home

Guam Caucuses

Bump and Update(TL): Hillary won Dededo 509 to 313, getting 61% of the vote. As Big Tent says below, that gives Obama a 7 vote win out of 4521 votes. It's Obama 50.1% to Hillary 49.9%.

There will be a recount due to about 500 ballots being "spoiled."

Update (BTD): It has been reported that unofficial initial results have Obama winning the Guam caucus by 7 votes, 2264-2257. I assume a recount may be in order though the delegate split is set. I doubt a 7 vote differential is going to sway the Guam superdelegates.

Update (TL): Still waiting on Dededo. Here's a chart with the caucus results so far. Obama's lead is down to 52.7 % . (7:06 am Guam time.)

While we're waiting, I just checked to see where Obama's Guam office is. It's in Hagåtña , "the island's second smallest village in both area and population" . It's where the government seat is. Dededo's 46,000 residents include 17,000 Chamorros and 24,000 Filipinos. Farming is making a comeback there. There is a university and it has a student group for Obama on his website but it only has 28 members. {More...]

Here is Hillary's Guam page. It has much more substance than Obama's.

Update (TL): Only Dededo is left. Agat is in, Hillary won it. Obama's ahead by 204 votes. (6:30 am Guam time)

Lujan/Paulino are handily winning the race for party chair/vice chair which makes them superdelegates. As said below, Lujan is undeclared while Paulino is for Obama. As to the other three superdelegates, Guam will have three other superdelegates:

Committee Woman Taling Taitano, who said she's committed to Clinton; Delegate Madeleine Bordallo, who is undeclared; and the committee man position, which will be filled by appointment. Both candidates up for consideration, Sen. Benjamin Cruz and attorney Mike Phillips, are Obama supporters.

Update (TL): Yona is now in. 2 Districts to go, Dededo (the big one) and Agat. Obama is up by 217 votes with 53%.(6:25 am Guam Time)

Update (TL): 18 of 21 districts now in and Obama has 53.3% of the vote. Dededo is still out. (5:40 am Guam time). This account says the final three could change the outcome. Obama leads by 211 votes.

Dededo is huge compared to the rest of the towns. It has 40,000 plus residents. I wonder if they will all get counted today.

16 of 21 districts now in, Obama still ahead but Dededo and Yigo, two of the largest districts are still out. (5:05 am Guam time)

Update (TL): 2/3 of vote in, it's Obama by 7. Hillary just one a district by a single vote. Obama won another by 3.

Guam is holding caucuses as we speak. With a little over half counted, apparently it is 53-47 Obama. Guam has 8 half-delegates and 5 superdelegates. These caucuses determine the split of the 8 half delegates. It looks like it will be an equal split.

3000 American citizens in Guam are expected to vote. Thus, the effect on the popular vote count will be minimal. Yet again, the absurdity of the Democratic delegate system is exposed. Guam will send 9 delegates to the Democratic convention. Right now, Florida and Michigan, and its 2.3 million voters who voted in their primaries, will send NONE. What a ridiculous political party we Dems have.

By Big Tent Democrat

Update (TL): Hillary may do better with the superdelegates in Guam who are treated as whole delegates (pledged delegates are only considered half delegates):

Arlene Bordallo, who is running for vice-chair of the Democratic Party of Guam, and also running for a delegate seat showing her pledged support for Senator Clinton. Her running mate for chairman of the party is Joseph Cameron, who has also publicly announced his support for Clinton. Then you have Taling Taitano, running for national committeewoman - she is actually the state advisor for Senator Clinton's campaign on Guam.

So theoretically if they win their party officer elections tonight, that would mean mathematically Clinton would have three guaranteed superdelegate votes.

But, according to the first link above:

Meanwhile, the race for Party Chair and Vice-Chair isn’t as close as the delegates’. With over half of the counting done the team of Pillar Lujan and Jaime Paulino is leading the three teams with 48 percent of the vote.

Pillar Lujan is uncommitted but her running-mate Paulino has endorsed Obama.

Update: Comments now closed. There's a new and open thread here.

< Unity | Saturday Night Open Thread >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Wow (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by AnninCA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:18:59 PM EST
    Guam is Obama?

    I figured it for Hillary.

    My "bad."

    And, Hillary was the one (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by JavaCityPal on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:23:42 PM EST
    pushing for them to actually get to vote in the GE.  

    They are voting in caucus, though. I've lost all trust in that particular system.  

    [ Parent ]

    Amen. If I Never Hear The Word Caucus (5.00 / 3) (#51)
    by PssttCmere08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:55:25 PM EST
    again, it will be too soon!  They are, for all intents and purposes, a bit of a joke.

    [ Parent ]
    Caucuses are (5.00 / 2) (#60)
    by AnninCA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:04:59 PM EST
    cheaper.  They dominate in states that are Red.  These states simply cannot raise the money to have primaries.

    Even looking at the "buy-off" from the PACS to super-delegates from BOTH Obama and Hillary tells the story.

    Some of those donations were $2500 or less.  

    That tells the story.

    So we're not going to be "rid" of caucuses.

    Now, I'd argue to my last breath that Iowa caucuses should not be in the first 4, setting the tone.  And, just for the record?  I went to school in Iowa and love the state.  But that is nuts to give them power.

    Frankly, what has yet to be really discussed is just WHY Florida and Michigan went after the DNC over that issue.

    I personally think they are right.  The DNC is wrong.

    Just my 2 cents.  Iowa has a horrible record.  They usually don't end up even voting for their caucus winner.

    They need to be axed.

    [ Parent ]

    The Repub caucus in Iowa was (5.00 / 2) (#106)
    by Joan in VA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:34:11 PM EST
    by secret ballot. How do they do that and why can't we? Blunts the intimidation factor but how would it be called consensus voting? The biggest diff in cost is no machines and votes counted by party rather than BoE. Or is there some cost I'm missing?

    [ Parent ]
    Thoroughly agree about IA. (none / 0) (#71)
    by magisterludi on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:28:39 PM EST
    Too much influence.

    Off topic a bit, but, as a child watching the news of the primaries, i always remember thinking how everybody must feel so sorry for New Hampshire, it was so-oo little everyone let it go first just to be nice.

    [ Parent ]

    Dominate? (none / 0) (#211)
    by JavaCityPal on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:27:38 PM EST
    I don't know how many red states are caucus states.  My very blue state of Washington has always been a caucus state...until this year where we did both. The democrats took the caucus results, but we still had a primary vote several weeks after the caucuses. The Republicans used the vote counts.  I'm hoping we've seen the last of the caucuses here.

    [ Parent ]
    Apparently (none / 0) (#10)
    by Just another person on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:31:09 PM EST
    Obama had three people on the ground campaigning for him. I guess Hillary's finances didn't allow for that :-/. Sometimes it's money that talks.

    [ Parent ]
    That's silly (none / 0) (#11)
    by AnninCA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:32:22 PM EST
    talk.

    [ Parent ]
    they cling to not having the vote (none / 0) (#28)
    by Stellaaa on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:40:46 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    What would it do to one's self esteem (5.00 / 1) (#58)
    by oculus on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:04:05 PM EST
    ot be elected a "half-delegate"?

    [ Parent ]
    And what about your "better half"? (none / 0) (#70)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:27:59 PM EST
    (your spouse) Do they now become your "better fourth?" because you're a half?

    [ Parent ]
    Its a caucus in name only, I think (none / 0) (#125)
    by ding7777 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:57:15 PM EST
    The caucus differs little from a primary because voters can cast ballots all day at polling stations. The election is run by the Democratic Party, which means that voters don't have to be registered with the local election commission.



    [ Parent ]
    Hmmmm (none / 0) (#214)
    by JavaCityPal on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:32:24 PM EST
    doesn't each state set their own rules for how to?  I heard terrible things about the way the Texas caucuses went, and that some in Washington state were questionable. I just know they are very hard to get to, and only a fraction of the people who normally vote ever attend.

    Mail-in ballots allow all registered voters the easiest opportunity to vote.  

    [ Parent ]

    Heh (none / 0) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:20:33 PM EST
    I was waiting for Zogby to tell me.

    [ Parent ]
    Well, their closest neighboring state IS HA, (none / 0) (#9)
    by jawbone on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:28:50 PM EST
    so there'e the favorite son factor...?

    [ Parent ]
    Yes, I read that is significant for him (nt) (none / 0) (#22)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:37:47 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    He was supposed to win there (none / 0) (#30)
    by eleanora on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:41:37 PM EST
    according to his spreadsheet, IIRC. The big news will be if he wins by enough to get the add-on delegate, otherwise it'll be a wash at 2-2 all.

    [ Parent ]
    Obama spreadsheet was 0 55% to C 44% (5.00 / 1) (#204)
    by jawbone on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:47:21 PM EST
    From Politico link -- there may be a better presentation of the spreadsheet.

    [ Parent ]
    I heard some talking head say (none / 0) (#69)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:25:56 PM EST
    it would be a blowout for Obama.  Not sure if it is a big enough deal for"the expectations game" to matter, but if so Clinton can have a little bit of joy here.

    [ Parent ]
    If you (none / 0) (#171)
    by facta non verba on Sat May 03, 2008 at 05:19:38 PM EST
    read Guam's Pacific Daily News, many in Guam view Obama as a "favorite son." The whole he was born in Hawaii sort of thing.

    [ Parent ]
    That Didn't Come Across In The Results (none / 0) (#210)
    by PssttCmere08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:20:44 PM EST
    maybe his campaign has been wounded worse than we thought...when the "native son" only wins by 7 votes, what does this tell us?

    [ Parent ]
    This (5.00 / 6) (#7)
    by Andy08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:25:11 PM EST
    Guam will send 9 delegates to the Democratic convention. Right now, Florida and Michigan, and its 2.3 million voters who voted in their primaries, will send NONE. What a ridiculous political party we Dems have.
    in unacceptabl.
    I am sorry but out of principle I find it very hard to have any respect and most likely support for the Democratic party unless the resolve this issue before the democratic nominee is decided.
    FL & MI should have their say and weight in the decision of the democratic nominee.
    I will not consider such nominee legitimate until FL&MI preferences are heard and counted. And I know I am not alone. I am sorry but democratic values, principles and country come before "party".  We are not the USSR.

    Dean's strategy? (5.00 / 2) (#33)
    by zebedee on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:42:57 PM EST
    I agree. What Dean and co may be planning is to pursuade enough SDs that HRC can't win (based on excluding Fla/MI), which may or may not be true, and then for the "sake of the party" most of the uncommitted SDs line up behind the inevitable nominee to give enough leeway to count Fla/MI delegates fully. They can then pretend that these states have been fully enfranchised.

    I doubt this would appease the voters in these stays and may be perceived as something of an insult to include them only when they can't affect the result. But this is probably Dean's strategy and they will try to announce the Fla/MI inclusion before the SDs they have lined up are announced.

     If this is what they're planning to coronate BO I would find it pretty disreputable.

    [ Parent ]

    Because the entire process (5.00 / 3) (#40)
    by Edgar08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:48:10 PM EST
    is sequential, designed to allow for momentum to influence later states, everyday that goes by whereby FL and MI aren't allowed to count and have their rightful influence on the race/narrative is a day that Howard Dean pees on them.


    [ Parent ]
    Absolutely agree (5.00 / 1) (#90)
    by Andy08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:38:38 PM EST
    Edgar08; that's why I'm getting more and more angry each day. The DNC is letting
    the issue die to influence the narrative.

    [ Parent ]
    Right on all counts (5.00 / 1) (#67)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:23:22 PM EST
    That is indeed the strategy, and everyone sees through it.

    A travesty.

    [ Parent ]

    Yes, but I resent (5.00 / 1) (#91)
    by Andy08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:40:29 PM EST
    the DNC pushing it down my throat. I will not accept it; if they do this they can try to win without me.

    [ Parent ]
    I am seriously struggling with that also (5.00 / 1) (#102)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:24:32 PM EST
    I live in FL.  If Obama is the candidate, he probably won't win here anyway, so I will write-in Hillary.

     I can't have McCain win the overall election though, so if SUSA tells me it is close in FL, I will vote for Obama and resent every second of it.

    [ Parent ]

    Somehow (5.00 / 2) (#103)
    by dissenter on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:29:45 PM EST
    I don't think you will have to make that vote lol. Barack Obama, after this fiasco and his problems with seniors and working class dems, isn't going to get close.

    As the Obamabots like to say, It's all about the math.

    [ Parent ]

    They have stopped (none / 0) (#173)
    by facta non verba on Sat May 03, 2008 at 05:24:15 PM EST
    talking about the math, at least until after Tuesday.

    Where Have All the Mathematicians Gone?

    [ Parent ]

    If the DNC (5.00 / 5) (#108)
    by themomcat on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:36:22 PM EST
    does not count the FL delegates in a way that is fair to the voters, I don't think you will have to worry about voting for Obama in FL. I will not vote for him or McCain. They are both bad choices. I will support all the down ticket Democrats. This is just the way I am feeling and thinking. I have one vote, it is mine and it cannot be bought or coerced.

    [ Parent ]
    I feel (none / 0) (#184)
    by Andy08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:02:58 PM EST
    similarly at this point.

    [ Parent ]
    I (4.50 / 8) (#105)
    by sas on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:33:18 PM EST
    live in PA and my vote matters.

    I will not have Obama shoved down my throat.

    I will register as an independent the day after he gets the nod
    (if he does)

    Then the best the Dem party will get from me is a write-in for Hillary.

    I know that is blasphemy to some... but the DNC reaps what it sows, imo.

    [ Parent ]

    Well (5.00 / 6) (#123)
    by hitchhiker on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:52:24 PM EST
    the argument of the DNC is that it has to draw a line in the sand to let states in future elections know that they can't just go out and do whatever the hell they want.

    There must be consequences, says the DNC, to behavior that would cause chaos and injustice.

    So say I to the DNC.  There must be consequences to behavior that causes chaos and injustice, and in this case the consequence is going to be an en masse registration as Independent.  

    The party doesn't own my vote, and they've demonstrated this year that they don't even want it.  Good to know.

    [ Parent ]

    It used to be that the state parties (5.00 / 1) (#181)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 05:52:35 PM EST
    told the DNC what to do.  Seriously.  A parent of mine was a state party official, so I got to grow up with all this sort of talk that turned me into a political junkie.

    Now the national party seems to have some control issues -- so it's just, well, junky. :-)

    [ Parent ]

    Have you made that known (none / 0) (#215)
    by JavaCityPal on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:36:20 PM EST
    to Dean? You can call or email the DNC headquarters and let them no you will not contribute a dime toward their convention and GE funding needs if he takes that stand.  Money talks.

    Although, I see enough of Dean changing positions depending on who he is talking to...

    [ Parent ]

    flip flopper (none / 0) (#219)
    by Lil on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:41:34 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    We Dems? (5.00 / 4) (#13)
    by janarchy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:32:41 PM EST
    3000 American citizens in Guam are expected to vote. Thus, the effect on the popular vote count will be minimal. Yet again, the absurdity of the Democratic delegate system is exposed. Guam will send 9 delegates to the Democratic convention. Right now, Florida and Michigan, and its 2.3 million voters who voted in their primaries, will send NONE. What a ridiculous political party we Dems have.

    As the old joke goes "Speak for yourself, kemosabe". It's precisely hare-brained thinking like this (not seating FL and MI, not anything you've said, BTD!) that's got me (and my aged parents, also life-long Dems) leaving the party to be Independents come convention time.

    Also absurd is how many voters/citizens each (5.00 / 2) (#20)
    by jawbone on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:35:51 PM EST
    delegate represents:

    Compare NY's 281 delegates and how many primary voters and state citizens each delegate represents  to how many voters/citizens each Guan delegate represents!

    And many more people voted in PA (5.00 / 1) (#26)
    by andgarden on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:38:43 PM EST
    than NY.

    [ Parent ]
    Funny thing those rules (5.00 / 5) (#36)
    by themomcat on Sat May 03, 2008 at 12:44:59 PM EST
    They were put in place to prevent another McGovern/ Mondale GE disaster and here we are about ready to most likely blow something that should be a sure thing. Just my gut feeling at this point.

    and the rules themselves are working... (5.00 / 3) (#82)
    by p lukasiak on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:01:46 PM EST
    .... basically, candidates can only win the nomination in the primary season if they win 60% of the delegates available through primaries and caucuses.

    Obama and his supporters are flat out lying (big shock) when they try to promote the idea that a simple majority of "pledged" delegates entitles you to the nomination.  The system was set up specifically to prevent that from happening.

    But intellectual dishonesty seems to be the hallmark of Obama supporters -- between the race-pimping of his supporters, and the lies about how the nominee is selected, I don't know how any decent person can support Obama anymore -- Obama refuses to speak out about these lies, and that is all you need to know about him.

    [ Parent ]

    TeamO explaining how 'the contest' of Guam=Cali (5.00 / 2) (#100)
    by Ellie on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:15:40 PM EST
    should be good. This isn't a nitpick; they've based major talking points about Obama's destiny and appeal on the cheesy math, and engaged media in a fraudulent campaign to pressure Clinton to take a dive.

    (TeamO: He won more "contests" than HRC -- as if Guam equals California -- and he has more "pledged delegates", though that wasn't the metric, &c &c.)

    This should be put out to challenge all the sloppy CW that's been repeated without challenge (even the basic one of passing simple logic) by the Frontal Lobes of Punditstan.

    [ Parent ]

    Remember Hannity (none / 0) (#109)
    by Edgar08 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:37:16 PM EST
    Holding up his red map in 2004?

    "Look at all that red" = "Look at all those contests."


    [ Parent ]

    Speaking of Rules & Texas (none / 0) (#88)
    by BackFromOhio on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:27:42 PM EST
    There was a very long post yesterday at MYDD about fraud by Obama campaign & Texas caucuses.  There are affidavits, etc.  But supposedly DNC told HRC campaign not to go public with this. THe claims reflect extreme scurrilousness to me & clear violations of the rules. Will the infamous rules committee take this up & take it seriously?

    [ Parent ]
    please stay on topic (none / 0) (#118)
    by Jeralyn on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:46:14 PM EST
    we close at 200 comments and there's more to say about Guam.

    [ Parent ]
    Speaking of topical (5.00 / 1) (#122)
    by digdugboy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:50:05 PM EST
    are the posts in this thread about Florida and Michigan topical?
    [tagline censored]
    [ Parent ]
    somewhat (5.00 / 2) (#124)
    by Jeralyn on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:55:31 PM EST
    they are by comparison to Guam and how it could be that 2.3 million voters don't count but Guam's few thousand do.

    Voter fraud is not related at all to this topic.

    [ Parent ]

    Sorry! (none / 0) (#162)
    by BackFromOhio on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:46:11 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    FL & MI (5.00 / 1) (#62)
    by Lady in Blue on Sat May 03, 2008 at 01:12:50 PM EST
    Guam will send 9 delegates to the Democratic convention. Right now, Florida and Michigan, and its 2.3 million voters who voted in their primaries, will send NONE. What a ridiculous political party we Dems have.

    Agreed.  Neither nominee will be vaild in my mind if Florida and Michigan are not counted.  

    I can't help but do this (5.00 / 1) (#85)
    by waldenpond on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:15:57 PM EST
    Obama projected to take Guam by 11 pts.  If 3000 people are expected to vote:

    Obama 55.5; Clinton 45.5
    Obama 1665; Clinton 1335
    Difference = 330

    Currently 7 pt spread
    Obama 53.5; Clinton 46.5
    Obama 1605; Clinton 1395
    Difference = 210

    330-210 = Obama's support has dropped a drastic 120 votes.

    If the math is wrong... is it really worth correcting?

    :)

    Recount also could affect (none / 0) (#217)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:37:56 PM EST
    whose super-delegates won, affecting that count.

    [ Parent ]
    the chads, 8 chads, 8 pregnant chads, please (none / 0) (#226)
    by feet on earth on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:54:27 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    Wow, this is too bad ... (5.00 / 2) (#101)
    by Tortmaster on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:21:12 PM EST
    ... Hillary really needed to win Guam by at least 300,000 votes.

    Ha. That is The Math for ya (5.00 / 1) (#104)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:30:57 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    Wow, BTD very informative (5.00 / 1) (#129)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:09:57 PM EST
    I nominate TalkLeft for the best up to the minute Guam election coverage.  Look at all those charts, look at all those links.  Guamtastic!

    I've been doing the updating all day (5.00 / 2) (#133)
    by Jeralyn on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:14:59 PM EST
    BTD did the initial post.

    [ Parent ]
    Agreed -- if there is a silver lining (5.00 / 1) (#195)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:28:52 PM EST
    to this long primary season, I have learned so much and looked up more about each state and territory as it comes along (love census.gov's quick facts for each).  I could only think, when we heard the other day that one candidate is "bored" with the campaign -- well, you get to be exhausted, I understand that.  

    But bored?  What a fantastic opportunity to get to see so much of this country, to meet so many of its people.  And how great for the states and cities and towns that are too often ignored when it's all over early.

    I hope that all the candidates go to Puerto Rico.  I wish that they had to go to every territory.  Maybe then we would finally abolish that awful status.  We started as a country of colonies that resented colonial status, yet we created our own colonies right away with the Northwest Territory).  But at least there was a process to statehood in the Northwest Ordinance, a process followed for the rest of the continental U.S. and finally -- I can remember this -- Hawaii and Alaska.  

    We ought to apply that process now, and we ought to get every candidate to go to every corner of this country before they even get to run.

    [ Parent ]

    Nice job (none / 0) (#141)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:21:35 PM EST
    I'm actually interested in the results from Guam because of your work here.  Before I wasn't.

    [ Parent ]
    I have come to the conclusion: (5.00 / 2) (#130)
    by Mrwirez on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:10:44 PM EST
    I will not vote for president in November if Michigan and Florida's delegates and super delegates are not represented and allocated according to the way the elections unfolded. I will simply leave "President" blank. I WILL however, vote straight down the ticket Democrat, and hope for a majority in the House, Senate, local and national candidates. I do not like Obama, Dean, Brazille, Axelrod, or Dashle. They have done everything to punish the voters of Florida and Michigan and to help Barack Obama win the nomination. Obama will lose to McCain and McCain will not run again in 2012. So I say, Hillary 2012!!

    Little known fact (5.00 / 3) (#131)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:13:07 PM EST
    While we wait, consider this....

    Dededo could loosely be translated to mean "of the finger" in Spanish.

    More updates when they become available.

    Thank you for sharing this information. (none / 0) (#134)
    by oculus on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:15:46 PM EST
    Tell me, are there any A list bloggers in Guam?  I feel I've been completely blind sidded by these results.

    [ Parent ]
    Obama was expected to win Guam by 10%+ (none / 0) (#149)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:30:09 PM EST
    according to his own campaign spreadsheet.

    What's an A-list blogger anymore anyway?
    I predict that within a few more months no one will want to call themselves a blogger in public.

    [ Parent ]

    Mamas, don't let yer babies grow up (5.00 / 2) (#185)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:05:12 PM EST
    to be bloggers!  I picture parents cowering in shame if word gets out, so disgraced as they would be. And worried that grandparents would find out and disown the young 'uns doing that newfangled blogging that undermines democracy, giving the family fortune to pet sanctuaries, instead.  High holinesses of myriad faiths finally would excommunicate those who bitterly cling to their computer keyboards, screaming "but, but, but -- my candidate was the political messiah!  and he had the math!"

    There may have to be interventions.  Tough love.  Bloggers torn from their keyboards, kidnapped, and turned over to deprogrammers . . . who will read, rinse, and repeat, endlessly, the actual party roolz, until the bloggers repent and admit -- repeat after me, now -- that super-delegates don't have to add, subtract, multiply, divide, fold, spindle, or mutilate the math but vote as they darn well want.

    The new order, I feel it coming -- bringing back the old order, or at least its terminology.  The A list will become unlisted.

    Oh, and acronyms -- LOL, FWIW, BTW, etc. -- will have to be banned.  (But madamb will get an exemption for IACF, as it becomes elevated to the daily mantra of the media, since it takes less time to say than all those darn just words -- thus leaving more time to keep talking about car chases and missing blond white girls, when it's back to normal on November 5.)


    [ Parent ]

    There is still time (5.00 / 2) (#135)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:16:20 PM EST
    for bloggers who wish to move the goal posts on Hillary and claim that whoever wins Guam will get the nomination.  Sure Oregon could have been the test, but this one could happen today! Seize the moment.

    Guamtanamero... (5.00 / 1) (#138)
    by Stellaaa on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:19:43 PM EST
    Another misheard song lyric for years...

    (alas...it's Guantanamera, the girl from Guantanamo.  So, I confess my long life confusion with Guam and Guantanomo thanks to this song.  Bush cleared up the Guantanomo confusion.  But now it all comes around.  

    [ Parent ]

    it's a moment of epiphany (5.00 / 1) (#142)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:22:26 PM EST
    the light has shined down and soon you will be voting for Obama.

    [ Parent ]
    More likely a troll-induced stroke (5.00 / 2) (#145)
    by Kathy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:25:47 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    We surprised a Cuban band by (none / 0) (#235)
    by oculus on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:16:34 PM EST
    requesting anything but Guantanamaro.

    [ Parent ]
    Barack Obama (none / 0) (#242)
    by Mrwirez on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:41:18 PM EST
    said Indiana was the tie breaker.... We shall see.

    [ Parent ]
    guam (5.00 / 1) (#146)
    by echowarrior on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:27:10 PM EST
    I'm happy to say I'm conservative, not democrat not republican, I feel america needs to keep its ideals and even go back to when it was prosperous for every american not just the rich, so that being said I have seen many things over the years occur but when guam, not even a state!, gets to vote when Michigan and Florida are locked out is a sign for the future, get ready when china get to vote or vietnam gets a vote or how about russia.  my fellow americans , wake up our country has been stolen and sold out. We need to unite again and stop all this power madness before the red flag flys right over the whitehouse and we have to live like oppressed chinese!!!!!!

    Actually (5.00 / 4) (#158)
    by dissenter on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:38:29 PM EST
    You are the one that is ill informed. Further, my loyalty is to country not party. The A is larger than the D.

    And I can vote or not vote however I wish. The Obamabots are childish and so are their threats. I don't make threats. I have said repeatedly for months I don't think Obama is a Dem and therefore have zero reason to support him.

    I an guaranteed one thing from Obama apparently - higher payroll taxes and that alone might push me from not voting to voting for McCain.

    It is you that lives in childhood fantasies. I will vote my interests not what Daily Kos says I must do.

    digdugboy (5.00 / 5) (#159)
    by Jeralyn on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:39:59 PM EST
    you are suspended today for chattering, repeated posting with the intent to annoy other readers, see the comment rules. I've just deleted a slew of comments here that demonstrated your effect on other readers.

    Childishness knows no bounds. . . (5.00 / 2) (#161)
    by LarryInNYC on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:41:36 PM EST
    in this contest.  While you can find it here if you're really interested in quantity I suggest the Obama blogs.

    I agree with you that the fault in Florida and Michigan lies as much with the Democratic leaders as with the legislature.  Both camps seem convinced that Dean is trying to steal the election for the other candidate.  But I believe he's simply trying to restore sanity to the primary calendar.  I didn't really follow the original decision, if I had I doubt I would have had an opinion.

    That said, the idea that in 2008 an intra-party election might be decided by refusing to count the votes in Florida (no matter who's at fault) seems insane to me -- both in context of Bush v. Gore 2000 and in context of Democrat v. Republican in November 2008.

    they can't vote in the GE... (5.00 / 1) (#183)
    by boredmpa on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:02:00 PM EST
    It's great that we give delegates to a territory that can't vote in the GE.  I'm glad we're so inclusive, but nine is a bit much imho and I hope the FL/MI people don't hear about it.  

    It would be nicer if we gave people in all our states the same feeling of inclusion.

    They should be able to vote in the GE too. (5.00 / 2) (#203)
    by jfung79 on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:42:11 PM EST
    This is the 21st century.  We shouldn't be having colonies that can't vote.  

    [ Parent ]
    Well, I'm hearing about it NOW (none / 0) (#198)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:35:29 PM EST
    AAAARRRRRGH!!!!

    Yes, I am happy the Democrats of Guam will be able to feel included vicariously in the GE debacle, even though they don't get to vote.  Misery loves company.

    [ Parent ]

    Obama wins Guam by 7 votes (5.00 / 2) (#186)
    by KevinMc on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:08:44 PM EST
    Obama wins Guam
    Even the Kentucky Derby wasn't this close. In the strangest of circumstances that could only bring about the closest of races, Hillary Rodham Clinton finished with 49.9% of the vote of the Guam Democratic Caucus, just 7 votes shy of Barack Obama's total of 50.1%. While Obama led for the vast majority of the night's tallying, Clinton needed a strong finish in the municipality of Dededo, Guam's most populous village. And she did - gaining 61% of the 822 votes counted by the Democratic Party of Guam.

    Note: these are unofficial, uncertified results as tabulated by the Democratic Party of Guam. The DPG also noted a high number of spoiled ballots in Dededo.



    I Read In Another Blog That HRC's Quiet Army (none / 0) (#216)
    by MO Blue on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:36:57 PM EST
    (the seniors) had a strong showing and that is what helped close the gap.

    [ Parent ]
    Way to go Hillary! (none / 0) (#223)
    by JavaCityPal on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:50:17 PM EST
    and, again she did this after Obama had the more active campaign.

    [ Parent ]
    CNN and ABC (5.00 / 2) (#187)
    by americanincanada on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:08:48 PM EST
    are saying Obama won Guam by...

    get this...

    7 votes.

    if you don't look at popular vote, and we all know Obaba ignores that...it was a tie.

    CNN (5.00 / 4) (#188)
    by sas on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:14:57 PM EST
    breaking news - Obama wins Guam by 7 votes

    This is terriffic news for Hillary because people expected Obama to cruise there.  I saw one poll that had him up by 10%.  He was viewed by some as a native son, since he did spend some growing up time in Hawaii.

    It (5.00 / 1) (#191)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:18:25 PM EST
    plays right into their "Obama is fading" narrative they now love.

    [ Parent ]
    correct me if I'm wrong (5.00 / 3) (#194)
    by ChuckieTomato on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:27:18 PM EST
    but hasn't he won most caucuses by 20-30 points? This is huge for Hillary

    [ Parent ]
    Pretty (none / 0) (#220)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:46:12 PM EST
    much iirc. He was on a roll in Feb. Not so much lately.

    [ Parent ]
    What about the "spoiled votes" that they (none / 0) (#224)
    by FlaDemFem on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:51:19 PM EST
    are going to recount? After hearing what happened in Texas and a couple of other caucases, I am leaning towards wondering if Obama's people had something to do with the spoilage. Any info on that?

    [ Parent ]
    Dont know the details here (none / 0) (#227)
    by riddlerandy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:57:17 PM EST
    but it could mean a couple of different things

    At least in Cal, a spoiled ballot generally means a ballot on which a voter made a mistake, and which was exchanged for a new ballot.  In that event, the ballot would not be counted.

    It is also possible that the ballot was somehow damaged going through the counter, in which case election workers will have to "remake" the ballot so that it can be run through the system.

    [ Parent ]

    On the one hand I understand (none / 0) (#225)
    by riddlerandy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:53:34 PM EST
    why Obama migh be considered to be a Guam favorite son

    On the hand, Hawaii is closer to Seattle than it is to Guam

    [ Parent ]

    You've obviously never lived in either (none / 0) (#229)
    by tree on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:05:48 PM EST
    Hawaii or Guam if you don't understand the connection between the two. Traveling-distance-wise, Hawaii may be closer to Seattle, but culturally, topographically, and climatologically, Hawaii and Guam are much more akin than Hawaii is to any of the other 49 states.

    [ Parent ]
    Been to both numerous times (none / 0) (#232)
    by riddlerandy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:10:44 PM EST
    which is why I said I understand on the one hand hey there is a connection.  Still, it's an 8n hour flight from Honolulu to Guam.  But yes, I get that they are both proud island peoples who became dominated by the US.

    [ Parent ]
    And add 5+ and a stopover (none / 0) (#237)
    by tree on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:21:37 PM EST
    in Hawaii from any other state. A candidate that was born in Hawaii is probably about as close as a "native son" as Guam is ever going to get.

    [ Parent ]
    ABC (5.00 / 1) (#201)
    by AnninCA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:36:30 PM EST
    lists Obama as the winner ahead by 5 votes.  Good golly.  LOL*

    (Could this race be any tighter?)

    Recount To Examine "Spoiled" Ballots (5.00 / 1) (#205)
    by xspowr on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:00:04 PM EST
    Officials Say Guam Recount Is Imminent

    Herbie Perez, Democrat Party Nominating Committee Chairperson, says officials will look over the large amount of "spoiled" ballots in the coming days. At issue is small margin of victory for Senator Barack Obama. He beat his rival Senator Hillary Clinton by 7 votes, but well over 500 ballots were deemed invalid during the tabulation process. Perez says she will not certify the results because the Committee needs to ensure all were properly identified as "spoiled." She says officials from the Party and representatives from both candidates will meet probably Monday or Tuesday to address that issue.

    She is also looking into missing ballots. In total, over 8,100 were printed in response to reports of shortages at precinct sites. But when the final vote count was given, only a little over 4.500 ballots were used.



    Noooo let Hillary lose by 7 votes (5.00 / 1) (#207)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:03:49 PM EST
    or else the media won't report it!

    [ Parent ]
    I like your theory (5.00 / 1) (#208)
    by xspowr on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:15:37 PM EST
    But I'll still take a win any way we can get one! It appears that most of the spoiled ballots were in Dedego, which Hillary carried with 61% of the counted ballots.

    [ Parent ]
    then she will probably win the recount (5.00 / 3) (#209)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:19:01 PM EST
    don't tell that to CNN which already jumped the gun and put the checkmark next to Obama.

    When Hillary is up 10% they say too close to call, but 5 votes with a recount coming and it's a certain checkmark for Obama.  Most trusted name in news.

    [ Parent ]

    LOL* (none / 0) (#228)
    by AnninCA on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:01:51 PM EST
    I'm just amazed.  Imagine living where 500 votes are in play and someone loses by 7.

    Sounds like some of Obama's other "state" wins.  :)

    [ Parent ]

    Clinton tricks the media! (5.00 / 1) (#206)
    by diplomatic on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:00:59 PM EST
    Losing by 7 votes in Guam may be the best result for Hillary, she is so devious.  Here's why:

    We know the media loves to report Obama victories and ignore or downplay Clinton victories ASAP.

    So what better way to get the media to let the world know just how badly Obama is losing momentum than to report about this "historic victory" (aren't they all?) in a state he was expected to win by over 10+ according to his own campaign.

    Number #2 it once again illustrates the fact his is practically a tied race and that 4000 votes in Guam are more important to the DNC than over 2 million in Florida and Michigan.

    Number #3 Clinton is surging? Oh yea.

    If Hillary had won by 7 votes you would not hear about Obama's collapse in Guam tommorrow because Hillary wins are so yesterday

    -diplomatic

    The spin has begun on guam (5.00 / 2) (#222)
    by boredmpa on Sat May 03, 2008 at 07:48:29 PM EST
    I noticed over at daily kos that a lot of commenters were focusing on:

    It's not really a caucus!
    ...So it doesn't look bad that Obama didn't landslide a caucus state.

    Additionally, lots of folks rec'd comments along the lines of this thing seems fishy with her being behind by 5% and then losing by seven, they must have screwed up trying to rig the election.  (I'm serious, go look).

    I really can't understand how your first response at not doing well is to think someone stole the election...?!!!  And then post online about it?!!!

    And when did KOS add a delegate counter at the top of his page.  Talk about spin/focus/talking points.

    Thanks (5.00 / 1) (#230)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:07:54 PM EST
    for the info. The Obama supporters on other blogs are really starting to look desperate too. They're screaming how he's already won but no one will answer my question as to why if he's already won he losing primaries.

    [ Parent ]
    Boy, that is flimsy rope to hang on to (5.00 / 1) (#239)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:29:53 PM EST
     I can't wait to hear what they say when he only wins NC by 3%.

    [ Parent ]
    Desperate to spin Obama couldn't close Guam' huh? (5.00 / 1) (#240)
    by Ellie on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:33:41 PM EST
    No wonder they're working the hamsters in the wheels extra hard today at Spin Central.

    [ Parent ]
    Oh look, new personal email from Hillary (4.80 / 5) (#86)
    by ruffian on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:16:28 PM EST
    It is critical that the DNC make a final decision in May before the final primaries in early June so that Florida and Michigan voters have a say in deciding our nominee.

    With yet another petition tor the DNC to ignore, HERE.

    What the heck, I'll bite.

    Ok, I did it (none / 0) (#87)
    by dissenter on Sat May 03, 2008 at 02:24:15 PM EST
    and wrote this in the message section:

    If you think this party will hold together by giving a voice to Guam, the VI, Puerto Rico and A. Samoa but not FL and MI, you deserve to lose. I for one will leave this party. This is outrageous.

    [ Parent ]

    Sent my soon-to-be-ignored message (none / 0) (#98)
    by sumac on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:11:04 PM EST
    In the message section I wrote:

    Unless the situation with Florida and Michigan is resolved in a meaningful and transparent manner, the DNC can kindly stop soliciting me for money. I am already looking at the Green party and your lack of leadership and blatant bias towards one candidate have made my research of the Green party far more enjoyable than I would have thought.

    You cannot disenfranchise millions of voters and call yourself the "Democratic" party.

    [ Parent ]

    OK (none / 0) (#107)
    by sas on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:34:28 PM EST
    I did it too.

    [ Parent ]
    Me too (none / 0) (#174)
    by kenoshaMarge on Sat May 03, 2008 at 05:30:12 PM EST
    and decided to make another contribution while I was there.

    [ Parent ]
    Me too. (none / 0) (#236)
    by derridog on Sat May 03, 2008 at 08:17:12 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    Thanks -- signed on and let it rip! (nt) (none / 0) (#189)
    by Cream City on Sat May 03, 2008 at 06:15:07 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    I thank you (4.00 / 4) (#97)
    by Stellaaa on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:07:00 PM EST
    I must say, I have truly enjoyed reading your comments and posts at Corrente.  Thank you for taking the time to decipher and to analyze all this complexity, frankly, my eyes roll over when I see it.  

    You are appreciated.  

    Congratulations, Guam (1.90 / 10) (#119)
    by digdugboy on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:46:43 PM EST
    I applaud you for being smarter than Florida and Michigan, in that you didn't decide to defy the DNC's scheduling for your primary. Because you were smart enough to play by the rules, your delegates get to count in Denver. Maybe next time Florida and Michigan will be smart enough to play by the rules.
    [tagline censored]
    Maybe next time (5.00 / 2) (#126)
    by cmugirl on Sat May 03, 2008 at 03:57:43 PM EST
    The DNC won't have their heads up their patooties and have this figured out before the next election.

    And maybe monkeys will fly out of .....

    [ Parent ]

    Maybe next time the DNC (5.00 / 2) (#137)
    by FlaDemFem on Sat May 03, 2008 at 04:19:18 PM EST
    won't let the Republicans decide the nominee. THE REPUBLICANS are the ones who set the FL p