home

DC Sniper Seeks to Halt Execution

DC sniper John Allen Muhammad is scheduled to be executed Nov. 10. His lawyers are asking the Supreme Court to halt the execution, because he is delusional.

In May, 2008, Muhammad wrote a rambling letter to his lawyers in which he proclaimed his innocence.

No one should be executed, but if Muhammed is mentally ill, clearly he should not be put to death. Will the Supreme Court agree?

< Wednesday Afternoon Open Thread | 27 >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Agreed (none / 0) (#1)
    by Inspector Gadget on Wed Nov 04, 2009 at 09:29:55 PM EST
    No one should be executed,

    period.

    He's in a place where he can't hurt anyone. His partner in this killing spree pulled the trigger on several of the murders and was sentenced to life without parole.

    Letter on November 5? (none / 0) (#2)
    by diogenes on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 03:31:47 AM EST
    If he were delusional in May 2008, surely his lawyers would have requested that he receive appropriate mental health treatment then.  The timing of this one is a bit suspect.  


    Delusional? (none / 0) (#3)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 08:29:22 AM EST

    He was not delusional to the point that he thought they were shooting bowling pins or Martian invaders.  He knew perfectly well what he was doing.  

    Lifers in prison commit murder.  Once executed, we can be certain this dirt bag will commit no more murders.  

    Parent

    So "not very often" is ok then. (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 11:40:33 AM EST
    the murder rate in prisons is very low: (none / 0) (#7)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 01:37:17 PM EST

    How many additional murders would you willing to accept to end the death penalty?

    Parent

    hardly (none / 0) (#11)
    by diogenes on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 07:04:56 PM EST
    Perhaps the murder rate if average people were disarmed and guarded in society would be much less than the murder rate for average people who have guns and freedom.

    Parent
    " but if Muhammed is mentally ill" (none / 0) (#6)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 11:51:27 AM EST
    but if Muhammed is mentally ill, clearly he should not be put to death.
    If he was not mentally ill when he committed the murders I'm not sure his becoming mentally ill (or physically ill, or born-again, or a parent, or whatever) afterwards should be much of an impediment to carrying out his sentence.

    Well actually (none / 0) (#9)
    by Steve M on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 02:32:58 PM EST
    the traditional (common law) rule is that you can't execute someone who's insane.  It was upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of Ford v. Wainwright, which I believe is still good law.

    Parent
    Thanks, good to know. (none / 0) (#10)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 02:45:56 PM EST
    Are mentally ill and insane equivalent terms?

    Regardless, if my opinion is not shared by the Supremes it won't be the first time...

    Parent

    fitness to execute (none / 0) (#12)
    by diogenes on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 07:10:53 PM EST
    The justice of not executing an insane person is that the person being executed should be aware of the crime and penalty and be able to make peace with his or her God or higher power.  Writing a rambling letter in 2008 does not prove that he is unfit to be executed in November 2009, and accepting this delayed appeal one week before execution would reward brinksmanship and manipulative lawyering.  

    Parent