Is it a good deal?:

The plan has two key features:First, the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will backstop some losses against more than $300 billion in troubled assets. Second, the Treasury will make a fresh $20 billion investment in the bank. The government has already injected $25 billion into Citigroup as part of the $700 billion bailout passed by Congress in October. In return for the latest intervention, the government will receive an additional batch of preferred shares - $20 billion for its direct investment and $7 billion as compensation for the loan guarantees. Citigroup will pay an 8% dividend rate on those shares. In addition, the government will get warrants, or the right to purchase $2.7 billion worth Citigroup shares in the future.

The government will impose restrictions as well. Citigroup will be prohibited from paying out a dividend of more than a penny per share for the next three years and will face limits on executive compensation. Plus, Citigroup will be expected to adjust mortgages for troubled borrowers, using procedures similar to those the FDIC implemented at IndyMac, which it took over last summer.

(Emphasis supplied.) Krugman is quite negative.

By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only

Allen St. Pierre, Executive Director of NORML, takes a hard look at President-Elect Barack Obama's appointment announcements to date and finds them not a good sign for those seeking marijuana law reform.

While we've documented likely Attorney General nominee Eric Holder and VP-Elect Joe Biden previously (Also see NNDB and Radley Balko here), Allen points out three other stumbling blocks: Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, ONDCP Transition Team Director Dr. Don Vereen and likely Drug Czar Former Congressman James Ramstad.

In an e-mail, Allen tries to put some optimism in the picture: [More...]

Most mayors go out of their way to be publicly supportive of the police because they think it's the politically smart course of action. Not Richmond, California's Mayor Gayle McLaughlin. When the Richmond Police Department was patting itself on the back for the role it played in a coordinated effort to execute search and arrest warrants that targeted gang members in the San Francisco Bay area, McLaughlin questioned the department's celebratory tone.

"While I understand that this action was addressing criminal activity, I do have concerns about the collateral damage and how this will be mitigated," McLaughlin wrote in an e-mail to the Times. "For example, oftentimes grandparents let their grandkids stay with them and they themselves are not involved in any criminal activity, yet they had their homes descended upon by hundreds of police. That can be traumatizing for innocent people."

[more ...]

The New York Times reports President-Elect Obama may not repeal the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy but let them expire naturally in 2011.

A member of the Obama economic advisory team, William M. Daley, acknowledged that because of the gravity of the situation, Mr. Obama was leaning toward letting a Bush tax cut for the wealthy expire on schedule in 2011 rather than repealing it sooner. There were hints Sunday that a stimulus package might be extraordinarily large.

....When asked if the tax cuts might be allowed to expire on schedule, Mr. Axelrod replied: “Those considerations will be made.”

Daley said it's more likely than not this will be the case. Obama will announce his new economic team tomorrow: Timothy F. Geithner as Treasury Secretary, Lawrence Summers as director of the Natinal Economic Council. Peter Orszag will be White House Budget Director.

Corrente hosted a representative of Health Care NOW to discuss, shockingly, health care reform. Not knowing anything about the subject, I merely point you to the discussion.

This is an Open Thread.

I wish Matt Yglesias would start writing more about this point (he has made it well and repeatedly), because a false meme is beginning to gain traction among Democrats - to wit, that the GOP lost because of their politics, not their results of their policies. Here are two examples of that faulty thinking. First, my friend Ed Kilgore:

[w]e now have the clear example before us of the failure of a GOP strategy that so very recently looked compelling and perhaps invincible, based on a political map of the country that proved to be no more permanent than, I suspect, the one we see today.

This is just wrong. Republican politics failed because Republican policies failed. Similarly, Nate Silver argues the GOP lost the art of persuasion. This is also wrong. Look, Bill Clinton explained it in simple terms:

(20 comments, 500 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments