Howard Wolfson explains how Obama's speech in Denver made him a solid Obama supporter:
For 18 months, I listened to Obama on television, sometimes intently, often just barely -- background noise to a running series of conference calls and meetings and e-mails. In person, my attention undivided, I saw something of what so many others had seen for so long.
Progress in America is never cheap, and even today history exacts a price for Obama's victory -- the dreams of electing the first female president, the dreams of so many who rushed toward Hillary Clinton on rope lines across America and refused to give up her hand and their hopes. Today these dreams are giving way to another kind of progress.
For me, the presidential campaign began in a crowded Iowa hall, where I saw a man my age lift up a daughter around my daughter's age and tell her that one day she could be president. Last week things came nearly full circle, when I saw another man my age lift up another child and say the very same thing.
Nice piece by Howard.
By Big Tent Democrat
(48 comments) Permalink :: Comments
I always thought Roger Cohen was not the sharpest knife in the drawer and this column on NATO, Georgia and the Ukraine proves it. Interestingly, Cohen starts well:
In retrospect the NATO summit declaration of April 3 about Georgia and Ukraine seems almost criminal in its irresponsibility: “We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.” That lofty commitment emerged from a Bucharest meeting so split over the two countries’ aspirations to enter the Atlantic alliance that it could not even agree to offer the first step toward joining, the Membership Action Plan that prepares nations for NATO.
(Emphasis supplied.) Absolutely. So what does Cohen suggest NATO do?
at the NATO foreign ministers’ meeting in December, it should replace Bucharest blather with basics: a Membership Action Plan for Georgia and Ukraine.
Say what? To coin a phrase, that would be "criminal irresponsibility." Does Cohen think we do not have enough wars to fight right now? More . . .
(14 comments, 392 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Actually, in real life, he does, but I am really sick of the silly "Obama plays poker" arguments regarding politics. Obama is playing politics, not poker, and quite well. Here is an example:
A reader e-mailed me explaining the choice this way: Obama plays poker, McCain plays craps. Poker relies on a steady understanding of the probabilities and the willingness to bet when you have a good hand. Craps requires the willingness to bet and bet big, even though you know the house is against you.
In politics, no one is going to fold before election day. And in terms of issues, you won't know who won the hand until election day. It turns out, imo, that Obama was dealt a sweet political hand - George W. Bush, the worst President in history. And now he is playing the hand by the book (Biden as VP, hammering on Bush's Third Term, etc.) There is no poker involved. As for McCain, he has a lousy hand and is drawing new cards (the Palin pick), playing draw poker, not craps. (Oh no, now I am doing it.)
By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only
(44 comments) Permalink :: Comments
It made landfall this morning.
This is an Open Thread.
(18 comments) Permalink :: Comments
The whole "experience" debate is silly. Under our system of government, there is only one job that gives you both executive and foreign policy experience, and that's the one McCain and Obama are running for [BTD - That's what Bill Clinton was saying when he noted no one was really "Ready to be President."] Nevertheless, it's a hardy perennial: If your opponent is a governor, you accuse him of lacking foreign policy experience. If he or she is a member of Congress, you say this person has never run anything. And if, by chance, your opponent has done both, you say that he or she is a "professional politician." When Republicans aren't complaining about someone's lack of experience, they are calling for term limits.
[More . . .]
(132 comments, 528 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

Today is Labor Day. If you aren't familiar with its origin and history, here's a primer.
The observance of Labor Day began over 100 years ago. Conceived by America's labor unions as a testament to their cause, the legislation sanctioning the holiday was shepherded through Congress amid labor unrest and signed by President Grover Cleveland as a reluctant election-year compromise.
On the first Labor Day parade: [More...]
(11 comments, 232 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
The Washington Post writes that the McCain campaigned explained the detailed and thorough vetting process it used for Gov. Sarah McCain.
Nor, he said, was Palin selected without having gone through the full vetting process that was done for other finalists. That process included reviews of financial and other personal data, an FBI background check and considerable discussion among the handful of McCain advisers involved in the deliberations.
"Nobody was vetted less or more than anyone in the final stages, and John had access to all that information and made the decision," Davis said. "It's really not much more complicated than that."
More...
(57 comments, 687 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Want to know why James Dobson is so fired up about McCain/Palin when he refused to support McCain before her addition to the Republican ticket?
I've opined before it's to get the evangelical vote, but Harper's has done a little more research.
Since becoming governor in 2006, Palin has attended the Juneau Christian Center, where Mike Rose serves as senior pastor. Her previous pastor was David Pepper of the Church on the Rock in Palin’s hometown of Wasilla — a church that “was kind of a foundation for her.”
Here's a sample of their sermons: [More...]
(76 comments, 298 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
John McCain today on Fox News called Sarah Palin his soul-mate.
Can you honestly say that Sarah Palin is the best person to put a heartbeat away from the presidency?MCCAIN: Oh, yes. She’s a — she’s a partner and a soul-mate....
Enjoy. This is an open thread, all comment rules apply.
(112 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Delegates to the Republican National Convention are as divorced from reality as is John McCain. Like McCain, they think the nation's economic outlook is rosy. Nine out of ten Democratic delegates think the economy is in a recession, while nearly three out of four Republican delegates disagree with that assessment. The Republicans have proof:
"If we were in a recession, people would not be eating out — they would be in the grocery store and cooking at home," said Phyllis Gorman, 59, a business owner and delegate from Oklahoma, in an interview after the delegate poll was taken. "When I drive by McDonald’s, there are so many people in line there."
Right. Because if you can afford a Big Mac with fries, you must be doing well.
(28 comments) Permalink :: Comments
(Video removed by You Tube)
Why do women, including some major former Hillary Clinton supporters, support Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden? I had the opportunity to interview two women's rights leaders at the CNN Grill at during the Democratic National Convention in Denver this week.
The interview above is of Katherine Spillar,Executive Vice President of the Feminist Majority Foundation and Feminist Majority. My interview with Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority and former President of NOW has also been removed.
(158 comments) Permalink :: Comments
A number of TalkLeft posts have focused on the need for legislation to reverse the Supreme Court's Ledbetter decision. That decision severely limits the ability of wage discrimination victims to sue their employers. Barack Obama co-sponsored legislation to correct the problem.
John McCain opposes the legislation. Today we learned that Sarah Palin joins him in that position.
The McCain campaign said Sunday that the presidential candidate and Palin support equal pay for women even though they do not think the 180-day limit for filing complaints should be changed.
In other words, they support equal pay as a theory, but they don't support an effective remedy for women who don't discover within 180 days that they are being paid less than male employees doing the same work. McCain and Palin want to continue to give discriminating employers an easy way to avoid the law: keep pay decisions secret for 180 days, and they get a pass for their illegal conduct. It's nice to know that some things never change, including Republican support for business interests over employees' rights.
(47 comments) Permalink :: Comments
| << Previous 12 | Next 12 >> |






