home

House Judiciary Committee Votes Out Contempt Citations Against Meirs, Bolten

Here is the House Judiciary Committee Report.

It begins:

The House Judiciary Committee voted today to issue contempt citations for two of President Bush's most trusted aides, taking its most dramatic step yet towards a constitutional showdown with the White House over the Justice Department's dismissal of nine U.S. attorneys. The panel voted 22-17, along party lines, to issue citations to Joshua B. Bolten, White House chief of staff, and Harriet E. Miers, former White House counsel. Both refused to comply with committee subpoenas after Bush declared that documents and testimony related to the prosecutor firings were protected by executive privilege.

More.

. . . The vote represents the first overt step towards finding Bolten and Miers in criminal contempt of Congress. Next would come a vote of the entire House, followed by a referral to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. But the Bush administration has made clear it intends to block prosecution of any contempt charges, arguing that a presidentially-appointed U.S. attorney cannot legally be forced by Congress to flout the president's determination that the materials and testimony sought are protected by executive privilege. . . . Brian A. Benczkowski, principal deputy assistant attorney general, wrote in a letter to lawmakers Monday that the Justice Department had a long-standing position, "articulated during administrations of both parties, that the criminal contempt of Congress statute does not apply to the president or presidential subordinates who assert executive privilege. The same assertion also applies to Miers, Benczkowski wrote.

Inherent contempt will be the process that can get anything done for the Congress now in the face of the Bush Administration's outrageous position that the court's can not rule on the President's executive privilege claim, stated in the OLC opinions relied upon by Bush.

< Floyd Brown's Story | Politico: Specter To Review Testimony of Alito, Roberts, In Light Of Decisions >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Question, BTD (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by baba durag on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 12:47:06 PM EST
    Is there some procedural reason that the committee voted to bring criminal contempt charges first, rather than inherent contempt charges?

    No (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 12:58:56 PM EST
    I think it was the optics. They want Bush to violate the statute so they can argue their hand was forced. I think it makes sense politically.

    Parent
    Thanks (none / 0) (#5)
    by baba durag on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 01:05:42 PM EST
    It was the theater that drove the choice.  Makes sense.  And we get a twofer that way - both a criminal and an inherent contempt charge.  I like it.

    Parent
    I'd say the (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by Deconstructionist on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 12:59:09 PM EST
      reason is not so much "procedural" as practical.

      If the House first votes to refer contempt charges to DOJ for investigation and DOJ squelches it then the House has the ability to portray itself as having done everything possible to avoid a confrontation and can accuse the WH of forcing it to resort to the inherent contempt process with its stonewalling.

      That's also why the House Republicans are advocating a court challenge to the assertion of EP because if the House doesn't do that they will use the decision not to bring an action to counter the argument the House did everything possible to avoid resorting to the extraordinary remedy of inherent contempt.

    Exactly (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 01:01:40 PM EST
    Also ... (none / 0) (#6)
    by chemoelectric on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 11:37:19 PM EST
    ... it keeps this stuff churning while the logistics of inherent contempt are arranged. Presumably committees will have to be formed and scheduled and so forth.

    Parent