home

What The Big Dog Said

I want all of you who supported [Hillary Clinton] to vote for Barack Obama in November. Here's why.

Our nation is in trouble on two fronts: The American Dream is under siege at home, and America's leadership in the world has been weakened.

Middle class and low-income Americans are hurting, with incomes declining; job losses, poverty and inequality rising; mortgage foreclosures and credit card debt increasing; health care coverage disappearing; and a big spike in the cost of food, utilities, and gasoline.

Our position in the world has been weakened by too much unilateralism and too little cooperation; a perilous dependence on imported oil; a refusal to lead on global warming; a growing indebtedness and a dependence on foreign lenders; a severely burdened military; a backsliding on global non-proliferation and arms control agreements; and a failure to consistently use the power of diplomacy, from the Middle East to Africa to Latin America to Central and Eastern Europe.

Clearly, the job of the next President is to rebuild the American Dream and restore America's standing in the world. Everything I learned in my eight years as President and in the work I've done since, in America and across the globe, has convinced me that Barack Obama is the man for this job.

. . . Look at the example the Republicans have set: American workers have given us consistently rising productivity. They've worked harder and produced more. What did they get in return? Declining wages, less than ¼ as many new jobs as in the previous eight years, smaller health care and pension benefits, rising poverty and the biggest increase in income inequality since the 1920s. American families by the millions are struggling with soaring health care costs and declining coverage. I will never forget the parents of children with autism and other severe conditions who told me on the campaign trail that they couldn't afford health care and couldn't qualify their kids for Medicaid unless they quit work or got a divorce. Are these the family values the Republicans are so proud of? What about the military families pushed to the breaking point by unprecedented multiple deployments? What about the assault on science and the defense of torture? What about the war on unions and the unlimited favors for the well connected? What about Katrina and cronyism?

America can do better than that. And Barack Obama will. But first we have to elect him.

The choice is clear. The Republicans will nominate a good man who served our country heroically and suffered terribly in Vietnam. He loves our country every bit as much as we all do. As a Senator, he has shown his independence on several issues. But on the two great questions of this election, how to rebuild the American Dream and how to restore America's leadership in the world, he still embraces the extreme philosophy which has defined his party for more than 25 years, a philosophy we never had a real chance to see in action until 2001, when the Republicans finally gained control of both the White House and Congress. Then we saw what would happen to America if the policies they had talked about for decades were implemented.

They took us from record surpluses to an exploding national debt; from over 22 million new jobs down to 5 million; from an increase in working family incomes of $7,500 to a decline of more than $2,000; from almost 8 million Americans moving out of poverty to more than 5 and a half million falling into poverty - and millions more losing their health insurance.

Now, in spite of all the evidence, their candidate is promising more of the same: More tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans that will swell the deficit, increase inequality, and weaken the economy. More band-aids for health care that will enrich insurance companies, impoverish families and increase the number of uninsured. More going it alone in the world, instead of building the shared responsibilities and shared opportunities necessary to advance our security and restore our influence.

They actually want us to reward them for the last eight years by giving them four more. Let's send them a message that will echo from the Rockies all across America: Thanks, but no thanks. In this case, the third time is not the charm.

(Emphasis supplied.) Sic the Big Dog on them.

By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only

< Obama Up By 12 In Latest Iowa Poll | McCain Economic Memories: The Keating Five >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    The only line in that speech I would have (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by steviez314 on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:28:10 PM EST
    changed:

    Instead of "thanks, but no thanks," I would have said "You've GOT to be kidding."

    Other than that, perfect.

    No more distractions (5.00 / 4) (#2)
    by Lahdee on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:29:20 PM EST
    The specter of a third bush term must be driven home. No more side trips for whateverpaloza the republicans dream up tomorrow, hit 'em on their record of failure and tie McCain to it over and over again.

    What an interesting idea (5.00 / 9) (#3)
    by Steve M on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:30:18 PM EST
    Making this election a referendum on Reaganomics?

    If only someone had thought of that earlier.

    zing! (none / 0) (#4)
    by Faust on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:32:45 PM EST
    Ouch! (none / 0) (#7)
    by vicndabx on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:47:07 PM EST
    Hope Springs Eternal (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by ks on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:37:19 PM EST
    As usual, the Big Dog is on point but, while BC will do some sort of campaigning for Obama at the edn of the month, if the Obama campaign hasn't "sicced" him on McCain yet it ain't gonna happen.  

    Also, at the end of the day, Obama is going to have to make the sale himself.

    In response to McSame's statement (5.00 / 3) (#6)
    by litigatormom on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:45:40 PM EST
    this morning that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," Obama is making a speech this afternoon that asks, "Senator, what economy are you talking about?"

    Beautiful (5.00 / 2) (#8)
    by addy on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 02:36:42 PM EST
    It's the message I have been waiting for. I'm voting for Bill Clinton!

    Oh Bill. I miss you so. (5.00 / 4) (#9)
    by rooge04 on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 02:48:07 PM EST


    He hits a nerve (5.00 / 3) (#11)
    by mmc9431 on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 03:19:53 PM EST
    I sincerely hope Obama (who they say is a great spokeman) reads this and follows the lead. This is the meat that so many Democrat's are hungry for. Give up the post partisan garbage and become a real Democrat.

    they should unleash the Big Dog (5.00 / 4) (#12)
    by thereyougo on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 03:33:53 PM EST
    and let him win it for Obama --he well could, he is still loved.

    I love the reference to Hillary, she remains my favorite. I am still mourning her, damn!

    In view of the other side's candidate, what an exercise in mediocrity putting the corrupt from the wilderness state to be 2nd in line. It is stunning.

    So good. (5.00 / 5) (#13)
    by prose on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 03:57:41 PM EST
    I was really hard on Bill in the Primary and even running up to the convention.  I was frustrated with the carelessness of some of the things he said.  But I have to say I was wrong to question him.  

    His critique of the GOP is spot on.  This is the message we need to get out there.  I was wrong.  Bill Clinton is the man.

    Thanx (5.00 / 4) (#14)
    by Swiggs on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 04:17:15 PM EST
    Thanx for "coming clean" on your Big Dog turn around.  I can't tell you how much good I think it would do if only Obama were seen to do the same thing vis-a-vis Bill.  Gore made the mistake of shutting Bill out of his campaign.  I hope Obama sees the light before it's too late, too.

    Parent
    Did you make up stuff about him? (none / 0) (#17)
    by hairspray on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 05:17:59 PM EST
    Did you distort his record as if he were a two bit hoodlum?  Or did you carefully evaluate his actions looking at the big picture. Did you treat him with the respect he earned fighting the right wing smear machine day after day.  And did you whine about the triangulation over and over as if Bill could have done all that he did without some strategy to fight them? I heard plenty from people like you who didn't know how good you had it with BC.

    Parent
    I'm not so sure (5.00 / 4) (#15)
    by oldpro on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 04:41:07 PM EST
    that you could stand 'the new puppy' up next to 'the big dog' and have him look/sound good as 'the candidate.'

    Standing next to Bill Clinton, almost anyone shrinks politically.

    Big dogs bark.

    Puppies?  Not so much.

    Unless they work out some kind of a dog and pony show, with a backandforth reinforcing one another, I wouldn't put them on a stage together.

    Standing next to either Clinton, Obama is diminished in too many ways.

    I'm Confused... (3.00 / 2) (#10)
    by Strick on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 03:03:46 PM EST
    I thought Obama was running for President.  For that matter, didn't he run largely on the premise he wasn't a Clinton?  What makes anyone think Obama will follow Clinton's relatively conservative economic policies?  NAFTA?  Deregulation?  Greenspan flavored monetorism?  You know the stuff that's supposed to have made the 90s what they were.

    Drawing Clinton in is essentially an admission Obama can't handle the situation.  That'll work?

    Go ahead and bring him in -- if you can.  And if you think Clinton's willing to really help Obama win in 2008 rather than set Hillary up for 2012.

    You must be some kind of a mind reader (none / 0) (#16)
    by hairspray on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 05:13:35 PM EST
    to think Bill Clinton isn't going to help.  On Sunday Obama took the day off while Hillary headed for Ohio to campaign for him. I don't know what is in their minds (and neither do you) but their actions are quite clear. Look back at history and see how many also rans went out like the C's are doing. And yes it does look like Obama needs them. I think he has to eat crow a lot if he wants to win this.  The Clintons love this country too much to not care.

    Parent