home

U.S. Building New Prison in Afghanistan

The Pentagon is building a shiny new prison complex in Afghanistan, where it believes prisoners will be held "for years to come." The initial cost: $60 million.

Until now, the Bush administration had signaled that it intended to scale back American involvement in detention operations in Afghanistan. It had planned to transfer a large majority of the prisoners to Afghan custody, in an American-financed, high-security prison outside Kabul to be guarded by Afghan soldiers.

But American officials now concede that the new Afghan-run prison cannot absorb all the Afghans now detained by the United States, much less the waves of new prisoners from the escalating fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

More....

The U.S. not only incarcerates more prisoners than any nation at home, it's intent on spreading its prison mentality throughout the world.

Military officials have long been aware of serious problems with the existing detention center in Afghanistan, the Bagram Theater Internment Facility. After the prison was set up in early 2002, it became a primary site for screening prisoners captured in the fighting. Harsh interrogation methods and sleep deprivation were used widely, and two Afghan detainees died there in December 2002, after being repeatedly struck by American soldiers.

Conditions and treatment have improved markedly since then, but hundreds of Afghans and other men are still held in wire-mesh pens surrounded by coils of razor wire. There are only minimal areas for the prisoners to exercise, and kitchen, shower and bathroom space is also inadequate.

Really? In another paragraph the article says,

American officials also acknowledged that there are serious health risks to detainees and American military personnel who work at the Bagram prison, because of their exposure to heavy metals from the aircraft-repair machinery and asbestos.

“It’s just not suitable,” another Pentagon official said. “At some point, you have to say, ‘That’s it. This place was not made to keep people there indefinitely.’ ”

Is this where the Bush Adminstration (or John McCain, if elected to succeed him) will ship the Gitmo detainees?

The U.S. says the new prison will be better than the old prison:

The new detention center at Bagram will incorporate some of the lessons learned by the United States in Iraq. Classrooms will be built for vocational training and religious discussion, and there will be more space for recreation and family visits, officials said. After years of entreaties by the International Committee of the Red Cross, the United States recently began to allow relatives to speak with prisoners at Bagram through video hookups.

How about provisions for the prisoners' release? Are there any? Do they get a trial?

Some detainees have been held without charge for more than five years, officials said. As of April, about 10 juveniles were being held at Bagram, according to a recent American report to a United Nations committee.

On a related note, TalkLeft will be gaining a correspondent living in Afghanistan in a few weeks. We talk about it in the comments here.

So yes, there will be life after the primary battle ends.

< Colorado's State Convention Held Saturday, Udall Nominated for Senate | Obama Reaches Out to Jewish Voters >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Well, they are just spreading (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by Molly Pitcher on Sun May 18, 2008 at 12:33:38 PM EST
    Americanism.  If it is true (and I don't doubt) that a too-large proportion of our citizens are incarcerated--well, we just want to share the wealth!  Any chance this can be derailed before the money goes down the drain (and what's left of our reputation with it)?

    a ps--I am not sure that Gitmo detainees would be kept there (short of another Alcatraz); if they did escape, they could surely blend in over there.

    Gotta keep emptying the federal coffers (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by clio on Sun May 18, 2008 at 01:29:20 PM EST
    straight into Republican campaign contributors pockets.

    Harvesting Human Beings (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by squeaky on Sun May 18, 2008 at 03:29:26 PM EST
    And calling them prisoners is a new growth industry. Seems to be working out quite well $$$. I am sure that the owners of the prisons are making more money off of each prisoner than the prisoners would make in their lifetime.

    Ah... (none / 0) (#14)
    by Alec82 on Sun May 18, 2008 at 04:38:45 PM EST
    ...a lasting import for Afghanistan...

    Parent
    While George W. Bush is (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by oculus on Sun May 18, 2008 at 04:40:23 PM EST
    scolding Middle Eastern rules on their faults re democracy.

    Parent
    More proof.... (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by kdog on Sun May 18, 2008 at 05:50:16 PM EST
    we will never, ever leave that place.  Or the other place.  Or the 100 or so places we have troops and/or cages flying under our flag.

    War and death to innocents will continue unabated...here again eventually and abroad pretty much constantly.  No matter which stooge wins.

    Shameful (none / 0) (#1)
    by Arabella Trefoil on Sun May 18, 2008 at 12:32:46 PM EST
    Who gets paid to build and run this prison? Is it a for-profit frachise? America warehouses more people in prisons than any other country in the world. It is shameful. Maybe American prison franchises will be exported overseas like fast food franchises.

    And what are the "religious discussions" I wonder. Are these dedicated to Christianizing people? Who leads the discussions? Is somebody paying for the opportunity to run the discussions?

    There are always people who make money on the misery of others.

    I will (none / 0) (#7)
    by Wile ECoyote on Sun May 18, 2008 at 03:08:22 PM EST
    disagree.  China warehouses more people in prisons than anyone else in the world.  They just don't call them prisoners.

    Parent
    I read this article yesterday. An eye-opened. (none / 0) (#3)
    by oculus on Sun May 18, 2008 at 12:33:49 PM EST
    I'd like to say: not in our names.  But, it is.

    Moving on:  I'm glad to hear life will go on after the primary season.  Especially after listening to the blogger conference call I've concluded reading blogs and commenting may further entrench opinions and it may not assist in reaching the goal of unifying the party before the GE. Not much listening going on at present.

    what? (none / 0) (#5)
    by Kathy on Sun May 18, 2008 at 02:28:00 PM EST
    Are you reading what I'm reading? (none / 0) (#8)
    by oculus on Sun May 18, 2008 at 03:15:39 PM EST
    Did you listen to the blogger conference call?  I think Clinton should fight and hope she will win the nomination because I am convinced Obama won't win the GE and, even if he does, I don't expect him to be an effective President on the issues I care about, which are universal health care, women's reproductive freedom. withdrawing from Ira.  Why do I care so much about these issues?  Hard to say as I'm no longer of child-bearing age and I have excellent health care coverage.  But, because of McCain's unblemished record against women's reproducative choice rights, I see no merit in voting for him, writing in Clinton, or just leaving the Presidential choice blank.  As you know, I am not an Obama troll and not, as accused of today, from DK.  There is zero exchange of information at this point.  Just endless talking points.    

    Parent
    joke! joke! (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by Kathy on Sun May 18, 2008 at 06:18:55 PM EST
    "are you listening?"

    "what?"

    Parent

    Not That Different Here (none / 0) (#10)
    by squeaky on Sun May 18, 2008 at 03:32:42 PM EST
    Although, I do not follow dkos.

    There is zero exchange of information at this point.  Just endless talking points.    

    I guess that this insanity is the elite version of what goes on at English soccer games.  

    Parent

    Actually, I was talking about "here," (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by oculus on Sun May 18, 2008 at 04:03:18 PM EST
    as I don't read DK at present.

    Parent
    Not Surprised (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by squeaky on Sun May 18, 2008 at 04:20:29 PM EST
    That you have kept your perspective. It is amazing to read some of our recently minted TL commenters go on about how insulting and superficial the Obama supporters, while insulting them and then repeating Hillary talking points.

    Not pretty.

    Parent

    At least we agree! (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by oculus on Sun May 18, 2008 at 04:24:57 PM EST
    Why should their priorities there (none / 0) (#6)
    by riddlerandy on Sun May 18, 2008 at 02:53:47 PM EST
    be any different than they are here?