Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader-elect, says:

Forty-nine is not a bad number of Senators to have, in a chamber that requires sixty to control. And I can assure you that our Democratic friends will give President Bush's judicial nominees a floor vote - if they want to get anything done, in a chamber that requires 60 to control.

Three detainees at Guantanamo have been released and sent to Albania. It was determined they were no longer enemy combatants. Were they ever?

Jim Webb wrote:

The most important--and unfortunately the least debated--issue in politics today is our society's steady drift toward a class-based system, the likes of which we have not seen since the 19th century. America's top tier has grown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfair to say that they are literally living in a different country. . . . The top 1% now takes in an astounding 16% of national income, up from 8% in 1980. The tax codes protect them, just as they protect corporate America, through a vast system of loopholes. ... [T]he true challenge is for everyone to understand that the current economic divisions in society are harmful to our future. It should be the first order of business for the new Congress to begin addressing these divisions, and to work to bring true fairness back to economic life. Workers already understand this, as they see stagnant wages and disappearing jobs.

I propose the following tax plan to address in a small way the problem Jim Webb identifies.

TalkLeft asked this question last year: "Are federal prosecutors worried that they can't convict Osama Awadallah if he has a fair trial?" If the prosecutors were indeed worried that a fair trial might produce an acquittal, they were right.

Awadallah was charged with committing perjury while testifying before a grand jury that was investigating the 9/11 attacks. His first trial ended with a hung jury. At the conclusion of a second trial, it took the jury only an hour to conclude that Awadallah is not guilty.

Voters sent an unambiguous message that it's time to begin reducing the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. This is the White House response:

The Pentagon announced Friday that 57,000 U.S. troops, including five combat brigades, have been told to deploy to Iraq early next year -- a move that will maintain current force levels there.

A/k/a, stay the course.

TalkLeft predicted here that the president's poor choices to fill judicial vacancies would not be confirmed during the current lame duck Senate session. This editorial reminds us why the nominees don't deserve confirmation:

The four most controversial nominees that President Bush resubmitted are ideological in the extreme. William Myers III, a longtime lobbyist for mining and timber interests, would no doubt use his position on the San Francisco-based United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to gut environmental laws. William Haynes II, who helped develop the administration’s torture and “enemy combatant” policies as the top lawyer for the Pentagon, could be counted on to undermine both civil liberties and reasonable limits on executive power.

I am no fan of David Ignatius, and take the point raised by Left bloggers that Ignatius' slam of Pelosi is absurd, but there is an interesting and insightful aspect to his column today:

The Democrats' challenge is to fuse populist anger with the party's other dynamic movement -- the call for fiscal reforms made by former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin and other members of the Hamilton Project, which seeks budget-balancing changes in entitlement spending. The goal should be to articulate policies that are at once pro-equality and pro-growth. That's a tall order, especially at a time when the U.S. economy appears to be slowing.

I agree but I think that is the challenge of those Democrats like me who believe that. Ignatius states it is the Democrats' challenge and so it is - but it is my wing of the Party, the pro-free trade, pro-market wing of the Party, that must produce the goods here.

William Powers explains your Liberal Media:

The hive is buzzing because a Democratic Congress is better for journalism. What!?? you say. Journalists really prefer Democrats? Yes, but not for the reasons you've heard -- covert pinkoism and so on. . . . Tough love. Journalists are more aggressive under Democratic rule. This doesn't jibe with the stereotype of reporters as liberals, but it's the stereotype that winds up undermining itself. When Democrats are in power, there's a huge incentive for reporters not to appear too sympathetic and thereby confirm the old liberal-bias charge. Thus, despite the friendly coverage we're seeing in this honeymoon period, the Democratic restoration will eventually produce tougher coverage than we saw of the GOP Congress, as media outlets strive to prove that they aren't soft on the Democrats.

Case in point, Mark Halperin.

Greg Sargent gets it in his "memo" to the Times:

[I]t's really, really critical that the paper be more skeptical when reproducing the storyline that Lieberman may leave the Democratic Party, and hence, that he alone holds the fate of the Dems in his hands. Mr. Taubman and Ms. Abramson, this is exactly the story Lieberman wants you to tell. But the truth is this: Lieberman is virtually certain not to switch. The Senate map for 2008 looks like tough sledding for the GOP, so if Lieberman switched parties, he'd be at grave risk of relegating himself to the minority for years to come. And as you've probably noticed by now, the last thing Lieberman wants is to be considered irrelevant. Every time he hints that he might switch, he's doing it to get attention -- nothing more, nothing less. Why would you allow yourselves to be played for suckers in this manner for two days in a row now?

Having avoided fighting in Vietnam, President Bush is belatedly "reading and studying" about the country. The lesson to be learned from the Vietnam war is simple: the United States should not wage war against a country that has not attacked, and poses no credible threat to the security of, the United States or its significant allies. Leave it to the president to learn the wrong lesson:

[A]sked on arrival in Vietnam for an economic summit whether this country holds any lessons for the debate over Iraq, the President answered: "Yes. One lesson is, is that we tend to want there to be instant success in the world, and the task in Iraq is going to take a while."

In other words, the lesson Bush learned from the Vietman war is: stay the course. Brilliant. All those years of staying the course in Vietman worked so well.

Donald Davis lost his legs 21 years ago after a man robbed him and left him on railroad tracks, where he was hit by a train. He gets around on his motorized wheelchair. At least, he did until September, when he was hit by a car.

"She didn't have her lights on or I would have seen her," he said. "She backed into me, hit my chair and flipped me over. I hurt my head."

Davis disagrees with the police report, which says his wheelchair was undamaged. The officer apparently didn't see the bent wheel. He also disagrees with the two citations he received: one for failing to display a light on his wheelchair, and one for failing to sign the first citation.

An ambulance took Davis to a hospital after the accident. He doesn't recall being asked to sign the citation.

"I woke up and had my wallet and two tickets laying on my chest," he said.

As I stated earlier, I think Jane Harman's chance of chairing the Intelligence Committee were doomed when Steny Hoyer was elected Majority Leader. I support Harman's bid, but I think it is not going to happen. That said, I think Glenn Greenwald is quite unfair to Harman when he says:

I think Harman -- who was one of the most aggressive defenders of the President's warrantless eavesdropping program ("both legal and necessary," she repeatedly chimed) and is currently under investigation for her work on behalf of AIPAC -- would make a horrendous Chair . . . She has been far too sympathetic to the administration's excesses and far too eager to serve as a Democratic shield publicly defending the President.

That simply has not been true for the past year. For example, Harman has been leading the fight for the full release of the NIE on Iraq:

A spokesman for Negroponte's office said the latest intelligence estimate on Iraq was begun in August, and Bush administration officials have indicated that it is unlikely to be ready for release until next year.

Harman has expressed frustration with that timetable. She said Thursday that she had recently learned of a separate assessment on Iraq that was much closer to being finished.

. . . "I know that there is a substantially complete assessment on Iraq," Harman said. "I understand it is grim. I understand many working inside the intelligence community are frustrated because the release of that document is being blocked."