Change we can believe in?:

Individually, each charge -- with the exception, perhaps of the until-recently-unpaid taxes on the InterMedia car and driver -- might be seen as not much more than business as usual for a former Congressional leader who has slipped through Washington's revolving door to offer his contacts and expertise to private interests. But cumulatively, they paint a picture of a Washington insider who, at best, has grown negligent about tracking the various forms of compensation he's receiving.

(Emphasis supplied.) So the new Obama slogan will be "Business as usual we can believe in?" Again, I never much cared about all this, but I did detest the sanctimonious BS that got flung around regarding all the "change" we would see.

Speaking for me only

New Orleans is in dire need of government transparency and accountability so Cerasoli's loss is being mourned across the city.

Though the IG's office will continue without Cerasoli, his departure has got me thinking about public corruption, particularly the kinds of public corruption cases brought by the beloved U.S. Attorney down here, Jim Letten. [More...]

Your turn.

This is an Open Thread.

A daily kos diarist, citing Politico, says Baucus To Blame For Slow Daschle Confirmation.

From where I sit, this is one of the few things I can laud Max Baucus (D-MT) for doing. Good work Baucus. Keep it up.

Speaking for me only

In his first hundred days in office, President Barack Obama will do nothing more important to his political future and the future of the Democratic Party than enact stimulus measures to revive an economy spiraling into depression (I think that he has already done the most important thing he could substantively, end torture as sanctioned US policy.) And of course, it is extremely important on substance. How should we judge Obama's performance on the economic stimulus plan? I think politically and substantively, the criteria is the same - will it work? E.J. Dionne writes a good piece reviewing the strange obsession with bipartisanship, the possible reasons, and even benefits, for it, and the extreme pitfalls it presents:

He's amazing. Best I've ever seen him. He starts with Tenth Avenue Freezeout. Tune in, don't miss this.

Update: I'm speechless. He's always good, but this just rocked. It also was the happiest halftime show I've ever seen. The adlibs were great. I'm about to watch it again. [More...]

A study of wrongful convictions in New York cites human error as a leading cause of mistaken guilty verdicts.

It determined that the root causes of the convictions included errors by a prosecutor, judge or member of law enforcement, as well as the misidentification of the accused by victims or witnesses. The mishandling of forensic evidence and a reliance on false confessions from the accused or false testimony from jailhouse informants were also to blame.

Some of the examples cited in the linked article go well beyond "human error." When the police or prosecutors withhold evidence that casts doubt on a defendant's guilt, their willful misconduct isn't a simple mistake. False confessions usually result from deliberately coercive interrogations. A refusal to be fair in the investigation and prosecution of crime isn't just error -- it's malicious, or reckless at best.

I love all sports. But college football is my first love. Then college basketball. Then the NBA. But I enjoy NFL football and am a NY Giants fan.

I'll be watching the game, set to kick off in an hour and 25 minutes. But it will be as a casual fan. No particular rooting interest (though Anquan Boldin is from the small Florida town I grew up in and went to the same high school I did.) I understand watching the commercials is a big deal, And Bruce Springsteen will be hawking his new album at halftime.

Perhaps some of these things will be of interest to you and here is a thread for discussing all things Super Bowl related.

Speaking for me only

This is damn funny to me (photo here):

Olympic great Michael Phelps has acknowledged “regrettable” behavior and “bad judgment” after a photo in a British newspaper showed him smoking marijuana. In a statement released to The Associated Press, the swimmer who won a record eight gold medals at the Beijing Games conceded the authenticity of the exclusive picture published Sunday by the tabloid News of the World.

Phelps said: “I engaged in behavior which was regrettable and demonstrated bad judgment. I’m 23 years old and despite the successes I’ve had in the pool, I acted in a youthful and inappropriate way, not in a manner people have come to expect from me. For this, I am sorry. I promise my fans and the public it will not happen again.”

No word on whether he inhaled. UPDATE- Obama's half brother arrested for marijuana possession in Kenya. A "youthful indiscretion" no doubt. I hate the hypocritical BS.

Speaking for me only

The rumors are becoming strong that Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) will be the next Secretary of Commerce. The really interesting part of this story is who would replace Gregg. May I suggest that in our post-partisan unity schtick world, a caretaker appointment of Warrent Rudman, as rumored here, would be a brilliant post partisan unity schtick choice.

Rudman would be the equivalent of a vote for cloture on just about every piece of legislation (which means he is part of that whole "60 votes" thing). Heck, you could get his vote a few times to boot. He'll spend two years wailing about "entitlements," but Broder & Co. will love having Rudman around to define "the Center." But the thing is he would be a caretaker (no reelection run for him), so who really cares? This is supposed to be the type of 11 dimensional chess we have been promised that Obama will deliver -- meaningless "reachout" that does not compromise a progressive agenda. We'll see if it is what we get.

Speaking for me only

I've never cared for Tom Daschle, on substance or politics, but I know so little about health care that I have hesitated to discuss whether Daschle is a good choice for HHS. But in light of this news, why in heaven's name should President Obama lift a finger for a guy who basically did not tell him the truth:

President Obama’s choice for health secretary, Tom Daschle, was aware as early as last June that he might have to pay back taxes for the use of a car and driver provided by a private equity firm, but did not inform the Obama transition team until weeks after Mr. Obama named him to the health secretary’s post, senior administration officials said Saturday.

(Emphasis supplied.) In my view, that should disqualify him from holding a post in the Obama Administration. But the President is more forgiving apparently -- the Times reports that "Mr. Obama is standing by his nominee." That seems nuts to me.

Speaking for me only

Nadal breaks Federer's will in Australia.

The Super Bowl is tonight.

Some gasbags will be talking about stuff this morning.

This is an Open Thread.