Borderism is bad enough on the opinion page. It is unacceptable on the news page. But WaPo's Shaleigh Murray does a Broderist opinion piece disguised as a news story on the upcoming election:

Moderate Republican House members such as Bass, Christopher Shays of Connecticut, and Jim Gerlach and Michael G. Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania often side with Democrats on environmental, social and budget issues. On the rare occasion when a vote fails in the House, they are usually the culprits. Ditto for internal dissent. After then-Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) was indicted on campaign finance charges in Texas, Bass helped launch a petition drive to replace the powerful House majority leader. DeLay gave up his post a few days afterward and later resigned from Congress.

But what of Bass' votes for leadership? Or Iraq? Charlie Bass is not a moderate based on those votes, the most important he casts. You know who else will side with Democrats on environmental, social and budget issues? Democratic congresspersons. Charlie Bass enabled the Rubberstamp Republican leadership and President Bush. He is part of the problem. He must go.

We think of elections as accountability moments for our elected officials. And it should be that. But this election is just as much, it seems to me, an accountability moment for the American electorate. For it the Republicans are maintained in power, after the last six years, then we have the government we deserve.

In an editorial today, the New York Times said:

This election is indeed about George W. Bush — and the Congressional majority’s insistence on protecting him from the consequences of his mistakes and misdeeds. Mr. Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and proceeded to govern as if he had an enormous mandate. After he actually beat his opponent in 2004, he announced he now had real political capital and intended to spend it. We have seen the results. It is frightening to contemplate the new excesses he could concoct if he woke up next Wednesday and found that his party had maintained its hold on the House and Senate.

So yes this is indeed an moment of accountability for the Rubberstamp Republican Congress. But it is just as much a moment of accountability for the American People.

The church investigation has concluded. Pastor Ted Haggard has been fired for "sexually immoral conduct."

The board that made the decision, called the "Overseer Board of New Life Church," said in a prepared statement Saturday afternoon: "Our investigation and Pastor Haggard's public statements have proven without a doubt that he has committed sexually immoral conduct."

A letter of explanation and apology by Haggard as well as a word of encouragement from his wife will be read during services at New Life Church Sunday morning, the statement said.

Here's the full text (pdf) of the announcement:

President Bush spent an hour today in Greeley, Colorado trying to sell Marilyn Musgrave, and to a lesser extent, gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez to those in attendance.

"She has worked to prevent the family institution of marriage from being redefined by activist judges. She understand your values, and that’s another reason to send her back to the United States Congress."

We'll see about that. One young woman in attendance who voted for Bush the first time around but wouldn't again, and who although an independent has already voted for Angie Paccione, Musgrave's Democratic challenger, had this to say about the war:

"I think all it’s resulting in is a generation that will hate America even more."

How true.

From esteemed appellate lawyer Peter G. in the comments:

In Pennsylvania, where I live, the Republican committees are working as hard as they can, not so much to get out their vote as to suppress and discourage ours. They are flooding Democratic households, particularly those with regular voters, with telephone robocalls which begin: "I'm calling with important information about {name of Democratic candidate}." Identical calls are placed repeatedly to the same household, often at inconvenient or even disruptive hours (late at night). The calls violate election law by failing to identify up front who sponsored them. Many people think the calls are in support of the named candidate, but in fact the message is deceptive and false. Thus, if the caller hangs up right away in frustration, s/he is likely to think the Dem is to blame; this is the goal, to make people mad and reluctant to vote for the candidate. Or if they listen, they are being bombarded with a negative message.

I do not predict election results in a global way, +16 to +43 seems a silly exercise to me. But a lot of folks have fun with it. So here's your chance, tell us how it is going to come out Tuesday night.

Oh, and here are two Senate races I do give you for free like you needed me for thiese two) - Santorum has been toast for a year. Dewine is also toast. As for the rest, anything COULD happen (though, to be honest, I think Ford is gone, but hope I am wrong.)

Your predictions please. House and Senate.

How bad is it for the GOP this cycle? Consider this, the issue being pushed by the extreme Right Wing blog Red State is that Democratic candidate for Congress in the 9th district of Indiana, Baron Hill, was not the official 100 yard dash record holder in high school as he claims, because he did not run his record dash in the state finals. I kid you not:

Hill’s campaign biography said he set the dash record while at Seymour High School and continued to hold it. But the Indiana High School Athletic Association lists someone else as the record holder for running a time of 9.5 seconds during the state finals of the 1965-66 school year. According to Seymour High School, Hill ran a 100-yard dash in 9.5 seconds at a 1970 track meet. But because it was not part of the state finals, the IHSAA does not count it as tying the record.

Lies about war? Who cares? But whether the man was the OFFICIAL recordholder (there is no dispute he ran a record tying time) is a disqualifying issue. The Republicans are beyond pathetic this cycle.

Republicans say they have the better program for getting out the vote, one devised by Karl Rove.

party strategists crow that they have the ultimate advantage, which will hold down their congressional losses and enable them to maintain their majorities in the House and the Senate: a massive voter turnout machine that even some Democratic Party officials admit exceeds their own.

They are gearing up for the latest iteration of the 72-Hour Plan — a brainchild of top Bush White House aide Karl Rove and his protégé, Republican National Committee Chairman (RNC) Ken Mehlman — in which GOP operatives and volunteers flood into states and districts with competitive races to generate turnout.

Democrats say they have been catching up. But several experts believe they are not quite there. What can you do to help?

3 days to go. It's been at least 20 years since an election had the possibility of a big Democratic Congressional victory like that possible this year. Key word - POSSIBLE. GOTV and pushing to the end is required from Democrats everywhere now.

But the fact is, the Republicans remain the Democrats' most potent political topic:

This may be the closing weekend from hell for the White House. First, the mainstream media is savoring the Ted Haggard controversy; it led network newscasts last night. Then, those brave neo-cons who pined for a war with Saddam Hussein essentially regurgitate all over the entire Bush national security team in Vanity Fair. Vice President Cheney, in an interview with George Stephanopoulos yesterday, looked shell-shocked.

Then the Los Alamos security breach.

Then, of course, the news that the four independent and influential newspapers that serve the branches of the military will jointly call on Monday for the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld in an editorial entitled "Time For Rumsfeld To Go."

Cheney, on ABC, said it was "full speed ahead" with the admin's Iraq policy.

"It may not be popular with the public — it doesn't matter in the sense that we have to continue the mission and do what we think is right. And that's exactly what we're doing," Cheney said. "We're not running for office. We're doing what we think is right."

The contrast between Dems and the GOP could not be sharper - thanks to the GOP. I am an eternal pessimist, but rationally speaking, I think it is going to be hard to pick against Dems taking control of both House and Senate.

A new Newsweek poll finds that Republicans are not gaining momentum in the final days before the election, despite the stumping by Bush and Cheney. Rather, they are falling farther behind.

53 percent of Americans want the Democrats to win enough seats to take control of one or both houses of Congress in the midterm elections on Tuesday. Those results are close to early October levels, while less than a third of Americans (32 percent) want Republicans to retain control. If the elections were held today, 54 percent of likely voters say they would support the Democratic candidate in their district versus 38 percent who would vote for the Republican-a 16-point edge for the Democrats.

The war in Iraq is the most critical issue to voters.

....nearly a third of registered voters (32 percent) now say Iraq is the most important issue in deciding their vote. The economy comes in second at 19 percent. And just 12 percent say terrorism, the Republican trump card in the last three elections, is their most important issue. In fact, as millions of Americans fill in their employers’ health-care selection forms for next year, terrorism is statistically tied with health care at 11 percent.

More pressure for Rumsfeld to resign, this time from an unexpected source -- the Military Times newspapers.

An editorial scheduled to appear on Monday in Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times and Marine Corps Times, calls for the resignation of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The papers are sold to American servicemen and women. They are published by the Military Times Media Group, which is a subsidiary of Gannett Co., Inc.

You can read the editorial here.

The case of Majid Khan is proceeding through the courts. The Judge, Reggie Walton, is the same judge presiding over the Scooter Libby trial.

What will he do with the Government's latest request -- to prevent detainees in CIA secret prisons from talking to their lawyers about their conditions of confinement?

The government, in trying to block lawyers' access to the 14 detainees, effectively asserts that the detainees' experiences are a secret that should never be shared with the public.

... Joseph Margulies, a Northwestern University law professor who has represented several detainees at Guantanamo, said the prisoners "can't even say what our government did to these guys to elicit the statements that are the basis for them being held. Kafka-esque doesn't do it justice. This is 'Alice in Wonderland.' "