Spending Priorities
by TChris
Which is more important to the Senate: protecting the troops from harm, or enhancing the profits of defense contractors? Here's a clue:
A Senate measure to fund the war in Iraq would chop money for troops' night vision equipment and new battle vehicles but add $230 million for a tilt-rotor aircraft that has already cost $18 billion and is still facing safety questions.
President Bush's request for the emergency appropriations to cover costs of the continuing war and Hurricane Katrina recovery operations included no money for the troubled V-22 Osprey, which takes off and lands like a helicopter but flies like a plane.
The Osprey, manufactured by Bell Helicopter, a subsidiary of Textron Inc., has been in development since the 1980s and has cost the government $18 billion so far. It has suffered numerous setbacks over the years, including two crashes in 2000 that killed 23 people. ...
To pay for the Ospreys, the Senate Appropriations Committee - guided by the Corps - cut into funding for night vision goggles, equipment for destroying mines and explosives, fire suppression systems for light armored vehicles and new vehicles that can be transported into battle inside the V-22.
A related question: could the money devoted to the war in Iraq have been spent more usefully?
$255 billion in taxpayer funds have been spent on the war, enough to have provided more than 153 million children with health insurance for one year.
| < Open Thread | Don't Park in Judge Bradfield's Spot > |
