home

Blagojevich Opening Arguemts to Begin

The jury in the Rod and Robert Blagojevich trial will be picked this morning.

Then, opening arguments will begin. The prosecutor is expected to be low-key and to the point. Team Blago lawyer, Sam Adams likely will take longer, and he'll tell a story. The opening argument is like the preview of coming attractions in the movies. It's what you expect the evidence to show. Adams will be fired up. He's a story-teller.

If I lived in Chicago, I'd try to attend every day. it will be interesting, particularly when the co-operators testify, all of whom got sweetheart deals in exchange for testimony that sinks Blagojevich.

I'm rooting for Blago. And his brother Robert. Among the things you might not have know about Blago's accomplishments in office: [More..]

He raised the minimum wage (angering some business groups), provided state-subsidized health insurance to every child in Illinois, banned discrimination of gays and lesbians, increased education spending, won approval to expand preschool and increased mammogram and cervical cancer screening for uninsured women.

He also opened a prison solely for drug offenders that stressed prevention and re-entry program. From his 2003 State of the Union Address:

Illinois leads the nation in drug-related crimes. We should lead the nation in drug crime prevention. Today, I am announcing that we will re-open Sheridan prison as a national model institution aimed solely at deterring drug crime. Drug addicts return to the streets - only to land right back in jail - after finding new victims and committing new crimes. Since more criminals are in Illinois prisons for drug-related offenses - the more we reduce drug crime, the safer our streets will be.”

The press constantly portrays him as a crook, an incompetent, an absentee Governor, a man only into the job for what he could get out of it, it's nice to know he wasn't as one-sided as he comes across.

He's not a fingers in every pie kind of guy. He doesn't micromanage (He has said his assistants should earn their pay and report back to him.)He calls himself a "big picture kind of guy." I like him more every time I see him unscripted, which usually is after a press conference or on Celebrity Apprentice. Patty did the "I'm a Celebrity Get me Out of Here reality show. She was the best persons on it.

The deck is certainly stacked against Blago, perhaps for good reason, perhaps not, but I'm keeping an open mind and going to report on things that develop during trial I find curious or unfair.

< Peru Reports Joran Van der Sloot Has Confessed to Killing Stephany Flores | Tuesday Morning Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Thank you for this, Jeralyn. (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by prittfumes on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 09:32:14 AM EST
    I too am rooting for Blago. You will be an important resource for me as these proceedings unfold.

    More than rooting... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 09:38:50 AM EST
    we're counting on him.

    Put the political system on trial Blags!  

    Parent

    why do you "root" for anyone? (none / 0) (#13)
    by nyrias on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 01:17:26 PM EST
    Have you seen the evidence? Or do you expect there isn't enough to convict?

    Personally, I have ZERO compassion for a corrupt politician if indeed it is proven that way.

    Do you think some good deeds are excuses for corruption? I do not believe in excuses.

    Parent

    I'm rooting for the United States (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 10:31:51 AM EST
    v. Blago.

    The trial will tell the tale, but I believe the evidence against Blago demonstrates overwhelmingly that he was trying to sell a Senate seat.

    I believe that is a crime. A serious one imo.

    Furthermore (none / 0) (#5)
    by nyjets on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 10:59:36 AM EST
    Whether or not he has good polices is not relevant.
    The only important points is whether the US can prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. If they can, he is guilty, otherwise he should be found innocent.
    Anything else should be ignored.

    Parent
    Correction (none / 0) (#6)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 11:02:11 AM EST
    No one is "found innocent" in our judicial system.

    Parent
    Not by a jury. But sometimes (none / 0) (#7)
    by oculus on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 11:10:59 AM EST
    a defendant found not guilty by a judge or jury petitions for a declaration of innocence, which is rarely granted.

    Parent
    Rare, but true (none / 0) (#9)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 11:50:53 AM EST
    The jobs offering by Administration helps Blago (none / 0) (#1)
    by Saul on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 09:31:38 AM EST
    IMO.  I wonder if they will let him bring these recent job offerings to politicians in order that they would not run against a favored administration candidate for congress a quid qo pro.

    IMO Blago was doing what is going one in most states he just happen to have gotten caught doing it.  Maybe because it was the Obama seat did it get the attention it did.  

    stories are nice, facts are dispositive. (none / 0) (#8)
    by cpinva on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 11:43:08 AM EST
    i have no dog in this fight, other than to see justice prevail. my brother lives in chicago, and thinks the guy leaves a slime trail behind him, good works not withstanding. based on its political history, i can only conclude that there must be something in the air and water in the greater chicago metropolitan area.

    There is something (none / 0) (#11)
    by Zorba on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 12:53:25 PM EST
    indeed, in the political DNA of Chicago, and has been for a very long time.

    Parent
    living here (none / 0) (#10)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 11:52:18 AM EST
    I have heard a bit of the contents of this post but less than you would think.  he seems to have a good deal of support in the poorer communities.

    but I have to say.  for putting the system on trial I am not sure he, with his ubiquitous hair brush and unquenchable thirst for publicity, is not the one to carry the banner.
     

    They have a jury (none / 0) (#12)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 12:59:59 PM EST
    Here they are:

    Eleven females and seven males were announced.

    They first 12 are thought to be the official jurors:

    103, a quiet-spoken white woman in her 20s who works as a full-time legal assistant

    105, an African-American woman who teaches math to sixth- and seventh-graders in public school; her husband is a state probation officer

    106, a white, female retired director for state public health department who has served on two juries before

    115, a blond woman in her 30s or 40s who has worked in retail for the past 15 years; a fan of boating and gardening, she reads news "only for the weather"

    119, a mother in her late 20s or early 30s who works in investment accounting and is an avid runner

    121, a white, female accounting student at Western Illinois University with an interest in law; her father is a police officer

    123, a white, male human resources manager in his 30s who volunteers for a family shelter and has done volunteer work for political candidates

    127, a woman in 50s or 60s who likes reading and crafts like knitting and cross-stitch

    128, a white community college student and former Best Buy salesman who likes sports, videogames and hanging out with his friends

    133, a former Marine of 18 years who served in various places, including Beirut, where he suffered an injury; he has had a hip replacement and was concerned about sitting for long periods of time

    135, a retired man in his mid-60s who said he was born in a Japanese internment camp in California; a former Marine, he has served on a jury

    137, a retired Navyman who works full-time

    The six who are thought to be alternates are:

    148, an African-American, church-going man who worked as a letter carrier for 30 years; has served on two juries in the past, one of which did not reach a verdict

    151, a mechanical engineer with a graduate degree who supervises a crew of 30 at a steel company

    153, a female secretary and paralegal in the real estate department of a law firm

    155, a secretary at Northwestern Memorial Hospital who volunteers at her church and used to be an event planner for a dating service; said it was hard to avoid the news, but believed she could be fair

    156, young women who works in direct mail marketing and likes spending time with her boyfriend and her dog

    166, a female, African-American social worker for a nursing home with a college degree

    No. 134, a young mother of two who works in outreach for the Department of Children and Family Services was announced as a juror but then removed for hardship and another reason that Zagel did not discuss. She was replaced with No. 166.



    Has someone studied the effect of (none / 0) (#17)
    by oculus on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:28 PM EST
    a female's hair color on their propensities as a juror in a criminal matter?  How about male hair color.

    Here's who I wouldn't want on the jury:  103, 123, 153, 166.

    Parent

    I can see (none / 0) (#18)
    by CST on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 03:51:41 PM EST
    123 and 153 having various conflicts of interest - 123 because of work in politics, 153 because they generally don't like people who work in legal professions on juries.

    What's the beef with 103 and 166?

    Parent

    I bet (none / 0) (#19)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 03:54:22 PM EST
    Don't want anyone with any kind of legal education / experience, as it's hard to turn off what you know when you walk in the jury room and instead focus only on the evidence in the particular case.

    Don't know about 166

    Parent

    right (none / 0) (#20)
    by CST on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 03:57:46 PM EST
    I missed that entirely about 103.

    166...?

    Parent

    Social worker? (none / 0) (#21)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 04:11:06 PM EST
    "Bleeding heart" who always would pull for the underdog (in this case, Blago)?

    Parent
    May have a propensity to. Not will. (none / 0) (#22)
    by oculus on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 04:26:39 PM EST
    Reminds me of (none / 0) (#15)
    by jbindc on Tue Jun 08, 2010 at 02:55:28 PM EST
    a conversation I had when I was a court clerk for a judge.  I was talking to a lawyer before a trial - a lawyer I really enjoyed talking to and liked - and I said, "Good luck.  Hope you win."  He corrected me and said, "It's not about 'winning' or 'losing'.  It's about getting justice., and if the jury believes the defendant is guilty, they'll convict, and they don't believe it, then they'll acquit.  And that's the way it's supposed to be."

    Oh yeah - this guy was a prosecutor.