This from an article by Bill Owens: (http://tinyurl.com/3ng6zn)

"For those of you unfamiliar with Dohrn and her special love of violence in the name of radicalism, one need look no further than her December 1969 rant celebrating the brutal Tate-LaBianca murders with the exhortation, "Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in their bellies. Wild!" According to Discover the Networks, Dohrn had even less sympathy for those who were on the receiving end of the Weathermen's violence:

A Chicago district attorney named Richard Elrod was seriously injured in the Weatherman riot that erupted during the Chicago "Days of Rage" in October 1969, and he was paralyzed for life as a result. Dohrn later led a celebration of Elrod's paralysis by leading her comrades in a parody of a Bob Dylan song -- "Lay, Elrod, Lay.""

That's how Republicans get away with damaging the nation with impunity.

Inasmuch as Ayers/Obama is concerned I wonder if Obama knew of Ayers' background. When Obama came to Chicago, Ayers was an accepted part of the local establishment.

If anyone believes Obama should have vetted Ayers, I'd have to ask how many people vett each and every one of their associates. They served on the same board, but neither appointed the other. From what I've read Obama and Ayers were only very marginal associates.

Or to use a Tom Wolfe 60s term, mau mau-ing the flak catchers.

In the modern parlance, it's called working the refs.

I doubt Brokaw is going to ask about Ayers tomorrow.

That's not the "detached relationship" that Obama (and the media sycophants) are describing. And  it's a lot closer than the Keating event 20 years ago that's already been "internalized" by the public.

As Mark Levin writes:

As someone who has written critically of John McCain on a host of issues, including the Keating Five, none of it compares to the life that Barack Obama has led and his belief system. Obama is not merely associated with domestic terrorists, Palestinian radicals, Marxists, and black liberation ideologues -- he was their favorite candidate. They groomed him. They befriended him. He befriended them. He socialized with them. In other words, these people saw Obama as representing their views and aspirations and he saw them the same way. I am not among those who raise Obama's associations but add "of course, it doesn't mean Obama shares their views." Oh really? These miscreants include Obama's former pastor, political mentors and allies, and friends. Obama attempts to downplay and distance himself from his own circle of allies now that he is running for president. But he is one of them. Obama is getting a pass that no other candidate in my memory has ever received.

If John McCain had belonged to a church for 20 years and that church advocated white supremacy and the  pastor of the church spewed racist propaganda wrapped in Biblical verses -- much of which was caught on video-tape -- what would we say? If McCain's good friends included people involved in blowing up abortion clinics instead of the Capitol Building, the Pentagon, and police stations, what would we say? If McCain was socially close to a professor with ties to neo-Nazi groups in Berlin, as opposed to a professor who had ties to the PLO, what would we say? If McCain spent his formative years schooled in fascism as opposed to Marxism, what would we say?

Every time Obama's life experiences and character are raised, the response is a diversionary tactic. Today, we're supposed to be impressed with the moral equivalency argument (Ayers = Keating Five), or Obama's associations and friendships aren't what they appear to be, or Obama really isn't like all those people he drew around him, or those raising these issues are guilty of McCarthyism.  There are 30 days left in this election. It's high time the Obama fan-dance ended.

In a conference call with reporters, attorney John Dowd was asked about a specific part of the Keating Five inquiry, the fact that Cindy McCain and her father had invested in a Keating strip mall.

"It was part of the inquiry, but it did not -- John was unconnected to that and unaware of it at the time, and did not participate in it," Dowd said.

"Sometime in 1986, I was told by Mr. Delgado, who was Executive Vice President of my father-in-law's company, that they were going to invest in a shopping center and that the investment -- the project -- was being put together by a subsidiary of American Continental," McCain said. "He later told me that they -- that that had happened. And I had no interest in it and just noted in passing that this investment took place."

The attorney asking the question during the hearing? John Dowd.