home

How Many Lawyers Does Blagojevich Need?

Lawyers for former Ill. Governor Rod Blagojevich have been battling the Government over whether he can use his campaign fund, Friends of Blagojevich (“FOB”) to pay legal fees. The Government obtained a temporary restraining order against the funds, claiming they are forfeitable. Blagojevich says he needs the money in the fund to pay for lawyers.

It appears a solution has been agreed on. The funds will turned over to the Court and put into a special account, from which the Court will allow his lawyers to be paid at the Criminal Justice Act rate of $110.00 per hour.

The Government notes in a filing this week (Doc. 85, available on PACER)that no lawyer has yet entered an appearance yet for Blagojevich.

So, Blagojevich cannot afford to pay personally for his own defense. And the Government and Court are willing to allow his lawyers to be paid from his campaign fund so long as they work for the reduced rate of $110 per hour and the disbursments are administered by the Cout.

Still to be worked out: How many lawyers the court will authorize for Blagojevich: [More...]

In a joint pleading by Blagojevich and his brother Robert, who is not indigent, lawyers Sheldon Sorosky and Michael Ettinger write:

[The Government has] tendered 264 CDs and 21 audio cassette tapes wherein the document portion is about 1 million pages. The audio portion is approximately 400 hours of conversations.

That there are approximately 300,000 documents currently at the F.O.B. campaign office contained in paper form and on the computers located there.

....That pursuant to grand jury subpoenas, the Office of the Governor has provided approximately 2 million documents to the government.

The Blago lawyers then do the following math:

That assuming one attorney can work 8 hours a day, 364 days a year, 2912 hours could be expended.

In an 8 hour day, an attorney can only be expected to read, digest, make notes and understand 20 pages an hour or 160 pages a day.
Multiplying 160 pages times 364 days, an attorney would only be able to read and digest 58,240 pages a year.

That 3 million divided by 58,240 pages equals 51 years for one attorney to just read the documents.

With 10 attorneys just reading the materials, it would take 5.1 years. With 20 attorneys just reading the materials, it would take 2.6 years. With 400 hours of tapes, it would take an attorney who listens 8 hours a day, 50 days just to listen to the tapes.

And so on. The Government isn't taking a position on how many lawyers Blago needs, but writes that "the discovery in the instant case is manageable and not as complicated as the defendants suggest."

The Government says some documents have been counted twice; it's willing to provide "line sheets" as to the intercepted phone calls; and it provided the discovery in an electronic, searchable format.

Does Blagojevich even have a lawyer willing to work on the case? AUSA Patrick Fitzgerald writes,

First, despite an indictment being returned on April 2, 2009, not a single lawyer has filed an appearance for defendant Rod Blagojevich in the instant case. Second, despite suggestions in prior court filings that defendant Rod Blagojevich has at least four defense lawyers willing to work on his case, the government has only had discussions with a single lawyer working on behalf of defendant Rod Blagojevich.

Fitz is anxious to get Blago's team identified and for them to start working. He urges them to enter an appearance quickly, and should that not happen, he writes:

Otherwise, the Court should do what it would in any other CJA case, which is to refer the matter to the Federal Defender’s Office for the appointment of counsel.

He makes the point again a few paragraphs later:

...Of course, each of those lawyers would need to be committed to expeditiously reviewing the discovery materials and beginning to prepare the case for trial.

Again, if defendant Rod Blagojevich cannot find counsel willing to engage in the review of discovery, prepare appropriate pretrial motions, and be ready for trial in a reasonable period of time, then the Court should refer the matter to the Federal Defender’s Office for the appointment of counsel.

So, Blago's too broke to pay for his own defense and the Government is willing to let him proceed under the Criminal Justice Act with appointed counsel, whom he gets to choose -- so long as they are willing to work for $110. an hour. But if they don't get on board quickly, Fitz wants the Court to appoint a public defender for him.

I think it makes a big difference how many lawyers the court is willing to appoint. If it's just two or three, Blago's private lawyers may say they don't have time to do the case -- they have to consider their other clients. If it's five or six, they can probably divide the work among them and still have time for their other cases.

Now that Blago has now agreed his lawyers will work for $110 an hour, the Court gets to decide how many he can have. If it's too low a number, Blago may end up with the Federal Community Defenders as his lawyer. That's not a bad thing for Blago, it's one of the best public defenders' offices in the country.

< Friday Afternoon Open Thread | Friday Night Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    One lawyer's full time job: keep (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Fri May 08, 2009 at 08:14:13 PM EST
    client from talking to the media, and anyone else besides his wife and his counsel team.

    Lawyers aside (none / 0) (#2)
    by rdandrea on Fri May 08, 2009 at 08:41:49 PM EST
    I wonder how his contributors feel about that particular use of their money?

    how many lawyers (none / 0) (#3)
    by cpinva on Sat May 09, 2009 at 02:22:58 AM EST
    does it take to change a light bulb?

    12. one to actually change it, and 11 others to bill out for watching.

    Now that Mr. Green* has shown up (none / 0) (#4)
    by scribe on Sat May 09, 2009 at 07:13:23 AM EST
    in the form of allowing the putative attorney(s) to be paid, I suspect someone will enter their appearance.  In my experience, no attorney will enter an appearance unless and until their fee is "protected", i.e., there is more than a mere promise to pay.  Once you enter the appearance, you are the attorney of record and are stuck with the case.  If you enter one without a firm fee agreement and payment in place and then you try to back out later when the fee agreement and payment fall through, you are just as likely to hear "Counsel, you got into it knowing you didn't have a finalized agreement and payment in hand.  Denied." as you are to have it granted.  
    -
    *  In some of the courts where I practice, it was common for judges to ask attorneys at arraignment and/or bail hearings whether they were entering an appearance for a particular defendant, when the attorney had been sought out by that defendant or his/her family.  When the money had not yet come in and the attorney did not want to be stuck entering and appearance (and the judge did not want to stick him), the attorney would answer some variation of "Not yet, your Honor, we're investigating and want to get Mr. Green's story, he looks to be an essential witness" or "once Mr. Green shows up - the family's looking for him and think they'll find him by tomorrow - we'll know whether we can take the case".  

    The arraignment or bail hearing might get continued a day or so with an instruction from the judge to "let me know how you make out, counsel".

    To many that is a lot of money (none / 0) (#5)
    by Saul on Sat May 09, 2009 at 09:27:01 AM EST
    I wonder how many people would have loved to get paid $110.00 per hour.  

    Thats $4400 per week (40 hrs per week)

    Thats $228,800 per year

    I am aware the defense must invest money in the defense but they could say I will work for $110.00 per hour plus expenses to cover their over head in preparing the case. Let the expense be additional to the 110.00 dollars in defending Blagojevich.  Let it come out of those funds.

    Maybe lawyers have become spoiled as the years have gone by and look at $110.00 per hours chump change these days.

    How much money did the taxpayers dish out to Fitz and his crew to do the investigation? Probably in the millions. Fitz gets a blank check.  Then why can't that same amount of money be dedicated to the public defender for someone who can't afford a lawyer.  I mean dollar for dollar.

    I remember the Special prosecutor that was investigating  Henry Cisneros here in San Antonio.  He spent millions yet after it was all done Cisneros ended up with a minor crime and all he had to pay was a $10,000 fine.

    I do not agree with Blagoveich but this is just an example of how money controls whether you are found guilty or not guilty.  I do not say having money is a guarantee of acquittal  but it sure helps. IMO money does help a defendant to get off or with a very light sentence.  

    If you gave me a blank check as a defense lawyer here in San Antonio, I would probably empty the jails for all those that could not get the best defense from their public defender.  

    It should not be this way but as long a lawyers rely upon the almighty dollar as the main factor in their decision of taking a case or not then this system will continue.

    Money talks and Bull Sh===t walks.

    That's a lot of money (none / 0) (#6)
    by Steve M on Sat May 09, 2009 at 11:08:48 AM EST
    if you're a lawyer with no office, no staff, no expenses...

    Parent
    Maybe (none / 0) (#7)
    by Saul on Sat May 09, 2009 at 11:20:30 AM EST
    So if after expenses,  office, and  one staff you net $90,000 that's still good money IMO.   It just depends how greedy one wants to be.  In this case I say let the defense expenses in this case come from the money that the judge set aside for Blagoveich defense in addition to the hourly rate.

    Parent
    Depends on where you live, (none / 0) (#8)
    by andgarden on Sat May 09, 2009 at 11:33:35 AM EST
    what kind of family you have, and what living circumstances you're willing to put up with.

    Parent
    Of course (none / 0) (#9)
    by Saul on Sat May 09, 2009 at 12:03:33 PM EST
    Yet many lawyers, not many, are doing it, because some lawyers are more concerned in their beliefs of defending someone rather than on how much they you receive monetarily.

    But that is not the only point of my blog, the most important point I am making is that  the quality of the defendants defense in today's world is directly proportional to the money his or her lawyers receives from the defendant.  With very few exceptions.  

    If the the prosecutions can get a blank check then why can't the public defender.  Both are from our taxes.

    Parent