I'm offline at work today. If there are new developments in the George Zimmerman case, or you have more to say about things we have already covered, here's a thread for them.
Keep in mind that this is not a free-for-all to attack the verdict or defense. Our commenting rules are here and fairly strict. Comments that don't comport with the rules will be deleted when I return. Don't quote an objectionable comment in your reply or that has to go too. Refer to it by the name of the person who posted it.
(175 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Rolling Stone has made available online the full article about Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Jahar's World. I haven't had time to read it yet, but if you have, here's a place to discuss it.
(51 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Stephen Rakes, a potential witness against Whitey Bulger, has been found dead. The Government says it was not going to call Rakes due to contradictions in his versions of events. I haven't been following the Bulger trial, so I don't know the significance of this, but it's making major headlines.
The full Rolling Stone article on Dzokhar Tsarnaev, Jahar's World, is available to read online.
I have a few more hours of work to do before I get to read Jahar's World, but I'll put up a post for it now, as well as one for Zimmerman.
This is an open thread, all topics welcome (Except Zimmerman).
(77 comments) Permalink :: Comments

Alternate Juror No. E-54 would have voted to acquit George Zimmerman. He was interviewed by Fox News. Here is the video.
Juror E-54 says the non-emergency call was the best evidence for George Zimmerman. There was no evidence Zimmerman profiled Martin. There was no evidence of ill will.
Zimmerman's injuries were a significant factor in his conclusion GZ should be acquitted. [More...]
(93 comments, 189 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Former President Jimmy Carter:
JIMMY CARTER: "I think the jury made the right decision based in the evidence presented because the prosecution inadvertently set the standard so high that the jury had to be convinced that it was a deliberate act by Zimmerman and that he was not defending himself and so forth. It's not a moral question, it's a legal question and the American law requires that the jury listens to the evidence presented." (WXIA-TV)
Rachel Jeantel now says she thinks Trayvon threw the same punch. She also thinks, although there was no evidence presented to support it, that GZ tried to detain Martin.
Rachel now has a reason to extend her 15 minutes. A radio host has given her a full scholarship to college.
How many times is CNN going to replay juror B37's interview? Has anyone not heard it?
(120 comments) Permalink :: Comments
To gradually wean myself away from the Zimmerman case, I have moved my laptop from the room I blog in during the evenings, and am switching to the iMac desktop I got several months ago but still haven't learned how to use. The keyboard is very small and the mouse quite different, so you may see more typos until I get accustomed to it. My laptop has all the GZ case documents and research and I'm not transferring it to the Mac. If this experiment lasts more than a few hours, I'll be surprised, but I thought I'd try it.
Here is an open thread for all topics except the George Zimmerman case.
(107 comments) Permalink :: Comments

Just released: a groundbreaking report with
[an] inclusive examination of the profound racial and ethnic disparities in America’s criminal justice system, and concrete ways to overcome them.
The full report is here. It is co-sponsored by co-sponsored by the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, the Foundation for Criminal Justice, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions, and the New York County Lawyers’ Association.
The scope of the disparity: [More...]
(52 comments, 771 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

Panderfest: The Department of Justice is setting up a public email address for tips on George Zimmerman.
Amid pressure from the NAACP and several Democratic lawmakers to pursue Zimmerman, the department has set up a public email address asking for any tips or information regarding the case.
This is nothing but a Neighborhood Watch program gone wild. Report your suspicions and three-times removed gossip. It's just more pandering to private interests. [More....]
(101 comments, 900 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

(Song here)
I'm sure there will be people outraged by the presence of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover of Rolling Stone. I'm not one of them. I'm looking forward to reading the featured article about him.
[RS Editor Janet]Reitman spent the last two months interviewing dozens of sources – childhood and high school friends, teachers, neighbors and law enforcement agents, many of whom spoke for the first time about the case – to deliver a riveting and heartbreaking account of how a charming kid with a bright future became a monster.
I just wish they hadn't called him a "monster." Hopefully the article will provide some unbiased insights into Jahar from people that really knew him. It comes out August 3. [More...]
(180 comments, 252 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

Anderson Cooper's interview with Juror B-37 is airing now.
Some thoughts as I'm watching. Juror B-37 said it wouldn't have made any difference if GZ had testified. The result would have been the same. To me that furthers the argument the state miscalculated by introducing his police interviews, re-enactment, and particularly his Hannity interview.
A prosecutor legal analyst on the show just said the defense got the jurors to look into GZ's heart. Actually, it was prosecutor John Guy. In his rebuttal closing, Guy asked the jury to look into George Zimmerman's heart and find hate. He talked about the window into George Zimmerman's soul. He told them to use their "G-d given common sense." They followed his suggestions. Unfortunately for the state, in doing so, they rejected the conclusion he though they would make. Another big failure in their argument. [More...]
(114 comments, 285 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

The mistakes of the prosecution in the George Zimmerman trial began with overcharging Zimmerman with second degree murder. But they went far beyond that. USA Today has a new article, Experts: Prosecutors Failed to Humanize Trayvon Martin.
While the state played the emotion card hard in closing, there was a disconnect and the jury wasn't swayed by it. Why? Because one thing the jury never got to hear was the story of who is Trayvon Martin? He was never personalized or humanized.
What many may not realize is that this was a strategic decision the state made, not an unintentional omission. The defense had let the prosecution know that once the state introduced evidence of Trayvon Martin's good character, the floodgates would open and it was ready with an avalanche of text messages, photos, videos, school records and more to fight back. While I have no intention of discussing the specifics of what the defense would have introduced to counter the state's character evidence, it's available for all to see at the Zimmerman legal case website. It's referred to in pleadings and court orders. Please do not include details in your comments, or they will be deleted. [More....]
(113 comments, 1530 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments

The interview of George Zimmerman juror B-37 on Anderson Cooper last night was extraordinary for the detail the juror provided about the deliberations process.
Shorter version: Zimmerman acted in self-defense. He was credible. Race was not a factor -- the jurors never even discussed race. Martin attacked Zimmerman. 5 of the 6 jurors believed Zimmerman was screaming. The sixth wasn't sure, she thought it might be Martin. Zimmerman did not act from ill-will or hatred. If anything he was over-eager to help others, which is indicative of a good heart.
Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with this juror, and taking into consideration she is speaking only for herself as to why she voted to acquit, it is clear from her statements that the jury as whole unanimously agreed the state failed in this prosecution. Which makes Angela Corey's interview, aired on HLN last night, every more bizarre. [More...]
(196 comments, 2254 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
| << Previous 12 | Next 12 >> |






