home

OPR Opens Investigation Into 2002 DOJ Torture Memo


The Office of Professional Responsibility, which is the branch of the Justice Department that investigates alleged misconduct, announced today that it has opened an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the infamous August, 2002 "torture memorandum" that opined interrogation techniques such as waterboarding were not torture.

Among other issues, we are examining whether the legal advice contained in those memoranda was consistent with the professional standards that apply to Department of Justice attorneys," Jarrett wrote.

More...

Jason Leopold, who has written two articles on this topic this week, explains that the basis for the August, 2002 memo appears to be a health benefits statute.

As to who wrote the memo, WAPO recaps:

The signed author of the August 2002 memo was Jay S. Bybee, then the head of the Office of Legal Counsel and now a federal appeals court judge in San Francisco. But the memo was primarily drafted by one of Bybee's deputies, John Yoo, now a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley.

Other secret Justice memos that are known to have dealt with waterboarding and harsh tactics are a pair of opinions penned in 2005 by Steven G. Bradbury, now the acting Office of Legal Counsel chief. Administration officials have said those
opinions authorized a number of techniques, including waterboarding and head-slapping.

Other probes underway by the OPR include one into the authorization of the warrantless NSA wiretap program and the firing of the 9 U.S. Attorneys.

OPR says because of the high interest in the torture investigation, it may break with its usual tradition and release the results publicly when it concludes the investigation.

The August, 2002 memo is titled "Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. 2340-2340A." It was a memo from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to Alberto R. Gonzales, then counsel to President Bush. A copy is available here (pdf.) Here's a 2004 WaPo article on the memo.

I think the best coverage on the torture memos has been that of law profs Jack Balkin and Marty Lederman at Balkanization -- Their writings through the fall of 2007 are accessible here.

< What Digby Said About Hillary | Another Run for Ralph Nader? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    wow! (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Sat Feb 23, 2008 at 03:40:52 AM EST
    it only took what, 6 years for them to finally get around to this? at this rate, everyone involved will be dead by the time the investigation is completed and conclusions reached. really, why even bother?

    let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that OPR finds all involved to have violated DOJ's professional standards for their attorneys, so what?

    will judge bybee be tossed off the appeals court? i doubt it. will prof. yoo be fired by UCB? don't bet the rent money on it. will mr. bradbury be unceremoniously booted from his perch? not hardly likely.

    just another example of the boys covering each other's butts.

    x (none / 0) (#2)
    by Mary Mary on Sat Feb 23, 2008 at 11:19:17 AM EST
    Is this just another one of those Bush admin deny and delay tactics?

    You know - "Sorry, we can't give you the information you seek because we're conducting our own investigation?"