home

Monday :: August 11, 2003

Partisanship in Editorial Pages

Via The Horse, we learn that The Shorenstein Center has released a new study on partisanship in newspaper editorial pages. The study was written by Michael Tomasky in the Spring of 2003. Tomasky will become the Executive Editor of American Prospect on September 1.

The study was conducted using four major liberal and conservative editorial pages in the U.S. The findings?

...Conservative editorial pages are far less willing to criticize a Republican administration than liberal pages are willing to take issue with a Democratic administration.

You can access the full report here.

Permalink :: Comments

Transportation Security Agency Investigating Air Marshals

MSNBC reports:

The Transportation Security Administration is conducting a “witch hunt” to ferret out and discipline employees in the federal air marshal program who have talked to the media, several sources within the program told MSNBC.com. Some air marshals are even being threatened with having the USA Patriot Act, a law enacted to help fight terrorism, used against them. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the TSA, denies that any such investigation is taking place.

[thanks to Patriot Watch for the heads-up]

Permalink :: Comments

Biden Won't Run for President

Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE) announced he will not run for President. Smart move, he could not have won and he's got it pretty good where he is.

Permalink :: Comments

The Tonasket Resolution

Tonasket? Yes, Tonasket in Okanogan County Washington --the latest small town to pass a resolution against the Patriot Act.

Tonasket has 1,000 residents. One of them, Mark Alan, drafted the two page resolution opposing the Patriot Act. The Police Chief edited it. Two nearby towns are considering adopting it, as is the county.

Its preamble reinforces the notion that America was created "in the shadow of bloody conflicts" with intentionally strict limits on government. It goes on to suggest that the Patriot Act and similar incursions on individual civil rights are unconstitutional.

While supportive of fighting terrorism, the Resolution points out, correctly in our view, that the Goverment was equipped with laws to do so before the Patriot Act.

And it boldly proclaims that any law that "dilutes, weakens or denies" a person's constitutional rights is "unenforceable in our jurisdiction."

True, federal laws trump local ordinances and the Tonasket Resolution may not be enforceable. That's not the point. The point is the message.

...similar resolutions in other U.S. cities contain "unenforceable-in-our-jurisdiction" language to warn the feds that their police are there to protect citizens, not serve as FBI gofers.

The Bill of Rights Defense Committee keeps track of the number of jurisdictions opposing the Patriot Act. The current numbers: "three states and 141 counties and cities representing 16 million Americans."

Here is the text of the Tonasket Resolution:

(512 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

Hurdles Facing Patriot Act Lawsuit

The National Law Journal examines the two suits recently filed against the Patriot Act and the potential hurdles they face.

The good news is these lawsuits will not be the only ones:

This is not the final gunshot. It's the opening salvo," said Charles Shanor of Emory University School of Law. "It's a complex process that no doubt will involve the courts, the legislature and public opinion. And it could turn on matters that are as nonlegal as whether there is another terrorist attack between now and judicial decision time."

The process involves weighing whether the judgments made in the act were appropriate or over-reactions, Shanor and others said.

"Part of the context of this is the Patriot Act was enacted in an environment where there was virtually no discussion or careful scrutiny," said Stephen Schulhofer of New York University School of Law. "Maybe there shouldn't have been because we needed to act quickly. But now we have the time and room for thought about what we need in the post-9/11 world."

The two pending suits were filed by the ACLU and the Center for Consitutional Rights. You can read the ACLU complaint here and a description of the CCR suit here.

In our view, the Patriot Act is a classic example of "Act in haste, repent at leisure."

Further Reading:



Silencing Political Dissent: How Post-September 11 Anti-Terrorism Measures Threaten Our Civil Liberties

by Nancy Chang, Howard Zinn, Center for Constitutional Rights

Permalink :: Comments

Why Jose Padilla's Continued Detention Threatens Us All

Robert Levy, senior fellow at the CATO Institute, reviews the Jose "Dirty Bomber" Padilla case in a smart op-ed in today's Chicago Times. By now, we're all familiar with the facts: Padilla, an American citizen, has been declared an enemy combatant and held in a military brig for over a year without charges or access to counsel.

Padilla may deserve the treatment he is receiving--perhaps worse. That is not the point. When Americans are taken into custody, they have the right to retain an attorney.

Congress must first set the rules. Then an impartial judge, not the president, should make the ultimate decision as to whether the arrest and imprisonment comport with the Constitution.

James Madison, in Federalist No. 47, put it succinctly: ''The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.''

We are letting Bush, Ashcroft and Rumsfeld, our own favorite axis of evil, take all the power. They are weakening the judiciary, both by taking power away from federal judges and by nominating only conservatives who agree with them to the bench. Their cronies dominate Congress. Unless we get our act together and vote this triumverate out in 2004, we won't recognize our own system of justice in five or ten years--it truly will have become a system of injustice.

Give a little to the Democrats, give often and do your part to get out the vote.

Permalink :: Comments

Liberals to Spend $75 Million to Defeat Bush

This is great news. Billionaire philanthropist George Soros is teaming with liberal groups and individuals to form a $75 million fund to get out the vote in 2004 and defeat Bush.

Labor, environmental and women's organizations, with strong backing from international financier George Soros, have joined forces behind a new political group that plans to spend an unprecedented $75 million to mobilize voters to defeat President Bush in 2004.

The organization, Americans Coming Together (ACT), will conduct "a massive get-out-the-vote operation that we think will defeat George W. Bush in 2004," said Ellen Malcolm, the president of EMILY's List, who will become ACT's president.

....The formation of ACT reflects growing fears in liberal and Democratic circles that with Republicans likely to retain control of Congress, a second Bush term could mean passage of legislation, adoption of regulations and the appointment of judges that together could devastate left-supported policies and institutions.

The group has received $30 million in committed funds to date, including $10 million from Soros. [link via Cursor.]

Permalink :: Comments

Inmates: Death With Dignity and Early Release

Our aging, sick and dying prison population is presenting a fiscal crisis and worsening. What can states do about it?

A report by the non-partisan California Legislative Analyst's Office says elderly inmates cost two to three times more to care for than do younger ones. It notes that the National Center of Institutions and Alternatives estimates incarceration costs for an elderly inmate are $69,000 a year, compared with a national average of $22,000 for all inmates.

Some states are adopting early release for aging prisoners. We hope the practice spreads:

When considering dangerous, violent and predatory inmates, one does not usually envision an elderly man hobbling down a prison corridor with a cane or walker," says a new institute report for the Justice Department's National Institute of Corrections.

"However, in reality, some of the most dangerous and/or persistent criminals sentenced to life in prison without parole 30 years ago are now old, debilitated, frail, chronically ill, depressed and no longer considered a threat to society or the institution," the report says.

The Warden at Angola, Louisiana's harshest prison, takes it one step further:

In a state where a "life sentence" means just that, officials at Angola are determined to provide "death with dignity" for inmates. There is a hospice for the terminally ill. No one dies alone. Since 1998, a glass-enclosed hearse, made by prisoners and drawn by two Percheron horses, carries bodies to the prison cemetery in handmade coffins. Inmates walk behind, singing Amazing Grace as they go.

(509 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

False Reporting in Rape Cases

Joanna Spilbor, guest columnist at Findlaw, examines false reporting in rape cases and asks what happens if Kobe Bryant is falsely accused:

Spilbor argues that Colorado's and other states' decision to make false reports mere misdemeanors, with light penalties, is unfair to the accused. She also suggests several legal changes that would help deter false claims -- including allowing juries to find an accuser "Not Credible."

[comments now closed]

Permalink :: Comments

New Study on Effectiveness of Boot Camps

The National Institute of Justice, which is the research arm of the Department of Justice, has completed a ten year study on boot-camps as an effective alternative to prison.

This NIJ Research for Practice presents findings from 10 years of data analyzing whether boot camps are successful in reducing recidivism, prison populations, and operating costs.

The report found that although boot camps generally had positive effects on the attitudes and behaviors of inmates during confinement, these changes did not translate into reduced recidivism. Programs were often too brief to exert a lasting effect on inmates released to the community and they lacked, as well, a strong treatment model or sufficient preparation for reentry into the community.

Boot camps' efforts to achieve multiple goals contributed to conflicting results. For example, lengthening camps so that more treatment programs could be included, which reduced recidivism, also shortened the discount in time served and undercut lower prison bed costs.

The full report is available here.

Permalink :: Comments

Sunday :: August 10, 2003

Arnold's Super Wealth

Arnold Schwarzenegger earned $50 million in the past two years.

Schwarzenegger's tax returns, made public at a news conference, showed he earned $31 million in 2000 and paid more than $10 million in state and federal taxes. Income dipped slightly in 2001 to $26.1 million, with $9.3 million paid in taxes.

He also made charitable donations of close to $5 million in those two years, including $1.1 million to Proposition 49, the voter initiative that he successfully backed which increases funding for after school programs.

Why did he release list such a detailed list of his business holdings when he wasn't required to disclose them? Probably because his advisors want him cast as a successful businessman who could turn around California's economic woes, instead of as an actor.

Arnold is leading in the polls.

The other day we touted Arnold's progressive stand on social justice issues. But, today we learned something we don't like: He voted for Proposition 187--the resolution that denies health and other social services to illegal mmigrants.

The GOP-backed Proposition 187 (search) to deny health care and public education to illegal immigrants was passed by a wide margin, although it was eventually ruled unconstitutional. It remains a contentious issue and a litmus test for some voters, particularly Hispanics (search), to gauge whether a candidate is immigrant-friendly.

Gray Davis voted against Proposition 187.

Permalink :: Comments

Democrats Unlikely To Take House in 2004

The Washington Post reports that Democrats are unlikely to win back the House in 2004:

Analysts who have been following the early battle for control of the 435-member House say a relative lack of public anger to fuel anti-incumbent voting and a strong GOP fundraising effort underway will be difficult for Democrats to surmount.

The biggest factor, however, is one that has thwarted Democratic hopes before and, if anything, is growing worse: Congressional redistricting has produced a remarkably small number of competitive districts nationwide. As a result, Democrats must win a huge percentage of the toss-up races to regain the House majority they lost a decade ago.

Permalink :: Comments

<< Previous 12 Next 12 >>