home

Trump Takes a Pass on Colorado as Unfavorability Rating Rises

There is no huge fight for Republican delegates in Colorado. Donald Trump isn't here. Colorado is off his radar. Ted Cruz can have the state's delegates.

"The process here doesn't lend itself to our kind of campaign," said Alan Cobb, a senior Trump adviser based in Kansas who is on the ground in Colorado Springs. "Our expectations are really low. If we get a delegate number higher than zero, it's going to be a success."

Kasich isn't coming to Colorado either. He has sent ex-Sen. John Sununu to pitch for him. Sununu claims Republicans will lose the U.S. senate and the state legislature to Dems if Trump is the nominee. [More...]

Ex-Gov John Sununu (father of ex-Sen. John Sununu) was RNC rules committee chairman in 2012. He says Republican rule 40 is being misinterpreted and won't stop Kasich from being nominated. The rule, written in 2012, was meant to apply only to that year.

(rules 26-42) were the rules that solely dealt with the convention and are called the "standing rules" for the convention. These rules are only in effect for the five days the convention is running. After the convention, those rules are no longer valid.

....The elder Sununu told CNBC: "Each convention write its own rules. Tweaking Rule 40 will be part of that process. But remember, you do not have to be formally nominated under the requirements of Rule 40 to receive delegate votes. Last time Ron Paul did not qualify to be nominated under Rule 40, but he received his delegate votes (around 200) when the balloting took place."

The elder Sununu was on Greta yesterday, which I listened to on the car radio. Here's what I think he said: The new Rules committee, which will meet the day before the Cleveland convention, will replace it with one that meets the needs of this years candidates. There will be 2 delegates from every state, likely picked by the state's delegate winner. I think he said Rule 40, the 8 state rule, has to do with who gets TV time and have their nomination televised, not who can get delegate votes and be nominated. Because of Hurricane Katrina, Republican TV time had been cut into, so they needed to limit the televised floor speeches of nominations.

Meanwhile, Trump's unfavorability ratings seem to be growing. A new poll:

Fifty-five percent of Americans say they have a negative opinion of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in the latest AP-GfK poll. But that's not nearly as bad as how they view the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, Donald Trump. His unfavorable rating stands at an unprecedented 69 percent.

It seems Dems are much happier with Hillary than Republicans are with Trump:

And unlike Trump, members of Clinton's party largely like her. More than 7 in 10 Democratic voters have a favorable opinion, compared to 53 percent of Republicans who have a positive view of Trump.

Just 17 percent of Democratic voters say they wouldn't vote for Clinton in the general election, about the same share as wouldn't back Sanders should he win the nomination. Thirty-one percent of Republicans say the same about Trump.

Clinton remains the candidate viewed by the most Americans as able to win a general election, with 82 percent saying she could capture the White House. Just 6 in 10 say that of Sanders or Trump.

Trump plans on taking every New York Delegate. Cruz thinks he can win some upstate conservative New Yorkers. New York has one of the worst voter turnout records. Will Trump be able to get his supporters to care enough to vote?

< Hillary and Bernie Vie for Brooklyn | Saturday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    An LBJ ... (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Robot Porter on Fri Apr 08, 2016 at 06:04:38 PM EST
    level landslide for Hillary Clinton looks more certain every day.

    Don't count chickens before (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Molly Bloom on Fri Apr 08, 2016 at 10:30:58 PM EST
    I remind you, this is an electorate that voted for bush in 2004

    The guy below still thinks Dubya was ok

    Parent

    Not the same electorate. (none / 0) (#4)
    by Robot Porter on Fri Apr 08, 2016 at 11:25:57 PM EST
    It's changed considerably.

    A candidate today with the same demos as W would lose.

    Parent

    You may be right the demographics have changed, (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Apr 09, 2016 at 07:34:01 AM EST
    Maybe I am pessimistic, maybe it's the dot the i's cross the t's nature of my work, maybe it's watching Leo do a 3rd amended complaint after discovery is complete because new facts have come to light and opposing counsel's strategy has been fully revealed (Leo has not lost a summary judgment hearing in 10 years now, very adept at refining strategy as needed- off topic but I am proud of him) but I prefer to wait til victory is at hand, before celebrating.  

    Parent
    You be pessimistic ... (none / 0) (#7)
    by Robot Porter on Sat Apr 09, 2016 at 09:07:53 AM EST
    and I'll be optimistic.

    And somewhere in the middle the job will get done.

    Parent

    The entire campaign thus far (none / 0) (#9)
    by pitachips on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 06:32:06 AM EST
    Has been one big media troll job. Trump never had a chance. Media needs ratings and they know nothing gets 'merican blood flowing more than xenophobia, fist fights and sexual innuendo. And in the end we all lose.

    Parent
    Trump outed himself as just another phony. (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 11:20:24 AM EST
    People wanted the protectionism without the GOP's political baggage, its widely ignored "conservative" policy wonk bull$hit economic fantasies, and the party's permanent employment for gasbags trance-channeling a crudely imagined Ronald Reagan.

    Trump should have blown off the question about prison for women having illegal abortions.  It popped a big hole in his image as a closet social Liberal.  Now he's either a poseur or a pro-life hardliner.  

    Parent

    Another (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by FlJoe on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 01:27:49 PM EST
    one from the "why even the vote" files
    The most painful result, though, may have been Trump's failure to capture two of three slots in his strongest South Carolina congressional district.

    In fact, Trump lost five of the six delegate seats on the ballot in South Carolina's 3rd and 7th congressional districts. Ted Cruz nabbed a delegate in the 7th district, while another, Alan Clemmons, remained uncommitted despite Trump's dominant finish there in the state's Feb. 20 primary. (The Manhattan billionaire won 43 percent of the district's vote, to Cruz's 20 percent and Kasich's 6 percent.) Cruz also won two of three delegates in the 3rd district, while a third -- Susan Aiken, a supporter of Marco Rubio -- will go to the convention as an uncommitted delegate.

     
    Everything I have read and heard up to this point indicated that Trump had swept the delegates in SC, the rules seemed quite clear on that, yet now appears that pretty much nothing is written in stone. You got to give Cruz a hand though, he seems quite adept at playing "Calvin Ball". Trump on the other hand might as well be playing "Go Fish"

    The question is (none / 0) (#2)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Apr 08, 2016 at 08:45:49 PM EST
    are we electing our best bud or the best leader?

    And let's not kid each other. That has been Hillary's strategy since day

    No different with Trump.

    And if Trump is the nominee then all of Hillary's problems will be put on display.

    As will Trump's.

    Gosh, who knows. We may be forced to choose between two candidates that nobody likes,

    Nobody? (5.00 / 3) (#14)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 08:52:01 PM EST
    I like Hillary. I thinks millions of voters feel the same way.

    Parent
    This year will be (none / 0) (#5)
    by TrevorBolder on Sat Apr 09, 2016 at 05:33:00 AM EST
    Taking the lesser of 2 evils to the max.

    This is not a normal year.

    Fifty-five percent of Americans say they have a negative opinion of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton in the latest AP-GfK poll. But that's not nearly as bad as how they view the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, Donald Trump. His unfavorable rating stands at an unprecedented 69%.

    The negative feelings for both are a harbinger of a general election contest that's shaping up to be less about voters supporting the candidate of their choice, and more about their picking the one they dislike the least.



    Parent
    Let's not kid each other.. (none / 0) (#13)
    by jondee on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 04:00:58 PM EST
    about the fact that only one of the two has a documented record of years spent working as a public servent that the voters can refer to.

    And let's not ourselves about the fact that only one of the two has "best bud" charisma and a following of enthralled illiterates as their main qualification for office.

    Parent

    Lol (none / 0) (#8)
    by TrevorBolder on Sat Apr 09, 2016 at 02:21:30 PM EST
    Gotta love Lindsay Graham

    http://tinyurl.com/zybm3rb

    Graham, a reluctant supporter of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's presidential bid, told CBS that Republicans need to unite behind Cruz to save the party.

    "Let me say this, my Republican friends: If you parachute somebody in just on electability -- Paul Ryan's a wonderful guy, doesn't want to be put in this position. I'm trying to get us the most viable nominee for 2016 that could win without destroying the party," Graham said. "I think Trump destroys the party. And if you parachute somebody in, and try to ignore millions of votes, you're going to destroy this party. So we're right back to Ted."

    Asked how Republicans who dislike Cruz could support the Texas senator's campaign, Graham said, "If I can do it, anybody can do it."



    Boston Globe's post Trumpocalypse Headline (none / 0) (#11)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Apr 10, 2016 at 11:24:35 AM EST