home

Hillary, Obama and the Campaign Debt Factor

Thomas Edsall at Huffpo writes that the Obama campaign may agree to pay off Hillary Clinton's campaign debt of $10 plus million, plus her campaign expenses of $10 plus million, if she bows out gracefully now.

George Stephanapoulous says:

We know that Senator Clinton loaned herself a little more than $11 million. Going into April, the campaign finance reports show the campaign was carrying a debt of $10 million to $15 million. My sources are now telling that that number is far higher. The campaign debt is far higher than ten million dollars. It could be double that, maybe even more. And the lack of money and load of that debt could be driving the decisions inside the Clinton camp in coming days.

What do you think? Will there be an offer of debt repayment and if so, is Hillary likely to take it?

< Coca is Not Cocaine; Let the Farmers Be | The Delegate Math; Clinton Nixing MI Proposal? >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Well, it would clear the way for (5.00 / 4) (#2)
    by oculus on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:19:58 PM EST
    for Obama to proclaim himself the winner, since the press and his campaign are trumpeting May 20 as The Date.  Smells bad, though.  I would prefer Clinton not do this, but, then again, it isn't my money.

    I Suspect That's Why Obama Is Pushing This (none / 0) (#168)
    by BDB on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:25:33 PM EST
    I'll bet you anything this comes from his campaign.

    For a guy who has this sown up, he sure is doing an awful lot to drive her from the race.

    [ Parent ]

    He's trying to pay her off (5.00 / 10) (#3)
    by LibOne on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:20:00 PM EST
    just like the SuperDelegates.

    darn, you beat me too it (4.33 / 6) (#37)
    by DandyTIger on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:31:59 PM EST
    I was going to say the same. This is exactly right, he bought most of his SD's (part of his hacking the system to win), and now is offering to buy Clinton off.

    In my opinion, this would be political suicide for Clinton. From that point on, anytime she would make the case for something, or try to run again (for senate or for pres.), the issue of being bought off to stop running and thus stop trying to help americans would come up.

    She definitely should not accept the bribe. In fact, I'd make this a campaign issue if it could be verified. Just think of the stump speeches: Well, he bought off a number of SD's, seems to have bought off members of the DNC, now he's trying to buy me out of this race. Well, I'm not for sale.

    [ Parent ]

    Excellent retort (5.00 / 2) (#91)
    by BarnBabe on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:50:51 PM EST
    N/T

    [ Parent ]
    and you bought it .. (5.00 / 1) (#122)
    by v2r1 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:22:21 PM EST
    It's not a bribe but an attempt to end the race if thats all she is in it for. If she still believes that she can win the race she has every right to stay and owes it to her supporters to continue.

    What's interesting with this is .. inspite of righteous indignation I see in here/kos/mydd about the Media it takes just a silly story by one reporter suggesting what is just one possibility for folks to be up in arms. It still shows how little the media the needs to do to manufacture consent... Pavlovian conditioning  

    [ Parent ]

    Most Excellent !!!! (none / 0) (#126)
    by Cate on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:23:31 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    As was said earlier... (none / 0) (#153)
    by Thanin on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:42:53 PM EST
    its not your money, so its very easy to be this critical.  

    [ Parent ]
    I agree 100% (none / 0) (#179)
    by angie on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:48:38 PM EST
    not only should she not accept it, she will not accept it.  The msm is rewriting the entire scenario that Obama "closed the gap" in IN (when it was the other way around) and Hillary "had to win NC" (when she was never expected to) in order to start their "Hillary should drop out" shrieking again. Yet, FL & MI remains unresolved and Obama still doesn't have the 2209 delegates needed to be the nominee.  The fact is, after she turned IN around, they are scared to death she might win OR -- I for one, am going to try to help her do that.  Furthermore, I'm not watching the news at all. I'll rely on the good people here to keep me updated.


    [ Parent ]
    Hmmm... (none / 0) (#90)
    by flashman on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:50:43 PM EST
    They used to tell me, "Money talkes and bu!!$hit walks."

    [ Parent ]
    i don't like it (5.00 / 8) (#5)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:21:07 PM EST
    if he was or is willing to do that, he should keep that very private and only discuss it in passing when questioned "post good deed".  

    It is rather ugly to let that slip out in the press as it sounds like he is using this to twist her arm a bit into making a statement.

    And that he is... (none / 0) (#183)
    by NO2WONDERBOY on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:11:30 PM EST
    trying to "buy" her TO SHUT HER UP once and for all, but most important to him is that by "offering" to pay her debt, HE IS HUMILIATING HER IN PUBLIC....ONCE AGAIN. THIS WOULD BE THE LAST BLOW TO (in his own words) "KNOCK HER OUT".

    [ Parent ]
    jeez... (5.00 / 7) (#6)
    by kempis on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:22:04 PM EST
    I can't blame her for trying to retire that debt. However, if such a deal is in the works, it should have been done discreetly. If the Obama campaign or the DNC has leaked this then it's just one more effort to rub salt in her wounds.

    I'm hating the Obama campaign and the DNC more by the minute.

    How do we know who leaked? (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by zzyzx on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:25:17 PM EST
    It could be speculation; that's how that article read.  For that matter, someone in the Clinton camp could be floating a trial balloon to the Obama group.

    [ Parent ]
    To determine (5.00 / 2) (#26)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:29:17 PM EST
    who leaked information, you have to ask yourself, who does it help?

    Does it help Hillary for people to think she can't fundraise?

    No, it helps Obama.

    And BTW, I may need to remind folks that McCain had a horrible time in fundraising....

    [ Parent ]

    who says it leaked? (none / 0) (#31)
    by TruthMatters on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:31:06 PM EST
    this happens all the time, Hillary's debt is known by all.

    eventually a reporter would ask if they were willing to pay, and a staffer somewhere said yes they would probably do it if he ended the primaries faster.

    you can't really keep it secret the public finds out eventually so why would the Obama campaign lie if they really are willing to do it?

    [ Parent ]

    umm... (none / 0) (#44)
    by mindfulmission on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:34:08 PM EST
    Does it help Hillary for people to think she can't fundraise?
    Umm... pretty sure that we already know that she is struggling with money.

    Do you really think that we only know about this because the Obama campaign may pay off her debts?

    [ Parent ]

    Wolffson for one. (none / 0) (#72)
    by jimotto on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:43:58 PM EST
    He's the one who talked about the 6.5 million dollar personal loan.  If she's 25 million in the hole, including 11 million out of her pocket, seems like paying off her debt is helping her quite a bit.

    [ Parent ]
    Wolfson was asked ... (none / 0) (#188)
    by NO2WONDERBOY on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:36:56 PM EST
    on MSNBC earlier about the state of her campaign finances after alluding it (the campaign) was in trouble. He dismissed the "rumor" saying that although the campaign had not raised as much as BO, it had raised more than enough to fund the rest of the campaign's events leading to the nomination. In the meantime, there is quite a dynamic contribution process at hillaryclinton.com , we the Hillary stalwarts will not let her down, it's been done before, it will continue to be done, until she says so.

    [ Parent ]
    Wolfson was asked ... (none / 0) (#189)
    by NO2WONDERBOY on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:38:22 PM EST
    on MSNBC earlier about the state of her campaign finances after alluding it (the campaign) was in trouble. He dismissed the "rumor" saying that although the campaign had not raised as much as BO, it had raised more than enough to fund the rest of the campaign's events leading to the nomination. In the meantime, there is quite a dynamic contribution process at hillaryclinton.com , we the Hillary stalwarts will not let her down, it's been done before, it will continue to be done, until she says so.

    [ Parent ]
    I Think It Would Put obama's Camp In A Bad (none / 0) (#175)
    by PssttCmere08 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:36:54 PM EST
    light...or at least it should, but who knows with the way they spin everything to death.  It makes him look weak and trying to buy his way into one more office.

    [ Parent ]
    really? (none / 0) (#18)
    by kempis on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:27:07 PM EST
    To humiliate herself?

    [ Parent ]
    Yesterday, the media was suggesting (5.00 / 1) (#156)
    by JavaCityPal on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:48:48 PM EST
    that Clinton would go to Obama and negotiate a place on the ticket with the pay-off of her debt as the bait to get her to drop the race.

    This is all just media creating a web of speculation scenarios to fill in all those many hours they need to talk.


    [ Parent ]

    Combo of A Slow News Day & obama Still (none / 0) (#176)
    by PssttCmere08 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:37:52 PM EST
    getting free passes and being the darling of the media.

    [ Parent ]
    No Veep For You... (none / 0) (#181)
    by AlladinsLamp on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:56:49 PM EST
    After paying off her debts to drive her from the campaign, Hillary could have no complaint about not being offered the VP slot.

    [ Parent ]
    Perhaps the leak is like a wolf in sheep's clothin (none / 0) (#207)
    by BackFromOhio on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:47:52 PM EST
    I.e., a so-called leak of a fable, just like the leak on the even of the PA primary to the effect that there were 50 SDs waiting in the wings to endorse Obama.

    [ Parent ]
    This is done to humiliate her (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by Stellaaa on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:22:18 PM EST
    do you not get it?  

    Absolutely (5.00 / 3) (#11)
    by cmugirl on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:24:34 PM EST
    And voters will hear that and think "I don't want to back a loser", so they won't vote for her.

    [ Parent ]
    Bernstein the other pig... (5.00 / 4) (#17)
    by Stellaaa on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:26:35 PM EST
    (not sexist just pig in general, TM warning) kept talking about her how it's all about the Hillary psychology now.  His bit theory of how she loses it when she fails.  C'mon, this is what this is, they are trying to humiliate her so that she loses her cool and momentum.  

    [ Parent ]
    And don't forget bully (5.00 / 2) (#29)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:30:22 PM EST
    they're also trying to bully her.  After all, media isn't about reporting facts, it's about helping Obama...until he wins the nom, then it's about helping McCain.

    [ Parent ]
    Would you want to (none / 0) (#89)
    by Helen8 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:50:18 PM EST
    give money to a candidate who sure doesn't look like there is a chance at all to win?

    Money = votes and support.

    [ Parent ]

    I just did. (none / 0) (#187)
    by wasabi on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:33:45 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    It's (5.00 / 5) (#19)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:27:13 PM EST
    on par with the Lake County BS.

    Yeah, they want our vote.  Scumbags.

    [ Parent ]

    So right (5.00 / 1) (#132)
    by stefystef on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:26:31 PM EST
    using money to insult her and buy the White House.

    Obama is no good.

    [ Parent ]

    And To Dry Up Her Donations (5.00 / 1) (#170)
    by BDB on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:26:55 PM EST
    In fact, I suspect that's what all of this is about - first the Gary mayor holds the vote, then the declaration of Mission Accomplished, and now the money.

    [ Parent ]
    Yes, and it's only part of what the media (none / 0) (#155)
    by JavaCityPal on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:43:55 PM EST
    is trying to get started. Yesterday, TWICE I saw Andrea Mitchell trying to get the subject of Bill Clinton's financial exposures (including the Foundation and the Library) going again since her loans to the campaign have now dipped into their "joint" funds. I was surprised the people around her didn't bite, except that it's outside the arena of telling her to quit for the sake of the party.

    [ Parent ]
    Her hubby needs to explain to her how (none / 0) (#163)
    by Joan in VA on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:15:30 PM EST
    you can take your millions and make more millions. She seems to have no idea about investments. She is stuck on the library stuff and his speaking fees. I have heard her talk about it several times, too. Guess she has missed how all former presidents make a bundle in speaking fees.

    [ Parent ]
    More Like Andrea Needs To Retire And After (5.00 / 1) (#177)
    by PssttCmere08 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:39:54 PM EST
    all of Greenspan's bad advice on America, he would not be my go-to guy for investment advice.

    [ Parent ]
    I don't like it. (5.00 / 4) (#10)
    by bslev22 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:24:06 PM EST
    I'm not a politician or a strategist, but something tells me that Hillary can pay off her debts through fundraising without going to Senator Obama.  I also see Obama folks complaining about their money going to Hillary, etc.  And selfishly, I want no favors from Senator Obama's campaign.

    interesting (5.00 / 5) (#15)
    by kempis on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:26:07 PM EST
    (Almost) all of us who posted initially had the same thought: this is a crappy thing to leak. Obviously the aim is to humiliate her.

    This is just getting uglier and uglier. Someone needs to explain to Obama the concept of graceful winning. I'm sure there's room for it in the "new politics." All I've seen for the past two days are knives sticking out of Hillary's back.

    Obama is just tired of campaining (5.00 / 1) (#39)
    by thereyougo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:32:38 PM EST
    He's never had to work this hard on getting elected.

    He wants what he wants?

    Please get over yourself already. You're not the prez and you haven't been nominated.

    [ Parent ]

    neither has obama! (1.00 / 1) (#129)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:25:55 PM EST
    was your post snark? i hope so! if not then then, get over yourself. thanks so much!

    [ Parent ]
    Obama graceful? (5.00 / 1) (#50)
    by alforhil on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:35:25 PM EST
    Obama have not been gracefull about anything. he was sulking and whining when he lost and arrogant when he won. Hope Hillary does not take any charity from him..


    [ Parent ]
    Aw, the real Obama is coming out (5.00 / 2) (#98)
    by BarnBabe on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:55:35 PM EST
    And he is tired and bored of campaigning. It is hard work. Remember who said that first.

    [ Parent ]
    That is very insulting (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by BigB on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:26:17 PM EST
    If the Obama campaign thinks this way. They think Hillary is staying in this race because of that?

    Mmm looking at the full quote (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by Faust on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:28:15 PM EST
    Everything we're hearing is that a deal over Florida and Michigan could be cut in the next few days. The Obama campaign apparently realizes they have plenty of room to give. The hurdle isn't Clinton and Obama anymore, though; it is folks in the DNC who believe those two recalcitrant states still need to be punished in some form, so states realize there are consequences to doing this in 2012. The latest offer from Michigan is a 69-59 split, with supers going however they want. The two state parties don't want to be halved, meaning their delegate votes become .5, a la Democrats Abroad. But it's clear to us that DNC types want some flesh on this issue. Many hate the idea of Florida and Michigan getting full delegations simply because now it appears their delegations won't make a difference in the process.

    If the DNC needs their pound of flesh then strip the supers. It's been suggested before and it seems like this way everyone gets a little of what they want. There is a punishment, but it doesn't affect the voters.

    Time already served (5.00 / 1) (#42)
    by Manuel on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:33:46 PM EST
    is punishment enough.  I don't see many states signing up for the treatment FL and MI got this year.

    Of course the right solution is regional primaries with rotated or randomly determined schedules.

    [ Parent ]

    And do the same with FL (none / 0) (#24)
    by Faust on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:29:04 PM EST
    Strip supers, seat pledged.

    [ Parent ]
    Either punish all 5 rule violaters (none / 0) (#206)
    by BackFromOhio on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:42:59 PM EST
    or none.  Not fair to single out FL & Mich -- what about South Carolina & others who moved up the dates of their primaries in violation of the precious rules?  

    I'm so tired of half-truths from the media -- I'm not sure at this point if the media is shilling for Obama or just plain ignorant.

    A relative of mine has a pithy statement to describe another relative who was fond of leaving out inconvenient truths in an attempt to gain the psychological upper hand:  "__ has no respect for the truth."  I believe this is where we are today with the so-called 4th estate.  

    [ Parent ]

    Steph makes me ill. I never watch him. (5.00 / 2) (#22)
    by thereyougo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:28:37 PM EST
    Other than that, until I hear it from Hillary, I'm telling her to keep on keeping on.

    If they meet and solve the problem with MI, FL to the  satisfaction of and fairness of her supporters, we can get beyond the math.

    Untill then she has nothing to lose except votes if she drops out. And she needs to rack up popular votes. She shouldn't pull and Obama like in the 2 states everyone is fighting over.

    People expect to vote for her. let them.

    I fear that Obama (5.00 / 2) (#23)
    by DCDemocrat on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:28:39 PM EST
    is going to be the nominee, and I fear his nomination will result in yet another defeat for the Democratic Party in 2008.  Both of those opinions are my honest assessment today.  Perhaps we have a political year where we could elect McGovern,  Mondale, Dukakis, or Kerry.  Maybe the forces of disgust are adequate to lift any boat, but all things being equal to other years, I think McCain will be president.

    Grant those presumptions, I think Hillary should start to prepare for 2012, take Obama's money, and get out of Dodge.  I say that as a person who believes Hillary's defeat is a national tragedy.

    For Sale? (5.00 / 2) (#25)
    by Prabhata on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:29:08 PM EST
    BO is out to stop Hillary from showing that his support from Whites has dropped significantly.  It's another pr from BO.  HRC can get 30 million from donations.  I think that if people see her as losing the nomination, some donors will back away, but small donations pile up fast.  It's keeping the campaign flush with money that's a bit of a problem.

    I don't believe in his small donors claim. (none / 0) (#75)
    by thereyougo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:45:31 PM EST
    Not at his burn rate. He's got some bundling thing going on with Oprah money IMO.

    He has to have a huge trough somewhere. Ask yourself, how can a virtual unknown, sell enough of himself as a unity/hope butterfly in the sky to hardcore donors? Doesn't pass the smell test.

    [ Parent ]

    Read this (5.00 / 1) (#141)
    by Leisa on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:30:21 PM EST
      this and decide where the $$ comes from for yourself...

    [ Parent ]
    Not Surprised...Read About obama's Money (5.00 / 1) (#180)
    by PssttCmere08 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:50:05 PM EST
    bundlers before when he purged the rolls of wanna delegates and only left them on, along with their spouses/girlfriends.  He got called on it and all of a sudden the wannabe delegates were reinstated

    [ Parent ]
    I have no facts to refute your (none / 0) (#86)
    by bjorn on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:49:22 PM EST
    speculation but I would not be surprised if he did not get a donation from almost every AA in the country.  They have to be excited about this candidacy.  College students may be donating small amounts as well.

    [ Parent ]
    think about this. his big donors may have (none / 0) (#135)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:28:54 PM EST
    told(i repeat told/ordered so to speak) obama to shut it down NOW if he wanted more money. they would give extra to get hillary out of the way. that is the source of the money and just general meaness(is there anything else with these folks) that led to this "i've got a secret" announcement.

    [ Parent ]
    Democratic Campaign Finance Reform (5.00 / 1) (#28)
    by Manuel on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:29:37 PM EST
    The amounts of money raised and spent by both campaigns in this primary are obscene.  Even if we can't get meaningful campaign finance reform at the national level, could they at least get it incorporated into the DNC rules?

    A-greed!! (none / 0) (#143)
    by Leisa on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:31:43 PM EST
    I can think of better ways to spend $$.

    [ Parent ]
    Did the (5.00 / 2) (#30)
    by Ga6thDem on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:30:51 PM EST
    Obama campaign overdose on stupid pills today? First, the MI and FL issue and now this? They are doing everything they can to make sure that Hillary supporters don't vote for Obama.

    If they do this (5.00 / 1) (#35)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:31:33 PM EST
    then the purge will be complete.  After all, they don't need the "old" Democrats.

    [ Parent ]
    i say let them do stupid! (none / 0) (#138)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:29:42 PM EST
    the faster the world sees just what type of president he would make, the better.

    [ Parent ]
    I highly doubt she will ask (5.00 / 2) (#32)
    by ajain on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:31:08 PM EST
    These are simply speculations and frankly insulting ones.

    I dont think she will ask for help with the money, or ask for the VP slot. I find either scenarios hard to believe.

    the news this morning (5.00 / 2) (#48)
    by bjorn on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:34:52 PM EST
    is saying exactly this, Clinton could retire her own debt if she needs to ... so far there is nothing coming from the CLinton camp to suggest she is stopping or worried, one report said she might loan her campaign money again if she needed to...I don't know if it is bravada but Wolfson just told Andrea Mitchell they still see a way to the nomination.  Bill Clinton is telling peopin WV not to listen to the media and to come out and vote for Hillary.  He says she will win popular vote when the seat MI and FL.

    [ Parent ]
    Undermining Axelrod trick (5.00 / 2) (#51)
    by karen for Clinton on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:36:18 PM EST
    It is strictly to dry up her donors and make them worried when they know they are heading into Clinton Country voter bases in WV and KY.

    10 million even 30 million is just a book away from either Clinton.  They could likely sign book deals right now and get enough to finance the whole campaign for the mere 28 days left.

    They wouldn't even have to have donor support.

    She won't take a dime from Obama, and that I would bet on big time.

    He is increasingly annoying every single damn day.

    Does anyone seriously think Hillary Clinton (5.00 / 2) (#59)
    by Anne on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:38:37 PM EST
    will have a problem paying off her own debt?  A book deal and a speaking schedule will knock it out in pretty short order, so if I were her, I would just ignore Obama and keep fighting the good fight.

    would you really (1.00 / 2) (#64)
    by TruthMatters on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:39:30 PM EST
    give up $20 million of your own money, when the common practice is for the winner to pay it?

    how dumb would that be

    [ Parent ]

    If it's so common, why haven't (5.00 / 1) (#99)
    by Anne on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:56:43 PM EST
    I heard the magnanimous and beneficent Senator Obama offering to pay off the debts of all of the "losing" Democratic candidates?  You'd think he would have helped out Dodd and Richardson, at least, who endorsed him for heaven's sake - they've been asking people to contribute to help them retire their campaign debt.

    [ Parent ]
    Dodd and Richardson (5.00 / 1) (#162)
    by JavaCityPal on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:08:22 PM EST
    have both endorsed him. Maybe that is what they were promised.

    [ Parent ]
    because they dropped out (2.00 / 1) (#105)
    by TruthMatters on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:00:49 PM EST
    before their bills got this high, they could still PAY their debts.

    can Hillary still pay hers? if so fine reject it and she and her supporters can pay off the $15 million in debts and the $11 million in loans.

    [ Parent ]

    maybe in a "typical primary" but as we (5.00 / 1) (#142)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:31:12 PM EST
    know this isn't typical. obama and his campaign have crossed the line time and again.

    [ Parent ]
    Interesting how everything is breaking in 24 hours (5.00 / 5) (#67)
    by elixir on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:42:11 PM EST
    First, BOs campaign announces "mission accomplished" date of 5/20, then MI/FL delegations will be seated within days and, finally, we'll pay your debts.  All of this smacks of desperation.  They want this really badly and I'm wondering why.  Is it just because she'll clean his clock in WV and KY and he'll look weak..or..do they know something more devastating to BO?  I certainly don't think it's for the benefit of the party.  That ship sailed a long time ago.

    Hmmm.  Where's my tinfoil hat...

    i speculated the big money donors told him (none / 0) (#144)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:32:09 PM EST
    to shut it down or no more money. follow the money always.

    [ Parent ]
    MIssion Accomplished (none / 0) (#205)
    by BackFromOhio on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:34:35 PM EST
    Brilliant! -- Let's transfer that mantra from Bush to Obama.

    [ Parent ]
    OMG. I just went (5.00 / 3) (#71)
    by pie on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:43:53 PM EST
    to a local garden spot and was talking to the owner about the election.  This is someone who's right in the midst of her busiest time of the year, who doesn't blog, and who barely has time to watch the news.  She said she really didn't want to vote for McCain, but she doesn't "like Obama all that much."  She preferred Hillary, but admits it doesn't look good.  

    She then asked, "Don't the democrats party know they're splitting the party right in half?!"

    Ya could have knocked me over with a feather.  People get it.  It's not just people on the blogs.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    She said she might write in Nader to send a message.  Oy.

    OMG OMG OMG... (1.00 / 2) (#94)
    by kcarab on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:52:37 PM EST
    And i've met many Obama supporters who say that Hillary is splitting the party by continuing? What's your point?

    Is the person you met qualified to represent the "people"?

    [ Parent ]

    Hillary is splitting the party (5.00 / 1) (#106)
    by pie on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:02:19 PM EST
    by continuing?  I'll bet the voters in the remaining states don't think that.  What's your hurry?  Afraid she might pull off a victory after all?

    My point, oh clueless one, is that people besides bloggers are paying attention, and you can't assume that everyone is going to flock to Obama in November.

    [ Parent ]

    i think that poster intended the message (none / 0) (#146)
    by hellothere on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:33:24 PM EST
    to be that the democrats are splitting the party. true that!

    [ Parent ]
    Kcarob (none / 0) (#197)
    by Jeralyn on Thu May 08, 2008 at 04:49:33 PM EST
    you have posted 28 comments here today -- your first day. Please come back another day and limit yourself to 10 comments in a 24 hour period. You are chattering.

    [ Parent ]
    More Obama BS (5.00 / 2) (#85)
    by Terry M on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:48:40 PM EST
    A lot of campaigns incur debt alomg the way - indeed, probably most do.  Not as big a deal as one might think.

    This "Hillary is in debt" narrative sounds a lot like the "50 supers are going to announce for Obama" after Ohio bit that circulated awhile ago, or the party elders are furiously working behind the scenes to secure Hillary the majority leader spot or Governor of NY  so she'll dropout story that circulated before Penn.

    The Obama people have been saying for months that the forces of destiny are lining up against Hillary. Nothing new. And Obama is wrong as usual about the power of the Hillary camp. He can't win outright so he has to come up with some story to deflate Hillary supporters.

    Hillary won Indiana.  That was the tie-breaker per Obama himself.  She is just as viable as ever.  

    I say on to the Convention! Stop the losing streak of the Democratic national party!

    What supers need to remember is the Ned Lamont campaign.  He won big over the national party's former VP!  Lamont was extremely popular with the left wing of the party and esp. with the netroots because of his opposition to the Iraqi war.  So, Lieberman went around him and won handily because he is a moderate.  Most of the electorate is in the middle, and Obama's essentially a single issue candidate - Iraq.  That is not the most important issue to most Americans. So long as Dems keep running candidates who most appeal to the far left of the party - such as McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry - the party will never get the White House back.  

    Hillary is the party's best hope in the fall - that is the metric which now should count given the virtual tie btwn Obama & Hillary in every other regard.

    Hillary's debt (5.00 / 2) (#92)
    by AnnL on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:51:21 PM EST
    According to the Josh Marshall (you know, he who must be obeyed) says Baracks small donors should not bear the burden of Hillarys bad campaign, that's not what they gave for.  Charming these Hellary haters.

    I almost agree (1.00 / 3) (#102)
    by TruthMatters on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:59:00 PM EST
    I didn't give so that Hillary's debt could be paid.

    she has supporters then can step up, she can forget the $11 million in loans, and her supporters can raise the another $15 million to foot the bill.

    but I know my hard earned and then donated dollars weren't given to pay her debts and then have her supporters attack him for it.

    forget it people say Hillary and her supporters can pay it, then let em pay it.

    [ Parent ]

    yes, well, people (5.00 / 2) (#109)
    by pie on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:04:01 PM EST
    didn't give to John Kerry to fight election irregularites to watch him break his promise to do so.

    Another bright one, he is.

    [ Parent ]

    Yes I agree. (1.00 / 1) (#134)
    by Helen8 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:28:38 PM EST
    I am one of the 1.5 million small donors and I don't want to pay her debts. NOt when she is a triple-digit millionaire and everyone here claims that she can raise more in a second, and if not, bill can sell his crap on ebay.

    [ Parent ]
    No One Asked Obama to Pay Anything for HRC (none / 0) (#203)
    by BackFromOhio on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:31:39 PM EST
    I believe the Obama campaign is floating the idea of paying Hillary's campaign debts to bolster the notion of Obama's being the successful one -- it is condescending and purposefully belittling. I'm sure Hillary won't be taken his or anyone else's handout.  The Obama campaign may have succeeded in buying out SDs with contributions to their re-election campaigns (so I hear), but I wager that it will not be able to buy Hillary -- nor any of her supporters.  So, don't worry, your donations are safe.

    [ Parent ]
    that would be the one bright side (none / 0) (#118)
    by fiver2 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:20:34 PM EST
    if Obama were to pay her debt.  I will mentally allocate Kos' Obama contributions and those of Josh Marshall and Keith Olbermann to payment of debts to the creators of the 3 am and gas tax ads.

    [ Parent ]
    If any of the OFB's put their money where (none / 0) (#171)
    by Joan in VA on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:27:13 PM EST
    their mouths are, I would be surprised.

    [ Parent ]
    really (none / 0) (#124)
    by sas on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:23:26 PM EST
    draws me to their side

    good Democrats that they are....snark

    [ Parent ]

    all this is just a distraction (5.00 / 2) (#93)
    by hummingbirdv on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:51:50 PM EST
    Folks I got to go to work but this is a waste of time!  SHE CAN HANDLE HER OWN DEBTS!  THE RACE ISN'T OVER YET.  SHE'S STILL IN IT.  This is just a smoke screen distraction to turn our attention away from the prize.  We need people working right now not gossiping about the finances.  If your REALLY concerned make another donation.  I just made my 4th in the last 36 hours.

    GO HILL GO!

    oh god, jeralyn, (5.00 / 5) (#101)
    by kangeroo on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:57:08 PM EST
    i really wish you weren't posting this kind of stuff.  it really demoralizes and kills the spirit.

    i don't know how the rest of you feel, but for me, as new facts have unfolded, this campaign is no longer simply about winning in november.  i agree with koshembos's comment to shystee's latest post at corrente:

    The issue is not of being pissed off. The issue is that we were rejected, our values disregarded, our past poopooed and our nemeses embraced. The Obamacans are history-less, they are not the continuation of Bill Clinton and even our "god" FDR, they are a new beginning. That, of course, is scary and reminisces of the worst regimes the world has seen. We have a history and tradition, we cannot turn the switch and fall in love with Obama. It's over.

    - "Not being jerks about it" solves exactly nothing. It's not hurt feelings; it's a hurt credo.

    Obama intentionally and explicitly discards the FDR coalition which is the foundation of the Democratic party. Namely, he is a 3rd party candidate that is in the midst of a hostile take over of the Democratic party.

    it's driving me nuts to see people talk about kissing and making up and finding a way to "unite the party."  i can't understand why people can't see that it's one thing to "triangulate" when you have a strong conservative movement working against you--and quite drastically another kind of thing to do so when you have a groundswell of popular support for a leftward shift.  there's something very, very wrong about this primary season and i'm NOT going to resign myself to this crap and be an ostrich about it.  GRRRRR.

    Thak you for writing this (none / 0) (#194)
    by MichaelGale on Thu May 08, 2008 at 04:10:43 PM EST
    Obama intentionally and explicitly discards the FDR coalition which is the foundation of the Democratic party. Namely, he is a 3rd party candidate that is in the midst of a hostile take over of the Democratic party.

    I guess the idea of a progressive movement was forming a new party.  Who knew until after they did it. And here we are.

    [ Parent ]

    Smells like desperation to me (5.00 / 2) (#110)
    by stillife on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:04:40 PM EST
    although I have not the faintest idea why the presumptive nominee would be in such a hurry for Hillary to drop out that his campaign is resorting to bribery.

    The story probably is just being circulated to promote the meme that Hillary is finished and Obama is all-powerful.

    Obama used the Clinton Money as a way to get more (5.00 / 2) (#112)
    by ajbb on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:07:35 PM EST
    from his supporters in an email saying they have to keep up with the Clintons since Obama personally doesn't have that kind of money. Obama's camp apparently isn't raising the amount of money they were previously or there would be these grand announcements. Also, he's had to spend millions on advertising to try to take her out in the last 4 states. In PA he spent something like $10mil. IMO this was a deliberate attack on Clinton to help dry up her funding. Obama used the Rush Limbaugh effect as a way of explaining her win in Indiana to make her win look like less than it was. Her win in Indiana was a remakable accomplishment. The media is so dumb anymore I can barely stand it. Even Pelosi is now saying this is not over! I think there is something else going on. Dick Morris tried to float that crap about debt being the reason she is staying in weeks ago, I'm not buying it.

    Did you know he was (5.00 / 1) (#116)
    by rooge04 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:17:53 PM EST
    raised by a single mother?

    /snark

    [ Parent ]

    Hillary has all that money for the general (5.00 / 3) (#117)
    by lorelynn on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:18:48 PM EST
    Can't she use that to pay off her campaign debts if she drops out?

    Essentially, he's trying to purchase his right to the nomination. He is so ugly that I just don't know what to think. I can't believe someone like this is a member of the Democratic party.

    I think I have a better question. (5.00 / 3) (#133)
    by Joelarama on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:27:12 PM EST
    Why leak it?

    It's an attempt to demoralize Clinton supporters and humiliate her.  Part-and-parcel with the Obama/Blogger Boys/MSM strategy for the past several months.

    Eearth to Obama campaign:  if you want the votes of Clinton supporters, cut the crap.  Stop leaking this stuff and deal with Hillary directly.

    At this rate, the only thing that will make any of this good again is a unity ticket.

    Where is Obama (5.00 / 1) (#159)
    by JavaCityPal on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:01:47 PM EST
    now? He had condescendingly said in the past, "she can stay in the race for as long as she wants". Sunday, on Meet the Press he said the race will continue "until Hillary drops out" or he gets to the magic number. Does that sound like someone who is going to give her millions of dollars, or someone who thinks she deserves to lose as much money as she decided to risk?

    If he wants to show some kind of compassion for Hillary supporters, he needs to give another famous speech that reminds the media how this process works, and that it is wrong, blatently wrong, for them to demand the process stop simply because they are still terrified she'll manage a win if she gets to convention. I can't respect him when he allows the media to bend the process into an unfair "take" (it's sure not a win) for him. "Stealing this nomination" is, in fact, underway. It's just not being done by Hillary. The party is divided. It's just not the fault of anything Hillary has done.

    [ Parent ]

    Joelarama, if he wants the votes (none / 0) (#198)
    by bodhcatha on Thu May 08, 2008 at 04:56:19 PM EST
    of Clinton supporters, you say??  After all the lowball tactics this slimy toad has pulled, he could walk on water, find a cure for all cancer that tastes like ice cream, end global warming and world hunger, AND get me back into my high school prom dress and I STILL wouldn't vote for the sanctimonious pr-k!

    [ Parent ]
    He's just trying to purchase (5.00 / 2) (#140)
    by Rhouse on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:30:04 PM EST
    the Clinton brand.  It's all part of his new politics.  Hillary Clinton Campaign (tm) a division of Democatic Party (tm) which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of ObamaCorp.(tm).


    Amen. Lambert had a blog post about (5.00 / 1) (#152)
    by tree on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:41:33 PM EST
    the Obama campaign as hostile takeover. It made a lot of sense, sad to say.

    Think of it all as a hostile takeover, not yet accomplished but well on the way. Steps as follows:

    1. OFB are noisy shareholders generating buzz

    2. Investment bankers (the funders) supply the capital (teebee!)

    3. Loss-making divisions -- working people, the poor, the old, anyone who needs government to work -- are downsized or cut loose; Donna Brazile was sending a message to the backers; it's just business.

    4. Assets -- remaining reputation of Dem Party -- are stripped to repay the investment bankers (coal, nuclear)

    5. The shell of the Party is sold to a bigger fool

    6. All the players get good jobs in the Village and sleep the sleep of the righteous!


    [ Parent ]
    The Question is: what will it take to convince her (5.00 / 2) (#157)
    by JavaCityPal on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:52:49 PM EST
    to drop out.

    This is just one of the several scenarios the media has come up with. The media is like a relay race. At the close of one program, the following moderator grabs the baton and keeps spinning the same story until someone along the way comes up with something even more insulting against the Clinton camp.

    Tomorrow they will have come up with yet a new idea. They are so desperate to be right, but the truth is they don't know anything that's coming, so they just keep brainstorming out loud and in public hoping they will hit on it.


    This is a BS story intended to undermine (5.00 / 4) (#161)
    by Exeter on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:06:42 PM EST
    Clinton. She can raise 10 million as the Senator from the second largest state in a month.

    If she ran her campaign into this much debt (5.00 / 1) (#172)
    by debrazza on Thu May 08, 2008 at 02:33:04 PM EST
    It was really irresponsible of her.  We all knew that the odds were long for the nomination since WI.  Even after wins in OH, TX and PA, he continued to increase his pledged delegate lead.  At some point you have to make a cost-benefit analysis and look at things with a cold look at the facts.  And while she knows she still has a lot of supporters, if you don't have the money it is irresponsible to continue.

    One major concern for me is that a huge bulk of that debt is to Mark Penn, who is owed at least $5m, if not more by now.  There is no reason why she should have continued to pay that wanker millions for the horrible way he has run this campaign.  I have also heard that Wolfson gets paid hundreds of thousands a month.  I know he does a great service, but this is not a campaign that even considered from the beginning that it should be run within any rational budgetary demands.  Why stay at the Bellagio in Vegas?  Why fly ordinary staffers around the country first class?  The catering bills in Iowa were atrocious.

    The way that this campaign has been run both financially and strategically has been a disaster.  And since the end of Febuary, the strategy finally was found, but all of the money was already wasted.  It's a disgrace and while I think she would be a better GE candidate, I think it is wrong of her to continue to ask moderate income people to continue to donate to her campaign, when it seems clear that money is not to continue to run a campaign, but to pay off Penn, who is a multi-millionaire.

    If the Obama campaign wants to pay this off, more power to them, because if not, Hills will have to fundraise for years into the future just to retire this debt and in the meantime, a lot of small businesses are going to suffer.

    It's an individual choice (none / 0) (#186)
    by kmblue on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:29:39 PM EST
    to donate to any candidate.

    Give people some credit, whether they
    donate to Hillary, Obama or McCain.

    [ Parent ]

    When Bill left office (none / 0) (#199)
    by bodhcatha on Thu May 08, 2008 at 05:03:15 PM EST
    He was 3m dollars in debt.  He paid it off in no time, in addition to paying the legal debts of his WH staff from years of pointless investigations.  The total was in excess of 25m.  So go away, we're not buying what you're selling.

    [ Parent ]
    You cannot pay off campaign debt this way (none / 0) (#211)
    by debrazza on Fri May 09, 2008 at 12:29:44 AM EST
    Except for the personal loans, all campaign debts must be repaid from contributions that are subject to the contribution limits.  Perhaps with the loans, she is transferring the debt of the campaign to her personally and then plans on paying themselves back through more books, speeches and Burkle, but I think that their campaign debt is greater than that.  On May 20th we will find out exactly how much when they are forced to release their financial data, but last month it was $10m, with another $5m in personal loans.  Considering that the campaign has not been eager to release it's April fundraising totals yet when they have typically released that information on the first day of the next month, I think speaks volumes.  I would not be surprised if the campaign debt is now $15-20m, not including personal loans.  And all of that debt, except the personal loans, will have to be repaid through contributions subject to federal contribution limits.  Which means that they will not be able to fundraise for those debts from existing maxxed out donors until January 1st.

    [ Parent ]
    How condescending (4.60 / 10) (#1)
    by Stellaaa on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:19:18 PM EST
    If they would do that leaking it is insulting.  These guys are real pigs.  

    This would not be the first lie they told (5.00 / 4) (#97)
    by MMW on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:55:10 PM EST
    I'm just saying. I don't trust those B@ST@RDS!

    [ Parent ]
    Stellaaa (5.00 / 7) (#120)
    by Kathy on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:21:46 PM EST
    you are so freaking right, and women all around the country are seeing these tactics for what they are: bullying bullsh*t.  The more they push, the more we will push back.  We've got some big wins coming around the corner and I have not given up on Oregon.  No matter what the media says, she was not expected to win anything last Tues.  Mr Potato Head himself said (prior to the election) that if she won Indiana, it would be a game changer.  The only thing that's changed now is the freaking spin.

    And let's remember a few facts here:

    1.  The Clinton name alone can raise the funds to cover these debts in a week.  Bill can crap and sell it on eBay and still have change in his pocket.

    2.  Wins in WVA and KY will bring in even more donations.

    3.  She's got 25mm banked for the ge.  If she doesn't make it to the ge (which, hello, this is by no means a certainty) she can roll that money into her senate coffers, and in turn bail out her presidential race.

    4.  The woman is a freakin' millionaire.  Where did that get lost in the equation?  She didn't have to beg a slumlord to help her get a house.  She's got the dough to do it herself.

    5.  Obama has had all the money in the world to spend and HE STILL KEEPS LOSING.

    6.  I dunno; I just like to keep these things even.  And I am still donating, and so are other people.  NOTHING HAS CHANGED EXCEPT THE MEDIA SPIN.


    [ Parent ]
    LOL* (5.00 / 3) (#131)
    by AnninCA on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:26:11 PM EST
    So true about your e-bay comment.

    That's why this entire discussion is downright silly.

    [ Parent ]

    Except that he won. nt (none / 0) (#128)
    by Helen8 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:25:23 PM EST
    .

    [ Parent ]
    Except that he didn't win (none / 0) (#190)
    by angie on Thu May 08, 2008 at 03:45:11 PM EST
    IN, CA, PA, OH, NY, NJ, TX or FL for that matter. He only won the state he was expected to win (NC). The fact that you buy the media's after-the-fact spin that she had to win NC doesn't make it so -- she had to win IN, and she did. Furthermore, I still don't see that he has reached "the magic number" to win the nomination -- the fact that he may be closer to that number then Hillary doesn't mean squat -- close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. If your guy was a "winner" he would know that.  

    [ Parent ]