home

Wednesday Morning Open Thread

One of those days.

Open thread.

< Tuesday Night Open Thread | Palin Once Again Claims Center Stage, Creates Controversy >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    snow day (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by CST on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:40:24 AM EST
    Nice picture, CST... (none / 0) (#6)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:50:19 AM EST
    We dodged another bullet here in MD - I think we might have had 3 inches, which, after last winter's storms that each dumped multiple feet of snow, doesn't seem like much to get excited about.

    I'd like to see a big one along about mid-February, when the time until things start getting green again seems like it will never get here; it should be enough that no one who doesn't have a critical job has to think twice about whether they're going to work, and we can stay home without guilt because we know everyone else is, too.  A nice fire in the fireplace, a good romp with the dogs out in the snow, hot chocolate or a good merlot, something really yummy perking along in the slow-cooker...I'm feeling more relaxed just thinking about it...

    Now...back to reality!

    Parent

    Unfortunately (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:54:58 AM EST
    There are many of us who don't have a critical job, but are paid by the hour, so a snow day is not a day to relax and enjoy, but a day with no pay.

    I like winter - if it only snowed on the grass!

    Parent

    most people stayed in (none / 0) (#9)
    by CST on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:59:51 AM EST
    I actually don't mind coming out in this kind of weather.  Got boots on, bundled up, walking to work is like playing in snow.

    Plus in the city there is limited time where the snow will actually be white.

    Should be good for the mountains too.  Looking forward to getting back out there this weekend.

    Parent

    On a side note, the $19 "early bird" (none / 0) (#20)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:18:27 PM EST
    parking rate almost made my eyes fall out...I thought paying $200/month for parking was bad, sheesh...

    Guess that's one more difference between Baltimore and Boston!

    Good luck on Sunday against the Jets, if for no other reason than to make Rex Ryan STFU - he did a great job as the Ravens' defensive coordinator, and I get that he's trying to give Sanchez some breathing room, but the man needs to give his jaws a rest already!

    I have no idea how we will fare against the Steelers - I expect a brutal, close game that once again goes down to the last minutes - but I suspect the Pats - assuming they win - would rather face Pittsburgh in the AFC championship game than the Ravens.

    There is purple everywhere here - City Hall has switched out to purple lights, the streetlights that surround the harbor are purple, the Ravens' organization has been painting the logo all over the area.  It's really fun, and exciting and I hope the feeling continues on past Saturday afternoon!

    Parent

    Rooting for the Pats? (none / 0) (#40)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:01:17 PM EST
    I'm surprised Anne...wouldn't you rather play the Jets than the mighty Pats?  

    So sad what Ed Reed has been going through, losing his brother...making me pull for your squad against Pitt.

    Parent

    Yuck it up Don... (5.00 / 1) (#83)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:04:08 PM EST
    I ate my crow on Monday morning, in case you missed it:)

    Parent
    Figured... (none / 0) (#85)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:18:10 PM EST
    I should look up the origins of the "eating crow" expression, just in case it is offensive.  

    According to Wiki, I think I'm safe...and there is Leviticus 11 again!  I swear, Moses musta been on some wild psychedelics...I'm jealous:)

    Parent

    Well, the fun part of playing the Jets, (none / 0) (#64)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:41:20 PM EST
    if both are the last two standing in the AFC, would be that because the Ravens are the five seed and the Jets the six, we'd get to host the AFC Championship...

    It's not that I'm rooting for the Pats so much, as I think the Pats are rooting for the Steelers, if that makes sense.

    But, I'm not a Jets fan, either - sorry!  I think Rex is a good coach, but I don't care for his personality: I think he's a major a$$, with a nasty temper, and a tenuous relationship with sportsmanship.  Well, I could probably say the same for Belichick, huh?

    The Ed Reed thing is very sad, kdog, and I think it's pulling the team together in a very significant way; they're trying to be there for him, and it's making them stronger, I think.

    Can you believe, though, that if the NFL were playing an 18-game season, this weekend would be the end of the regular season - and not the divisional round of the playoffs?  Assuming they can get the CBA done, we might have the Super Bowl competing with the NCAA basketball tournament next year.  

    Honestly don't see how these guys could do 18 regular season games and possibly 3 or 4 more playoff games.  Hard to believe that the league that says it cares about its players' health thinks two extra games would be good for them...but we all know it's about the $$, right?

    Hope you all have a good game - wishing the same for the Ravens!

    Parent

    18 Games... (none / 0) (#70)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:53:02 PM EST
    I am firmly against...talk about greed and hypocrisy.  Hope it goes nowhere in the labor negotiations, as I hope there is a 2011 season at all.

    You'd think the league and the union aren't crazy enough to leave all that money on the table, but greed has been killing a lot of golden geese around here lately, so who knows.

    Parent

    Well, I have to hope (none / 0) (#42)
    by smott on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:01:43 PM EST
    That REx Ryan, even though I too would like him to STFU, will somehow topple the Pats.
    They own my Steelers, and Brady and Co pick apart our High-School level secondary unfortunately. So not suprised that Pats would like to see the Steelers. Who wouldn't?

    We in Pgh, on the other hand, were hoping like heck to have the Ratbirds (sorry Anne! Local terminology LOL! ) go to NE this weekend!!

    It will be a knock-down drag out like it always is with Purple v Black & Gold...here is hoping the winner is semi-healthy next week at least, for whatever opponent they face....


    Parent

    Knock-down, drag-out, indeed... (none / 0) (#67)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:48:01 PM EST
    really no love lost there, for sure, lol!

    All things beibg equal, if we had New England and you had the Jets, and we both came out on top, it would be us meeting in the AFC Championship, which, frankly, would probably be a more compelling game than the Super Bowl...

    As for the NFC, I would seriously like to see Matty Ice melt into a big red and black puddle at the hands of the Packers...

    Parent

    hahaha yea (none / 0) (#52)
    by CST on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:26:37 PM EST
    and believe it or not, that is "cheap" parking.  Hence my riding the T.

    Gotta say, I think we lucked out pretty big on wild card weekend.  Glad to see the Ravens and Steelers beat each other up this weekend, and hopefully lose a little muster before next weekend if Brady and co. can put away the Jets.

    It's hard not to feel too confident after the last meeting, but the playoffs is an entirely different beast so it should be a good game.

    Hopefully we put them away, and I have to also root for the Steelers as I'd rather see them in the AFC champ. than the Ravens.  Of all the games we won this season that was the closest.  Plus your guys have a history of winning on the road.

    Should be a great football weekend regardless.  Division rivalries on the big stage.

    Parent

    Made it in... (none / 0) (#18)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:14:30 PM EST
    for the noon opening...to twiddle me thumbs.

    But I must say the highways and main roads were in good shape on LI...we shall see how iced they are for the commute home.

    Parent

    great photo... (none / 0) (#34)
    by desertswine on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:50:51 PM EST
    bundle up!

    Parent
    Oh, no (none / 0) (#117)
    by Towanda on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:43:06 PM EST
    as my daughter still is there and had been delighting in Skyping me from the sunshine.  And she talked her dad into renting not just any car but a convertible and sent photos of herself, a blonde, as -- as she put it -- "Hawaiian Barbie."  And photos from the lovely family wedding, outdoors; thank heavens the rain held off then.

    And my son just returned from the entire continent southwest of you that is coping with semi-tsunami flash floods.  There must be a mean weather system stuck over the Pacific.  Stay dry and, as kdog would say, high!

    Parent

    The Guardian on "blood libel": (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:27:00 PM EST
    Matthew 27:25
    link

    She is just a truly horrible person (none / 0) (#27)
    by magster on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:38:30 PM EST
    It's interesting though. I certainly (none / 0) (#29)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42:30 PM EST
    new the historical background of blaming Jews for crucifixion of Christ.  And the passage referenced in the link.  But had not heard the term "blood libel" before.

    Parent
    I thought blood libel was the killing of Jesus (none / 0) (#47)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:14:22 PM EST
    and blaming the Jews...

    Parent
    In both Jewish and Muslim law, (none / 0) (#49)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:23:40 PM EST
    it is not permitted to eat food that contains blood. Ingesting even the smallest amount of blood is strictly forbidden -- which is why the term, as it relates to the slur about Jews using the blood of Christian children to make Passover matzohs, is so heinous.

    Parent
    Question (none / 0) (#63)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:39:58 PM EST
    So Jews and Muslims can't eat a rare steak? Serious question - I didn't know that about eating the blood.

    Parent
    Well, we're talking dietary law here (none / 0) (#68)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:49:24 PM EST
    and mostly it's Orthodox Jews that adhere to it. (It comes from Leviticus, I think. Something about not eating the blood of the animal because the soul is in the blood.) The rule is that the meat must be thoroughly drained and salted before cooking. Honestly, I wouldn't eat rare meat if you paid me, but that's for taste reasons. All the holiday briskets I've eaten are roasted through and through!

    Jews and Musilms do have similar dietary laws.

    Parent

    Thanks (none / 0) (#69)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:51:44 PM EST
    Glad I don't have to live with those restrictions because I love a rare steak!

    Parent
    Mmmm....Rare (5.00 / 2) (#71)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:06:06 PM EST
    and a lobster tail or some jumbo shrimp wrapped in bacon on the side:)

    I too am glad my god(s) told me the world is my oyster when it comes to food & drink...he/she/they said help myself, just try not to waste any of it.

    Parent

    to make it better. Jim Gaffigan has a great bit on bacon on Youtube, look it up, it's hilarious.

    Parent
    Or, as my husband likes to call it: (5.00 / 1) (#89)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:24:27 PM EST
    "Meat Candy."

    Sunday, my daughter and her boyfriend cut hot dogs into thirds, wrapped them with bacon and secured them with toothpicks, brushed with BBQ sauce and put in the oven on a baking sheet for 15 minutes, then a minute or two on "broil;" they made excellent wild-card football-watching snacks!  With extra BBQ sauce for dipping...

    Parent

    Yummy, perfect addition to my new healthy (none / 0) (#93)
    by vml68 on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:32:18 PM EST
    diet.. :-0!

    Parent
    Meat candy, nice :) (none / 0) (#107)
    by republicratitarian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:04:00 PM EST
    Make them even better (none / 0) (#140)
    by CoralGables on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 07:52:01 PM EST
    Substitute lil smokies for the cut hot dogs, wrap each one with a third of a strip of bacon, stick a toothpick thru it to hold it together, cover in brown sugar, and bake until each one is a crispy gooey delight.

    Parent
    Ooh, I just remembered - they did (none / 0) (#142)
    by Anne on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 08:13:02 PM EST
    sprinkle brown sugar on them!

    Will mention the L'il Smokies - that sounds really good - thanks for the suggestion!

    Parent

    I have (none / 0) (#141)
    by chrisvee on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 08:12:01 PM EST
    a friend who makes these but instead of barbecue sauce, she rolls them in brown sugar.

    I am ashamed to admit that I have eaten them and that they are delicious.

    Parent

    Found it... (none / 0) (#125)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:05:31 PM EST
    and it was hilarious.

    One good turn deserves another my brother...here's my bacon pasta recipe, try it sometime.

    Parent

    now (none / 0) (#126)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:08:04 PM EST
    Im hungry again.

    Parent
    Noted, I'll give this a whirl this weekend! (none / 0) (#144)
    by republicratitarian on Thu Jan 13, 2011 at 07:40:53 AM EST
    Correct (none / 0) (#72)
    by smott on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:19:49 PM EST
    IIRC for Orthodox Jews the blood is as holy as the life itself. In fact I believe that a murdered (Orthodox) Jew is buried along with their bloody clothes...that the rituals surrounding Jewish burial involve including the blood of the deceased, ie. not cleaning the clothes...placed in the (plain wood) casket at the feet of the deceased. IIRC...not up on Orthodox law lately...please correct as need be...

    But the blood is as holy as the life, yes.

    Parent

    But I hope that she keeps on flapping her yap (none / 0) (#41)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:01:33 PM EST
    and making a frightful embarassment of herself. At this point, mainstream conservatives are running away from her. Let the GOP get so freaked out by her incendiary nonsense that they can't help but hand her her walking papers. Let the intra-party crisis over Palin begin.

    Parent
    It's such a classic screw up! (none / 0) (#50)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:23:49 PM EST
    She was already in damage control mode.  But it was fairly easy damage control.  She might have gotten out of the headlines with:  Freedom of speech.  Blah blah.  Can't we all get along?  Blah blah.  Credits.

    Instead she sticks her face right into the antisemitism hornet's nest.  Ouch!

    Now she's in damage control mode for her damage control.  And it's all tied to the Tuscon story. The biggest story of the year so far.  This means her screw up gets covered locally as well as nationally.

    Everything gets replayed, reanalyzed, etc..

    It really is the perfect storm of political screw ups.

    Parent

    Me thinks... (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:27:32 PM EST
    Mrs. P should stick to making up her own words, as a rule of thumb (snark figure of speech intended)...no worries about the historical baggage existing words/phrases/figures of speech carry doing that!

    Parent
    Bloodage? Libelating? (none / 0) (#57)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:30:58 PM EST
    There's a couple of suggestions for her.

    Parent
    She always wants to be the center of attention (5.00 / 1) (#59)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:33:16 PM EST
    Now the 24/7 media is going to play a continual loop of Palin's blood libel speech, followed by video of her shooting animals on her reality show, followed by web screen shots of her congressional target map, followed by excerpts of her emails with Glenn Beck... Be careful what you wish for Sarah. Unintended consequences and all that.

    Parent
    Sarah Palin latest speech was damage control (none / 0) (#1)
    by Saul on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:39:03 AM EST
    IMO.  She never apologized for the cross hair sight which she took off just this week.  If it played no role why take it off?  IMO her speech was all about her being attacked and damage control of her image.

    Very shallow person.

    I think you have to be almost a Nazi (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by observed on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:01:28 PM EST
    to cry "blood libel" when you, as a Gentile, are criticized for rhetorically threatening to shoot a Jew who  is then actually shot.
    I don't write off Palin; in fact, I think she is an out and out fascist whose rise to political prominence is very troubling.

    Parent
    A blood libel? (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:16:48 PM EST
    This usually refers to an attack against Jews.  Wikipedia explains it well:

    Blood libel (also blood accusation) refers to a false accusation or claim that religious minorities, almost always Jews, murder children to use their blood in certain aspects of their religious rituals and holidays.  Historically, these claims have-alongside those of well poisoning and host desecration-been a major theme in European persecution of Jews.[

    Why did Sarah Palin's speechwriter use this term?  Is she honestly equating attacks on her to the historic persecution of Jews?

    I think this is a turn of phrase which is going to haunt her for quite a while.

    Parent

    She knows her political future is on the (none / 0) (#21)
    by observed on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:19:40 PM EST
    line here. Expect her to continue to make outrageous statements about her victimhood.


    Parent
    Well, she'll never win ... (none / 0) (#22)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:21:40 PM EST
    Florida now.

    Parent
    yeah, but that won't be a problem in the (none / 0) (#24)
    by observed on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:30:59 PM EST
    primaries.

    Parent
    This is the type of miscalcution ... (none / 0) (#28)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:39:42 PM EST
    which causes donors to close their checkbooks.

    Parent
    Sorry, I was musing that Florida primaries (none / 0) (#76)
    by observed on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:39:10 PM EST
    don't count, these days.

    Parent
    Oh, I get you now! (none / 0) (#116)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:39:19 PM EST
    Guess this proves I don't hold political grudges, I completely forgot about that.

    Parent
    Heh (none / 0) (#25)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:32:29 PM EST
    "She is her best spokesperson by far," said Crawford. "She had things she wanted to say."
    link

    Parent
    ADL condemns blood libel phrase used by Palin (none / 0) (#54)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:28:52 PM EST
    She has an uncanny ability to escalate even already fever-pitch controversies....

    Parent
    I had never heard the term (none / 0) (#13)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:32 PM EST
    before today. I can't be the only one.  Which leads me to believe that those words were deliberately chosen and not and accident.  They are not words most people would normally put together, so it seems to be a dog whistle to some constituency.

    Parent
    Of course they were deliberately chosen. (none / 0) (#14)
    by observed on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:06:40 PM EST
    Although who knows if her speech writers even know what a Jew is, let alone the historical meaning of the term "blood libel".
    It's chosen to sound sensational and get attention.

    Parent
    Trying to figure out why Palin says things (5.00 / 1) (#88)
    by christinep on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:22:35 PM EST
    is a puzzle-game that could be patented. Yet, I agree, observed, that the attention-getting quality of this phrase has to be a major driver. That bunch seems attracted to very graphic words..."blood" would seem to be in the pattern of that type of language. So, in the one sense, the design could be for her base to hear "See, I'm not cowed," etc. etc. while also employing a reference that she might not have fully understood other than to think it made her a victim in the sense of another persecuted group. (My own guess is that Palin or her speechwriters may not have comprehended the specificity of the particular anti-Semitic invective. I would not understand why someone who might be considering higher office--in a party that has been trying in recent years to court the Jewish vote--might issue a statement so obviously offensive to a significant number of that populace.)

    Parent
    Agreed very deliberately (none / 0) (#44)
    by smott on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:05:38 PM EST
    ...chosen.

    One wonders if she is prepared to accuse Gifford of Blood Libel for saying the Cross Hairs ad can "have consequences".

    If we had a Free Press (and/or she would allow herself to ba accessed by same) someone might ask. I will be interested to watch Jon Stewart's response if there is one....

    On the other hand, not a lot of Jews are in Palin's corner anyway. So probably in her view, minimal popularity damage for a well placed dog-whistle.

    Sickening.


    Parent

    Yes (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:01:31 PM EST
    that statement was pathetic. I don't think she could have done much worse.

    Parent
    Palin's recorded speech (none / 0) (#51)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:26:02 PM EST
    convinces me even more she is running for President.

    It was some 7 minutes long.  It was like a response to a State of the Union.  She referred to Obama and tried to place herself on the same level by saying they disagree about much but surely agree on....blah, blah, blah.

    She released the speech the day Obama is giving his Eulogy in Tucson.  She wanted to get her speech to have equal footing....

    You could see the reflection of the teleprompter in her glasses....

    She seemed like she was trying to give a "Speech to the Nation" by an important public official....

    If Palin weren't running, she would have released or made a less formal statement like the one Sharron Angle did today....

    She is impervious to the fact that a large majority of the country can't stand her.  The hits she has taken from Krauthammer, George Will, Scarborough, and the horrid polling, do not seem to have registered at all.....She seems delusional--as if she really believes she is the modern Ronald Reagan....

    She seems like she is off her rocker.....

    But I do hope she runs....It will mess up the Republicans big time....

    Parent

    re: reflection in glasses (none / 0) (#60)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:34:03 PM EST
    that actually looks like a soft box, which would be standard for video/photography

    not that I'm defending her!!! I'm sure she was reading something since we know she can't carry on a train of though for very long and be somewhat understandable :)

    Parent

    What's a soft box? (none / 0) (#74)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:26:11 PM EST
    Lighting (5.00 / 0) (#79)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:46:29 PM EST
    I used to always bump into them while distracted, when I wasn't tripping over various cords that is :)

    Parent
    It wouldn't be a standard teleprompter (none / 0) (#135)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 06:01:15 PM EST
    The whole idea behind a teleprompter is to be almost invisible.....the dual glass panes version makes no sense....

    Here, with a prepared speech and no audience in the room, they would just run the speech on a big t.v. or project it on a big screen.....no one would see it that way as the camera is focused on her and not what she is reading from....

    So, it makes sense it was lighting reflected in her glasses...

    Parent

    Well (none / 0) (#80)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:48:32 PM EST
    if she runs and wins the GOP primary she and Obama can have a debate as to who likes Ronald Reagan better or who is more like him or who Ronald Reagan would want to hand his crown to or who Ronald Reagan would vote for....

    Parent
    She's a politician (none / 0) (#3)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:40:36 AM EST
    Very few of them are more than a few inches deep.

    Parent
    And she only did more damage (none / 0) (#7)
    by Towanda on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:51:46 AM EST
    to herself with yet another constituency, again showing her (or her speechwriters') ignorance of history, cultural literacy, etc., and especially considering Congresswoman Giffords' faith.

    Palin, like so many so-called leaders today, is not faith-based.  She is one-faith-based.

    Parent

    It was loaded language designed to gain (5.00 / 1) (#45)
    by esmense on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:10:08 PM EST
    publicity. With no more or less "meaning" than that. Just another way to put Sarah before the public eye in the media that has made her rich.

    Parent
    Not to mention her use of ... (none / 0) (#12)
    by Yman on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:14 PM EST
    ... the loaded phrase blood lust.

    Parent
    Of course (5.00 / 1) (#36)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:54:33 PM EST
    She said that today, ahead of Obama's speech there tonight.  Who do you think people will be talking about tomorrow? (Hint:  It won't be Obama).

    Parent
    That was the point--to upstage Obama (5.00 / 1) (#56)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:30:39 PM EST
    She is ignorant, mean and very savvy....

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#81)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:50:12 PM EST
    let's be honest. It's not hard to upstage Obama so that hardly shows great political skill.

    Parent
    No, I don't agree (none / 0) (#82)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:59:45 PM EST
    Obama's theatrics have never really been criticized.  And, in fact, former Hillary supporters used to say Obama was only about  theatrics....A showhorse....

    Parent
    2 different Obamas (none / 0) (#87)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:22:20 PM EST
    Campaign Obama vs Pres Obama.

    Parent
    Well, (none / 0) (#146)
    by Ga6thDem on Thu Jan 13, 2011 at 09:16:12 AM EST
    it's kind of ironic that Palin is using his own tactics against him. I had forgotten that he did the same thing during the primaries.

    Obama the President is quite different from Obama the candidate. The president isn't only surrounded by party members holding his hand.

    Parent

    She's smarter than people ... (5.00 / 0) (#61)
    by Yman on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:34:58 PM EST
    ... giver her credit for.  She upstages Obama's speech and feeds her constituency some (slightly veiled to the general public?) red meat.

    Parent
    Actually (none / 0) (#90)
    by christinep on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:26:58 PM EST
    Palin must like rare meat...what with all her "blood" talk of late.

    Parent
    2010 Tied as Warmest Year Globally on Record (none / 0) (#4)
    by ScottW714 on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:41:00 AM EST
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41040418/ns/us_news-environment/

    Other facets pointed out by NOAA:

        * 2010 was the 34th consecutive year with global temperatures above the 20th century average.
        * 2010 was also the wettest year on record in terms of global average precipitation.
        * For the U.S. mainland, the 2010 average annual temperature was the 14th consecutive year above average and the 23rd warmest year on record.

    Hot cars (none / 0) (#5)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:47:25 AM EST
    on display in Detroit at the North American International Auto Show

    LeBron believes God and karma were (none / 0) (#15)
    by magster on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:09:59 PM EST
    responsible for Cleveland's 55 point defeat last night.

    LeBron might have a future as a Republican politician someday.

    Seriously (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:11:51 PM EST
    Maybe I missed the point in catechism, but I don't believe the God cares about DADT or the Cleveland Cavaliers or whatever single issue you want to come up with. (Since I will now speak for him since everyone else with a pulse feels free to do so).

    These people are crazy.

    Parent

    If you need a fix re alleged murderer (none / 0) (#17)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:12:13 PM EST
    in Tucson, see CNN.com for video of "strange altar" in his backyard, and two poems he wrote for community college poetry class.  Oh, and the neighbors are talking.

    ADL Condemms Palin ... (none / 0) (#26)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:35:02 PM EST
    for Use of "Blood Libel"

    Here's their statement:

    It is unfortunate that the tragedy in Tucson continues to stimulate a political blame game. Rather than step back and reflect on the lessons to be learned from this tragedy, both parties have reverted to political partisanship and finger-pointing at a time when the American people are looking for leadership, not more vitriol. In response to this tragedy we need to rise above partisanship, incivility, heated rhetoric, and the business-as-usual approaches that are corroding our political system and tainting the atmosphere in Washington and across the country.

    It was inappropriate at the outset to blame Sarah Palin and others for causing this tragedy or for being an accessory to murder. Palin has every right to defend herself against these kinds of attacks, and we agree with her that the best tradition in America is one of finding common ground despite our differences.

    Still, we wish that Palin had not invoked the phrase "blood-libel" in reference to the actions of journalists and pundits in placing blame for the shooting in Tucson on others. While the term "blood-libel" has become part of the English parlance to refer to someone being falsely accused, we wish that Palin had used another phrase, instead of one so fraught with pain in Jewish history.

    And she thinks she touched a nerve before ...    

    Unfortunately, the ADL statement is not (5.00 / 1) (#37)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:56:33 PM EST
    nearly harsh enough. But Foxman is a conservative himself, and I think he's toeing a fine line here, in order to not stir too much of a storm with Christian Israel supporters. (As a reform Jew committed to peace in the Middle East, I find that most of what comes out of Foxman's mouth and pen irritates me.)

    By the way, RP, nice to see you back commenting here again.

    Parent

    Perhaps ... (none / 0) (#43)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:05:28 PM EST
    but you usually want to be fairly tempered in these things, so you don't get tarred by your own brush.

    Plus, the important thing here is the headline "ADL Condemns Palin".

    Some of the other groups I linked to below are more strident.

    Parent

    Yes, the other groups were much more pointed (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by shoephone on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:12:07 PM EST
    in calling her out. (Darn you for making me go click on the Orange Place!)

    Meanwhile... back at the wacko right-wing radio factory... Rush Limbaugh is, at this moment, talking about that self-absorbed baby boom generation, and whether or not he feels old at 60. Thrilling radio. "Blood libel?" Look at that shiny thing over there...

    Parent

    Local news here (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:21:23 PM EST
    called it lashing out. Another said something  similar. The one that said lashing out seemed offended by her video. SP not playin' well here . . .

    Parent
    Has Ms. Palin ever "played well" in the (5.00 / 1) (#55)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:30:20 PM EST
    bay area?

    Parent
    LOL--can't even picture her there (none / 0) (#58)
    by MKS on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:22 PM EST
    among all those who are not real Americans....

    Parent
    Ah, the perks of living (none / 0) (#65)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:41:21 PM EST
    surrounded by all those who are not real Americans.... I seem to have a knack for that  ;)

    Parent
    Hey! we have our Red Zones :) (none / 0) (#62)
    by nycstray on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 01:36:58 PM EST
    Big ol' TP sign on one of the hills by the freeway during the last elections. Really bugged the crap outta me . . . and the dude across the street has a McCain sticker on his truck, STILL. oy.

    Parent
    More Jewish groups condem Palin ... (5.00 / 1) (#39)
    by Robot Porter on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:59:37 PM EST
    over use of "Blood Libel".

    Here's the coverage from Daily Kos.

    Parent

    New reduced witholding... (none / 0) (#30)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:45:35 PM EST
    worked out as an extra 12 bucks net for me per week...not too shabby.  

    Enough for 2 meals, or a pack of criminally overtaxed smokes, or 4 packs of liberty smokes from the rez...I'll take it.  Though with the way gas prices are going it'll be going in the tank for awhile till the gamblers chill out on oil.

    Or a couple pints @ the Dead Poet. (none / 0) (#31)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:48:27 PM EST
    There ya go.... (5.00 / 1) (#35)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:53:37 PM EST
    first round is on Uncle Sam in Feb!

    Parent
    So will you guys take me to a cool NY bar? (none / 0) (#86)
    by ruffian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:22:16 PM EST
    Of course... (5.00 / 2) (#96)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:37:52 PM EST
    just call me Prabaker!

    Parent
    Ruffian, from mon mornings thread (none / 0) (#92)
    by vml68 on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:29:03 PM EST
    in case you missed it...:-)

    I don't live in NYC but am just across the water (5.00 / 2) (#132)
    by vml68 on Mon Jan 10, 2011 at 05:21:22 PM EST

    so you have one more friend in the area. If you ever need a place to crash let me know.

    How is it that people who live hundreds of miles away get to meet kdog when I am practically his neighbor and haven't met him yet?



    Parent
    Say when pal... (none / 0) (#94)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:35:35 PM EST
    or better yet, join oculus, ruffian, and I on Feb. 26...see the show or just meet up after....though Oculus has a tight between show window, and ruffian too if she is partaking of the entire oculus social calendar.  Oculus has the details.

    Same goes for anybody so inclined...the more the merrier!

    Parent

    I am on the Oculus Saturday theater schedule (none / 0) (#101)
    by ruffian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:48:56 PM EST
    Got my tickets and my BAMbus reservation!

    Manhattan->BAM transit tips appreciated! any other tips as well.

    Parent

    Eat your Wheaties... (none / 0) (#119)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:51:48 PM EST
    she's a ball of energy that oculus....just warnin' ya:)

    And I'll see you guys to wherever you're off to next...no worries.

    Parent

    Great! I will be so excited for my (none / 0) (#138)
    by ruffian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 06:11:45 PM EST
    big weekend that the adrenaline will help me keep up!

    Parent
    Jealous! (none / 0) (#139)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 06:34:42 PM EST
    Would love to join you all but will (none / 0) (#103)
    by vml68 on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:54:58 PM EST
    be out of town then. Since Oc is such a frequent visitor, I am hoping there will be another opportunity.

    Btw, how is the Shanataram reading coming along? I had the book on hold at the library and my turn finally came mid-December. With family visiting over the holidays and some other goings on in my personal life, I did not even get a chance to crack open the book. Yesterday, I was on my way to the library to return it unread since it was due back and there is a waiting list for it.
    Well,I had some car trouble. So, bypassed the library and headed straight to the garage. The three hour wait at the garage was the perfect opportunity for me to start reading the book. After my car was fixed, I decided to let the people on the waiting list wait a little longer....:-). Hoping to finish it by this weekend.

    Parent

    Quite well... (5.00 / 1) (#118)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:49:14 PM EST
    I'm at Chapter 29...Jeralyn and Oculus did not oversell it, digging it more and more by the page...had planned on a heavy dose today till I got called into work:(  

    It's one helluva story, and most thought provoking on so many levels.  The writer speaks to me like few others have.

    Case in point, I see a point you made about domestic servants in other cultures much more clearly, thanks to the novel, if you recall that convo from awhile back.

    Parent

    Oh, thank you VML! (none / 0) (#100)
    by ruffian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:46:01 PM EST
    I hope you can join us for the drinks at least! I'm looking at some good off-season hotel rates, so I won't trouble you for that.


    Parent
    I was going to go in there (none / 0) (#32)
    by lilburro on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:49:50 PM EST
    when I was in NYC...never made it though I hear good things.

    Parent
    Quiet enough for conversation. A + (none / 0) (#33)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:50:45 PM EST
    Profile of Dr. Rhee, who is treating (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 12:57:54 PM EST
    Rep. Giffords:  Reuters

    Doesn't sound like anything phases this man, who is a credit to U.S. military medicine.

    AP predicting... (none / 0) (#78)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 02:43:59 PM EST
    the Supreme Court is gonna further erode our right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.

    Just in case you are not riled up enough... (none / 0) (#84)
    by vml68 on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:14:14 PM EST
    Plenty riled now... (none / 0) (#91)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:27:02 PM EST
    Thanks vml...I think:)

    Leave it to Texas to set a new low...but I guess there is something to be said for housebreaking the pups at a younger age...I grew up kinda free and the adult world of tickets, summons, arrests up the wazoo was a bit of a rude awakening:)

    Parent

    I like the quote from the state courst (none / 0) (#109)
    by republicratitarian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:12:59 PM EST
    The state court said the police cannot rely on urgent circumstances they themselves create to enter a home without a warrant.

    That says a ton right there. How many dangerous situations do the police themselves create?

    Parent

    In my personal experience... (none / 0) (#121)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:56:08 PM EST
    I've seen a 911 call make a bad situation worse right quick.

    This case...I'm double shocked that a) it even made it to the SC, and b) they're fixing to decide it so obviously wrong, imko.  

    Parent

    Peter King to the rescue (none / 0) (#95)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:36:43 PM EST
    Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, will introduce legislation that will make it a federal crime to carry a firearm within 1,000 feet of federal officeholders and judges in response to the shooting in Tucson that killed Judge John Roll and gravely injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

    excellent.
    I feel much safer.  dont you?

    in other words (5.00 / 1) (#97)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:38:13 PM EST
    you can carry yer gun to church.  or to a bar.  or to the supermarket.  but dont come near me with it.

    Parent
    New depths of... (none / 0) (#98)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:41:12 PM EST
    different rules different fools depravity.

    Parent
    If that law is drafted like, and intepreted like (none / 0) (#105)
    by Peter G on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:59:31 PM EST
    the law that enhances the penalty for possessing drugs within 1000 feet of a school or playground -- which, by the way, is pretty darn far (think of a 100-yard/300-foot-long football field) -- it wouldn't require that the person know that the federal official was present w/in the zone.  It would operate, in effect, as a virtual ban on possessing private firearms, even those which were otherwise lawful, within a radius of more than three football field lengths of anywhere a federal office holder might be.  The NRA would never go for that.  Also, just wondering, how many of today's firearms can be aimed and shot accurately at a distance of over 1000 feet?  

    Parent
    None that you can hide under your clothing (none / 0) (#112)
    by republicratitarian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:18:10 PM EST
    But you can fire into a large crowd with anything from 1000 feet away and hit something every time.

    Parent
    Pretty bulkey for Arizona concealed carry wear (none / 0) (#145)
    by Rojas on Thu Jan 13, 2011 at 08:41:55 AM EST
    But there are a few single shot pistols that will shoot well under one MOA at that range.
    In answer to Peter's question pretty much any bolt action hunting rifle made in the last hundred years will do it.

    Parent
    And how exactly are you supposed to know (none / 0) (#110)
    by republicratitarian on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:14:05 PM EST
    when you are within 1000ft of one of them?

    Parent
    the (none / 0) (#111)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:16:46 PM EST
    smell?

    Parent
    Da-dum-dum! (none / 0) (#113)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:19:07 PM EST
    Jan Brewer to the rescue (none / 0) (#99)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:42:19 PM EST
       Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed emergency legislation Tuesday establishing "funeral protection zones" to keep protesters away from the memorial services for the victims of Saturday's shooting in Tucson.

        Earlier in the day, the Arizona Legislature passed the bill unanimously. ...

        The law will establish a 300-foot perimeter around a funeral location beginning one hour before a service until one hour after a service.

    as long as they were just protesting the funerals of gay people it was ok I guess.

    Clairvoyant (none / 0) (#104)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:58:59 PM EST
    oops (none / 0) (#106)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 03:59:40 PM EST
    And yet (none / 0) (#114)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:27:44 PM EST
    Despite all the Palin nonsense, there really ARE bigger problems in the world.  What's wrong with you people that you focus on Sarah when stuff like this is on the minds of so many?

    CASEY??? (none / 0) (#115)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:31:09 PM EST
    Was this you?

    No, not me. lol! (none / 0) (#120)
    by caseyOR on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 04:55:21 PM EST
    The Ducks' return flight was not publicized. And the media was asked to leave the players alone. Amazingly, the media complied.

    I do love the Ducks, but a 200 mile roundtrip drive to meet a plane that was besets with delays requires more fan love than I can muster.

    Parent

    Good to know (none / 0) (#123)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:02:28 PM EST
    I've always liked the Ducks too - as a far away fan.  (My Lions got Joey Harrington, and then, well, sorry, destroyed his career.  They do have a way of sucking the soul of poeple - much like Death Eaters in Harry Potter).

    But I digress. I like the Ducks for superficial reasons: 1) Green is my favorite color and 2) I think it's awesome to have a fierce, fighting school mascot like...a Duck.

    Parent

    We have both water fowl, (none / 0) (#128)
    by caseyOR on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:13:34 PM EST
    and water rodents. An homage to our state's water-soaked reputation.

    And since the ground is more often than not water-clogged when Oregon and Oregon State meet in the Civil War, it all comes together rather neatly.

    Parent

    I remember the allegations (none / 0) (#122)
    by brodie on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:00:34 PM EST
    of TPers spitting on and jousling Dem members of Congress as they walked over to vote on the HCR bill, but I don't think I ever heard about this

    Garamendi, now 65-years-old and a member of Congress, said he's kept a close watch on crowds ever since. He did just that as walked through a Tea Party demonstration last year to cast his vote in support of healthcare reform legislation.

    "I was one of those Democrats that marched out of the Cannon office building 200 yards over to the nation's capital," he said.

    "The crowd was there right next to us shouting epithets, spitting on a couple of our members. And it was a very, very heated situation."

    Garamendi said people had painted "kill the bill" signs, with the word "kill" in giant letters. It was frightening for a moment, he said, as G.O.P. colleagues looked on.

    "And I know that our Republican colleagues went out onto the veranda with the crowd below them and encouraged the chanting, encouraged the anger."



    oh I did (none / 0) (#124)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:05:16 PM EST
    the were waving the segmented snake flag and other stuff from the balcony.


    Parent
    "Don't tread on me... (none / 0) (#127)
    by kdog on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:10:28 PM EST
    tread on them."

    There's a cop who lives down the block from my sister flying one of those...me and my bro-in-law were like "Can he seriously be flying that?  He's the treader!"  A good laugh that one.

    Parent

    I remember the cable (none / 0) (#129)
    by brodie on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:16:57 PM EST
    news shows I watched offering a very brief 3-second video clip of the walk, but the focus, if there was any, was down below with the congresscritters walking the gauntlet amidst the angry TPers.  And I recall thinking that even at that, the whole story seemed to be vastly underreported, or diverted by the controversy over whether members were actually spat upon.  

    Like the 2000 recount shutdown by the Brooks Bros Mob of Goopers -- very very limited coverage, short and sweet, strangely so.

    Parent

    here ya go (none / 0) (#130)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:26:28 PM EST
    Yes, thx, your links (none / 0) (#131)
    by brodie on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:40:23 PM EST
    tend to back up Garamendi's assertion, but my complaint was more about the emphasis in the MSM's coverage that day, and how it sort of devolved into a he said/she said back and forth about whether Dem members were really spat upon or called the "n" word by TPers.  

    The aspect of GOP members up on the balcony egging on the TPers tended to be not reported as a consequence, or not covered nearly to the extent it should have been, imo.  And with names -- as they would have if the tables were turned and Demo members were up there inciting the crowd.

    how cool is this (none / 0) (#132)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:40:26 PM EST
    virtual reality contact lenses


    All those 3DTVs and virtual reality goggles are soon to be rendered obsolete by contact lenses with built-in LED arrays that can display images on top of your retinas, whether you want them to or not.

    Researchers at the University of Washington have been working on extremely tiny and semi-transparent LEDs designed to be integrated into contact lenses. So far, they've managed to create red pixels and blue pixels, and when they can figure out green ones, they'll be able to make full color displays.

    Despite being millimeters from your retinas, the images created by the lenses will be in perfect focus, and when the display is turned off, everything will be transparent. Since the lenses are inside your eyelids, though, you can't un-see anything that they decide to project, which is something that you'll have to consider when you're watching something especially scary or gross on them. Power will come from a beltpack that transmits electricity wirelessly to a resonating antenna in the lens itself, and data will be transmitted the same way so that you don't have to plug HDMI cables into your eye sockets.




    Just what we need (none / 0) (#133)
    by chrisvee on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:42:55 PM EST
    That would be (none / 0) (#136)
    by brodie on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 06:07:27 PM EST
    TX whackjob Louie "Terror Babies" Gohmert.

    Parent
    And the insanity continues (none / 0) (#134)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 05:56:47 PM EST
    Man arrested on charges of threatening Rep. Jim McDermott.

    Charles Turner Habermann, 32, was arrested on charges of threatening a federal official, according to the Seattle Times.

    The Times reported that the criminal complaint against Habermann detailed two phone calls he placed to McDermott's office on Dec. 9, in which he said that founding fathers such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would "blow [McDermott's] brains out" if they met him.

    "He's a piece of human filth. He's a liar, he's a communist, he's a piece of [expletive] garbage," Habermann said, according to the complaint.

    Habermann was reportedly angry over McDermott's opposition to extending tax cuts for high-income earners. The California man also is alleged to have threatened to kill McDermott's family and friends.



    And this makes sense (none / 0) (#137)
    by jbindc on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 06:09:48 PM EST
    Right of privacy of alleged shooter (none / 0) (#143)
    by oculus on Wed Jan 12, 2011 at 11:45:43 PM EST
    in Tucson seems to be fraying.  Apparently Pima Comm. College has released its records.  Why?