One should consider however the tactics of the enemies of Isreal when playing the moral equivalency card as Ernesto has already done in this thread.

One should consider however the tactics of the enemies of Isreal

Why do you think a mostly European culture chooses to invest a huge amount of their GDP on their military? Why?

Is it because if they don't they will be inialated by the millions of Arabs that think they have no right to be there?

Isreal does have a superior military. Why?

Peaches if correcting spelling mistakes made by an engineer on a blog makes you feel smart more power to you.

Peaches if correcting spelling mistakes made by an engineer on a blog makes you feel smart more power to you.

Peaches if correcting spelling mistakes made by an engineer on a blog makes you feel smart more power to you.

Oscar by your logic we have not right to be hear either. Australians have no right to be where they are.

So you're saying theirs a statue of limitations on proper land greivences?

One should consider however the tactics of the enemies of Isreal when playing the moral equivalency card as Ernesto has already done in this thread.

Oh no, never. Spelling isn't important to me. I've misspelled plenty.

Peaches corrected my spelling. His intent has yet to be established.

inialated is a long way off from annihilated and I was just offering the correct spelling for you to use in future so as to avoid confusion with your interlocutors.

Nice straw man. Obviously ALL Arabs don't feel the same about anything. There does seem to be a substantial subset that enjoys seeing Jews blown up.

There does seem to be a substantial subset that enjoys seeing Jews blown up.

Isreal is a state. Recognized at the UN. They're not going anywhere and I maintain if Hezzbollah and Hamas left them alone there would be no violence. The problem is these groups want something that is impossible so they violence continues.

The problem is these groups want something that is impossible so they violence continues

and what do you think that is.

Well, I think we can safely cross "live in peace with Israel" off the list. Good luck with your fishing!

The two parties will either let bygones be bygones - regardless of who feels like they "lost" or "won" - and get on with their lives or they won't.

I believe you are precisely correct.

Well, I think we can safely cross "live in peace with Israel" off the list.

Sarcastic I agree with you my only point is the Isrealis fight with their military in response to their enemies that use children as suicide bombers directly targeting civilians.

The militant group Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes Wednesday across the border in southern Lebanon, prompting a swift reaction from Israel, which sent ground forces into its neighbor to look for them.
The forces were trying to keep the soldiers' captors from moving them deeper into Lebanon, Israeli government officials said on condition of anonymity.

Palestine everything they wanted and they denyed it because Arafat was afraid of pissing off the extremists in his own country/state. So they decided to keep fighting.

Also what's the beef with Hezzbollah? Isreal left Lebanon and an attack is what they got for thier troubles.

Soon after the May 23 meeting in Washington, Israel began to ratchet up pressure on the Hamas-led government in the Palestinian territories and on Hezbollah and other Islamic militants in Lebanon. As part of this process, Israel staged low-key attacks in both Lebanon and Gaza. [For details, see Consortiumnews.com "A 'Pretext' War in Lebanon."] The tit-for-tat violence led to the Hamas seizure of an Israeli soldier on June 24 and then to Israeli retaliatory strikes in Gaza. That, in turn, set the stage for Hezbollah's attack on an Israeli outpost and the capture of two more Israeli soldiers on July 12.