Defense Closes in Lynne Stewart Terrorism Trial
Defense Lawyer Michael Tigar began his closing argument yesterday in the trial of attorney Lynne Stewart, charged with providing material aid to terrorists by disseminating messages from her imprisoned client.
Attorney Michael Tigar suggested Wednesday in a closing argument that the prosecution of a "courageous, brash and feisty" Manhattan defense lawyer on terrorism charges was an insult to the nation's other defense lawyers. "The government of the United States has the arrogance to tell the defense bar how to practice law," Tigar told a federal jury as he underscored a threat felt by defense lawyers that had received little mention in the 6-month-old trial.
Tigar called the prosecution's closing "cruel and reckless and inaccurate." Some more snippets:
Tigar said none of the conversations, most of which were translated for the jury from Arabic, suggested Stewart was part of a conspiracy "if one existed." And he said Stewart could not be faulted for differing with the government over how to interpret prison rules imposed on Abdel-Rahman to keep the blind sheik from communicating with anyone except his wife and his lawyers.
He noted that Ramsey Clark, another lawyer for the sheik, had spoken to the media about Abdel-Rahman's opinions, setting a precedent that was followed by Stewart when she told the media in 2000 that the sheik was reconsidering his support for a cease-fire by militant followers in Egypt.
He promised the jurors that before he finished his summation Thursday or Monday, he would show them that Stewart "never communicated a message to the outside world that called for violence."
The prosecution will get the final opportunity to address the jury. Stay tuned, and our best wishes go out to Ms. Stewart. All of our coverage is accessible here.
| < Dick Durbin Outs Gonzales as Disingenous, At Best | Chip Off the Old Block? > |





