Lake Tahoe resident Greg Felsch. Stopped at the border in Vancouver this month at the start of a planned five-day ski trip, he was sent back to the United States because of a DUI conviction seven years ago. Not that he had any idea what was going on when he was told at customs: "Your next stop is immigration.''
Felsch was ushered into a room. "There must have been 75 people in line," he says. "We were there for three hours. One woman was in tears. A guy was sent back for having a medical marijuana card. I felt like a felon with an ankle bracelet.''
(37 comments, 414 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Last month Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo said Miami is like a third world country. Even Jeb Bush took him to task.
But Tancredo will visit Key Biscayne Thursday to give a talk. His topic: the need for immigrants to assimilate.
Why is he going? How about attention:
Tancredo spokesman Carlos Espinosa...said Tancredo wasn't worried about whatever reception he will get in the Miami area.....ny protests or controversy will only draw more attention to the event, he said.
"It's always entertaining. It'll add to the flair of Miami," Espinosa said. "I really do hope we get some protesters. Otherwise, what else are we going for?"
(8 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Bump and Update: Jeb Bush writes this letter (pdf)to Tancredo complaining about his remarks.
Tom Tancredo Calls Miami A Third World Country
Is there nothing Tom Tancredo won't do for a soundbite?
He's now called Miami a "third world country."
In South Florida to attend Restoration Weekend, a gathering of conservative activists, the Colorado Republican, whose district includes suburbs of Denver, pointed to Miami as an example of how ''the nature of America can be changed by uncontrolled immigration,'' the story says.
''Look at what has happened to Miami,'' the WorldNetDaily quotes Tancredo as saying in an interview. ``It has become a Third World country. You just pick it up and take it and move it someplace. You would never know you're in the United States of America. You would certainly say you're in a Third World country.''
Talk about viewing the world through a cracked lens.
(11 comments, 269 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments