John Cole (yes, we agree on occasion) and Steve Benen are. like me, Joss Whedon-philes (read my "famous" diary attacking Freddie Prinze, Jr.) On Dollhouse, I am, like Benen, a complete pessimist (Fox will destroy it):
Fox made Whedon scrap the pilot (just as the network did with "Firefly," probably my favorite show of all time). Then, after several episodes had already been shot, Whedon stopped production because the scripts were deemed inadequate. And just to ruin any hopes we had about the show's future, Fox announced earlier this month that "Dollhouse" would air on Friday nights at 9 -- the same slot it gave "Firefly," and a notorious black hole on the schedule where the network dumps shows it doesn't intend to keep.
I'm an embarrassingly big fan of Whedon's work, so months before the first episode even airs, I'm already preparing myself to be disappointed -- not with the show, but with its likely demise.
Ditto. I am anticipatorily pi**ed about it. Let's make this an Open Thread.
By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only
(70 comments) Permalink :: Comments
I wonder if Greenwald and Digby (See also blog star and "concern troll" Jane Hamsher) will be called morons for this:
Digby explained perfectly why this reaction is so mystifying (re-printed with her consent):
Liberals took cultural signifiers as a sign of solidarity and didn't ask for anything. So, we have the great symbolic victory of the first black president (and that's not nothing, by the way) who is also a bipartisan, centrist technocrat. Surprise. . . . Obama said repeatedly that he wasn't ideological, that he cared about "what works." I don't know why people didn't believe that. He's a technocrat who wants to "solve problems" and "change politics." The first may actually end up producing the kind of ideological shift liberals desire simply because of the dire set of circumstances greeting the new administration. (Hooray for the new depression!) The second was always an empty fantasy --- politics is just another word for human nature, and that hasn't changed since we were dancing around the fire outside our caves.[MORE . . .]
(131 comments, 378 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
From the No Kidding File, though Halperin must have been asleep during the 2000 election:
Media bias was more intense in the 2008 election than in any other national campaign in recent history, Time magazine's Mark Halperin said Friday at the Politico/USC conference on the 2008 election.
No one can doubt that Obama was the Media Darling. But for Halperin to pretend that he and his cohorts were not disgustingly bad, indeed they turned in the worst political journalistic performance in history (see Somerby, Bob), during the 2000 election is just shameful of him. The difference is that their 2000 performance had perhaps the most devastating consequences in the history of the nation.
But Mark Halperin was, is and always will be a hack.
By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only
(35 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Back in the day, one of the reasons Matt Yglesias gave for preferring Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton was that Obama was perceived as being more Centrist than he actually was while Hillary was perceived as more progressive than she actually was. Of course Yglesias was wrong - Obama was actually perceived as more Leftist than he actually is and Clinton was perceived as more Centrist than she actually is. My preference for Obama was simpler - the Media loved him and hated Hillary (there is not a dime's worth of difference between them on policy.) Indeed, I think Yglesias suffered (suffers?) from CDS himself (thus his self delusion on how Obama was perceived.)
Now Yglesias uses the same theory, but in correct fashion this time imo:
(16 comments, 591 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Another Sunday of bloviating on TV, and on this blog too. Give us your thoughts.
This is an Open Thread.
(37 comments) Permalink :: Comments

The Albuquerque Police Department is seeking to hire snitches and placing employment ads in the paper.
The advertisement, which is running in the current Alibi newspaper, seeks criminals willing to snitch on other criminals.
The ad says, "Wanted: People who hang out with crooks to do part time work for APD. Make some extra cash. Drug use and criminal record OK."
The pay is crummy: [More...]
(27 comments, 182 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Gail Collins offers this fantasy of a Christmas miracle: For the good of the country, Dick Cheney resigns. Then George Bush resigns. These acts elevate Nancy Pelosi to the presidency until January 20. She immediately implements whatever agenda President-Elect Obama dictates. The Collins fantasy not only delivers immediate action to address the economic crisis, it gives the nation its first female president, if only for a month or so.
Back in the land of reality, we have a president who is so unconcerned about his legacy that he refuses to consider a proposed $300 billion economic stimulus package because that amount of money -- believed even by some conservative economists to be the minimum amount needed to prompt a recovery -- is too large. The Wall Street Journal disagrees with Bush:
[more ...]
(23 comments, 339 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
The truth of these allegations hasn't been established, but it's undisputed that Marvin Driver, Jr. was hospitalized after his encounter with the Houston police. The incident merits mention here because Marvin is the father of beloved Green Bay Packers wide receiver Donald Driver, who missed two days of practice this week to visit his dad in a Houston hospital.
According to the Driver family, Marvin was stopped by Houston police and arrested on outstanding traffic warrants.
"Later, the family found out he never made it to the jail, he was picked up by the paramedics several blocks from his parents home laying in the street bloody and unconscious and the police were no where to be found."
According to Marvin, who had to write out the details on paper towels because he was unable to speak: [more ...]
(8 comments, 334 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
The citizens of Valentine, Nebraska can resume their normal lives now that the notorious Butt Bandit has been captured.
Beginning in spring of 2007, a mystery vandal visited businesses at night, pressing his naked behind — sometimes his groin, sometimes both — on windows. The marks were made with lotion or petroleum jelly ...
The Butt Bandit (who really isn't much of a bandit despite the entertaining alliteration) terrorized the good people of Valentine with his cheek imprints during the last two summers. He took a break during the winter, presumably due to the discomfort of dropping trou in frigid weather. Despite concern that copycat criminals might leave their own moon imprints on Valentine's windows, Cherry County Attorney Eric Scott said:
"This isn't normal behavior for Valentine"
That's reassuring. (Note: Rumors that the Bandit's actual name is Seymour Butts turn out to be unfounded.)
(9 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Jamison Foser writes a good piece on how the Media now hates "experience" when they hated "change" in 1993. Foser links to Eric Boehlert's piece that explains it:
That's the point we've been making for the last week as we've watched MoDo and Chris Matthews and David Broder and the rest of the Village elders raise a stink about Clinton joining the Obama administration. And our point is this: The press represents nobody but the press on this topic. Meaning, the press has no political cover on this story because there's no partisan angle to the SoS story, which means their long-running Clinton hatred is just sort of out there, exposed for all to see.
Think about. It's been virtually impossible to find any senior members of Congress--Republican or Democrat--who publicly oppose Clinton as the SoS, which in and of itself is rather astonishing. . . . So, if you're keeping score at home, that means the Obama White House is in favor of Clinton, Republicans in Congress are in favor, Democrats in Congress are in favor, and liberal activists are, essentially, in favor. (And so are most Americans.) So we go back to our original point. Who was [Joe] Scarborough talking about when he kept referring to these detractors who Hitchens represented. Who were these SoS "critics"? Answer: Scarborough was talking about the Beltway press corps. And if the Beltway press corps thinks Clinton should not be SOS, then that's big news.
By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only
(80 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Today is Saturday, which means college football for all patriotic, red blooded Americans . . .
The Mighty Gators have a virtual bye against the Citadel this afternoon. The big action will be in Norman, Oklahoma tonight, where the Sooners host the Red Raiders of Texas Tech.
It should be a barnburner.
In any event, Go Gators!
This is an Open Thread
Speaking for me only
(73 comments) Permalink :: Comments
President-Elect Barack Obama is still 2 months from being inaugurated and some NYTimes op ed writers can not leave him alone. At least wait till he actually does something. Geezus Christ on a cracker! Look at Bryan Curtis:
Obama’s First Fumble
BARACK OBAMA went on “60 Minutes” this week and unveiled his first policy proposal as president-elect — a college football playoff. After detailing his preferred system, in which eight teams would meet in a three-week-long tournament at the end of the season, Mr. Obama said, “I don’t know any serious fan of college football who has disagreed with me on this.” Well, here’s one. To borrow Mr. Obama’s infelicitous phrase, I cling to college football in its current form.
All joking aside, I disagree with Mr. Curtis, as I will explain on the flip.
(20 comments, 631 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
| << Previous 12 | Next 12 >> |






