home

Big Day for Bad Bunny: He'll Knock it Out of the Park

I may not care for football but I will be watching this afternoon to see Bad Bunny's half time show, which he'll sing in Spanish. He is probably the biggest global performer in the world right now.

Close behind is Shakira, who just began her weeklong residency in El Salvador where she had her first concert last night. Tens of thousands of her fans crossed El Salvador's borders (legally) to be able to see her in person. Every hotel room in the country is reserved and she's expected to bring many millions to the local economy. El Salvador's gang-crushing President, Nayib Bukele, said he was determined to make sure everyone was safe and thus has deployed 3,000 military and civil guards to the venue. Here's a photo of what they look like.

Bad Bunny brought $400 plus million to Puerto Rico's economy during his music residency which just ended.

At the Grammy's last week, Bad Bunny began one of his acceptance speeches with:

"Before I say thanks to G-d, I'm going to say ICE out,"... "We're not savages, we're not animals, we're not aliens – we're humans," he added from the stage after his win for best musicá urbana album.

"The hate gets more powerful with more hate. The only thing that's more powerful than hate is love, so, please, we need to be different. If we fight, we have to do it with love."

Wouldn't it be wonderful if he could make it so?

The intense globalization of music and culture continues next month when k-pop super band BTS embarks on its first tour in five years. The pomp and circumstance in Seoul will be enormous. I could watch then dance for hours. But their tickets are going like wildfire all over the world:

BTS has made history in the UK after selling out London’s Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, setting a new record for the highest seat occupancy ever achieved for a single concert at the venue.

....The group is scheduled to perform at the 62,000-seat stadium on July 6 and 7, with total attendance expected to reach about 120,000 over the two nights. Both dates sold out completely after BTS announced a fully immersive 360-degree stage, allowing audiences to view the performance from all directions.

Their new album, the first in five years, is already at the top of the charts and it hasn't been released yet:

A day after the album’s release, on March 21, BTS will hold a live comeback performance at Gwanghwamun Square in central Seoul. The event will be streamed live to more than 190 countries via Netflix.

Yes, they will be touring in America, and all 42 shows are already sold out. After that, it's on to Europe and Asia.

The only place where global tourism may not rise is the United States, because of Donald Trump. Foreigners don't want to spend money or time here. How embarrassing that the Vice-President got booed at the opening winter games ceremony in Milan. I wonder how many years it will take the U.S. to shake the tawdry image the world now holds of us thanks to Donald Trump.

I'll put up an open thread this afternoon.

< Minnesota and Sunday Night Open Thread | Trump Secretly Deports 9 to Cameroon in Africa >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Trump slams the halftime show (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by fishcamp on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 12:02:14 PM EST
    and Bad Bunny being unpatriotic.  He probably doesn't even know Puerto Ricans are US citizens.

    El presidente es un idiota. (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by desertswine on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 03:40:33 PM EST
    Una cucaracha (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by jondee on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 05:04:35 PM EST
    naranja y gorda.

    Parent
    con el pene (none / 0) (#25)
    by jondee on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 05:09:48 PM EST
    diminuto.

    Parent
    ¿Dónde está el embustero? (5.00 / 3) (#35)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 10:55:26 PM EST
    El charlatán está con su esposa, la buscadora de oro. (Ahora llega la parte en la que emprendemos un viaje, y la seguridad del aeropuerto exige ver nuestras redes sociales y nuestro comprobante de ciudadanía.)

    I think we should do an entire thread in Spanish, just to pi$$ them off.

    ;-)

    Parent

    Whew (5.00 / 2) (#30)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 02:52:10 PM EST
    the weeks keep getting worse and worse for Trump and therefore he is gonna make Americans suffer for it. Jamie Raskin said that Trump's name appears over 1,000,000 times in the unredacted Epstein files. Leads me to believe the DOJ scrubbed the files and I also wonder how many of them were just shredded never to appear anywhere.

    More thann one MILLION times???? (none / 0) (#31)
    by leap2 on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 04:34:53 PM EST
    How can that be???

    Parent
    Im starting to like AI (none / 0) (#32)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 04:46:23 PM EST
    for current events.  
    This is the response to the query

    Trump's name appears over 1,000,000 times in the unredacted Epstein


    ---

    As of early February 2026, here is the breakdown of current findings:

    "One Million Times" Claim: Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) recently alleged that Trump's name appears more than one million times in unredacted files he viewed. He noted that many of these mentions were in "redacted stuff" and characterized the high frequency as making it "ridiculous" to get through even a fraction of them.

    Official Document Counts: Major news outlets reviewing the 3 million pages released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in late January 2026 have reported much lower specific counts:

    38,000 times: A review by The New York Times found approximately 38,000 mentions in the latest tranche.

    5,300 files: Other reports indicate Trump was flagged in over 5,300 individual files within the document cache.

    1,000-1,500 times: Some earlier analyses of specific document dumps reported roughly 1,000 to 1,500 mentions.

    Nature of the Mentions: Experts and journalists note that a significant majority of these mentions are non-incriminating, often appearing in:

    News articles and public records Epstein archived.

    Innocuous contexts like flight logs (showing 7-8 trips in the 1990s) and guest lists for Mar-a-Lago.

    Unverified tips or hearsay submitted to the FBI, which the DOJ noted they were legally required to release regardless of credibility.

    Parent

    Pirro flops again.... (5.00 / 3) (#34)
    by desertswine on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 09:31:17 PM EST
    Federal prosecutors in Washington sought and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video this fall that enraged President Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders, four people familiar with the matter said.

    It was remarkable that the U.S. attorney's office in Washington -- led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trump's -- authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nation's spy agencies.

    But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trump's bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.

    The move to charge the lawmakers -- among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan -- was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trump's directives to prosecute his adversaries.

    --NYT--

    Pam Bondi (5.00 / 2) (#37)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 09:51:04 AM EST
    Is getting a good beating on the Hill right now.

    Kind of fun to watch one dem after another go at it while she shuffles papers and pretends to not listen.

    Pam Bondi (5.00 / 1) (#49)
    by KeysDan on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 05:18:42 PM EST
    is an ongoing tragedy for the country.  As with her disrespectful and contemptuous demeanor to Democratic senators at a previously senate judiciary committee, so too was she miserable and unprofessional to Democrats  at today's house judiciary committee hearing.  Importantly, she showed no respect,, or even interest, in pursuing justice in the Epstein matter.

    The Democratic members were prepared for her  insults and stonewalling.  Someone should give Bondi a relevant history lesson: Nixon was pardoned, but his Attorney General went to prison.

    I think Thomas Massie (none / 0) (#50)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 05:31:04 PM EST
    brought up the fact the next attorney general can indict anyone who breaks the law.

    I guess he's to much of a republican to mention Mitchell but it would have been effective

    Parent

    All of these people (5.00 / 2) (#67)
    by Chuck0 on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 05:30:48 PM EST
    act as if they are pretty certain there will no "next." That's the really scary part. What are they planning?

    Parent
    Marc Elias, a smart election lawyer (none / 0) (#70)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 13, 2026 at 06:22:24 PM EST
    just said a couple of things about this.   First he said there's going to be elections.  Don't believe anyone who tells you there won't be elections.  

    But to your point, what they are planning, he said the reason they got Tulsi Gabbard involved was because she is DNI and she can say she wants Pam to do whatever because it's in the national security interest so she can't talk about it.

    Done and done.

    We'll see.  

    Marc Elias is very good I believe pretty much everything he says.  He has handled many important election cases

    Parent

    Elias is right. (none / 0) (#72)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Feb 13, 2026 at 07:30:53 PM EST
    I was watching. There will be elections.

    The problems are, will the ballots actually get counted (seized ballots), will the results be honored, or how many voters will be disenfranchised on election day. See my post #71. Dementia Donnie has revealed the plan.

    Parent

    John Mitchell was first indicted ... (5.00 / 1) (#80)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sun Feb 15, 2026 at 05:28:25 PM EST
    ... on numerous federal charges related to the Watergate scandal in May 1973, while Richard Nixon was still in the White House.

    Of course, the U.S. Attorney General who had just taken over that very same month for the just-resigned Richard Kleindienst was Elliot Richardson - who, of course, was the same guy who took down Vice President Spiro Agnew in late Sept. 1973 and then three weeks later, resigned his office on ethical principle, rather than carry out Nixon's directive to fire Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox.

    Mitchell was subsequently convicted in Jan. 1975, five months after Nixon resigned the presidency and was succeeded by Vice President Gerald Ford.

    ;-)

    Parent

    Drunk takes a Brody and sues city... (5.00 / 2) (#56)
    by desertswine on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 12:21:35 PM EST
    U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro is filing a personal injury lawsuit against her hometown over a trip-and-fall incident.

    The top federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia filed a $250,000 injury lawsuit against the city of Rye, New York, and ConEdison over a fall she alleges occurred in 2025, reported CBS News correspondent Scott MacFarlane.

    As a result of defendants' negligence, Ms. Pirro sustained serious personal injuries, including but not limited to bruises and contusions to the head, eye, face, and shoulder areas," the lawsuit states. "Ms. Pirro was confined to bed, required medical attention and treatment, has suffered, and continues to experience pain and suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and economic damages."

    She has required (5.00 / 2) (#57)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 02:30:06 PM EST
    large amounts of vodka to function at all.

    Parent
    Just keep your records (none / 0) (#58)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 02:33:21 PM EST
    "There Will Be Voter I.D. For Midterm (5.00 / 3) (#71)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Feb 13, 2026 at 07:27:25 PM EST
    Elections, Whether Approved By Congress Or Not!"

    There it is. That's the plan. I'm sure this exhortation by Dementia Donnie has no meaning where the law is concerned. But it is their opening salvo.

    I can tell you now what will happen. For any state that does not require ID/proof of citizenship at the polls, those election results will be "rigged." They will refuse to recognize the result and the winners will not be sworn in. Mikie will go along and refuse to seat any members Dementia Donnie has deemed elected fraudulently.

    This is extremely concerning to me. I vote by mail. I vote by mail. Have done so for awhile now. I am not physically able to stand in some long line at the polls. In my polling place, there is no seating anywhere in the lobby of the township building. And then there's the ID issue. If I am able to vote by mail, who checks my ID? If I have  to go somewhere to present ID, then what's the point of voting by mail? The registrar's office downtown is out of the question. I'd never make it from a downtown parking garage to the building. Too much walking. When I used to vote in person (and I actually enjoyed that ritual, I just can't do it anymore). I just took my voter registration ID, showed that and voted. No problem.

    RIP Robert Duvall. (5.00 / 1) (#82)
    by Chuck0 on Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 02:03:33 PM EST
    He was the embodiment of Augustus McCrae. He was absolutely born to play that role. Larry McMurtry wrote great characters in Capt McCrae and Capt Call in Lonesome Dove. Robert Duvall brought him to life.

    Duvall played many great roles from MASH to the Godfather. But no one has brought a character off the page like Duvall did for Gus.

    Duvall (5.00 / 1) (#86)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 07:08:26 AM EST
    was one of my favorite actors. He became the character to me. Many times I have been watching a movie he was in and said to my husband is that Robert Duvall? He was a chameleon.

    Parent
    ... for his work on feature films for the big screen, Robert Duvall noted in later interviews that playing Gus McCrae in the TV miniseries "Lonesome Dove" was his most satisfying and favorite experience as an actor.

    An avid and skilled horseman, Duvall helped train the mounts used in the 4-months-long shoot, to accustom them to the sound of gunfire. He grew so attached to his own horse, Mighty Redman, in the miniseries that after filming was completed, he took it back to his ranch in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley. The horse lived to be 40 and died in 2024.

    If I had to pick a favorite performance by Robert Duvall, it would be in "Network" (1976) as Frank Hackett, the tightly wound, ruthless and neurotic senior executive of the fictional UBS-TV network, whose cartoonishly slavish devotion to his CCA corporate overlord Arthur Jensen overrode and eclipsed any sense of common decency.

    He had a magnificent career, and he will be missed.

    Parent

    On Presidents Day, a/k/a Washington's Birthday (5.00 / 2) (#83)
    by Peter G on Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 03:20:34 PM EST
    a GWB-appointed federal judge in Philadelphia has issued a preliminary injunction, supported by a strongly-worded but legally-sound 40-page opinion, ruling that the removal of truthful historical displays about President Washington's ownership of slaves at the Presidents' House, which is part of Independence National Park, violated all sorts of pertinent federal statutes, including that is was "arbitrary and capricious." Knowing the judge, as I do (I volunteered to help her run workshops for high school students on Law Day several times), the choice of filing date was not coincidental. To the argument that the government can convey whatever message it chooses at its historical sites, the judge responded, well, yes, but not by inventing is own objectively false narrative. The opinion quotes extensively from Orwell's 1984.

    Bill "I'm an old-fasioned (none / 0) (#84)
    by jondee on Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 05:55:00 PM EST
    liberal" Maher gets his feathers in a bunch if people bring too much uncomfortable history into a discussion of America's historic icons. People who do that are "woke" and trying to encourage "white guilt."

    They should change the name of his show Unreal Time based on his rewriting of history and trying to push the Overton Window to the right.

    Not long ago, he confidentially spouted that "woke Hollywood" can't complain about the film 1917, because "no minorities fought in WW1." Meanwhile, upwards of 300,000 West Indians, NAs, black Americans, East Indians fought or participated in some capacity in the war.

     

    Parent

    I've heard that argument offered ... (none / 0) (#85)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 12:34:02 AM EST
    ... about Black Americans in the Second World War. My response was to inform them of the West Loch Disaster at Pearl Harbor on May 21, 1944, in which 75% of the casualties were Black.

    At that time, the U.S. military was fully segregated, and most Black service personnel were relegated to support roles behind the lines, such as in the U.S. Army's Quartermaster Corps. They were the guys who loaded the freight cars and trucks with supplies, and at Pearl Harbor, they were the personnel who loaded and reprovisioned the ships.

    In May 1944, the West Loch area of Pearl Harbor was unusually crowded with various vessels as a staging area for the upcoming Operation Forager, the U.S. invasion to retake Japanese-occupied Marianas and Palau Islands. Twenty-nine Landing Ships, Tank (LSTs) were tied up, beam to beam, at six Tare piers all fully loaded with the munitions, fuel, vehicles, equipment, and other general stores.

    At 3:08pm HST on May 21, LST-353, which was moored at Tare 8, exploded, sending a large fireball into the sky. Nobody knows what caused the explosion, because nobody aboard LST-353 at the time survived. What was clear was that this initial blast set off a chain reaction in the LSTs moored alongside it. The final explosion occurred at 10:30pm. The fires burned for more than 24 hours afterward.

    The West Loch disaster delayed the U.S. invasion of Saipan by six weeks. Due to the setback, it was immediately classified by military intelligence to prevent word getting out to the Japanese, and it remain classified until 1960. Afterward, the U.S. Navy drastically changed its ordnance-handling procedures, and mandated that vessels were no longer to be nested together when ammunition was being loaded or handled.

    Because of the classified nature of the disaster, for many decades it remained unclear just how many were actually killed. The initial official count was 27 dead and 163 injured, later revised upward to 163 dead in 1960. It's since been determined that 392 U.S. military personnel lost their lives in the West Loch disaster. 294 of them were Black American, mostly U.S. Navy stevedores.

    After the Pearl Harbor attack in Dec. 1941, the West Loch tragedy represents the second greatest loss of life in a single event in modern Hawaii history.

    Aloha.

    Parent

    When buffoons like Maher (none / 0) (#91)
    by jondee on Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 07:05:43 PM EST
    spout glib, revisionist BS without consequences, it just empowers other revisionists of different stripes to follow suit, till history becomes not an accounting of what happened, but just of what people wish had happened.

    Parent
    Robert Duvall (5.00 / 1) (#87)
    by fishcamp on Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 10:07:28 AM EST
    "Charlie don't surf here"

    ... spoke before a standing-room-only crowd at the Church of the Crossroads in Honolulu and inspired me to join his organization, the Rainbow Coalition, and get involved in Democratic Party politics. I believe we ultimately became a better country for him having been part of our national conversation.

    Rev. Jackson passed away last night in Chicago at 84, following a long struggle with Parkinson's disease. May he rest in love and peace.

    Me ke aloha pumehana.

    I will never, ever forget the image (5.00 / 2) (#90)
    by desertswine on Tue Feb 17, 2026 at 12:22:42 PM EST
    of Rev. Jackson in Grant Park, Chicago the night of Obama's election. He was a shining light of his generation.

    Parent
    Drone technology (5.00 / 2) (#92)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 19, 2026 at 06:02:52 PM EST
    Tariffs struck down. (5.00 / 3) (#94)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 09:19:33 AM EST
    6-3 decision.

    The markets has barely blipped. Quite the opposite from last April when stocks tanked across the board.

    6/3 (5.00 / 4) (#96)
    by KeysDan on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 10:33:22 AM EST
    Kavanaugh, Thomas and Alito dissenting.  Nothing said about return of tariffs in Court decision, which makes sense in that this is a responsibility of those who allowed this mess to happen to clean it up---Executive and Congress.

     Kavanaugh's dissent, in essence,  appears to be that it will be too difficult to make it right, so we need to keep it wrong.

    Repayment for tariffs levied on importers may hit citizen taxpayers twice since a large measure of those tariffs were passed on to consumers in higher prices.  And, of course,  according to Trump, those tariffs were paid by other counties so they would really cash in, having never been the ones who paid these tariffs in the first place.

    There  goes that $2000 tariff rebate and here goes Iran--Trump needs a war emergency.

    Parent

    I think (none / 0) (#95)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 10:30:18 AM EST
    it will take the market a while to digest that but also the markets probably think the tariffs are coming back. As I understand it Trump used some emergency powers to instate the tariffs and the decision could curtain his use of those powers too.

    IMO we won't see any price decreases any time soon if ever. High prices have now been normalized.

    Parent

    Or maybe (5.00 / 1) (#98)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 10:58:39 AM EST
    they expected them to be struck down.  

    Parent
    Woo hoo (none / 0) (#97)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 10:54:42 AM EST
    I spend one morning watching the Olympics and looks what happens.

    Does this mean we get all our money back?  Since we paid the tariffs

    Parent

    No tariffs? Where's my refund? (none / 0) (#99)
    by desertswine on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:15:02 PM EST
    Plus interest.

    Parent
    For the first time ever (none / 0) (#100)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:31:22 PM EST
    im enjoying listening to Trump.

    Parent
    Can't bring (none / 0) (#101)
    by KeysDan on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:43:00 PM EST
    myself to watch.  Is he throwing Ketchup bottles?   Loki forward to a report.

    Parent
    He is (none / 0) (#102)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:47:56 PM EST
    accusing the Supreme Court of being under the influence of foreign countries. LOL.

    Maga is screaming that China has "won". The stupidity of maga appears limitless.

    Parent

    That's the headline I think (none / 0) (#103)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:58:15 PM EST
    he officially accused the court of being "under the influence of foreign powers".

    I think it just popped into his head because he's planning to say that about the election.

    He looked like a crazy person.

    Parent

    Anthony (none / 0) (#106)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 01:25:25 PM EST
    Scaramucci said that the supreme court overturning his tariffs would be the end of Trump. Maybe he was right and we are seeing it in real time. All we have to do is stand aside and watch the GOP tear themselves apart over this because you know Trump is going to demand that congress vote in all these tariffs.

    Parent
    Now let him have it (5.00 / 1) (#107)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 04:08:06 PM EST
    on the birthright citizenship case.

    That's looking better

    Parent

    You should (none / 0) (#104)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 12:58:44 PM EST
    watch it

    Parent
    TGIF (5.00 / 1) (#105)
    by fishcamp on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 01:16:21 PM EST


    Bill Mazeroski, who ruined my childhood, has died. (5.00 / 1) (#128)
    by desertswine on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 03:54:02 PM EST
    Bill Mazeroski, the Hall of Famer whose home run in Game 7 of the 1960 World Series lifted the Pittsburgh Pirates over the New York Yankees, died Friday. He was 89.

    Mazeroski made the National League All-Star team 10 times and won eight Gold Glove Awards at second base for a decade, finishing his 17-year big league career as one of the best ever to play the position.

    Sometimes gold gloves are give out because (none / 0) (#141)
    by McBain on Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 09:13:08 AM EST
    of reputation more than actual performance.  However, Mazeroski also holds the record for most career defensive wins as second baseman(dWar), an impressive advanced stat.  I never saw him play but it would appear he earned his gold gloves and Hall of Fame honor.

    Parent
    Sorry I filled up the other thread (5.00 / 1) (#144)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 05:56:37 PM EST
    But Marc Elias say this is a very big day in the Trump era.

    "The Trump administration plans to abandon its defense of the president's executive orders sanctioning several law firms," the Wall Street Journal reports.

    "The Justice Department as soon as Monday is expected to drop its appeals of four trial-court rulings that struck down President Trump's actions against law firms Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey."

    He was talking about how the law firms who stood up to Trump are now free of threat and can do whatever but the ones that bent the knee remain obligated to do free legal work for Trump.

    Ha ha

    Oh wow (5.00 / 2) (#145)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:31:20 PM EST
    that last sentence made my day. If only those fools had listened to what a lot of attorneys were saying: you will win in court. But for some reason they thought bending the knee would get them further. now they have to work for free and have ruined their reputation.

    Parent
    And then, the very next day, they tried (5.00 / 2) (#163)
    by Peter G on Wed Mar 04, 2026 at 02:58:31 PM EST
    to withdraw the voluntary dismissal of their appeal of the ruling favoring the non-capitulating law firms.  Since only the Solicitor General's office can approve or direct that a government appeal be dropped, and the SG is essentially the #3 person in the DOJ, the reversal of position has to have come from above that level, that is, from Dep AG Blanche or AG Bondi. Which amounts to an order from the President. It cannot be assumed that the court of appeals will even allow the voluntary dismissal to be withdrawn. Further evidence of the general dysfunction in DOJ, including (or especially) at the highest levels.

    Parent
    A deal (none / 0) (#148)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:36:02 PM EST
    is a deal.  Unless your name is Trump.

    Parent
    Christofascism. (5.00 / 1) (#155)
    by KeysDan on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 12:01:06 PM EST
    Another reason for Trump's war on Iran?   The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has reported more than 110 complaints within 48 hours, from over 40 units across at least 30 installations--- there is unrestricted euphoria among segments of the chain of command, portraying the war on Iran as biblically sanctioned and tied to end-times prophesy in the Book of Revelation.

    According to complaints from troops, they have been told that "this war is all part of God's divine plan" and "President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark His return to Earth."

    This is the scary part. (5.00 / 2) (#156)
    by Chuck0 on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 12:47:37 PM EST
    This kind of cr@p from high ranking military fits into Hogsbreath's psychotic brand of religiosity. Tbis is what leads down the road to Gilead.

    Parent
    Something Similar From a Jewish Voice (none / 0) (#159)
    by RickyJim on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 04:24:16 PM EST
    Here is a video from an American born, Jerusalem rabbi who finds a parallel between current and biblical events, eg the villain Haman on the book of Esther is likened to Ali Khamenei. The comparisons start at about the 10 minute mark.  I have no doubt that such thinking impacts Israeli support for action against Iran.

    Parent
    These people (5.00 / 1) (#158)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 03:27:11 PM EST
    See my comment (none / 0) (#164)
    by Peter G on Wed Mar 04, 2026 at 03:06:48 PM EST
    I wish more American cans heard the booing (none / 0) (#1)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 09:20:54 AM EST

    The world heard JD Vance being booed at the Olympics. Except for viewers in the US

    Even MSN edited it out

    NBC appears to cut crowd's booing of JD Vance from Winter Olympics broadcast
    Vice-president given hostile reception by some in Milan
    US broadcast cuts out crowd's show of dissent

    No booing allowed (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by jondee on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 12:39:49 PM EST
    Holy sh*t, seriously?

    Why not use AI to give him a golden halo, a flock of twittering blue birds, and a rainbow overhead?

    They might as well go all the way.

    Parent

    It's pretty shocking (none / 0) (#7)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 01:58:23 PM EST
    but I wonder if the decision not to broadcast it had more to do with not showing the athletes being booed which also happened at about the same time.

    They started by booing the athletes and when the beard stood up it accelerated

    Parent

    I looked for a link (none / 0) (#8)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 02:01:53 PM EST
    But all US sources are saying the athletes got cheers and only Vance got booed.

    I read another account that did not agree.  But I can't find it,

    Parent

    AI (none / 0) (#9)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 02:03:59 PM EST
    Vance Booing: When U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance were shown on the stadium's big screen, loud and sustained boos broke out.
    Athlete Reception: While there were some boos for the U.S. delegation, the team was also met with cheers from spectators.

    Parent
    Not (none / 0) (#11)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 06:13:08 PM EST
    a good look

    This came from FBook

    Parent

    My sister, (none / 0) (#2)
    by Chuck0 on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 09:34:23 AM EST
    a US citizen living in Nanjing won't come here.

    U.S. military personnel (none / 0) (#3)
    by KeysDan on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 10:47:38 AM EST
    have complained of being pressured by commanding officers to see "Melania, the Movie". Mikey Weinstein, president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, reports that he is swamped with complaints from service members at eight facilities worldwide who felt forced to attend the film to avoid repercussions from unit commanders.

    A Department of Defense official stated there was no formal directive requiring service members to see the film, but added that the movie was "fantastic".

    Melania, the movie, does not seem like a manly choice of Hegseth for his male warriors what with its attention on her fashion and dress fittings. Perhaps, he is now woke.   In any event, this bomb can be added to the Pentagon's ordnance.  Wonder if Bad Bunny's half-time performance will be encouraged?  

    Funny (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 11:12:56 AM EST
    You can mass buy copies of crappy books but it turns out with movie tickets someone has to show up.

    Or people notice.

    Parent

    Fantastic.. (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by jondee on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 12:26:05 PM EST
    they should make a second documentary about searching the planet to find a single film scholar or critic anywhere who unironically thinks Melania is fantastic.

    The second shooter in the Grassy Knoll would be easier to locate.

    Parent

    Helpful guide (none / 0) (#10)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 02:22:10 PM EST

    It is almost certain the flag of Puerto Rico will appear in some form on the Super Bowl stage. But its colors are worth noting. If it is shown in red, white and blue, that is the current flag of Puerto Rico and has been since 1952. If there are flags that feature light blue, that is reflective of the Puerto Rican independence movement. A black and white version of the flag has become synonymous with Puerto Rican struggle and resiliency. And if there is a flag that more closely resembles the Dominican Republic's flag, that is the flag of the Puerto Rican mountain town Lares. It was used in the Grito de Lares, the first short revolt against Spanish rule in Puerto Rico in the 19th century

    KOS

    He did not disappoint (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 08:24:41 PM EST
    the Grammy to the kid was perfect.  

    Trump said it was a slap in the face to America.

    I was thinking watching it it was more like a slap in the face to him.


    Parent

    It was a (none / 0) (#13)
    by KeysDan on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 10:44:08 PM EST
    great production with impressive art direction. A celebration and musical sharing of Puerto Rican pride.  A fun Bad Bunny half-time program with  co-artists, Lady Gaga and Ricky Martin.  You need not be an aficionado of  Regaeton and Latin trap to have enjoyed it--in my case this music was all new to me.

    Trump, coaching MAGAts on what to think, proclaimed  it to be the worst ever--all in the dreaded Spanish which no one understood, although he no doubt has trouble with lyrics in English. That MAGAt half- time alternative was, apparently, about as watched as Melania the movie.

    Parent

    The suggestion that "no one" (5.00 / 2) (#17)
    by Peter G on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 10:38:38 AM EST
    in the U.S. -- or perhaps "no one" in the Super Bowl half-time audience (larger than the game-watching audience, apparently) -- understands Spanish is quite telling. Some 20% of U.S. residents speak fluent Spanish, numbering over 50 million. "No one" indeed. "No one" who matters to Tr*mp, I guess. I hope the Democrats can make effective use of this ignorant ethnic slur and insult in the coming campaign season.

    Parent
    Jennifer Lopez and Shakira (none / 0) (#19)
    by KeysDan on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 11:56:49 AM EST
    co-headlined the Super Bowel half- time show in 2020. It celebrated Latin culture and had a guest appearance of Bad Bunny. The bilingual performance involved singing parts of songs in Spanish. The show was widely praised, but at the time Trump was too busy defending himself during his first impeachment trial to bash it.

    Parent
    I think that this was the first Super Bowl... (none / 0) (#14)
    by desertswine on Sun Feb 08, 2026 at 11:03:46 PM EST
    Halftime Show that I actually enjoyed (except for the time Shakira was in it.)  I didn't understand the words but I certainly understood the music.

    Parent
    Bad Bunny's show was a lot of fun. (none / 0) (#15)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 01:42:29 AM EST
    My cousin, his wife and their son drove up Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara from Pasadena with friends and were part of a large group of activists handing "ICE OUT!" rally towels to Super Bowl attendees. An estimated 15,000 towels were given away. They spent the night in San Jose and are driving back down to Pasadena tomorrow.

    Parent
    I particularly liked the song that began with (none / 0) (#18)
    by Peter G on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 10:44:58 AM EST
    "God Bless America" (in English) followed by a rap recitation of the names of all the American nations, from the Antarctic tip of South America to Canada, including Cuba and the United States, presented roughly in geographical order.  I also appreciated the number with "pole dancers" (so to speak) who were electric utility workers, referencing the blackouts that have plagued Puerto Rico since the devastating Hurricane Maria in September 2017.

    Parent
    Yes, and (5.00 / 5) (#21)
    by KeysDan on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 12:20:36 PM EST
    a $300 million contract was granted to restore the electrical power in Puerto Rico. The grant was awarded to Whitefish Energy, a Montana-based company in business for two years with only two full-time employees.  

    What Whitefish lacked in capabilities it made up for with its association with Trump's then Interior Secretary, Ryan Zinke.  Whitefish was Zinke's hometown and was a friend of Whitefish Energy. One of the company's primary investors gave $100,000 to Trump's campaign. Puerto Rico was without power for 11 months---Bad Bunny appeared to give his artistic rendering. I was looking, in vain, for some interpretive song or dance on Trump throwing paper towels at the hurricane victims.

    Zinke resigned in 2019 after an investigation by the Inspector General found that he violated ethical rules and lied to investigators.  Which almost sounds quaint for Trump 2.0.

    Parent

    The light blue flag (none / 0) (#22)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 02:23:41 PM EST
    of independence made an appearance.  I'm surprised that has not been more of a thing.

    Parent
    Color as symbolism, (5.00 / 2) (#26)
    by KeysDan on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 05:40:56 PM EST
    such Lady Gaga's light blue dress, red shoes, red nail polish, and red/ white Puerto Rico flower corsage---like the flag, independence and colonial history.  

    Parent
    Yes (none / 0) (#27)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 06:37:23 PM EST
    but he was actually waving the flag.  No interpretation needed.

    Lady Gaga is a national treasure

    Parent

    A big flag (none / 0) (#28)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 07:10:04 PM EST
    battle size.  It was cool. It was the only thing I understood besides the rhythm

    Parent
    And the (5.00 / 2) (#29)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 07:12:01 PM EST
    line workers and sparks. I got that

    Parent
    Survivors (none / 0) (#16)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Feb 09, 2026 at 08:23:53 AM EST
    Meanwhile in the rest of the world (none / 0) (#33)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 06:00:17 PM EST
    In the other thread (none / 0) (#36)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 09:43:01 AM EST
    I said Republican governors would not like excluding Democrat governors.

    Governors won't hold Trump meeting after only Republicans invited

    This kind of sh!t is starting to break through.

    This is a lie (none / 0) (#46)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 04:02:59 PM EST

    The RINO Governor of the Great State of Oklahoma, in which I won all 77 Counties, three times (The only person to do so!), incorrectly stated my position on the very exclusive Governors Annual Dinner and Meeting at the White House," Trump wrote Wednesday on Truth Social. "The invitations were sent to ALL Governors, other than two, who I feel are not worthy of being there."

    All governors were invited to dinner except CO and MD.

    That's to DINNER.
    only Republican governors were invited to the meeting.

    Parent

    The governor (5.00 / 2) (#60)
    by Zorba on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 03:31:25 PM EST
    of Colorado is openly gay and the governor of Maryland is black.
    I guess that's enough for Donnie to exclude them from dinner.

    Parent
    Moore is the vice chair (none / 0) (#61)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 03:39:21 PM EST
    of the NGA.  The chairman, Stitt, R, OK, is the one who told Trump to shove it.

    Parent
    What Stitt did (none / 0) (#62)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 03:52:33 PM EST
    is yet another blow to Trump's crazy all Republican election stealing master plan.

    He wanted to talk to those republicans about November you can be sure.

    Republican governors may end up being some of the strongest opposition

    Parent

    Something Big Is Happening (none / 0) (#38)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 10:06:44 AM EST
    Long and long interesting thing on AI

    The AI labs made a deliberate choice. They focused on making AI great at writing code first... because building AI requires a lot of code. If AI can write that code, it can help build the next version of itself. A smarter version, which writes better code, which builds an even smarter version. Making AI great at coding was the strategy that unlocks everything else. That's why they did it first. My job started changing before yours not because they were targeting software engineers... it was just a side effect of where they chose to aim first.

    They've now done it. And they're moving on to everything else.

    The experience that tech workers have had over the past year, of watching AI go from "helpful tool" to "does my job better than I do", is the experience everyone else is about to have. Law, finance, medicine, accounting, consulting, writing, design, analysis, customer service. Not in ten years. The people building these systems say one to five years. Some say less. And given what I've seen in just the last couple of months, I think "less" is more likely.

    link

    I find this hard to believe (none / 0) (#39)
    by jmacWA on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 02:23:17 PM EST
    As an old school programmer who started coding in the early 1970s I have a hard time buying this.  But I have not kept up with AI at all, so maybe it's possible, I just have my doubts.

    Parent
    When did you (none / 0) (#40)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 02:41:32 PM EST
    stop coding?  Because of my digital work life I know a lot of programmers.  They all say the same thing.  

    It should not take long to find out.

    Parent

    I retired (none / 0) (#42)
    by jmacWA on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 03:15:58 PM EST
    5 years ago.  At that time I was coding primarily in Java, but I spent 15 years teaching and taught mostly IBM Mainframe languages including Assembly Language, COBOL and REXX.   The end of my career was spent mostly with IBM's various workflow products, teaching and consulting.

    Parent
    That's a lifetime in AI (none / 0) (#43)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 03:35:55 PM EST
    I have a Disney friend who has been working, on AI, for Google for about that same time.  He's been telling me all this

    All I can say is IMO everyone should read that.  Way moreso if you plan to be in the workforce in the next 5 years.

    If you have not followed AI you might not know how much is being invested in AI.  But it's mind boggling

    I ask how much is US companies are spending

    U.S. companies, particularly "Big Tech" firms (Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Broadcom, and Oracle), are investing unprecedented amounts in artificial intelligence, with total annual capital expenditures (capex) for this group reaching $256 billion in 2024 and projected to surge to over $427 billion in 2025.

    2026 Projections: The "hyperscalers" are on track to increase their 2025 spending by roughly 67% to 74% in 2026, targeting up to $650 billion to $700 billion for AI infrastructure.



    Parent
    Data centers on the moon (none / 0) (#44)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 03:40:45 PM EST

    Data centers on the Moon are actively being developed for deployment in the late 2020s and early 2030s by firms like LoneStar Data Holdings to meet AI energy needs, offer secure storage, and support Artemis lunar missions. While Mars remains a long-term goal, current initiatives focus on space-based or lunar-orbit data centers to overcome terrestrial energy constraints and latency.



    Parent
    Am I dating myself by disclosing ... (none / 0) (#47)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 04:15:16 PM EST
    ... that my first programming class was in FORTRAN? In the 1970s, my high school was one of the first secondary schools in the country to introduce computer programming into the curriculum. I learned just enough to realize that I'd probably be better off doing something else. But it did teach me to respect and appreciate computer programming as a both a force for good and a potential existential threat to humankind.

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL."

    "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."

    Parent

    Like you say (none / 0) (#48)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 04:31:06 PM EST
    I learned enough to know that's not what I want to do

    I got my first CGI job in 1978.  GE Genigraphics.

    But
    I would have been a EVEN better at my career if I had learned more.  It would have expanded my horizons and my paycheck.

    No, I'm an artist I'm an artist.

    Parent

    There have been times when I've regretted ... (none / 0) (#52)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 07:39:28 PM EST
    ... not sticking with computer programming. But back in 1977-78, we were working with a mainframe IBM computer at school that took an entire first-floor room which was the size of two entire classrooms. Let's be real - that big black beast presented an imposing look to a teenager.

    Programming back then consisted of not only creating the correct keypunch cards for the program formula you wanted to run (FORTRAN being a mathematics-based language), but also making sure your cards were all in the correct order. Otherwise, your program would turn out nothing but gibberish.

    I probably looked like those guys from the 2000 Florida presidential election debacle, searching for hanging chads on the keypunch cards, when I started asking myself, "Is this really something that I want to do with my life?"

    The biological microchips inside my head - little demons that they were - soon responded accordingly:
    "F**k no! You're a baseball player - and a damn good one at that!"

    Of course, at age 17, the rather short shelf life of the average pro athlete was never a factor in my considerations. I just knew in my heart that it was my destiny to run out onto that field and to be hailed and adored as a conquering hero, all because I was a gold glove-level first baseman who also swung a mean bat.

    Now, to be sure, I was certainly a much better ballplayer than 90% of my peers in high school. That's why I earned a full-ride athletic scholarship to the University of Washington, then a Pac-10 conference member.

    But once I was on the ballfield for my very first game in college, it finally dawned on me that perhaps there was indeed such a thing as a skill-set ceiling. I struck out on three straight pitches in the top of the ninth inning with two outs and the bases loaded to end the game. We lost to San Jose State, 9-8. Some moments are indelibly etched in our memories, and this is one of mine.

    I sat alone afterward on the bench, head down and inconsolable with the thought that I had just let down everybody on my team, and trying my best not to cry. Finally, my head coach - who back then was probably just a few years younger than I am now (I'll be 65 in six days) - came over, sat next to me, lifted my chin up with his hand and turned my face toward him, and said, "That's okay. It's just one game. Put it behind you and don't worry about it. You'll get 'em tomorrow."

    He was right, of course. And his patient guidance, not just as a coach but as a mentor, allowed me to recover my self-confidence on the field. But eventually, I realized that the odds of me successfully turning pro were rather long.

    I was a member of a UW Huskies team that was destined to never finish higher than 4th place in the Pac-10 conference standings during any of the five seasons I spent in Seattle. I started to take my schoolwork far more seriously and I excelled academically. In my junior and senior years, I made the Pac-10's all-conference academic team as a student-athlete with a 3.9 overall GPA. That stands as my proudest achievement as a baseball player.

    Sometimes, we grow too soon old and too late smart - but not always. To quote the late George Washington Plunkitt (1842-1924) of New York's Tammany Hall:
    "I seen my opportunities and I took 'em."

    Aloha.

    Parent

    Fortran was (none / 0) (#55)
    by jmacWA on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 04:48:14 AM EST
    my first language also.  But I can really date myself by saying the first machine I coded on was a Philco 2000, a vacuum tube machine.  The machine took up a good sized room, and had a whopping 32K of memory.

    Parent
    This is from that link (none / 0) (#45)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 03:44:36 PM EST
    curious what the legal folks think about this ..

    Legal work. AI can already read contracts, summarize case law, draft briefs, and do legal research at a level that rivals junior associates. The managing partner I mentioned isn't using AI because it's fun. He's using it because it's outperforming his associates on many tasks.



    Parent
    That may be literally true, but only because (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by Peter G on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 08:32:15 PM EST
    junior associates ("baby lawyers") are generally terrible at their jobs. Every lawyer I know who has tried out an AI product at summarizing case law and/or drafting briefs has found that the program commits egregious errors of analysis that would get the lawyer at least embarrassed, if not actually in trouble, if allowed to stand.

    Parent
    Peter, exactly and (5.00 / 5) (#76)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Feb 15, 2026 at 03:28:17 AM EST
    I'm so tired of clients sending me what they copied from AI and my having to review each cite and then explain to them why it's either wrong or doesn't apply. Most criminal lawyers charge flat fees because hourly fees to defend major criminal charges would be prohibitive to most people. This is just going to result in lawyers raising their flat fees and clients having to pay more money because of faulty AI analysis. Also, some lawyers are too lazy to review the client-submitted or baby-lawyer submitted AI stuff and just regurgitate it for the Court.

    (Although, to be fair, most lay people don't know how to correctly word their questions or describe their issues, and the result they get may be flawed because of it. Especially when they've made an error at stage one and keep digging -- they will never dig themselves out of that rabbit hole.)

    Some courts now require lawyers to state in their pleadings whether AI was used to compose any part of them. And there's definitely an uptick in lawyers being fined for submitting pleadings and briefs with incorrect cites from AI (especially when it turns out the cited case is not even a real case and the judge's law clerk spent time searching for it and not finding it). Also, it's astonishing how the clients (and some lawyers)  overlook the completely different factual underpinnings of their case at issue and the cases cited in the AI analysis.

    I usually turn AI off before searching, even non-legal google searches. With AI, it's taken me much longer to get to the exact place I want to go with it on.

    I also don't like the idea that it can search through the material on your computer to come up with its answers and analysis. Most of this stuff is privileged or personal to me. I don't trust that it's safe in the hands of an AI program.

    Doctors are now using it too which is really frightening. Some things are important enough to be done by humans and I think doctor-patient communications are one of them (this is not to say it has no value in medecine, it has led to breakthroughs in research and surgery decisions -- just that it should not be used indiscriminately.

    Parent

    I agree, Jeralyn. (none / 0) (#81)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 03:01:08 AM EST
    AI has actually added to my workload. Now Google has its Gemini AI built into its platforms. I ended up disabling it. Like you, I don't want it rooting around in the document files in my hard drive. Much of that work is confidential and needs to stay that way.

    Parent
    You hear similar things (none / 0) (#54)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 08:54:48 PM EST
    from people using AI all the time.  I think the interesting bit of that link is it helps explain why we are not yet seeing the huge changes predicted from AI.

    they have been teaching it to program first.  

    That was two years ago. In AI time, that is ancient history.

    The models available today are unrecognizable from what existed even six months ago. The debate about whether AI is "really getting better" or "hitting a wall" -- which has been going on for over a year -- is over. It's done. Anyone still making that argument either hasn't used the current models, has an incentive to downplay what's happening, or is evaluating based on an experience from 2024 that is no longer relevant. I don't say that to be dismissive. I say it because the gap between public perception and current reality is now enormous, and that gap is dangerous... because it's preventing people from preparing.



    Parent
    Hollywood reporter (none / 0) (#69)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 13, 2026 at 02:02:33 PM EST
    I saw that and (5.00 / 2) (#77)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Feb 15, 2026 at 03:53:51 AM EST
    watched the video, and it was very real. I wouldn't have thought it was AI. But really, how many people care about whether Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise get in a fistfight. I would have just assumed it was part of a movie, not real life.

    On the other hand, I'm having a lot of trouble with  You Tube news videos that don't divulge they are AI generated. Rachel Maddow is being used for five minute flawless screeds and then you click on the next video and its the same screed with some male announcer. And the audio matches the movements of their mouths, e.g., it's not lip synching.

    Today I watched the video of an 83 year old woman talking in Spanish for almost 20 minutes on how she's handled the decision between going to live with a child, in assisted living, or on her own. (You can turn on captions which are almost perfect, also unusual for You Tube). The second one was the same face and name, but a different speaker and in English. Then it turns out she's been on You Tube for less than one month and has already posted 23 videos with different views on aging. (Double that if you count both the English and Spanish ones). It's so sad to read the comments to the videos, no one gets that she's not real. They all praise her courage and spirit.

    This is not how 80 year olds should be making decisions about how to spend the remaining years of their lives.

    Parent

    The people posting on X (5.00 / 3) (#78)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 15, 2026 at 07:46:59 AM EST
    care because they make a living producing things that look exactly the same.  Which requires dozens or hundreds professionals.  Cameramen, lighters, makeup, catering, drivers etc etc.

    It says in the post that clip was the result of a 2 line prompt.

    No crew necessary.  Thats why they care.  They don't expect to be employed next year or the next.

    No one has hated AI more than me. Generative AI is worst thing to happen the artists, illustrators, technical drawing etc in my lifetime.

    And it happening to writers and musicians too.

    Generative AI replacing artists was easier than replacing lawyers and doctors but it only a matter of time.

    OTOH
    I find informational AI useful.

    Parent

    I've blocked quite a few (none / 0) (#79)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Feb 15, 2026 at 07:58:17 AM EST
    'friends' on FB because of their posting AI slop

    AI slop - the word of the year

    AI slop refers to low-quality, mass-produced digital content generated by artificial intelligence tools, often lacking in effort, originality, or factual accuracy. This content is typically created in high volume to exploit search algorithms and social media platforms for attention and profit, a practice that has led to the degradation of online information and a loss of user trust. The term has a pejorative connotation, similar to spam, and was named the 2025 Word of the Year by Merriam-Webster.

    Parent

    After losing a big procedural vote (none / 0) (#41)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 02:51:30 PM EST
    in the House yesterday today they are going to vote on tariffs.

    White House bracing for 'substantial' GOP mutiny on Trump tariff

    A White House insider admitted to Politico that they expect the effort to block the measure to fail spectacularly



    Bud Cort has died (none / 0) (#51)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 06:00:57 PM EST
    DHS finding (none / 0) (#59)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 02:34:13 PM EST
    just failed in the Senate

    "Harold and Maude" has always been ... (none / 0) (#73)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Feb 14, 2026 at 04:36:14 AM EST
    ... one of my guilty pleasures. Ruth Gordon and Bud Cort were such an odd pairing, but it worked. For a black comedy with a plot that centered on Harold's obsession with death, it was remarkably life-affirming.

    Parent
    Trump is losing low information voters (none / 0) (#63)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 04:05:36 PM EST
    Thees been several big polls that say the same thing;  when they get information they are no longer Trump voters.

    The less voters knew, the more they liked Trump in 2024. Not Anymore
    The least-engaged Americans have swung 25 points against him since 2024 -- about twice the shift among everyone else. Trump has flattened the engagement gap.

    According to our poll, low-knowledge voters backed Trump by a net margin of 11 points in 2024. Now, however, the same low-knowledge voters say they disapprove of the president by 13 points -- a 25-point shift away from the president.



    CNN (none / 0) (#65)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 04:29:58 PM EST
    Sigh. (none / 0) (#75)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Feb 14, 2026 at 11:02:53 AM EST
    It has only taken 10 years or so for the information to sink in with these voters. I am not sure how we have a more informed electorate but we sure need one to keep democracy.

    Parent
    NO TRUE BILL (none / 0) (#64)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 04:15:52 PM EST
    That is a phrase that is going to become a household phrase it seems.

    It's happening all over.  Citizens are saying F off.

    I googled "no true bill".  Check the last line.  Not anymore.

    A "no true bill" (or "no bill") is a decision by a grand jury that there is insufficient evidence or probable cause to indict a person for a crime. It acts as a dismissal of charges, meaning the case will not proceed to a criminal trial. It is the opposite of a "true bill".

    Key Aspects of a "No True Bill":

    Result: The investigation ends, and no formal charges are filed.

    Significance: It serves as a check on prosecutorial power, indicating the grand jury did not find enough evidence to believe a crime was committed by the accused.

    Process: A specific number of grand jurors (e.g., 12 in federal cases) must agree there is probable cause; if they do not, they return a "no true bill".

    Future Action: While it stops the current proceeding, in some cases, prosecutors might be able to bring the case before a different grand jury later.

    A "no true bill" is relatively rare, as grand juries often follow the recommendation of prosecutors.



    Carol Leonnig on MSN (none / 0) (#66)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 05:02:09 PM EST
    "if regular people off the street with no law degree and no adversarial process walk into this jury room and say, that's nothin' - that's a huge problem.  It's not just an embarrassment it's a violation of the ethical duties of the prosecutor"

    Parent
    Strangulation (none / 0) (#68)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 13, 2026 at 01:57:31 PM EST
    The worst (5.00 / 1) (#74)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Feb 14, 2026 at 11:00:56 AM EST
    thing or one of the worst things Bondi did was say she wouldn't appoint an independent commission to investigate the Epstein case. I would say worst but I think her refusing to meet with the victims was worse. She showed herself to be the terrible person she is

    Parent
    The Andrew Formerly Known as Prince ... (none / 0) (#93)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 05:42:48 AM EST
    ... has been arrested, detained in custody by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public office and then released pending further investigation.

    Evidence was unearthed from the latest tranche of Epstein files, which suggests that during his time as the U.K.'s trade representative, an appointed position under then-Prime Minister Tony Blair's government, Andrew allegedly leaked a number of highly sensitive, classified and confidential government documents to Jeffrey Epstein.

    Andrew is the first senior royal to be arrested and taken into custody by the authorities since King Charles I was effectively taken prisoner by Scottish military forces in 1646 toward the conclusion of the English Civil War (which Charles lost), who then turned him over to the tender mercies of the victorious Oliver Cromwell and Parliament.

    Cromwell had the King indicted for high treason against the state and put on trial before a rump House of Commons composed only of the King's opponents. Charles I was convicted, sentenced to death, and then executed by beheading at Whitehall on January 30, 1649.

    English kings named Charles have not fared too well in history.

    Off with his head... (none / 0) (#109)
    by desertswine on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 06:42:16 PM EST
    Throw him in the Tower and stuff him in a barrel of malbec.

    Parent
    Charles the 2nd (none / 0) (#111)
    by jondee on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 08:05:07 PM EST
    seems to have had a jolly good time. Making up for everything his father missed out one -

        Restless he rolls from whore to
        whore
        A merry monarch, scandalous and poor.

          John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester

    Parent

    Many of us were taught, falsely, ... (5.00 / 2) (#133)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 06:44:49 PM EST
    ... in our secondary school history classes that the last successful foreign invasion of England occurred in 1066 when William of Normandy and his Norman army crossed the English Channel, defeated Anglo-Saxon King Harold's English forces at the Battle of Hastings and killed Harold himself, whereupon William assumed the throne and became known in English lore as William the Conqueror.

    That's simply not true. While the story of William the Conqueror is correct, the last successful foreign invasion of England actually occurred in October 1688 when a huge Dutch fleet of 400+ ships - over three times the size of the infamous Spanish Armada that had threatened Queen Elizabeth I's reign 100 years prior - successfully transported a Dutch army of 20,000 men down the English Channel to the English port of Torbay in Cornwall.

    The Dutch forces were under the command of Prince William III of Orange, who was married to the Princess Mary, King Charles II's eldest daughter and Heir Presumptive to the English throne. Their expressed purpose for the invasion was to depose Charles and install Mary on the throne at the request of English nobility, who opposed the king or more specifically, objected to his Roman Catholicism.

    William deliberately chose to invade at Cornwall because the region was considered loyal to Mary and opposition to the landings would likely be minimal. Once disembarked, the Dutch marched swiftly northeast to London against negligible resistance. The Royal Army fled before the Dutch advance and Charles II's regime swiftly collapsed. Despite Mary's assurances that her father's life was to be spared, he and his wife fled to France, a move which William quietly facilitated by ordering his troops to not interfere with Charles' efforts to leave.

    The Dutch army took possession of London on December 18, 1688. In February 1689, Parliament declared that by fleeing to France, Charles had abdicated the throne, which was then offered to Mary, who accepted on condition that William be named king to reign alongside her, rather than be given the title of Prince Consort.

    Thus concluded the Glorious Revolution, and the reign of King William and Queen Mary began. They are the namesakes of the College of William & Mary College in Williamsburg, VA, which was founded by royal charter of the King and Queen in 1693.

    Aloha.

    Parent

    There is talk of Alito retiring (none / 0) (#108)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 06:13:22 PM EST
    Alito and Thomas, the two most likely to leave, are the best two for Trump to replace.  
    It's hard to imagine anyone worse than either one, that can get confirmed.

    I am certain (5.00 / 1) (#112)
    by leap2 on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 11:57:30 PM EST
    the Federalists will come up with even worse, and younger, candidates than Alito and Thomas for Trump to nominate and the Senate to confirm.

    Parent
    Maybe (none / 0) (#113)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 09:34:39 AM EST
    the point is it won't change the makeup of the court.

    Parent
    Well, yes and no. It wouldn't change the (none / 0) (#114)
    by Peter G on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 09:57:55 AM EST
    current makeup of the court, but placing Alitor and/or Thomas with a young right-winger extends that makeup for another 25 to 30 years, potentially.

    Parent
    But (none / 0) (#115)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 10:17:20 AM EST
    It won't change the makeup of the court.  Now.

    When we just got a 6-3 win.  After barring troops from cities.

    And who is about to affirm birthright citizenship.

    Plus it always risks him nominating someone better with meaning too.   It wouldn't take much to be better than either.

    My point was if he has to get another appointment let's thank God it's Alito or Thomas.  Probably

    Parent

    Adding (none / 0) (#116)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 10:24:04 AM EST
    The makeup of the court NOW is going to be very very important from now to at least Jan 2027.

    Big decisions are coming and God forbid he got to replace a sane one in that time frame.

    Parent

    One more (none / 0) (#117)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 10:39:46 AM EST
    I totally believe big big legal decisions are coming.  Over the election.   There's just no way one or more of his efforts to steal the election don't make it to the Supreme Court.

    How much good will do you think Trump generated by saying they were an embarrassment to their families and compromised by foreign powers?

    Not much I'm thinkin.

    Parent

    Trump's utterance bringing up (none / 0) (#120)
    by KeysDan on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:00:19 AM EST
    their families,  was odd, even threatening.  Sort of like, a nice family you've got there, a shame if anything happened to them.

    Parent
    Can you imagine (none / 0) (#122)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:05:27 AM EST
    the president saying this about you.  On tv.  Putting a target on not just you but your family knowing how insane his fans are.

    That little tantrum is going to be a turning point I think.

    Parent

    I wonder if any will (none / 0) (#123)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:08:00 AM EST
    skip the SOTU

    Parent
    After Trump (none / 0) (#124)
    by KeysDan on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:31:01 AM EST
    said they were `barely" invited, the justices may be well-advised to skip it.   Trump's "I won't forget it" may mean something other than the last time.

    Parent
    Going to be (none / 0) (#125)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:50:27 AM EST
    an interesting STOU.  Maybe even worth watching.

    Parent
    And, maybe (5.00 / 1) (#118)
    by KeysDan on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 10:53:08 AM EST
    the 71-year old Chief Justice.  John Roberts, if not a willing retirement,  may be pressured to leave before the end of Trump's term.  I couldn't help but think about this while reading  Kavanaugh's dissent in the tariffs case. It read like a fanciful audition for Trump's replacement for Roberts.

    Kavanaugh's argument should have ended after he opined that the  "IEEPA does not give this authority" and joined the Court. But, he went on to dissent, spurring Robert's imaginary " major questions doctrine"  and  Kagan's "straight-up statutory construction ",   to offer a  curious defense for Trump.   Kavanaugh suggested that the wrong box was checked relying on IEEPA--helping out by suggesting another statutory provision to impose Trump's big beautiful tariffs.

    Parent

    Will they have EPAULETTES (none / 0) (#110)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Feb 20, 2026 at 07:03:44 PM EST
    or riding breeches

    The Secret Service will provide two tailored suits to agents graduating from protective detail training, sources familiar with the matter told CNN, citing a recently published public contract solicitation. The suits will be navy blue, made entirely in the United States, and include embroidered name labels inside the jackets.

    Two sources said the idea for a style refresh "happened because Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem disliked how a protective detail was dressed in the suits they bought for themselves." But a DHS spokesperson denied that characterization, saying the decision "does not have to do with optics."



    Something the Democrats Should Think About (none / 0) (#119)
    by RickyJim on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 10:57:44 AM EST
    Supposing they do really well this November 3, is it better to replace Trump with Vance ASAP or wait until the 2028 election?

    That is interesting (none / 0) (#121)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 11:03:20 AM EST
    I kind of think it would be strategically better to keep Trump around as the face of the party.  Why give The Beard the perk of incumbency.  

    They could impeach him and not remove him.

    Parent

    I go (none / 0) (#126)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 01:29:38 PM EST
    with replace Trump with Vance. Vance doesn't have a cult and the more grossly he panders to maga the less they like him.

    The truth is politics really should be an aside. Trump should be tossed because of all the crimes he has done. It should be a warning to another Trump waiting in the wings.

    Parent

    You don't seriously think (none / 0) (#130)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 04:18:19 PM EST
    any part of the Trump family is an ongoing political threat after Cheeto croaks do you?

    IMO the boys will be luck to avoid prison.

    Parent

    The Musks,Thiels, Ellisons (5.00 / 1) (#132)
    by jondee on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 06:23:20 PM EST
    Andreesons et al with their megalomania, techno-feudal fantasies and unlimited resources are The ongoing political threat to end all political threats, imo.

    I don't give a sh*t how much they were inspired by Lord of The Rings, or how many outlets and journalists and podcast bros they buy, these are not visionaries with life-enhancing, democratic plans for the future of this country.

    Parent

    You (5.00 / 1) (#137)
    by Ga6thDem on Sun Feb 22, 2026 at 09:43:08 PM EST
    Left off their godfather Curtis yarvin

    Parent
    Oh (none / 0) (#136)
    by Ga6thDem on Sun Feb 22, 2026 at 09:38:19 PM EST
    I definitely do hence my reasoning to toss Trump as a warning

    Parent
    How about insurance subsidies (none / 0) (#127)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 02:51:06 PM EST
    Maybe school lunches

     "Trump administration officials have struggled to figure out how to increase U.S. military spending by a whopping $500 billion in their forthcoming budget, slowing the overall White House spending plan, four people familiar with the matter said."

    "President Donald Trump last month agreed to a roughly 50 percent funding boost sought by Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, in the White House's annual budget proposal."

    "Since Trump agreed to the higher number, White House aides and defense officials have run into logistical challenges surrounding where to put the money, because the amount is so large, the people said. The White House is more than two weeks behind its statutory deadline to send its budget proposal to Congress, in part because it is unclear how precisely to spend the additional $500 billion, according to the people familiar with the matter."

    link


    Or how about using less than half of it (none / 0) (#131)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 05:15:59 PM EST
    to refund everyone's money.

    Amount at Stake: Estimates suggest $175 billion to $180 billion in tariffs collected may be eligible for refunds.



    Parent
    I'm reminded of a 1977 song by Supertramp: (none / 0) (#134)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 07:03:12 PM EST
    "Guess I'll always have to be
    Living in a fantasy.
    That's the way it's got to be
    From now on.
    Guess I'll always have to be
    Living in a fantasy.
    No, it won't be real in me
    From now on.
    You think I'm crazy, I can see.
    It's you for you, and me for me,
    Living in a fantasy
    From now on."

    These people are truly too cuckoo for cocoa puffs.

    Parent

    It would be fine if they took it all (none / 0) (#129)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 04:15:36 PM EST
    This combination of Ivy League (5.00 / 1) (#139)
    by jondee on Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 01:41:03 PM EST
    Law School oiliness and unhinged apocalyptic religious mania..

    It's ike some toxin cooked-up by some mad scientist who hates the world.

    Parent

    I hope everyone realizes that ... (none / 0) (#135)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Feb 21, 2026 at 07:08:41 PM EST
    ... when the Trump era is finally done and we've emerged on the other side as a much diminished - and hopefully, an appropriately chastened - nation, that we will be apologizing to the rest of the world for all this crap for the balance of our lives.

    Parent
    According to the Bible.. (none / 0) (#138)
    by jondee on Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 01:33:17 PM EST
    people like Mike Huckabee will be ambassadors..people like Tucker Carlson will have huge audiences..

    There'll be human sacrifice..the moon will turn blood red.. dogs will mate with cats and vice versa..

    Parent

    And that's all the more reason to ... (5.00 / 2) (#140)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Mon Feb 23, 2026 at 07:14:47 PM EST
    ... keep our cats indoors. ;-D

    Parent
    Question for the day. (none / 0) (#142)
    by Chuck0 on Sun Mar 01, 2026 at 09:11:40 PM EST
    Will the bootlickers at FIFA demand their peace prize back?

    Good line from SNL (none / 0) (#143)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 09:39:53 AM EST
    Was Trump talking about how the Board of Peace had just gotten bored of peace

    Parent
    So much winning (none / 0) (#146)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:33:46 PM EST
    It seems (none / 0) (#150)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:41:20 PM EST
    finally maybe they will quit appealing their stupid cases and just move on. Considering how many lawyers have quit DOJ it just might be that maybe they don't have enough attorneys to appeal.

    Parent
    Trump's (none / 0) (#147)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:34:38 PM EST
    sore on his neck is not shingles I would say. My husband had them and his at least were not crusty like Trump. Maga is saying it is from his shirts. Too bad the white house wouldn't say what cream he was using. That would say a lot. Anybody else noticing his hair has been falling out? He used to be able to cover his bald head but now the hairdresser is trying to spread a few hairs across his entire head.

    Also the white house says that Baron being 6 ft. 9 in makes him too tall to serve in the military. Shows how much they know about the military.

    My shingles (5.00 / 2) (#149)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:40:42 PM EST
    did not look like this.  Plus, if they were like mine he could not wear a collar over it.   Shingles is incredibly painful.  

    It looks like a rash.

    Maybe it's from the saddle Beebee makes him wear.


    Parent

    Probably from all the handshakes ;-) (5.00 / 1) (#153)
    by vml68 on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 11:03:37 PM EST
    My guess it is a side effect from using Fluorouracil.

    From Mayo Clinic page...
    Fluorouracil topical is used to treat actinic or solar keratoses and a type of skin cancer called superficial basal cell carcinoma.
    Common side effects - Intense redness, itching, crusting, swelling, and scabbing of skin.

    Parent

    OMG (none / 0) (#151)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:44:46 PM EST
    that statement from Rubio was something wasn't it? Talk about circular and pretzel logic happening at the same time trying not to say Bibi is actually determining American foreign policy. Bibi is doing all this because he knows that he has a ring in Trump's nose.

    It seems between Iran and Epstein maga may just have finally cracked up.

    Parent

    Luckovich (none / 0) (#152)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Mar 02, 2026 at 07:50:25 PM EST
    I have noticed that his hair (none / 0) (#154)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 01:27:28 AM EST
    Is falling out. I thought it was just me. I really noticed it when he entered the chamber for SOTU. It looked like some kind of spray was used to color his scalp.

    Parent
    Looks like he's decomposing. (none / 0) (#157)
    by desertswine on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 02:09:22 PM EST
    Social media (none / 0) (#160)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 04:34:01 PM EST
    This is good (none / 0) (#161)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Mar 03, 2026 at 04:46:18 PM EST
    I don't like not being able to legally own a gun even tho I don't plan to own one.

    Expert taken aback as Supreme Court conservatives and liberals 'unite' for puzzling case

    "While we don't yet know how Hemani will be decided, members of both the conservative and liberal factions of the court seemed united against the broadness of the category that the law had created," Bazelon wrote. "Too many people could be prosecuted and disarmed for things that, the justices seemed to agree, just weren't worth it."

    She added that the case also poses a puzzling question to the court in the future because it leaves open the interpretation of when a recreational drug user becomes "too dangerous" to own a firearm.



    That's interesting (none / 0) (#162)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Mar 04, 2026 at 01:42:06 AM EST