home

Thursday Open Thread

By Jeralyn, Section Blog Related
Posted on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:04:30 AM EST
Tags: (all tags)
Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

Some days, no matter how much time I spend blogging, there are topics I don't get to. Happily, others do. This is an open thread, and if you're looking for some good stuff to read, here's a start:

  • Omar Kadhr update on the Guantanamo prosecutor who recently quit. My last post on Omar is here, one with more case background is here and one on the quitting of Gitmo prosecutor Morris Davis is here.

  • Marcy of Next Hurrah typed her fingers off live-blogging the FISA hearings on Firedoglake and then updated on the WSJ op-ed supporting telecom immunity, noting Big Tent's post on that here.

More...

  • Long-time liberal bloggers will remember Brian Linse who writes Ain't No Bad Dude, but has been on hiatus for a while. He's been up to his ears with a movie the past two years. Turns out, he's the producer and it's coming out now. Go see Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, directed by Sidney Lumet with an all star cast. Congrats, Brain. The trailer is here.
  • The reduction in crack cocaine sentencing guidelines go into effect today. I have my first gulty plea under the new guidelines on Friday. They won't help my client but they are a good first step, and I'll have a post about them on Firedoglake at 1:00 PT.
  • Chris Bowers at Open Left has a post about the candidates and marijauana law reform.
  • On the Hillary "pile on" -- how others see us -- a post from the Dutch Van Der Galiën Gazette -- which, by the way, has one of the most attractive, cleanest looking Wordpress templates I've seen yet.
As for my afternoon, I got a call this morning from the mother of my first college boyfriend who back then used to live in Denver. It's been 30 years since I've seen or talked to her, and she must be 85 at least, but she sounded as spunky as ever and will be shopping in Cherry Creek today so we're going to meet for coffee. She's a phenomenal woman, a holocaust survivor with a great gift for story telling, but I almost dropped the phone to hear her voice after so long. Should be fun.

Ok, your turn.

< The New Attack Phase Of The Campaign? | Mukasey's Written Answers to the Senate >

  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


    • Display: Sort:
    Thursday Open Thread | 120 comments (120 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

    The more things change (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Jen M on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:24:28 AM EST
    the more they stay the same.

    Torture: Posturing or taking an ethical stand

    Forced Dipomacy An Oxymoron (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:55:19 PM EST
    Iraq postings anger US diplomats

    Many positions are due to become vacant at the new Iraq embassy
    Hundreds of US diplomats have protested against a government move to force them to accept postings in war-torn Iraq.
    About 300 angry diplomats attended a meeting at the state department, at which one labelled the decision a "potential death sentence".

    bbc

    The US embassy in Iraq should be closed. It is not safe for the personnel there. Some sort of rump mission of hardy volunteers could be maintained. But kidnapping our most capable diplomats and putting them in front of a fire squad is morally wrong and is administratively stupid, since many of these intrepid individuals will simply resign. (You cannot easily get good life insurance that covers death from war, and most State spouses cannot have careers because of the two-year rotations to various foreign capitals, and their families are in danger of being reduced to dire poverty if they are killed).

    Juan Cole

    I wonder how many of those (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:00:31 PM EST
    diplomats have ever spoken out against the "potential death sentence" faced by the soldiers and Iraqi civilians?

    Parent
    Many Have (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:16:23 PM EST
    Remember Joe Wilson? And here is one that wrote to Juan Cole

    'As a retired foreign service officer . . . at the State Department in Washington, I would like to add to your rationale for closing the US Embassy in Bagdad to save lives. In addition to the extreme danger involved, many of us would not go to Iraq because there is virtually nothing we can accomplish there. We could have no contact with ordinary Iraqis and would put our professional contacts or, for example, potential cultural exchange grantees, in great danger, simply by virtue of being seen with us, working with us, or participating in our programs. Unless some minimum level of security is established, we would be unable to achieve any worthwhile results, while causing great harm to cooperating Iraqis and their families--putting our own lives as risk for activities that would in the end likely prove useless and even shameful . . .'

    Cole points out:

    The Jesse Helms Right always hated the State Department, because it is about compromise and finding peaceful solutions, whereas the US Right is about war, violence and imposing its will on people. But is is the State Department that, despite some lapses over the decades, generally embodies the best of what America is abroad.


    Parent
    Well played, Squeaky (5.00 / 1) (#28)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:22:21 PM EST


    Parent
    I believe that when they hire (1.00 / 1) (#76)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:07:24 PM EST
    you....you agree to serve where directed.

    If the individuals involved don't want to go, there is an easy solution:

    Dear Boss:

    I quit.

    Parent

    Yes (5.00 / 1) (#86)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:53:56 PM EST
    All the Diplomats may as well quit. THey are just windowdressing to make this administration appear to care about diplomacy.

    Parent
    And if they don't want to (1.00 / 1) (#109)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:38:03 PM EST
    follow the rules that were in place when they hired on, they should quit.

    I doubt they will/would be missed.

    Parent

    The Rules (5.00 / 2) (#111)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:45:07 PM EST
    Have always been that diplomats are pulled out of a war zone. They are just placeholders for Bush's Iraq palace, because there is nothing for them to do there except get shot at.

    Parent
    Oh really? (1.00 / 1) (#122)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 06:29:36 PM EST
    It is customary that diplomats are recalled when war is declared.

    There is no declared war in Iraq. Heck. I think you are one of the ones who said we won the war in 4 days and should just come home.

    And then there was Vietnam.

    And the rule that matters is the one that says:

    You will go where we say go and when we say go, just as it was explained to you when you took the job.

    Parent

    Ugh (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:55:42 PM EST
    Mega-depressing list of 25 underreported threats

    link via robot wisdom

    Some highlights or lowlights:

    In February 2007 the White House announced the formation of the US African Command (AFRICOM), a new unified Pentagon command center in Africa, to be established by September 2008. This military penetration of Africa is being presented as a humanitarian guard in the Global War on Terror. The real objective is, however, the procurement and control of Africa's oil and its global delivery systems.

    The enduring monument to US liberation and democracy in Iraq will be the most expensive and heavily fortified embassy in the world--and is being built by a Kuwait contractor repeatedly accused of using forced labor trafficked from South Asia under US contracts.

    Under the code name Operation FALCON (Federal and Local Cops Organized Nationally) three federally coordinated mass arrests occurred between April 2005 and October 2006. In an unprecedented move, more than 30,000 "fugitives" were arrested in the largest dragnets in the nation's history. The operations directly involved over 960 agencies (state, local, and federal) and were the brainchild of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and US Marshal's Director Ben Reyna.

    The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) flooded Mexico with cheap subsidized US agricultural products that displaced millions of Mexican farmers. Between 2000 and 2005, Mexico lost 900,000 rural jobs and 700,000 industrial jobs, resulting in deep unemployment throughout the country. Desperate poverty has forced millions of Mexican workers north in order to feed their families.
    The National Campesino Front estimates that two million farmers have been displaced by NAFTA, in many cases related to the increase in US imports. In 1994, the first year of the agreement, the United States exported $4.59 billion of agricultural products to Mexico, according to the Department of Agriculture. By 2006 the figure had risen to $9.85 billion--an increase of 114 percent. US exports of corn, Mexico's staple crop and largest source of rural employment, alone doubled to over $2.5 billion in 2006......
    .... It is not just a few companies seeking to cut corners. These are not just jobs that "US workers won't take." Migrants work in nearly all low-paying occupations and have become essential to the US economy in the age of global competition.
    And here is who these people are (1.00 / 2) (#60)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:56:00 PM EST
    Project Censored is a media research group out of Sonoma State University which tracks the news published in independent journals and newsletters. From these, Project Censored compiles an annual list of 25 news stories of social significance that have been overlooked, under-reported or self-censored by the country's major national news media.

    Best I can tell, no proof is provided, just claims the MSM is ignoring the story... How anyone can believe that the MSM ignored:

     

    more than 30,000 "fugitives" were arrested in the largest dragnets in the nation's history.

    is, well....... beyond belief.

    Squeaky, call home.


    Parent

    Write Them A Letter (5.00 / 2) (#63)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 11:50:40 PM EST
    And complain.

    Parent
    I note that (1.00 / 2) (#70)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 10:04:49 AM EST
    B W Squeaky doesn't attempt to disagree with my most learned assessment....

    ;-)

    Parent

    Your Lazy Comment (5.00 / 2) (#72)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 10:42:21 AM EST
    Is not worth a response. If you had read more than the first paragraph of the FALCON article it would be clear to you why it is on the list of 25.

    But reading has never been your strong point.

    Parent

    The important thing is that (5.00 / 3) (#73)
    by Edger on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 11:01:38 AM EST
    he's a man of faith. Ugg.

    Parent
    How do you know (1.00 / 2) (#77)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:13:40 PM EST
    what I have read? Do you now channel when you project or project when you channel?? ;-)

    Let me restate.

    I have a high degree of disbelief in the article, have seen nothing to back it up, and you have provided none except to claim that it's true.

    proof:

    evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.  

    1. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?  
    2. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.  
    3. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.  


    Parent
    Try Google (5.00 / 2) (#79)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:28:10 PM EST
    Dark Avenger has done your work, but there is plenty more.

    Parent
    As you well know (1.00 / 2) (#98)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:54:24 PM EST
    the issue is not the 30,000, but the off the wall charges, etc.

    Can you tell me what studio in Gollywood the lunar landing was shot in?

    What flights all the Jews left NYC on 9/10??

    The missile that hit the Pentagon?

    Parent

    You also failed to read the comment (1.00 / 2) (#107)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:31:39 PM EST
    and thus couldn't connect the link with the paranoia stated in the article....

    It is not my place to hold your hand and say:

    Look DA! These guys are making wild charges about the Feds!!

    I did give you a hint with the aluminum helmet link but you were so eager to do your ankle biting trick you didn't read it.

    Thanks for proving my point.

    tehe

    Parent

    You failed to read the article linked to. (1.00 / 2) (#78)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:27:08 PM EST
    With the aid of the corporate media and an alliance of far-right organizations, Bush has successfully removed all the traditional obstacles to absolute power. The groundwork has been laid for an American dictatorship. FALCON is just one small part of that much larger plan.

    If you had then you would have understood this.

    tehe

    Parent

    Curve Ball's (5.00 / 2) (#35)
    by desertswine on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 02:48:46 PM EST
    identity is revealed on 60 Minutes.

    You remember him, "the man whose fabricated story of Iraqi biological weapons drove the U.S. argument for invading Iraq."

    It looks like (5.00 / 3) (#74)
    by Edger on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 11:50:45 AM EST
    Iraq veteran Alex, who wrote The Real Deal as his response to Rush Limbaugh calling veterans opposed to the war "phony soldiers", has a pretty good shot at winning the 2007 Weblog Award for Best Military Blog.

    The Real Deal:

    When I was a kid I watched Rush with my dad every morning when he was still on TV and always found him pretty funny and clever. Over the years I didn't have a very concrete opinion about him, I just knew him as the kooky conservative radio host who defended Bush at every turn (and hey, so did I). What did Rush and I have to lose when the war in Iraq started in 2003? I didn't have any family in the military, and all my friends were too young to even enlist. Why not go kick the sh*t out of a country, as long as someone else was doing it?

    This was the last time Rush and I would agree on the war, so here's my opinion of you, Rush: you're as smart, selfless and courageous as I was as a 17 year old high school senior.

    You make a good point that people who joined the military during the war knew they were going and shouldn't be against it. As I've seen since I joined in 2004, everyone in the military is gung ho to a certain extent, at least in the beginning of their career. I was part of a large group of new guys who got to a unit that just got back from a year long deployment. After our hazing sessions became less and less frequent in the following months, we listened to the stories all of them were telling, of vicious firefights and rescue missions. We all wanted to do our part, we all wanted to get some too. We were going to see what it was like to take a life. Too bad Rush missed his chance to do so, or maybe he'd be singing a different tune.
    ...
    As a phony civilian hoping to be a phony soldier, I tried to enlist in the military after I graduated high school in 2003.
    ...
    Speaking of phony soldiers, I wanted to show Rush a few that I know: {click link above for Alex's pictures}
    ...
    This is Chevy in Baghdad. Brian Chevalier was going to reenlist but decided against it before he was killed on March 14 during our first mission in Baqubah. His phony life was celebrated in a phony memorial where everyone who knew him cried phony tears. A phony American flag draped over his phony coffin when his body came home. It was presented to his phony mother and phony daughter.

    I would be in awe if I ever met a real life soldier, and not a phony one like Bill, Matt or Brian Chevalier. Thank you, Rush Limbaugh, for telling me the difference. I hope your ass is ok.

    You can vote for Alex here.

    Alex's blog is (5.00 / 2) (#75)
    by Edger on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 11:53:41 AM EST
    Army of Dude. Help him win the award. He deserves it.

    Parent
    Dog (none / 0) (#2)
    by eric on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:29:39 AM EST
    How about discussing Duane "Dog" Chapman?

    This guy has been a Talkleft favorite...what do people think about him now?

    LINK

    I'm surprised and saddened (none / 0) (#3)
    by Jeralyn on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:39:10 AM EST
    by that clip. I'm glad he apologized. A&E apparently has suspended the show pending an investigation.

    On the other hand, it was a private phone call with his son that was surreptitiously (and, if neither Dog nor his son consented to the taping, illegally) recorded. I don't approve of that either.

    The Dog I know is not a racist and I've never heard  him utter a prejudicial word.

    I don't drop my friends when they face adversity.  There's no defending what he said, but I'll accept his apology.

    The sign of a true friend.... (none / 0) (#6)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:54:30 AM EST
    I don't drop my friends when they face adversity

    The Dog is lucky to call you one.

    Parent

    just because (none / 0) (#8)
    by cpinva on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 11:08:12 AM EST
    The Dog I know is not a racist and I've never heard  him utter a prejudicial word.

    you haven't, doesn't really mean anything. you don't live with him, nor are you around him 24/7/365. i believe billy joel wrote a song about this, "the stranger"; "we all have a face, that we hide away forever", or something like that. it's true of everyone.

    actually, i was less than stunned, when i read of this. it merely proves that, while you can take the trash out of the trailer park, you can't take the trailer park out of the trash.

    it's very noble of you to stand by your friends, but you're still known by the company you keep, as the old saying goes. there's a grain of truth in that, which is why it's an old saying.

    Parent

    Well unless the Dog you know (none / 0) (#40)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 03:51:30 PM EST
     sure throws #^$#^$%^% around a heck of a lot for a guy who isn't a racist. As the clip makes clear, in his own words,  one of the reasons he doesn't want the #%$^$^^$&^ around is because by being aroundd the &#&%&$^#$ will hear the word ##%^#^$^#%%##@ and might expose him and ruin him.

      I think he needs to look in the mirror to find the person who ruined him.

     

    Parent

    I doubt he is ruined..... (none / 0) (#41)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:00:00 PM EST
    everybody will forget in a week.

    Not for nothing...what kind of person sells info to the Enquirer?  The same kind of person who sells info to the police...a R-A-T.


    Parent

    Full audio (none / 0) (#43)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:22:48 PM EST
    here.

    Ironic that the phone call he makes in which he voices his concern about the possibility that someone would record him saying the n-word and give that recording to the Enquirer thereby ruining his career, is itself recorded, is chock full of him using the n-word, and is given to the Enquirer possibly ruining his career.

    Parent

    Seems he had the girlfriend... (none / 0) (#52)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:24:56 PM EST
    pegged correctly as being of low character, fwiw.

    Shame he couldn't express that without racial epithets, but I'd be lying if I said I never used some nasty terms in anger I later regretted.  

    Most of all I'm reminded of why I'm glad I'm not famous...imagine if you had to wonder if every person you met was turning around and calling the Enquirer.  Thats gotta suck.  

    Parent

    Even worse (none / 0) (#59)
    by eric on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 07:46:16 PM EST
    Listening to this in full only lowers my opinion of him.

    He keeps saying that it isn't because the girlfriend is black, but because she is, she is likely to take it the wrong way when he says the N word.  You see, he isn't a racist or anything, it would just be better if his son had a white girlfriend who wouldn't get the wrong idea when he uses the N word.  

    Yikes.

    Parent

    So? (none / 0) (#44)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:25:37 PM EST
      the person who outed him as a foul mouthed racist is a rat. That isn't going to save his career no matter what the rat's motive might have been.

      I will (although I don't think  it applies to you) point out that quite a few people defended Aravosis ratting on gay people  and should probably refrain from criticizing this rat.

      You  condemn all rats without regard to motive or target. I can respect that.

    Parent

    Ethical Rat? (1.00 / 0) (#46)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:35:27 PM EST
    Here:

    NEW YORK A reporter for The Village Voice helped discredit a key witness in a mob-related murder trial on Wednesday after his taped interview with the witness indicated she had changed her story. The move is expected to lead to a dismissal of the case.

    The New York Times reported Thursday that prosecutors seeking the murder conviction of former F.B.I. Supervisor Roy Lindley DeVecchio said they would drop the case after the Voice's Tom Robbins revealed his interview tape.

    DeVecchio, 67, was charged with helping a mob informant commit four murders in the 1980s and 1990s, the Times reported.



    Parent
    Technically.... (none / 0) (#53)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:27:38 PM EST
    the reporter ratted on a rat, not sure what the ruling is there:)

    Parent
    My Take Too (1.00 / 0) (#58)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 06:07:39 PM EST
    Seems like the reporter was at the top in a pile up of rats.

    Parent
    I think his bounty hunting.... (none / 0) (#54)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:34:34 PM EST
    career is safe, television maybe not.

    I'm just saying what kind of lowlife tapes conversations and sells them to the Enquirer...no point/just observation.

    I guess the world has always been one big sewing circle, it just seems particularly crazy these days.

    Parent

    apparently a very angry son (none / 0) (#68)
    by Deconstructionist on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 07:13:49 AM EST
      I can certainly understand his anger and the desire to punish his father for his reprehensible conduct. Being treated like that by one's own father would make many vindictive. It's common for people to get angriest at those closest to them. Selling the recording is  harder to understand.

    Parent
    kdog, btw, (none / 0) (#45)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:25:43 PM EST
    it seems the Dog's problem with the girl (among other things) was that he believes her to be, or was attempting to be, a R-A-T.

    Parent
    I probably should shut up... (none / 0) (#56)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:41:58 PM EST
    beyond saying recording people behind their back and selling it are pretty low.

    Because I'm not gonna listen to it.

    Parent

    Phelps case (none / 0) (#4)
    by sdf on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:46:25 AM EST
    I know it's not your particular area of greatest interest, but what is your take on the jury giving $10.9 million to the soldier's family who sued Phelps over the funeral protests?  Is it going to stand?

    I sure hope it doesn't stand..... (none / 0) (#10)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 11:54:14 AM EST
    otherwise free speech don't mean what I think it means.

    Parent
    If It Does (1.00 / 0) (#23)
    by squeaky on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:08:14 PM EST
    Then Falwell and Robertson should be next:

    This is the time to remind everyone that after September 11, the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, who inflicted the inaccurately labeled and proto-fascist 'moral majority' on the rest of us, said that God had 'allowed' 9/11 because the US tolerated gays and feminists. And Pat Robertson, the host of the 700 Club on which the remarks were made, agreed entirely and even issued a subsequent statement to the same effect.

    Juan Cole

    Parent

    Could a punch in the face (none / 0) (#24)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:11:08 PM EST
    to the a-hole who harrasses a grieving family be interpreted as another form of speech?

    Parent
    In my book it is:).... (none / 0) (#32)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:36:10 PM EST
    Funny you should mention that jondee...I was thinking of how I would deal with a bunch of animals like Phelps and his crew crashing a funeral of a loved one...I'd clean his freakin' clock and let him sue me.

    Thats the best solution, imo...better than potentially weakening the first amendment by lawsuit.

    Besides...I've met a few folks begging for a clock-cleaning in my day, Phelps takes the cake.

    Parent

    No, but (none / 0) (#47)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:38:31 PM EST
      I'm damn sure no jury would convict in a criminal case or award damages in a civil case-- and I'm sure plenty of lawyers would offer pro bono representation if necessary.

    Parent
    Free speech (none / 0) (#26)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:20:45 PM EST
    without an iota of civility is about as meaningful as cavemen smearing sh*t on a cave wall IMO.

    And yes, I know Im not always civil.

    Parent

    Luckily.... (none / 0) (#33)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:40:35 PM EST
    its the right to free speech, and not the right to free meaningful speech.

    I agree with your sentiments, but not even I would want to be the decider of what speech is meaningful and what isn't.  That's best decided by the listener.

    Parent

    The judge allowed the (none / 0) (#42)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:03:26 PM EST
     case to go to the jury so he evidently believed the plaintiff presented a prima facie case of actionable conduct causing damages.

      The compensatory damages are presumably for intentional infliction of emotional distress and while very high, an argument could be made that they are not irrationally related to the anguish caused by having people do such abhorrent things at a funeral. The punitve damages while very high in relation to the net worth of the defendants are not that high in relation to compensatory damages awarded.

      My conscience isn't shocked by the award and I don't know that many judges would find them irrationally disproportioate, so the question may be whether on appeal it is determined the conduct was protected speech. If not the award might stand.

      The right to free speech is not absolute and laws against  breach of peace, invasion of privacy, infliction of emotional distress, etc. can allow for damages for speech related conduct in appropriate cases.

     

    Parent

    Heckuva job... (none / 0) (#5)
    by desertswine on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:49:32 AM EST
    Bigfoot.

    Hughes to go back to Texas.

    Hughes has spent the past two years trying to defend Bush policy in the Middle East. Pffft.

    When did Jesus become a Republican? (none / 0) (#7)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:56:39 AM EST
    Local San Diego singer/songwriter Cindy Lee Berryhill answers the question with a tune.

    Dadler, are you in the WGA? (none / 0) (#13)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:23:36 PM EST


    Parent
    Yeah, I'm still a member (none / 0) (#14)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:29:42 PM EST
    Haven't been able to sell sh*t the last few years, but I still pay my dues.  Had a good script going out with a good producer.  But now...sigh...it looks like a long wait.  So it goes.  Oh well, I've got a lovely wife and beautiful son, life could be much worse.  

    Parent
    Let's hope this contract gets settled fairly (none / 0) (#19)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:53:47 PM EST
    and soon.

    Parent
    I hope so (none / 0) (#22)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:04:13 PM EST
    But I have a bad feeling it's going to last awhile.  

    Parent
    Great. (none / 0) (#27)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:21:07 PM EST


    Parent
    As long as the producers (none / 0) (#29)
    by scribe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:25:39 PM EST
    can throw "unscripted reality/variety" shows (Survivor, Dancing with Stars, American Idiot) up on the air and get ratings, they can keep going.  

    As I see it, it's the feature film biz that will take the real hit and, from the studios' perspective they probably could care less. The vertical integration of TV and movies under one roof allows them to take a hit in the theaters and stay afloat on the TV revenues.  Some of the mouth breathers out there will watch a test pattern, and they count as much as anyone else.  (Maybe more, because they're more susceptible to advertising....)

    Then again, with the Thought Crimes legislation going on, maybe being a writer isn't as good a gig as it once was....

    Parent

    Producers (none / 0) (#36)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 03:02:54 PM EST
    Ultimately it'll be settled, mostly because film producers have egos and need to be in on the blockbusters and the award winners.  And you need new material to do that.  As for TV, so many of the producers ARE writers on shows (ever notice how long the opening producer credits stretch into act one of any show?), and almost all think of themselves as writers first (and want that respect), so in the long run, unless they DON'T want to be writers anymore and NOT have that respect, they'll settle.  Everyone will.  But the big money will hold out as long as possible, I think, exactly for the reality show reason you cite.  It allows them to hold out longer.  But when reality is ALL there is, the audience will get sick of it, such are the cycles of the entertainment industry.  Remember when the sitcom was king during the heady days of NBC Thursday nights?

    Parent
    Dadler (1.00 / 0) (#62)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 11:09:28 PM EST
    Thought you might enjoy this, written by William Katz, a well known writer..

    Oh, by the way, I said that the short scene I wrote at the start of this piece never happened. Well, let me come clean. It kind of did -- but not to Alfred Hitchcock. It involved Fred Zinnemann, one of our greatest directors -- "High Noon," "From Here to Eternity," "A Man for All Seasons," "The Day of the Jackal." Not long before his death he met with a young studio guy who did in fact ask him what he'd done. Zinnemann, the story goes, stared down the kid and finally replied, "You first."

    There is no record of the answer.

    It had to be brief.

    Katz wrote several pieces about entertainment. They were in Power Line...

    If you want, and can stand the strain, I'll try and link'em.

    Parent

    Link 'em up (none / 0) (#119)
    by Dadler on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 01:54:25 PM EST
    BTW, the poker bug has bitten me hard.

    Parent
    Good luck (none / 0) (#120)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 06:16:43 PM EST
    I haven't been to LA in a while.... Tunica is fairly close...and the action is good at SJC.. But I've been wanting some 40-80 action at the Commerce...

    Parent
    But you are right (none / 0) (#37)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 03:08:50 PM EST
    The film studio game is completely different now.  But...the audience still wants new material, they always do, and there's something about scripted drama and comedy that for thousands of years have been indispensible for societies.  I'm still optimistic enough that I don't see that changing.  But I just have this nagging feeling this one is going to last a long while.  Don't know why, I just do.  I really hope I'm wrong.  

    Parent
    All true. (none / 0) (#39)
    by scribe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 03:35:52 PM EST
    Speaking from the perspective of having grown up in a union household in union towns where strikes were, if not common, at least understood and the learned wisdom of how to deal with them passed down orally, the point of how to deal with being on strike is to use the time as productively as possible.  For union households when I was growing up, that meant dad getting a moonlighting job that brought some dough onto the table, and mom getting (or keeping and trying for more hours) that second job outside the house.  Dads often wound up in the man-eating cardboard plant, where jobs were usually available because no one really wanted to work there because, well, it was nasty and dangerous.  It also meant budgeting the household with an eye on the contract expiration date, and having a chest freezer in the basement filled with staples before the strike set in.  "Once the trouble starts" is no time to start preparing.

    Of course, when the union goes on strike and the company says "fine" and two days later the trucks pull up at the plant to ship the machinery to another plant in a "right-to-work" state (which happened to my dad), then it's time to call on the network of contacts and relatives built during the salad days.

    For writers, I suppose it's a bit different if only (as I understand the business, which is "vaguely at best") because there isn't necessarily a paycheck every two weeks.  That means the writer likely has built up (or tried to) a cushion until the next piece sells.  In that situation, I guess the best thing to do is keep writing and putting pieces in the can and up on the shelf.  They'll keep.

    And don't cross picket lines.

    Parent

    It's a white collar union, after all (none / 0) (#48)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:41:34 PM EST
    But at least one that is defending and trying to strenghten benefits for the original creators of the stories that end up on the screen.  Writers are the only ones in the process who start with the literal blank page.  Then again, Hollywood is too close to home for me.  Grew up there, dad was an actor on the fringes, I spent many of the weekends that I saw him (once month on average) watching rehearsals at some dingy westside theatre (or eastside for the really dingy), and pops is a big actors union guy and union man in general.  Born two years before the Depression when many a toddler his age, including his brother, died as children.  Grew up in the tenements, more poor than one can imagine, sharing a "bathroom" with the dozens of other people on your floor, not knowing if dinner would be on the table, sleeping on the table until he was ten.  He swears he didn't see a tree until he was twelve and left his neighborhood to attend poor kids charity camp.  But I digress.  Anyway, yes, the WGA is a different union that the Teamsters, and, in fact, the Teamsters are being lukewarm about supporting the writers in this strike, as are the other unions.  

    All the mice are scurrying for their scraps.  Hopefully, like you said, they've stocked away enough for the famine.

    Parent

    As for me (none / 0) (#49)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:45:58 PM EST
    Marrying a woman who is Exec VP of a bank and more than capable of bringing home the bacon, frying it up in the pan, and never never letting me forget I'm a man...that certainly helps during the lean times.

    Ahem.

    Parent

    And amen. (none / 0) (#50)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:46:25 PM EST
    For all good women.

    Parent
    Although the banking industry. (none / 0) (#51)
    by Dadler on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 04:48:55 PM EST
    Not so much.  My wife would love to get back onto the credit union side, but even they have their drawbacks, as she found out at her last CU job -- corrupt CEO with the "my personal kingdom" attitude.

    Parent
    A union's a union, and I wish (none / 0) (#55)
    by scribe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:38:32 PM EST
    I hadn't written so much - beware the ziggaurat.

    Parent
    Good point. (none / 0) (#38)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 03:13:45 PM EST
    I wonder how much pressure the big theater chain owners, like Anschutz, can put on the studios...

    Parent
    I have a dumb question (none / 0) (#64)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:28:37 AM EST
    Are this season's shows finished or does the writers strike mean mid-season the scripts for my favorite shows are going to go downhill?

    Parent
    J (none / 0) (#81)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:20:59 PM EST
    If the guild strikes, there will be no writing,  no scripts, and therefor no production of TV shows. So, at some point, the networks will only have re-runs to put on the air.

    If there is a strike and it goes only a few weeks or so, production will start right back up again after the strike ends, so only some relatively minor hiccups in TV production.

    I do think many shows have tried to "stockpile" scripts such that they can keep shooting through the strike and not shut down production.

    However, for a number of reasons, many shows do not have many, or any, maybe, stockpiled scripts.

    Also, script pages are routinely re-written the night before, or even the day of, shooting those pages, so shows with stockpiled scripts often will not want to go into production w/o the ability to tweak them at the last minute.

    And, if the teamsters truly do support such a strike, a network could have an entire season of scripts stockpiled but it would be to no avail - there will be no production to speak of.

    Parent

    A union's a union, and this was my longer (none / 0) (#57)
    by scribe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 05:42:30 PM EST
    post, which the zig made me move over here:

    I wish the unions which seem to tend to look down their noses at unionized white-collar jobs as, I guess, being something less-than-a-real-union, would get their act together.

    The purposes of a union are to give the workers the ability to bargain on an equal ground against the employer, to ensure fair wages for the work, and to provide mutual support (and that, currently, includes benefits such as health insurance, etc.) for the members.

    Via my listening to German radio streaming through the computer, I've been watching the last couple weeks (stretching into months, now) as the German union of railway engineers (the Lokfuhrers, short for locomotive drivers) have been tying that country into knots.  Contract's up, and they've been on strike.  Their demands include a 10% wage increase and better benefits and working conditions.  They've used spot strikes, a day here and a day there, thus far targeted at commuter rail.  Because they don't have a Taft-Hartley Act (partly a legacy of our Occupation having enshrined the right of collective bargaining), the government can't order them back to work and the courts have been backing their right to strike (subject to a cooling off period in the summer, which passed with no productive negotiation).  Thus far, only two employees have been fired as far as I can tell, and that was because they parked (and left) their trains on main lines at the exact moment the strike was supposed to start, rather than going to the next station and then parking the train.  Bad behavior on any railroad.

    Next, they intend to target the freight rail system.  

    I think they'll win in the end.


    Parent

    Food for thought (none / 0) (#9)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 11:25:05 AM EST
      Even if we assume the numbers give only an approximation, this suggests some folks here might want to think about their antipathy  toward the religious because seeking to exclude even a fraction of those numbers would seem to be a profoundly stupid position.

    Link

    Eugene Debs (none / 0) (#11)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:03:12 PM EST
    , no intellectual light weight, used to say that he drew a tremendous amount of strength and inspiration from the Sermon on the Mount, (seemingly, the r.r's least favorite section in the Bible), and it's pretty much historically incontrovertable that spirituality was a very sustaining force to blacks struggling for their freedom and civil rights, yet somehow we've allowed the populist poetry of American religion to be hi-jacked by the spiritual descendents of the Bosses and slave traders and their passive enablers, to a large extent, (I think), because we've allowed European DOCTRINAIRE leftism -- an outgrowth of different histories, peoples, and struggles -- to be too much of a prevailing influence in this country without enough of an attempt made to integrate it with our own unique history and folk traditions.

    And the upshot is, that the right has hi-jacked populism with a shoddy, cult-like, apocalyptic, product --- that is still, to too many people, a "something" superior to the left's nothing.

    Thoughts?

    Parent

    The political (none / 0) (#12)
    by tnthorpe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:18:34 PM EST
    category of "the religious" is suspect altegether. There is a huge variety of religious expression in this country. Sure, among socially illiberal fundamentalists the word Democrat is anathema, but not among the mainline Protestant churches. Catholics and Jews. Frankly, the relgious calling of someone like Jimmy Carter, who has spent his post-presidential life on Habitat for Humanity, conflict resolution, and other worthy tasks, and that of, say, Pat Robertson, or the nutjobs at Bob Jones Univ. aren't comparable. Give me Bishop Sprong and William Sloane Coffin or Chris Hedges (Yale Divinity) anyday.

    Even among the most socially illiberal church goers (from the article line above):
    But Americans - even those who care the most about their religion - still have secular concerns. Although 60 percent of white evangelicals say they could not vote for someone who disagrees with their positions on social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion, the top two issues they want to hear the candidates talk about this year are health care and the war in Iraq, the same issues that matter most to people who are less religious.

    Parent

    Think about this (1.00 / 2) (#61)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:58:45 PM EST
    Sure, among socially illiberal fundamentalists the word Democrat is anathema,

    At one time that was not true.

    What did the Demos do to run off these voters??

    Parent

    Racist (5.00 / 2) (#65)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:42:26 AM EST
    Southern Democrats left the party after LBJ got serious about Civil Rights. It's a long and complex story, really. MLK Jr.'s assassination, Bobby Kennedy's assassination, Nixonian politics, Roe v. Wade, and then the rise of the Religious Right all contribute to it.
    I don't think the Dems ran anyone off as much as abortion rights, gay rights, affirmative action, the environment became increasingly polarizing issues that were effectively mobilized as wedge issues in Republican political campaigns. People like Barbara Jordan used to win in Texas before the culture wars made politics as completely uncivil as it is today.
    Now the Republican party's coalition between market fundamentalists and the religious right is perhaps dissolving because they do in fact worship different gods.
    Will the r.r. form its own party? They've got money and passion, who knows?

    Parent
    That was 40 plus years ago. (1.00 / 2) (#69)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 10:02:26 AM EST
    That's two generations.

    And if you'll do some research you will find many black mayors in towns large and small plus sheriffs, assemblymen, police, etc.

    To a certain extent, racism exists everywhere, but the old south doesn't exist anymore. There is something here besides the civil rights struggles.

    As for your "wedge" issues, I find that humorous.
    These are positions that the  people in question oppose. What shouldn't the Repubs highlight their opposition and the Demo support??

    If politics have turned nasty look at the MoveOn ad and almost any Left wing blog. You can't call people stupid, racists, bigots, dumb, etc., and expect them to listen to your point of view.

    And yes, the Repubs do it too, I refer you back to the wedge issues.... But the Repubs aren't trying to convert the voters. The Demos are. So what do the Demos do??

    For example:

    No. (none / 0) (#59)
    by Edger on Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 11:41:04 AM EST
    There is no equivalence, ppj.

    White supremacist nutbars have barely grown feet from their flippers and crawled out of the primordial slime pits. They are eons behind anyone they try to demonize.

    There will probably never be equivalence.

    After reading that I was reminded of what Forest Gump said.

    Stupid is as stupid does.


    Parent
    I find your (5.00 / 1) (#80)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:31:31 PM EST
    question more interesting that your own answer to it.

    You misunderstand the point about B. Jordan. Tom DeLay is the poster child for the sort of politics that made people like her impossible at the national level, and here I refer, as you seem to think, to the color of her skin, but the content of her character. Obvious, no?

     Given that the Repbulicans have given us Watergate, Willie Horton, and swiftboating, I find your complaint about MoveOn disingenuous. The Republicans have embraced politics of division, fear, hate, and rampant militarism, and have sold it in the most dishonest ways. Reagan couldn't bring himself to utter the word AIDS when the epidemic started to rage, but was happy to continue with his idiotic pronouncements such as "trees cause more pollution than automobiles do." It's not simply a matter of giving the people what they want, but of manufacturing phony crises through polarizing rhetoric. Surely you can see that?

    As far as who is dumb, etc., I refer you to the Creation Museum and the whole debate over evolution. There's the rr in action.

    Edger's right, white suprematists are unevolved, to say the least. I'm not sure what that has to do with anything you asked about though. Look at the Southern Poverty Law Center's work on white suprematists and hate on their site.

    You're right though, the religious right can embrace some pretty stupid positions and advocate for them in really stupid ways. When will conservatives such as yourself recognize that and change the errors of their ways?


    Parent

    So Tom Delay ran off Barbara (1.00 / 2) (#93)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 03:52:13 PM EST
    Jordon?? Wow. I never knew he was that powerful....Of course Rove could conjure up hurricanes...

    Watergate is also two generations back, and the only people who really care about that are the same ones who keep talking about racism in the south. Note my comment:

    And if you'll do some research you will find many black mayors in towns large and small plus sheriffs, assemblymen, police, etc.

    To a certain extent, racism exists everywhere, but the old south doesn't exist anymore.

    I think you are deliberately, although it is possible that you just can't comprehend that Edger's attack was meant to insult all white southerners, although he is free to deny it.

    Jondee though is more specific:

    Zero weight" (none / 0) (#68)
    by jondee on Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 01:09:56 PM EST
    means you're either completely out to lunch, or so occupied recieving "links" that you havnt heard or noticed that the bulwark of pressure and support from organized "Christians" for regime-change and The Greater Israel comes from groups that embrace the very dangerous, crack-brained, theological vision I described.

    [ Parent | Reply to This |  1  2  3  4  5  ]
    Yeah, in the long view, (none / 0) (#69)
    by jondee on Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 01:15:08 PM EST
    I believe they're equal threats.

    I could provide many other examples, but I know you get my point.

    But please, pay no attention and lose another national election. It's what the Demos have done best for 12 of the past 30 years.

    In the meantime NHC withers away....

    Parent

    zzzzzzz (5.00 / 2) (#94)
    by jondee on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:41:50 PM EST


    Parent
    I will say that some of us here (5.00 / 1) (#95)
    by jondee on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:50:39 PM EST
    dont automatically equate "all white southerners" with white supremacists even if Mr. Low Blood Sugar does.

    Why he would remains to be explained.

    Parent

    Guilty Conscious? (5.00 / 1) (#97)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:53:59 PM EST
    Or just rhetorical flair, aka trolling?

    Parent
    With friends like that.. (5.00 / 2) (#101)
    by jondee on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 05:13:41 PM EST
    It takes a real maestro to level that type of slander at the people you're allegedly defending.

    Parent
    I try (5.00 / 2) (#104)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 08:40:21 PM EST
    to give him the benefit of the doubt, but just read his rampantly idiotic posts. Really, he contorts words, abandons logic, doesn't know history from a hole in the ground, is unfailingly rude, jeez, what a piece of work. I think it's just time to ignore him. I wish I had a button to press to make his brain dead comments invisible.

    Parent
    your rudeness (5.00 / 2) (#102)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 08:34:59 PM EST
    knows no bounds at all, while the low intellectual level of your posts speaks for itself.
    If all you've got is this idiotic snark save yourself the trouble.

    Parent
    Rude??? (1.00 / 2) (#105)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:15:56 PM EST
    Well, when you lose the argument that is always your favorite fall back position.

    Parent
    ROFLMAO (5.00 / 1) (#110)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:40:50 PM EST
    where's that dang ignore button?

    Parent
    oops (none / 0) (#85)
    by tnthorpe on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:46:28 PM EST
    should read, "I refer NOT, as you seem to think..."


    Parent
    Character assassination (5.00 / 3) (#92)
    by jondee on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 03:48:36 PM EST
    directed at white supremacists.

    Who low will that Edger allow himself to sink?
    Those people are the salt of the earth; the backbone  of America.

    Parent

    Jondee makes things up... (1.00 / 2) (#106)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:24:12 PM EST
    nothing new, but it is better form to wait until the subject of the new Big Tale is on another thread.

    Character assassination
    directed at white supremacists. Who low will that Edger allow himself to sink?
    Those people are the salt of the earth; the backbone  of America.

    I wrote:

    I think you are deliberately, although it is possible that you just can't comprehend that Edger's attack was meant to insult all white southerners, although he is free to deny it.

    But knowing your history of seeing everything through the race card filter, I am not surprised to see you deliberately misstate what I wrote.

    Unless of course you agree that all white southerners are "white supermacists."

    I am sure Jimmy Carter will be surprised to learn that.

    And thanks for proving my point. If not on Edger, at least on you.

    Parent

    Heh! (5.00 / 1) (#114)
    by Edger on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 05:47:38 AM EST
    Sigh... another thread, another day, in the continuing Sad Story of ppj - Episode 2: The Revenge of Darwin.

    You're still dreaming of finding someone here stupid enough to think you make any sense, are you?

    You don't think the trouble you're having has something to do with the drastic shortage of stupid people here?

    Do you?

    Looks like you'll need to follow the teachings of George and Karl a little more closely. You can't just pay lip service to those guys, you know? You gotta get down an' dirty with them ppj! What are you holding back for? Create your own reality!

    Parent

    Who are you to say what other (5.00 / 2) (#116)
    by jondee on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 08:24:35 AM EST
    people "really meant" ?

    You're the one who's equating white supremacists with "all white southerners"; no one else made that equation.

    What a pathetic, dishonest, delusional, troll you are.

    Parent

    As Col Potter said: (1.00 / 1) (#121)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 06:23:53 PM EST
    Horse hockey.

    And in case you missed it:

    I think you are deliberately, although it is possible that you just can't comprehend that Edger's attack was meant to insult all white southerners, although he is free to deny it.

    But knowing your history of seeing everything through the race card filter, I am not surprised to see you deliberately misstate what I wrote.

    Unless of course you agree that all white southerners are "white supermacists."

    I am sure Jimmy Carter will be surprised to learn that.

    And thanks for proving my point. If not on Edger, at least on you.

    We can now add jondee's name to the "I distort what people write" list.

    Congrats. You've earned your place.

    In the meantime neither you, Tnthorpe, edger or B W Squeaky have the vaguest idea about the south, and/or how to convert anyone.

    The Demos deserve you.

    Parent

    No idea (5.00 / 1) (#124)
    by jondee on Sun Nov 04, 2007 at 11:37:21 AM EST
    about "the South"of your morbidly overactive imagination.

    I lived in Houma La. for two years and Charlottesville Va for two years and got to know many marvelous, perfectly decent, intelligent people and whether you believe it or not, sorry, but they're not all white supremacists.

    Dont take it too hard.

    Parent

    Good point , t (none / 0) (#15)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:33:48 PM EST
    Another question is, why does the media (seemingly) all-too-often want to spin this into a "conflict" between "traditional" (code word for politically conservative) religious folk and "secularists"?

    Is it just because the advertisers like extreme polarization and conflict?

    Or, is it because the r.r machine is so much better at manipulating how the issue is framed in the media?

    Parent

    because issues with (none / 0) (#18)
    by Jen M on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:45:37 PM EST
    shades of grey are hard to sell. Much less full living color.

    Parent
    Lets see if the evangelicals.... (none / 0) (#16)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:35:41 PM EST
    still poll the same way when the general election campaign is in full swing.

    After a few "Hillary wants your son to become an abortion doctor and marry a man" ads during the 700 Club, health care and Iraq might not be top two anymore.  In other words, plenty of time for the politics of fear to resume.

    Parent

    That's what Im afraid of kdog (none / 0) (#17)
    by jondee on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 12:44:06 PM EST
    (see, they've already got me scared)

    Btw, Thats what most of this immigration b.s is about, IMO.

    Oh definitely.... (none / 0) (#30)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:26:55 PM EST
    Heck...anybody is susceptible to it. I've made a vow not to vote for a democrat, but after several "Rudy wants ICE to raid your home at 2am to check your papers" attack ads I might cave out of fear too.

    We'd all be better served watching what they do and ignoring what they say.  The lot of them are snake-oil salesman by trade after all.

    Parent

    Texas "Judge" Keller gets protests (none / 0) (#31)
    by scribe on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:31:41 PM EST
    over closing the court at 5PM sharp, precluding filing appeal papers.

    From the article, the protestors would have protested at the Court, but since they all work days, they protested at the Judge's house, after they got off from work, i.e., after 5 PM.  It seems the judge was home.

    Dog has issued a further apology (none / 0) (#66)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 12:52:14 AM EST
    Here:

    In a statement, the 54-year-old Chapman said he has "utmost respect and aloha for black people who have suffered so much due to racial discrimination and acts of hatred.

    "I did not mean to add yet another slap in the face to an entire race of people who have brought so many gifts to this world," he said. "I am ashamed of myself and I pledge to do whatever I can to repair this damage I have caused." Chapman said, "My sincerest, heartfelt apologies go out to every person I have offended for my regrettable use of very inappropriate language. I am deeply disappointed in myself for speaking out of anger to my son and using such a hateful term in a private phone conversation." Chapman said the clip was completely taken out of context.

    "I was disappointed in his choice of a friend, not due to her race, but her character," he said. "However, I should have never used that term." Chapman said he is meeting with his spiritual adviser, Rev. Tim Storey, who is black, and hopes to meet with other black leaders, "so they can see who I really am and teach me the right thing to do to make things right, again." "I know that all of my fans are deeply disappointed in me, as well, as I have tried to be a model for doing the right thing," he said. "I did not do the right thing this time, and hope you will forgive me."
    Dog's Son Did the Taping (none / 0) (#67)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 02:22:04 AM EST
    and sold it to the Enquirer, according to Dog's lawyer.

    Parent
    Ouch. (none / 0) (#82)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:25:54 PM EST
    Thanksgiving dinner at the Dog's house is gonna be tense...

    Parent
    There Goes (5.00 / 1) (#83)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:32:27 PM EST
    His inheritance...  It does change the rat notion in a way. A son standing up for his girlfriend against racial slurs is honorable, much different than some profiteer who has nothing to lose.

    But selling it to the Enquirer is pretty extreme.

    Parent

    I assumed it was the girlfriend.... (none / 0) (#84)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:43:29 PM EST
    and made an arse outta me...again.  

    I guess the Dog failed to teach his son one of the golden rules...don't air the family dirty laundry in public, keep it in the house.

    Standing up for your lady is honorable, I just think there are better, and more honorable, ways to go about it.  Why didn't he just cut ties with his old man for example?  I still say it's a very low character thing to do.

    Parent

    Although (5.00 / 1) (#88)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 02:03:52 PM EST
    The silver lining is that Dog is forced to face his demons. Looks like the dialogue that may ensue will be a positive thing.

    If that is true the son did a good thing. Sometimes extreme action is needed to shake up closeted behavior so it can air out and be examined.

    Parent

    No squeaky.... (none / 0) (#90)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 02:14:06 PM EST
    in no way, shape, or form can I say the son did a good thing.  He did a terrible thing in my book.  Looks like he did it in response to some terrible things, but that is no justification.  Take the high road.

    I agree on the bright side...Dog will hopefully learn from all this and be a better man for it.

    Parent

    Yes (5.00 / 1) (#91)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 03:13:43 PM EST
    But given that Dog is a public figure with a big fan base he is in a position to take a lead on airing racism. For me it unthinkable to rat out anyone particularly friends & family, but greater good may come of it.

    Rules are meant to be broken if the situation calls for it though.  It is better to be called a rat and take the heat if, for instance, lives could be saved or some such things as that.

    It does get tricky with public figures in my book. I do not have a problem with outing gay bashing closet cases, especially when many of their close supporters know but keep it under wraps as long they toe the line. It was not a suprise that Mark Foley was buggering pages while he was supporting anti gay legislation. That is worse than outing him, in my book

    Parent

    That's a nasty charge (1.00 / 1) (#96)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:51:10 PM EST
    It was not a suprise that Mark Foley was buggering pages while he was supporting anti gay legislation. That is worse than outing him, in my book

    And it is not correct.

    wikipedia

    The e-mail exchanges that have become public in recent days are between Foley and male former pages. None of those interviewed said they had received a sexual or suggestive overture from him during their time on Capitol Hill.

    WaPost

    Perhaps you are confusing him with ex-Democrat Rep. Studds

    Studds was censured by the House for having sexual relations with the page. He acknowledged having sex with a 17-year-old male page in 1973 and making sexual advances to two others and admitted an error in judgment, but did not apologize.

    BTW - I find the emphasis on certain phrases in the link to be inappropriate.

    Parent

    Really? (5.00 / 1) (#99)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 04:57:52 PM EST
    Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman Mark Foley.

    ABC

    Parent

    In case you don't know (1.00 / 1) (#108)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:35:09 PM EST
    "sexual approaches" and "buggering" is two different things.

    No charge for the sex education.

    Parent

    Oh (5.00 / 1) (#112)
    by squeaky on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 09:49:53 PM EST
    Guess it makes sense that you would know so much about buggering, being such a social liberal.

    Parent
    Actually, David Kay (5.00 / 2) (#115)
    by jondee on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 08:16:17 AM EST
    said Foley was planning on getting back into the buggery business.

    And thats good enough for me.

    Parent

    Foley (5.00 / 1) (#117)
    by Edger on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 08:32:15 AM EST
    wants to buy beefcake? From Niger or anyplace else that will sell it to him?

    Parent
    Operation Bojangles (5.00 / 2) (#118)
    by jondee on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 09:01:23 AM EST
    Rendevous point: Minneapolis Airport

    Parent
    Who will join me (5.00 / 2) (#123)
    by glanton on Sat Nov 03, 2007 at 08:40:37 PM EST
    In laughing at this delightful post????  Those who will not, it speaks volumes about them.

    Jondee, that's a beauty.  

    Parent

    kdog, I know you don't want to, but (none / 0) (#87)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 01:58:43 PM EST
    you ought to listen to the full audio.

    Dog kicked his son to the curb - out of his house, out of his biz, out of his TV show, and out of his life - because the kid fell in love with the wrong girl.

    Sounds like a Shakespeare play.

    Parent

    I should... (none / 0) (#89)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 02:10:41 PM EST
    if I'm gonna comment, but I just can't do it.  Then I couldn't bust my ladyfriend's chops when she tries to listen in on her neighbor's spats through the thin walls of her apartment:)  I couldn't avoid a few clips on the news last night, but it was mostly incoherent bleeps.

    I'll accept your interpretation, and if I was Dog's kid I'd be like "see ya later pops" and get on with my life with my lady.  My response wouldn't be to stoop even lower.

    Parent

    Thursday Open Thread | 120 comments (120 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment