Iraq Policy In 2007
In both political and policy terms, I think all of the candidates should consider that in the real world they need not Iraq policies that will make sense in the fall of 2007, but Iraq policies that will make sense in January 2009 . . .
Does Yglesias believe this holds true for the Congress as well? 4 Senators and 1 Congressman are running for President. Is the leadership they demonstrate in the Congress NOW irrelevant to Yglesias? Atrios writes:
In more general terms, the stark inability of Democrats to think 6 or 12 months ahead on the issue has been revolting. Waiting for the ponies, or president Bush to come around, or the ISG to save the universe, or sensible Republicans to do the right thing has always been their strategy. But should have always assumed the obvious, that 6 or 12 months from now there would be no ponies, no sensible Republicans, and no wise old men of Washington to save the day. September is here, nothing will change... and these people appear to actually be surprised by this. As for the presidential candidates, 16 months from now the US death toll will likely stand at just about 5000. Billions more will have been wasted. Still there will be no sensible Republicans, no ponies, no wise old men of Washington, etc.
What Duncan writes points to the need for pressure NOW, indeed it pointed to the need for all out pressure last March from the progressive base.
Focus on ponies and plans in January 2009 is utterly misplaced. The fight is now and constant -in the Democratic Congress - for those who want to change Iraq policy.
| < Weekend Open Thread and Diary Rescue | Bush to Appoint New Attorney General Next Week > |





