I wasn't aware that a hidden caveman gene caused adultery.  Why is that even a part of a discussion.

Her biggest apology came in response to a question about comments by her husband, Bill Clinton, after the South Carolina primary, which Obama won handily. Bill Clinton said Jesse Jackson also won South Carolina when he ran for president in 1984 and 1988, a comment many viewed as belittling Obama's success.
"I want to put that in context. You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive," Hillary Clinton said. "We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama."

"Anyone who has followed my husband's public life or my public life know very well where we have stood and what we have stood for and who we have stood with," she said, acknowledging that whoever wins the nomination will have to heal the wounds of a bruising, historic contest.
"Once one of us has the nomination there will be a great effort to unify the Democratic party and we will do so, because, remember I have a lot of supporters who have voted for me in very large numbers and I would expect them to support Senator Obama if he were the nominee," she said.

(The banner is copylefted.)

This is just nonsense.  In the weeks leading up to the South Carolina primary - where the population is 50% black - charges of race-baiting mysteriously emerged.  At the time Clinton polled quite well among African-Americans and those racist white folks weren't going to vote for Obama anyway.

So...who stands to gain when the Clintons are suggested to be disparaging African-Americans?  Certainly not Clinton.  She loses blacks and gains... the whites who would've already voted for her?

TPM looks back at an article with the views of Jesse Jackson and Geraldine Ferraro on the 2006 race between an African-American and a woman--and comes up with the snarky conclusion that "[Ferraro Was] For Reason Before She Was Against It?"

When I look back at that article from 2006--in which both Jackson and Ferraro express the idea that a woman will have it easier than an African-American in the election--I realize just how much I did not expect the openness of the progressive media and voters to sexist and misogynistic discourses, regardless of whether that discourse is overt or cloaked in Clinton Derangement Syndrome.  

Obama may be willing to alienate Clinton's voters right now because the statistical evidence suggests that Democratic women seem to stick with the party. From the featured article at Corrente that I linked to in the previous thread:

"The expansion of the gender gap is due almost entirely to changes in how men vote. Only a few more women (1.6%, comprising 0.9% of all voters) prefer Clinton when matched with McCain than when Obama is matched with McCain--women pretty much stick with the Democrat regardless of whether its Clinton or Obama."