Several people wrote me yesterday asking why I wasn't covering The Washington Note's report that Bobby Ray Inman suggested Richard Armitage was in criminal jeopardy in the Valerie Plame investigation. The short answer is I don't believe it. I have believed for months that it is Armitage whom Patrick Fitzgerald refers to in Libby pleadings as "an innocent accused." Which to me means that he got immunity for his cooperation with Fitzgerald.

The Washington Note today updates and acknowledges Bobby Ray Inman was wrong. New sources provide opposite information on Armitage, i.e., he's been helping Fitzgerald.

That's the self-correcting nature of the blogosphere at work. Good for Steve.

Students for a Sensible Drug Policy tells us there's a new bad drug law bill in the hopper:

[There is] a new bill in Congress that would loosen the standard of evidence needed to search public school students' lockers and belongings for drugs. The so-called "Student and Teacher Safety Act of 2006" actually invents an entirely new standard called "colorable suspicion," whereas up until now "reasonable suspicion" was needed to search a student.

Details here.

by Last Night in Little Rock

Former NYC Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, an oft-mentioned potential presidential candidate for 08, spent yesterday in Georgia on the stump for former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed. But, Rudi had to hide his support for gay civil unions while visiting Georgia:

Former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani glided over his support for gay civil unions and declared heterosexual marriage to be "inviolate" on Thursday as he helped raise money for a former leader of the Christian Coalition, Ralph Reed, who is in a tough fight to become lieutenant governor of Georgia. For Mr. Giuliani, who is considering a run for the presidency in 2008, the political foray into the South allowed him to pocket a campaign chit from Mr. Reed that could be useful if the former mayor tries to build a national coalition that includes religious-minded Republicans, who are a core part of Mr. Reed's voter base.

While we wait....From Byron York at The Corner, debunking Wayne Madsen's report last night that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales met with the grand jury on Friday, May 12, where he was given a preview of the Karl Rove indictment so he could tell the White House. (Background here.)

First, a Justice Department source, speaking on background, says that Alberto Gonzales did not go to the courthouse on Friday, May 12.

Second, Gonzales, like his predecessor John Ashcroft, has recused himself from the CIA leak investigation. Gonzales, as White House counsel, had taken part in the White House's response to the Justice Department in the early days of the probe. When he became attorney general, there was no doubt that he would have to recuse himself from the matter. He was asked about it during a press conference in October 2005, when there was great anticipation that indictments were coming in the CIA leak affair, and this is what he had to say:

York quotes from the press conference:

Police in Wisconsin arrested a man they suspected of having ingested a bag of heroin. I guess they were in a hurry, because they made him drink six doses of a laxative to cause him to excrete the bag faster.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court yesterday upheld the police action.

The laxative was reasonable because police had a clear expectation it would help reveal evidence of a crime, the court ruled in reversing a state appeals court decision. The laxative also may have reduced the danger Tomas Payano-Roman would have faced had the bag ruptured in his body, the high court's decision said.

"The government would have had more difficulty in proving its case without use of the laxative," Justice Ann Walsh Bradley said in writing for the majority.

Is anyone else appalled by this decision? You can read the decision here. [Via How Appealing.]

I haven't seen anything in the news today about yesterday's court rulings denying David Safavian's motions to exclude "Other Acts" evidence, but here they are:

• Order Denying Safavian request to exclude cost of Scotland Golf trip.
• Order Denying Safavian request to exclude Tyco evidence

Issues involved in Golf trip:

This matter is before the Court on defendant Safavian's motion to exclude evidence of unalleged false statements, gratuities, bribery, or gifts from prohibited sources. Specifically, pursuant to Rule 104(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the defendant asks the Court to exclude all evidence relating to the actual cost of the 2002 trip to Scotland, as well as any other evidence implicating gratuities, bribery or gifts from prohibited sources. The defendant argues that the government should not be able to present evidence of offenses not charged in the indictment, that the actual cost of the Scotland trip is not probative of the charges contained in the indictment, and that any such evidence would unfairly prejudice the defendant and confuse the jury.

Alternet reports:

In 2001, an anonymous White House source leaked top-secret NSA intelligence to reporter Judith Miller that Al Qaida was planning a major attack on the United States. But the story never made it into the paper.

Attytood asks whether this is not the most stunning failure yet? From Alternet:

Now, in an exclusive interview, [Judy] Miller reveals how the attack on the Cole spurred her reporting on Al Qaida and led her, in July 2001, to a still-anonymous top-level White House source, who shared top-secret NSA signals intelligence (SIGINT) concerning an even bigger impending Al Qaida attack, perhaps to be visited on the continental United States.

Ultimately, Miller never wrote that story either. But two months later -- on Sept. 11 -- Miller and her editor at the Times, Stephen Engelberg, both remembered and regretted the story they "didn't do."

In Miller's own words:

Firedoglake is thoroughly covering (in posts and comments) the confirmation hearing of Gen. Michael Hayden for the position of Director of Intelligence. I've been at work, and have not seen the hearings. For those of you watching, here's a place to discuss Hayden and related issues.

News reports of this mornings session: New York Times; Washington Post; Reuters (leads with Hayden credibility attacked.)

The ACLU has issued a new press release saying his nomination poses serious civil liberties concerns:

by TChris

Polygamy has been in the news lately, perhaps because the HBO series Big Love has focused public attention on the practice. Polygamist Warren Jeffs made the FBI's 10 Most Wanted List, and Sean Hannity wonders whether efforts to capture him will lead to a Waco-style standoff. Polygamist leader Winston Blackmore, who reportedly has 28 wives, contends that all polygamists aren't as bad as Jeffs, and complains that he's being persecuted by Canadian authorities.

In the meantime, the Supreme Court of Utah ruled Tuesday (pdf) that the state's prohibition of bigamy is constitutional. The decision, which arose in the case of a former police officer who married two sisters, echoes a U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1878 (pdf) upholding Utah's law against a claim that the prohibition infringed on the free exercise of religion.

by TChris

As TalkLeft discussed here, Clyde Kennard was convicted and sentenced to 7 years in prison for buying stolen chicken feed in Mississippi, a crime he didn't commit. Kennard, an African American veteran of the Korean War, was set up for prosecution because he tried to enroll at an all-white university. He died in 1963, three years after he was framed for the chicken feed crime.

Interest in Kennard's case was recently renewed after a reporter obtained the recantation of a witness. Gov. Haley Barbour nonetheless refused a request to pardon Kennard, innocent or not, because Barbour doesn't believe in pardons. That position was widely criticized, which may explain Barbour's willingness to (belatedly) join a petition asking the circuit court to vacate Kennard's conviction.

Mississippi has no clear procedure to vacate convictions of deceased defendants, but Circuit Court Judge Robert Helfrich decided that justice required action.

"Because this matter did begin here, it should end here," Helfrich said from the bench. "To me, this is not a black and white issue - it's a right and wrong issue. To correct that wrong, I am compelled to do the right thing, and that is to declare Mr. Kennard innocent, and to declare that the conviction of Mr. Kennard is hereby null and void."

by TChris

James Tobin, the Republican party official who orchestrated a plot to jam telephone lines set up by the Democratic party in New Hampshire on Election Day 2002, has been sentenced to 10 months in federal prison and ordered to pay a $10,000 fine. That sentence doubles the 5 month sentence imposed on co-conspirator Allen Raymond, President of GOP Marketplace, LLC. Another co-conspirator, Charles "Chuck" McGee, the former executive director of the New Hampshire Republican Party, was sentenced to 7 months in federal prison.

The judge explained why this wasn't a simple case of prank calling:

"I'm not sure you recognize that the nature of this offense is extraordinary," Judge McAuliffe said Wednesday in imposing Tobin's sentence. "It was a direct assault on free and fair elections. ... Our democracy is fragile, it cannot afford assaults on the integrity of that process.

"It wasn't just about Shaheen and Sununu," he continued. "It was about an entire election. We'll never know if the wrong people are sitting in government. It had an impact. We just can't measure it."

Wayne Madsen, whom I have not read previously, is reporting there will be an announcement of Karl Rove's indictment Friday. His story somewhat tracks Jason's Leopold's article, except he says the meeting at Luskin's office Friday was not for 15 hours, Rove wasn't given 24 hours to get his affairs in order and he adds that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales met with the grand jury on May 12 and was advised by them that Rove would be indicted.

WMR can report tonight on more details concerning the confusing reports regarding Karl Rove and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald from last Friday. WMR can confirm that the appearance of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales before the Grand Jury at the US Federal Courthouse in Washington was a formality in which the jury informed the Attorney General of their decision to indict Karl Rove. That proceeding lasted for less than 30 minutes and took place shortly after noon. Gonzales's personal security detachment was present in the courthouse during the Grand Jury briefing. From the courthouse, Gonzales's motorcade proceeded directly down Constitution Avenue to the Department of Justice.

According to sources within the Patton and Boggs law firm, Karl Rove was present at the law firm's building on M Street. WMR was told by a credible source that a Patton and Boggs attorney confirmed that Fitzgerald paid a visit to the law firm to inform Rove attorney Robert Luskin and Rove that an indictment would be returned by the Grand Jury against Rove.