home

Reid: Bush Factfinding In Own Administration

Dem Senate leader Harry Reid on Bush and Iraq:

It's been two weeks since the Iraq Study Group released its plan to change the course and bring our troops home. Since then, the President has been on a fact finding tour of his own administration -- apparently ignoring the facts presented by those in the military who know best. The President needs to put forth a plan as soon as possible, one that reflects the reality on the ground in Iraq and that withdraws our troops from the middle of this deadly civil war.

< Bush Finally Admits We're Not Winning in Iraq | "Conservative" CNN Report Breaks Stupidity Record >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    This is such bogus BS. No one in the... (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by Bill Arnett on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 12:23:20 PM EST
    ...world has as much information as to what a total debacle Iraq has become than gwb.

    He inadvertently told the truth about why we're staying there when he said that we were nearing a deal with the Iraqis for their oil. You can bet it will be one sweetheart of a deal for Exxon-Mobil.

    To paraphrase Ben Franklin when he was asked by a lady, "What kind of government have you given us?", the reply now would be, "A democracy, as long as the oil keeps flowing."

    sweetheart of a deal (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Edger on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 07:42:13 PM EST
    October 2006 - Global Policy Forum
    Will Iraq Repeat Russia's Oil Mistakes?
    Iraqi oil Minister Hussein Shahristani announced last week that he aimed to sign oil production contracts with foreign companies by the end of next year. Notably, the announcement was made in Australia - like most of the significant statements of Iraqi oil policy, it was made to non-Iraqi ears.

    The same was true of the confirmation last month of the form of such contracts. Speaking to the conference of the International Compact for Iraq, a meeting of international donors in Abu Dhabi, Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih, who heads the committee drafting a new oil law, announced that production sharing agreements (PSA) would be used - the type of contract favoured by the companies themselves.

    Putting Mr Salih's comments into context, the US government representative to those talks threatened that any future economic assistance to Iraq would be conditional on economic reforms - the priority among which was the passing of an acceptable oil law.
    ...
     During the drafting of the oil law over the last five months, three consultations have taken place - none of them with Iraqis. The US government and the multinational oil companies were presented the draft law for their comments in July. Last month, the International Monetary Fund joined this list, examining the draft oil law in its quarterly review of the Iraqi government's compliance with its economic conditions.

    But the Iraqi people have not been consulted, nor even has the Iraqi parliament. Indeed, Iraqi civil society groups and parliamentarians who have asked to see the draft have been told that it does not exist. Instead it will be presented to the parliament in December, to be pushed through (the government intends) as a fait accompli.

    Russia realised the mistakes it made by signing PSA contracts only when it was too late. It remains to be seen whether Iraq follows the same course.

    Thursday, December 14, 2006
    Iraqi trade unions attack plans for foreign company control of oil

    At a meeting in Amman, Jordan, leaders of Iraq's five trade union federations - between them representing hundreds of thousands of workers - called for a fundamental rethink of the forthcoming oil law, which is designed to allow foreign investment in the oil sector.
    more details...

    Council on Foreign Relations
    Iraq and Oil: Revenue-Sharing Among Regions

    According to a recent study by the Global Policy Forum, sixty out of Iraq's eighty known oil fields may be explored under PSAs, handing at least 64 percent of Iraq's known oil reserves over to foreign investors.
    ...



    Parent
    Articles on the "Oil Motive" (none / 0) (#6)
    by Edger on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 07:56:00 PM EST
    THE JERK: (none / 0) (#7)
    by Edger on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 08:55:37 PM EST
    WHY SADDAM HAD TO GO
    "Control is what it's all about," one oilman told me. "It's not about getting the oil, it's about controlling oil's price."


    Parent
    Isn't that big of them? (none / 0) (#8)
    by aw on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 09:14:56 PM EST
    the US government representative to those talks threatened that any future economic assistance to Iraq would be conditional on economic reforms - the priority among which was the passing of an acceptable oil law.

    Wouldn't the Iraqis be better off keeping all the oil money and passing on the US aid?  

    Parent

    That seems reasonable... (none / 0) (#9)
    by Edger on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 09:59:25 AM EST
    ...which is probably why they won't be offered the chance. Unless they take it, of course

    Parent
    How did OUR oil wind up under their sand? (none / 0) (#10)
    by Bill Arnett on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 12:56:00 PM EST
    Dana Carvey

    Parent
    Heh (none / 0) (#2)
    by Wile ECoyote on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 01:52:55 PM EST
    apparently ignoring the facts presented by those in the military who know best.

    Uh oh, so someone does know something in the military?  Alert John Kerry!

    George Bush first (none / 0) (#3)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 02:54:51 PM EST
    Fact Finding (none / 0) (#4)
    by Edger on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 05:46:18 PM EST
    Bush's "fact finding tour of his own" is likely a desperate search for a way to cover his own ass:

    Asia Times Online
    Dec 20, 2006, Saudi Arabia and Iran in Iraq fix

    The Iranians figured that the US administration was more concerned about toppling Saddam than establishing a stable order in Iraq and that it lacked a cohesive post-conflict plan. Iran thus concluded that chaos would follow. What it could not have anticipated was the magnitude of that chaos, a train of events set in motion by the US deciding to abolish the Iraqi army and de-Ba'athify the country.

    In the broader context, Iran was driven by another objective: ensuring that it would not become the next victim of President George W Bush's doctrine of "regime change". This, more than anything else, would have driven Iran either to exploit the Iraqi chaos to its advantage, or to make its own contribution to worsen it. Either way, political and religious realities were overwhelmingly in favor of Iran.
    ...
    Saudi Arabia does not fare very well in this power game. Even though the Sunni Arab population of Iraq is about 25%, the Saudi rulers have no way of knowing what percentage of that population really supports al-Qaeda and other Islamists. All such forces are acutely opposed to Saudi Arabia.

    It is possible that Saudi intelligence forces are cooperating with the remnants of Saddam's security forces in an attempt to sabotage Iran's strategic objectives. But this is a very tall order, considering that Iranian intelligence forces have most likely penetrated all regions of Iraq. Equally important, they have been in Iraq for a long time and know the terrain well.


    -----
    Lebanon Daily Star
    Dec 21, 2006, 'This president is absolutely committed to Iraq' - Rice
    Q: Are you expecting a wider role from Saudi Arabia in the future to help on [national reconciliation in Iraq]?

    A: Well, Saudi Arabia has been active ... They've been very active on the Sunni outreach side, working with tribes and others to try to bring Sunnis into the process. Iraqi leaders have gone there to visit ... I hope Saudi Arabia will also do more to help stabilize Iraq ...