home

Karl Rove, Big Tobacco, and the Prosecution of Paul Minor

Four years ago, the question was:

Why Is Paul Minor Being Prosecuted?

The latest installment of Raw Story's "ongoing probe of political prosecutions by Bush appointed US Attorneys" focuses on Minor's role as a large contributor to the Democratic Party, made possible by the fees he earned in the settlement of states' litigation against the tobacco industry to recover smoking-related health care costs.

Republicans, meanwhile, who had previously enjoyed generous donations from the tobacco industry, were left with little for their campaign coffers.

[more ...]

Attorneys interviewed for this series of articles have depicted the “gloves off” stance taken by the Republicans against the Democrats in the South as a domestic war between corporations on one side and lawyers representing plaintiffs on the other. During the early years of the Bush administration, some inside the Republican National Committee allegedly saw Minor as an obstacle to the Southern strategy that was then being planned.

Have you been waiting patiently for the Karl Rove connection? As early as 1988, Rove was demonizing lawyers who represent injury victims in claims against corporations and their insurers, portraying them as "greedy corruptors of the judicial process."

Rove also served a consultant for tobacco giant Philip Morris, which invested heavily in Texas judicial races, helping to secure Republican dominance in that state’s courts by the end of the decade. An internal Philip Morris document from 1995 indicates just how involved big tobacco was in creating the “Tort Reform Project” — although there is no evidence tying Rove directly to that strategy.

Rove even did his best to head off Texas’s participation in the state lawsuits against the tobacco industry. “From 1991 through 1996, while guiding the ascent of Bush to the Texas governorship and during his early years in that office, Rove worked as a $3,000-a-month consultant to Philip Morris,” Salon’s Sidney Blumenthal wrote last year. “In 1996, when Texas Attorney General Dan Morales filed a suit against tobacco companies seeking compensation for state Medicaid funds spent on workers who fell ill because of smoking, Rove conducted a dirty trick against him — a push poll spreading smears about him.”

Rove wasn't the only Republican to resent the lawyers who went after Big Tobacco.

As a result of the tobacco lawsuits, some Republican politicians and tobacco industry lobbyists — such as now-Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour — appear to have become implacable foes of the trial lawyers who had frustrated them and their clients. Barbour returned to lobbying in 1997, after a four-year stint heading the Republican National Committee, and became one of the main lobbyists for Phillip Morris, which spent nearly $16 million that year in lobbying fees.

In the summer of 2002, as Barbour was gearing up to announce his candidacy in the governor's race, the Mississippi legislature held hearings on tort reform.

A few months later, Mississippi newspapers began to print leaked allegations that the FBI had launched an investigation of Paul Minor — a leading opponent of tort reform — on suspicion of having bribed several judges. David Baria, president of the Mississippi Trial Lawyers Association, described the timing as “very interesting,” according to an article by the Associated Press in October 2002.

According to the same article, Bush-appointed Mississippi US Attorney Dunnica Lampton, who was leading the investigation, himself had deep ties to Republican politicians who were in favor of the tort reform plan supported by the tobacco industry.

Here's the bottom line:

The US Attorney scandal as it unfolded in the South might best be understood as a two-part strategy that simultaneously served both the corporate sponsors of Southern Republicans and the politicians to whom they contributed. One aspect of this two-pronged strategy can be seen as a bribery scandal, in which corporate interests received government favors as a corollary to campaign donations. ... In Mississippi, the corporate client was big tobacco — and their chief lobbyist now sits in the Mississippi governor’s chair.

The second aspect of the strategy is the politicization of US law enforcement by the Bush administration, specifically the Department of Justice. The US Attorney scandal is less about the US Attorneys who were fired than about those who remained and are alleged to have used federal law enforcement resources to intimidate Democratic campaign donors.

The demonizing of Democratic candidates instigated by the federal government helped both the Riley campaign in Alabama and the Barbour campaign in Mississippi. Until these prosecutions, both states were led by Democratic governors.

In addition, by targeting Paul Minor, Barbour and his backers ensured a glacial freeze in contributions to Democratic candidates, since other Democratic trial lawyers were afraid of being targeted by the US Attorney’s office as well.

No matter how long Karl Rove continues to duck his subpoena (he too would be a good candidate for arrest), this scandal is too important to be forgotten or ignored after the November election. Raw Story is doing great reporting on this story.

< Hillary Clinton Returns to Senate Amidst Cheers | Soldiers Facing Death Need Experienced Lawyers >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    What happened to Paul Minor? (none / 0) (#1)
    by jtaylorr on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 10:02:18 PM EST
    This DOJ press release says he was found guilty, but did Minor appeal? Do you know what his sentence was?

    The Raw Story (none / 0) (#2)
    by TChris on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 10:19:54 PM EST
    linked story reports an 11 year sentence, appeal pending but no appeal bond granted.

    Parent
    I want to hear McCain (none / 0) (#3)
    by BernieO on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 06:47:45 AM EST
    say he will stop the politicization of the Justice Department. That would go a long way to establishing him as truly independent from Bush.
    I think he should be able to do this without alienating his base since right wingers generally hate the idea of government going after citizens for their beliefs. Just look at the stink they raised about Ruby Ridge and Waco. If he framed it in these terms he would present himself as a champion for our constitutional rights, something that is hard to argue against. If he can stand up on global warming he should be able to stand up for this.