The bigger issue is what rights do people who crash someone else's meeting and then demonstrate, try to distract, etc., have?

It should be over for Hillary: Party elites and MSNBC can't prop her up after Bernie's Michigan miracle
Trade, wages and the corrupt political class are the new key issues. Bernie and Trump finished off the party elites

None of those aforementioned parties have been forthcoming on any details, although ESPN is reporting today that an unnamed source familiar with the matter has disclosed that Montague's dismissal from school was the result of the university's internal investigation into an allegation of sexual misconduct on his part.

For all we know, Yale's dismissal of Montague may well be no different than the incident involving BYU's March 2011 dismissal of Cougar forward Brandon Davies -- the team's leading scorer and rebounder -- for violations of that school's honor code, after he reluctantly admitted to a school disciplinary panel that he had slept with his girlfriend.

Given that Yale and Brigham Young are both private institutions which maintain pretty strict standards for student conduct, it is perfectly within their rights to discipline and / or dismiss any student who fails to uphold those standards, even if such conduct would not amount to a violation at a public university or another private institution.

Speaking for myself only, when I don't really know, I don't just assume, whether for good or ill. Further, since the details are admittedly quite sketchy, nobody's talking as of yet and no police file has been opened in the matter, you can't possibly be privy to what actually happened here.

Therefore, you've got no business comparing Jack Montague's dismissal from Yale with the Duke Lacrosse case, which was initially a criminal investigation about an alleged sexual assault that went horribly awry for a variety of reasons, none of them good.

The sort of hysterical overstatement you offered in this instance is tabloidesque, because you're presuming as fact something which is not at all in evidence and thus, you are impugning the integrity of Yale University without sufficient cause to do so.

Some thoughts (yes, he worked for HRC, but unless you can dispute his facts, then so what?)

Sadly, many on the left imbibe and regurgitate these fabricated narratives, spewing falsehoods and filth at Hillary with gleeful abandon. They are joined by mainstream media operatives with personal vendettas like Maureen Dowd and the Morning Joe crew, whose venomous words reveal more about their own failings than about Hillary.

But the fact is this: no one has ever produced an iota of evidence that Hillary has behaved improperly because of a campaign contribution. No one has produced a scintilla of proof that there is a quid pro quo when it comes to her speaking fees. From Whitewater to Benghazi to her emails, nobody can point to a single instance of corruption or purposeful wrongdoing on Hillary Clinton's part.

None. Zero. Ever.

The most they have are votes they disagree with. And even there, the false frames are tossed around with no regard for facts. Hillary's voting record is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren's, yet somehow Hillary is the only one portrayed by critics as a sell-out, a closet Republican, a traitor to progressives.

Next--while it can be very difficult in view of how televised personality and party talking points do influence us--try looking at the race only from the policy screen that forms your standard checklist.  Why? Because not one of us can really tell what is inside the minds or intents of any of the candidates ...in this media-savvy day we can get taken in by our own emotions.  For example: You seem, automatically, to attach the "not honest" label to HRC ... from my perspective, I find her to be the most honest candidate that I've seen in a long while because she does not over-promise and because she takes her time with responses ... a individual who doesn't give you the sun & the moon or a quick yes/no as he suspects you want to hear may actually be the more honest precisely because of her precision.  Nuance doesn't fit neatly on bumper stickers or roll easily off the tongues of the news people; but, that attention to facts as opposed to the bravado/bluster of some easily wears longer than emotionally buying into a load of cr#p.