home

Trump Cancels Chicago Rally Due to Protesters

The cable news coverage of the cancellation of the Trump rally in Chicago today highlights why no one should be watching cable news for news anymore. It's all opinion. CNN just went from extended interviews with a former Romney campaign strategist to a former Secret Service agent to a current media person for Donald Trump. None of the three were there. All three were pushing biased talking points.

Romney guy: "Donald Trump can't win in November because there aren't enough white people who are angry at non-white people." [More...]

The secret service agent blamed the incident 100% on the protesters, based on images from CNN. This was not Donald Trump's fault, he said. Then the media spokesperson for Trump recited Trump talking points.

I started listening to this on the car radio at 4:15, before Trump canceled, when I left the jail in Castle Rock to drive the 30 miles back to Denver. Due to traffic, it took over an hour. I was able to switch between CNN and Fox. On CNN, the pundits were predicting violence and bashing Trump before anything happened. One CNN pundit said the protesters were shouting "Bernie" (as if Sanders was to blame. Absurd.)

Someone must have called down to the control room at CNN because by the time I got home and turned on the TV, CNN was pointing out no one was injured and no arrests had been made. But they are still showing images from the few skirmishes over and over.

These pundits have no idea of the numbers at the rally. One said there were 8,500 there, another said there were a few hundred protesters, another said there were a few thousand protesters, and one said there were 8,500 protesters.

The CNN anchor can't even listen correctly. When the ex-Secret Service agent claimed the Trump protesters clearly were out to instigate fights, (not once, but twice), the CNN anchor, when talking to the next guest, referred to the agent as having said the protesters clearly came with the intent to stop Trump from speaking. Two very different things.

Things were calmer over at Fox, but boring.

At one point Trump's campaign issued a statement saying the cancellation happened after Trump landed in Chicago and met with law enforcement.

CNN is now replaying the few fights over and over. CNN seems to think that if it puts on pundits from both sides, it's airing the news. Far from it. It's just presenting us with two warped perceptions.

There's really no network to watch if all you want is to turn on the news and find out what happened. That's a shame.

< Friday Open Thread: Cuba and Sweethearts | Trump Interview on Rally Cancellation >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    The context: St. Louis Trump rally today (5.00 / 2) (#14)
    by Towanda on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:02:44 PM EST
    If you missed that -- since hardly any cable media apparently are aware of it, and they never attempt context -- read up on the violence there today.

    I am sure that factored into the advice to cancel the Chicago rally tonight.  However, there was advance word for days now, all over social media (Move.On, Sanders sites, etc.), to get tickets to the Trump rally tonight to get inside to protest.

    And that the Trump campaign announced that the rally was cancelled before the Chicago cops could get there . . . well, it sure looks to me like the Trump campaign wanted the chaos that occurred.  

    The weeks leading up to this have been worrisome for anyone who knows the lessons of the past -- but this tonight, with the dominance of the media agenda tonight at a crucial point in upcoming primaries and with this bound to increase Trump votes again, is even more parallel to specific events in the 1930s in Germany.  And I shudder.

    (Fortunately, my Chicago children -- who work in the Loop -- were home by the time of the chaos.)

    And I ought add that the UIC locale (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by Towanda on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:15:03 PM EST
    was a Trump taunt, too.

    I also have been hearing that from faculty there, for days now, wondering why in the world that he was inflicting himself on that campus.  

    Tensions already have been high there, owing to the Illinois governor's refusal to fund it (and other state public campuses) for months now. Layoffs are underway -- and the first jobs to go often are student jobs.  It already was a powderkeg there.

    Parent

    What you said (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:21:04 PM EST

    On CNN (none / 0) (#91)

    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 06:59:29 PM EST

    They are trying to figure out why this location in downtown Chicago was chosen.  There have been calls on radio and social media all day to disrupt it.  Why they are asking would they not just move it to a suburban location?
    I'm going to offer this possibility just to irritate certain commenters,  he knew this would happen and he wanted it to happen



    Parent
    Wow (none / 0) (#17)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:14:38 PM EST
    Maddow just brilliantly laid out a chronological case to support nearly every word in your comment.

    If you didn't see it you should see it on the web.

    Parent

    Yes, the Trump campaign (none / 0) (#31)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 11:05:44 AM EST
    even had the Sanders signs professionally printed. Probably hired the people who passed them out.

    And Moveon had nothing to do with it.

    And pay no attention to the "protesters" inside fighting the security guards who were trying desperately to get the "peaceful" people to leave....just free speech, you know.

    Sarcasm alert.

    Free for them but not for Trump. Why they might have their ears hurt by hearing Trump say something that was not PC.

    And it was the Nazis who faked riots and crimes and blamed them on the Jews and then used that as an excuse for what followed.

    Hint. It ain't the Trump supporters in the streets  and attacking security guards shutting down Sanders and Hillary's events.

    Parent

    Nazi analogies are inappropriate, Jim. (none / 0) (#32)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 11:35:09 AM EST
    I recently pushed back against them in these threads when posters here were using them to describe Donald Trump, and I'll do the same to Trump's supporters who wield them with reference to persons or organizations who so happen to oppose the man's candidacy. Needless to say, Jeralyn doesn't appreciate Nazi analogies, either. Please state your case rationally without resorting to such shrill hyperbole, by which you equate the political opposition with the monsters who perpetrated the Holocaust and started the Second World War.

    Parent
    Then you need (none / 0) (#39)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 05:32:00 PM EST
    to take your problem to Towanda.

    .......but this tonight, with the dominance of the media agenda tonight at a crucial point in upcoming primaries and with this bound to increase Trump votes again, is even more parallel to specific events in the 1930s in Germany.  And I shudder.

    Or do you just want to play hall monitor?

    Parent

    No, you need to see (none / 0) (#42)
    by Towanda on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 06:38:01 PM EST
    what even the conservative, ardently Republican Chicago Tribune saw in this photo that topped its page.  

    And the woman said that it was deliberate: a Nazi salute.

    So, do you want to play stormtrooper?

    Parent

    She's outside the building in the middle (none / 0) (#50)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Mar 14, 2016 at 08:33:59 AM EST
    of a "protest" that is one act away from being a riot. She is not inside

    Now I'm not an expert on Nazi salutes, but in the ones I have seen the arm is pointing forward at a 90 degree angle to the body and about a 45 degree upward angle.

    This woman's arm is about is about 120 degrees from her body and around 70-75 degrees up.

    Looks like a wave or gesture to me.

    And the Tribune??? You really think the  Tribune is pro Trump?? To do you really think the newsroom is pro Trump?

    Parent

    Well, to be fair (none / 0) (#33)
    by mm on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 11:43:23 AM EST
    They're a little busy right now fighting a civil war with their own party against the sellout establishment RINOs.  

    It ain't the Trump supporters in the streets  and attacking security guards shutting down Sanders and Hillary's events.


    Parent
    Is your bias blinding you? (none / 0) (#34)
    by Towanda on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 12:23:07 PM EST
    Reread.  I said that the protests were planned, and I noted sites on which the planning occurred.

    I can only write.  I can't read it aloud for you.

    Parent

    I did read (none / 0) (#40)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 05:34:31 PM EST
    and I read this.

    And that the Trump campaign announced that the rally was cancelled before the Chicago cops could get there . . . well, it sure looks to me like the Trump campaign wanted the chaos that occurred.  


    Parent
    Yes, and I explained why (none / 0) (#41)
    by Towanda on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 06:32:58 PM EST
    but that is a different point.

    Do work on subtlety in your constant deflections.

    Parent

    This is what happens (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by NYShooter on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:14:23 PM EST
    when the Media behaves like Trump cheerleaders rather than journalists informing the public about who this character is.

    While journalism in America has never been perfect, there was a time when the rich folks that owned news outlets actually had a sense of duty regarding the "fourth estate." Many of them even used their news divisions as loss leaders in order to try and keep the public informed.

    That all changed around the time Reagan was elected, and the mantra, "Let Business be Business," followed by, "Greed is Good," was unleashed. Pretty soon 22 year old Wharton School graduates discovered that replacing loss leader news with "profit center" "news" would be a receptive idea in the, "anything goes," culture growing in Board Rooms nationwide.

    So, it should be no surprise that CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and all the rest, while purporting to be news outlets, realized that the American public, actually, preferred entertainment, masquerading as news rather than actual news.

    With, virtually, the entire news media industry being four-square behind Donald Trump, and, wanting to keep this financial bonanza continuing as long as possible I sure hope Hillary Clinton, and, her Team know what they're up against.

    Well (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:59:39 PM EST
    the good news is that the media never has been her friend. Trump or no Trump I'm sure she never expected to have any friends in the media. Fortunately she will probably have enough money where she can bypass a lot of the traditional media.

    Parent
    We are in the same page (none / 0) (#19)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:15:48 PM EST
    Brother

    Parent
    Amen sister (none / 0) (#1)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:14:14 PM EST
    This is as twisted a spectacle as I have ever seen.

    Shorter version, Donald wins the news coverage.

    Donald just told CNN they should not be showing the same scene over and over.

    Don Lemon says we show the worst to make a point.

    Again, holy hell.

    I can't believe (none / 0) (#2)
    by jbindc on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:20:43 PM EST
    This is what a presidential campaign has led to.

    It's (none / 0) (#3)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:24:06 PM EST
    March

    Fasten your seatbelt

    Parent

    Robert Costa (none / 0) (#4)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:32:20 PM EST
    On MSNBC.   Smartest guy on the channel.

    Republican consultants and rival campaigns say this will "stoke the vote" for Trump on Tuesday.

    Oh, you (none / 0) (#8)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:42:05 PM EST
    betcha it will. I agree he seems to be about the smartest reporter out there.

    Parent
    I''ll say one thing for Nancy Reagan (none / 0) (#5)
    by ruffian on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:36:24 PM EST
    on this the day of her funeral ...she would not recognize this Republican campaign.

    Neither would Ronald Reagan (none / 0) (#7)
    by jbindc on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:40:40 PM EST
    Bill Maher tonight: (none / 0) (#21)
    by ruffian on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:28:15 PM EST
    Nancy Reagan was lovingly laid to rest today next to the remains of the Republican Party.

    Parent
    Funny.. (none / 0) (#23)
    by jondee on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 11:11:52 PM EST
    to me the laying-to-rest process started back when Jerry Falwell was barnstorming the country with his big budget Moral Majority rallies for the GOP.

    I went to one once back in the late-seventies. It was as big and raucous and uniformly white and as imbued with irrational fervor and indignation as any Trump rally or Tea Party convention.

    The good old days weren't that good.

    Parent

    Rachel Maddow (none / 0) (#6)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:37:48 PM EST
    Agrees with me.

    This was on purpose.  She says.

    She is about to "prove it" after the commercial break.

    yes, (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by KeysDan on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:57:52 PM EST
    This is his modus operandi, a version of burning the reichstag.

    Parent
    She is making the case (none / 0) (#13)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:01:58 PM EST
    It making sense to me

    Parent
    She came on later (none / 0) (#26)
    by sallywally on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 08:22:22 AM EST
    and did make her case. Maybe she ran it by somebody.

    Parent
    Judging the way (none / 0) (#30)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 09:36:21 AM EST
    She first brought it up I think thats very likely.

    Parent
    Hmmmm (none / 0) (#10)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:57:14 PM EST
    She did not prove it.  At least yet.

    It was very interesting.  She started and stopped saying it several times.  Choosing her words very very carefully.

    I rewound the DVR

    ".....I recognize this is a controversial thing to say.......but I recognize that (loooooog loud sigh)....... What I mean to say......I recognize its uncomfortable to hear it......but I ABSOLUTELY believe it and I can SHOW YOU that this thing that happened tonight in Chicago did not happen by accident....this is not some......surprise...WOW...

    SNIP

    THIS WAS ON PURPOSE.

    Parent

    Lots of weasel words there (none / 0) (#12)
    by jbindc on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:59:26 PM EST
    Typical Maddow.

    Why would she have "proof" when no one else does?

    Parent

    Prove (none / 0) (#15)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 09:03:33 PM EST
    Was my word.

    You should listen to what she is saying.

    She is right.

    This will be up on the web soon but it's happening now.

    Parent

    Yes (none / 0) (#25)
    by jbindc on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 06:33:31 AM EST
    You said she didn't prove it.

    What does this buy him?  You think this hets him the nomination?  If so, you think this gets him a general election win?

    People who like Trump are going to vote for him.  Other Republicans who are on the fence will be scared off and will not want this nonsense with a president.  (Which someone on CNN just said after I typed that).

    Parent

    And just to clarify (5.00 / 1) (#29)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 09:17:08 AM EST
    That confusing set of Maddow comments,

    I noted what she said and said she planned to "prove " it.

    Prove was my word.

    Then after the commercial break I said she didn't prove it, yet.
    I meant she did not immediately discuss it.
    As Sally said, maybe she ran it by somebody.  It was pretty heavy stuff to accuse a political candidate of.

    Later she made an excellent case.  Proving it is irrelevant and it was a bad word choice by me.   Not the first or probably the last.

    Parent

    Trump picked up a lot of Republican support (none / 0) (#27)
    by itscookin on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 08:23:10 AM EST
    last night. Mostly from Cruz supporters. Trump couldn't have asked for better optics. The other big winner last night was Hillary. There's lots more incentive now to get the nomination locked down for her as quickly as possible. If this is allowed to fester too long, last night's rage could be directed at her. It has to be a long standing, foregone conclusion that Bernie isn't the nominee before the convention in Philadelphia. Anyone who thinks the protests last night hurt Trump or helped Bernie Sanders is delusional.

    Parent
    Yes (none / 0) (#28)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 09:11:52 AM EST
    Everything you said.

    Yes

    Parent

    Mostly (none / 0) (#36)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 03:56:27 PM EST
    I agree. Bernie was the big loser in all that. It does nothing to help him and does a lot to hurt him. And it turns a lot of his soft support away from him.

    It helps Trump with GOP voters yes, it does. However if he's the nominee it's going to be a big problem for them in a general election.

    Parent

    I actually think it (none / 0) (#43)
    by FlJoe on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 09:14:07 AM EST
    was a wash for everybody.

    Bernie doesn't really have a dog in this fight, I think his supporters were idiots for dragging his name in the mud by showing up loudly and proudly. Bernie did get baited into attacking Trump, but at this point I just don't see it costing him votes, he does need to avoid a direct sustained flame war with Trump.

    IMO Trump came out ahead only because he is insuring that his current support remains fired up enough to come out and vote come hell or high water. As far as expanding his support, this does not help and probably hurts him somewhat.

    So far polling and actual results have consistently shown that Trump has underperformed with late deciders, there is no logical reason to think that these latest events are going to impress anybody who is not already aboard the crazy train.

    Parent

    For a guy as smart as you are (none / 0) (#44)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 09:52:27 AM EST
    It amazes me that you continue, day after day, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that "logic" has even a tangential relationship to this election cycle.

    Parent
    Guess (5.00 / 1) (#45)
    by FlJoe on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 12:59:09 PM EST
    you never heard of chaos theory then. Nobody knows how the river is going to run until the spring melt happens but no matter how much the river bed has changed and how high the water levels are new, at least semi-stable patterns will emerge.

    There is absolutely no reason, logical or illogical, to think that anyone who has not already been captured by the "strange attractor" that the gaudy spectacle of Trump has become, will jump to him because the spectacle has become even more gaudy.

    How many fence sitters do you think are out there who will jump to trump because his rallies are devolving into ugly melees? I am pretty sure Trump cornered the market on that type of voter a long time ago.

    Parent

    Since early spring (none / 0) (#46)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 01:09:38 PM EST
    People have been saying what was going to happen based on past experience.  They have been wrong every SINGLE time.   Every political reporter covering this race says over and over they have never ever seen anything like this.

    I will follow with interest how long you can continue to cling to this idea that eventually conventional wisdom will reassert itself.

    It might.  I guess.  Anything is possible.  

    Parent

    I gave (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by FlJoe on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 02:24:25 PM EST
    up on conventional wisdom a long time ago. I am merely observing the patterns that are emerging. I conceded roughly a third of the vote to Trump months ago, so far he has gotten 35% of the actual vote so I don't feel completely lost in my analysis.

    Of course no one has really seen the likes of this, that's why conventional wisdom completely collapsed, but that doesn't mean there is not an underlying reality. Just because the limits on Trump's support have not yet been clearly defined doesn't mean they don't exist.

    Obviously I think that the constraints on the growth of Trump's support are much tighter than you do, but until the actual votes are counted we are both flying blind (along with the rest of the  world).

    Parent

    Let me join you (none / 0) (#49)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 02:27:34 PM EST
    In hoping you are correct

    Parent
    Btw (none / 0) (#47)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun Mar 13, 2016 at 01:12:09 PM EST
    I knew the 5 was from Trevor without looking.  He seems to be the only commenter here more invested in convention wisdom saving us than yourself.

    I am only interested in how you respond.  I actually worry about him.

    Parent

    cruz (none / 0) (#9)
    by KeysDan on Fri Mar 11, 2016 at 08:50:51 PM EST
    Is laying blame at the Trump doorstep. But he is so smarmy about it all. And we need to repeal Obama care also too.


    On the CBC (none / 0) (#24)
    by robert72 on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 01:45:23 AM EST
    Tonight in Canada, there was a program on Donald Trump that I thought was very well done. The program is the 'Fifth Estate' and the program called 'The Fire Breather - the Rise and Rage of Donald Trump'. Scary stuff.....
    http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/


    it's all the media's fault. (none / 0) (#35)
    by FlJoe on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 02:20:33 PM EST
    Frankly I have seen bigger brawls on tape at sporting events, at Little League games no less.

    CNN was practically begging for something to happen, not necessarily in words, but absolutely in tone. They showed that old guy's sucker punch on early and often all day. They had plenty of cameras and satellite trucks in Chicago, with live reports throughout the afternoon.

    As far as brawls go, last night was a fkng joke, no arrests, no reported serious injuries, it actually looked like both sides were enjoying themselves for the most part, mostly just doing a lot of taunting and smack talking.

    Predictably the media lets this nothing burger dominate the newscycle leading up to one of the most important voting days in the history of the GOP.

    This is your Fourth Estate, America, Cherish it.

     

    Some arrests, some injuries (none / 0) (#37)
    by Towanda on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 04:42:28 PM EST
    in Chicago, actually.  Not many, but not none.

    Parent
    I was on multiple channels (none / 0) (#38)
    by CaptHowdy on Sat Mar 12, 2016 at 04:45:25 PM EST
    And it looked to me like it could have gotten ugly real fast right about the time an army of police showed up.

    Parent