home

No Bomb at Starbucks

by TChris

On Wednesday, the San Francisco Examiner reported that a "homeless man suspected of planting a bomb at a Starbucks on Monday has not been charged in connection with the case." Today we learn why, from a story in the San Francisco Chronicle: the "bomb" was "nothing more than a flashlight with corroded batteries."

The Examiner story described the bomb as "an explosive with a fuse stuffed into a flashlight." The story also claimed:

The bomb, which police defused on the scene, is currently at an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms testing facility in the East Bay, ATF spokeswoman Marti McKee said.

It turns out that "defusing" the bomb meant that police shot it with a water cannon. They thought the bomb exploded. But there was no fuse, no bomb, and no explosion.

[Anonymous authorities] said a muffled noise that police heard when the water cannon hit the object, which they took to be an explosion, may have been the sound of a chemical reaction between the water and the corroded batteries.

Although the homeless guy isn't out of the legal woods, he at least won't face charges of trying to blow up Starbucks:

He was charged Thursday with burglary and is expected to be back in court today. After visiting the Starbucks, he allegedly went to a Circuit City and used the bag the coffeehouse gave him for the coffee grounds to shoplift a camera, prosecutors said.

< The Left As a Broken Triangle | Friday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: No Bomb at Starbucks (none / 0) (#1)
    by Mike on Fri Jan 13, 2006 at 05:58:22 PM EST
    They have to hold him on something to keep the egg off their faces.

    Re: No Bomb at Starbucks (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Jan 14, 2006 at 06:59:02 AM EST
    A flashlight? Good thing it wasn't a Baby Ruth. Doodie!