home

Monday Morning Open Thread

Your turn.

This is an Open Thread.

< Politico: Baucus Credited With Slowing Down Daschle Confirmation | Goodbye Cerasoli and the Need for Real Public Corruption Investigations >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    i see that Newsweek, (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by cpinva on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:18:16 AM EST
    in this week's edition, has labeled both afghanistan & iraq as pres. obama's wars. pretty nifty trick.

    bush & co. started them, nearly 7.5 years ago, ran them poorly for that entire time, failed to complete the missions, and after less than two weeks in office, pres. obama takes "ownership" of them.

    it must be nice to live on planet republican.

    the boss now (none / 0) (#89)
    by badgergirl on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:02:55 PM EST
    it is his now,bush is out ...remember???

    Parent
    Super Bowl (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:34:11 AM EST
    "We will not apologize for our way of life...."

    The Ultimate Advertisement.

    Party hard (5.00 / 0) (#19)
    by mmc9431 on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:40:51 AM EST
    I don't resent anyone getting into the Super Bowl or finding whatever they can to escape reality for a few hours. Right now, any excuse to party is a good excuse. We need all the fun and humor we can find. I wish I had been there myself, especially if it was warm! And I don't even follow football. I'm waiting for spring and baseball.

    Whats is reality? (none / 0) (#23)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:07 AM EST
    That's the real question.

    Parent
    an antidote to Greg Miller (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by lilburro on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:45:04 AM EST
    at the LA Times and his confusing article on renditions in the Obama era...an article by Richard Clarke called "The Confusion Over Renditions:"

    Although all renditions have become controversial, these examples did not involve dragging criminals to a third country for torture or interrogation, nor did they violate US law or human rights. In these cases, the country in which the criminals were arrested waived their own extradition process and handed them over to US officials on the guarantee that they would be brought to the United States and afforded the same rights of the accused in the US justice system. The Supreme Court has even ruled that renditions occurring without the cooperation of the nation of arrest are legal if the accused is expeditiously brought into the US justice system.

    Hopefully this is what Obama means.  It would be good if Obama made the nature of his renditions quite clear though - after all, Hayden, Tenet, and all the Bushies are going to use this as an opening to say we're not so different after all...and whitewash their endorsement of torture.

    Just a thought (5.00 / 2) (#24)
    by andgarden on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:50:12 AM EST
    It's really excellent how Paul Krugman has used his blog in a thorough, substantive, and wonky way over the last few months.

    I'm sure he has other stuff he could be doing.

    That's because (5.00 / 1) (#42)
    by Dr Molly on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:34:42 AM EST
    a) he's a real intellectual, and
    b) he really cares about substance

    I just love him.

    Parent

    The only (none / 0) (#45)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:50:54 AM EST
    thing that bothers me is when Paul served as a consultant for an advisory board for Enron in 1999 he didn't see right through the scam for what it was.


    Parent
    He didn't audit it, did he? (none / 0) (#51)
    by Fabian on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:46:47 PM EST
    I believe that the head honchos were lying to everyone that they could.  

    It turns out that many corporations have been lying.  Not nearly to the extent that Enron was, but I've forgotten how many "respected" large corporations were padding their profits.  

    ...and then there is Madoff.  There's a champion lier.

    Parent

    Pauls is the same boat (none / 0) (#25)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:53:37 AM EST
    all of us are. Basically powerless.

    Parent
    He has a megaphone (5.00 / 2) (#26)
    by andgarden on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:58:19 AM EST
    and I credit him for using it.

    Parent
    Sure (none / 0) (#29)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:04:22 AM EST
    he has a few decent ideas. To bad the PTB aren't listening.

    Parent
    The pillaging continues... (5.00 / 2) (#64)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:01:25 PM EST
    no, not the Solami Pirates, the American Bankers.

    Bank of America, receiver of buku bailout money, blows ten million at the Super Bowl as part of their "growth strategy".  Link

    Oh, No, That Comes From A Different Account (5.00 / 2) (#93)
    by daring grace on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:59:30 PM EST
    Maybe that's the explanation as I overheard Erin Burnett of CNBC and Steve Forbes explaining away the bonuses on Wall St on MTP:

    MS. BURNETT:  I understand the outrage, and you understand the populism. There are, though--well, how should we say this?  The taxpayer money is not being used to pay the bonuses.  I think people could understand if you work for a company--right?  If the three us worked for a company, your guests, and I lost $10 billion but Steve over there, he made a billion dollars. So overall the company actually loses money, but Steve went and did his very darndest for that company and he made money.  So should he be paid for his work?  That's essentially what we're talking about here.  And reasonable people could argue about this, but many reasonable people would conclude, yes, he should be paid for that.  And I think, David, you've raised a fair point, which is maybe it's the whole use of the word "bonus."

    MR. GREGORY:  Mm-hmm.

    MS. BURNETT:  If you explained to people this is how they are compensated, that might make a difference.,  But there is also a fundamental misunderstanding.  The taxpayer money isn't being taken and paid out in the form of bonuses.  It goes in a, a separate pool, shall we say, a separate account for banks.  So maybe people don't care about that distinction, but it is there.

    I have this stuff on while I'm doing housework, and let me tell you: I was grinding my teeth, thinking about this different pockets explanation, and the idea that hefty compensation for a guy who 'worked his darndest' to earn the company money. I was thinking about all the 'littler' guys--and gals--who worked their darndest and have been getting pink slips...

    Populism, indeed...torches and pitchforks time.

    Parent

    Hmm, we (taxpayers) aid its growth strategy... (none / 0) (#66)
    by easilydistracted on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:16:39 PM EST
    Did you get an invite Kdog? I didn't. Heck, and I even have a little portfolio with them. Time to pay a friendly visit to the local office and move that money.

    Parent
    I'd make that visit today easily.... (none / 0) (#68)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:22:20 PM EST
    before the buy a jet or pay for naming rights on a stadium somewhere.  Unless you trust the FDIC...I wouldn't.  Sh*t, I'm worried about the cash under my Sealy at this point...thinking of converting it all to cans of Chef Boyardee instead of just a partial allocation.

    Naming rights...maybe they should slap their names on the circles of hell instead of ballfields...better fit I think.

    Parent

    Just told the boss I'm (5.00 / 1) (#75)
    by easilydistracted on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:31:27 PM EST
    takin an EQ (early quit) today. Just got off the phone with the investment manager at BofA and explained I'd be there by 6 (didn't say why though).

    F*$kin p#**es me off

    Thanks for the scoop. I hadn't read it yet. No more of my money for them.

    Parent

    Good for you... (none / 0) (#79)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:39:27 PM EST
    the govt. ain't gonna hold 'em accountable...too busy signing blank checks...its up to their customers.

    I wouldn't trust 'em to tie my shoes much less safeguard my life savings.

    Parent

    And by the way (none / 0) (#81)
    by easilydistracted on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:40:28 PM EST
    the local Safeway-owned grocery had cans of the chef boyardee ravioli on sale for $0.79 per can this past weekend. I came home with 15 cans and my wife had a fit. I love the stuff.  

    Parent
    I'm stockpiling for the endtimes.... (none / 0) (#90)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:05:37 PM EST
    I've got a cupboard full tot he brim...maybe 100 cans or so strong.  Beef-A-Roni is my fav variety:)

    Parent
    WTF ? Yoo Hoo beltway idiots and friends (none / 0) (#70)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:25:10 PM EST
    "And what country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not
    warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
    resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
    to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
    in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
    time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
    It is its natural manure."

    I think our soil PH is a little low on tyrant blood at the moment.

    Parent

    Extremely low.... (5.00 / 1) (#74)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:30:36 PM EST
    Tracy, good call.

    The only thing that will wake us from our slumber and push us towards our duty is hunger...and nothing less.  iow, its gotta get worse before it gets better...a lot worse.

    Parent

    I fear this, haven't all of us (5.00 / 1) (#78)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:37:08 PM EST
    since the day we were in the cradle and realized how fragile life really is when we admit it to ourselves?  Civilization is a creation and when balance is gone comes destruction.  How much can the little guy take before people start to lose it?  Do these people not see what lies ahead a year from now economically?  How much mendacity can the population take before a heaving mass decides ENOUGH!?!?

    Parent
    I had had enough.... (5.00 / 2) (#83)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:43:34 PM EST
    long before the economy crashed...I just don't see the point in getting locked up, the numbers ain't there.  

    Faith in myself and my family and friends is what keeps me going...I plan on surviving and helping my loved ones survive no matter what is around the next bend.

    Parent

    Me too, but you know (none / 0) (#85)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:47:06 PM EST
    lots of folks are going to focus elsewhere when they get really ticked off about all this and life really really starts to hurt.  They will be focusing on who ripped us all off and who is living like kings and queens.  This could get REAL UGLY.  The general population understands the underlying factors much better than they did during the first American depression.

    Parent
    I'm a fan of street justice.... (none / 0) (#87)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:58:42 PM EST
    I'm not gonna advocate for it, but if the masters of the universe have a problem walking down the street without getting a knuckle sandwich from one of the victims I won't lose sleep...you reap what you sow.  I won't lose sleep if the masses storm the Hamptons and occupy million dollar vacation homes either.

    I just hope the masses hold the right people accountable if and when we collectively reach the boiling point...more often than not we take it out on each other....black vs white, man vs woman, straight vs gay, native born vs immigrant, believer vs non-believer, etc.

    Parent

    Only in New York (5.00 / 1) (#69)
    by andgarden on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:22:26 PM EST
    would anyone be outraged by this kind of Police behavior. So thank heaven for New York

    Richardson investigation expanded (5.00 / 1) (#82)
    by jbindc on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:41:13 PM EST
    Link

    Now the feds are looking at Richardson's time as head of the Democratic Governors' Association (DGA), into an expanding investigation into pay-for-play.

    As political alliances go, the four-year marriage between Gov. Bill Richardson and the Democratic Governors Association was golden.

    Richardson got prestige, coast-to-coast travel and national exposure that would help fuel his presidential bid, while the DGA basked in his growing notoriety and fundraising prowess.

    "It's been very beneficial," Richardson acknowledged in late 2006, when his stint with the political group -- as federal liaison, vice-chair and unprecedented two years as chairman -- wrapped up a month before he launched his unsuccessful quest for the White House.

    Now, that political shine could be tarnishing.

    Recent news reports say authorities have asked for information involving the DGA as part of the federal "pay-to-play" investigation that derailed Richardson's nomination for U.S. commerce secretary.

    That probe centers on a single financial firm involved in Richardson's $1.6 billion GRIP transportation program, CDR Financial Products, and its contributions to the DGA and two Richardson political committees -- Si Se Puede and Moving America Forward.

    A Journal analysis shows three other firms that made millions on GRIP bond work -- J.P. Morgan Securities, UBS Bank and RBC Dain Rauscher -- also gave to the DGA, contributing a total of nearly $500,000 around the time the transportation financing plan was being developed and finalized.
    Some of the donations were in cash, others were "in kind" services, such as catering. Swiss-headquartered UBS was by far the largest donor with about $421,000.



    Richardson (5.00 / 1) (#97)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:27:25 PM EST
    ahhh dear Judas, I knew him well!

    ...so on and so forth...

    Parent

    Thomas Edison once said (none / 0) (#1)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:11:20 AM EST
    he never failed at creating an invention--he just
    found 10,000 ways that wouldn't work.

    Your post reminds me (5.00 / 1) (#30)
    by brodie on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:09:17 AM EST
    of the quote from his rival in electrical matters, Nikola Tesla, who once said:

    "If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor."


    Parent
    Yeah (5.00 / 2) (#44)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:43:20 AM EST
    Tesla "yanked things" out of the forth dimensional ether pretty much at will.

    Parent
    The 5% of (none / 0) (#2)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:12:48 AM EST
    lumps in my oatmeal

    http://tinyurl.com/d2updh

    The 5% nation of (none / 0) (#3)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:13:49 AM EST
    Milton Bradley

    "BAILED OUT BANK SPENDS MILLIONS ON SUPER BOWL FESTIVITIES"

    Parent

    I love positive morning people (none / 0) (#4)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:17:34 AM EST
    To avoid becoming cooked (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:19:32 AM EST
    in our own stew of cynicism and hopelessness, there is one other, major saving grace that is common to humanity besides love, and that is - humor.

    Parent
    I didn't watch the Super Bowl (none / 0) (#8)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:24:43 AM EST
    We aren't a football family.  I'm sort of glad I didn't since we have 11 million unemployed in this country right now.  I can't do glitz and glamour under those conditions.

    Parent
    I've been following the layoffs (none / 0) (#14)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:31:14 AM EST
    2001. I suspect it's way more then that since the MSM stop reporting layoffs in 02.

    Parent
    why was Gen. Petraeus (none / 0) (#7)
    by lilburro on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:19:33 AM EST
    at the Super Bowl?  Did that strike anyone else as a pretty odd thing to do during war-time?

    Nope (5.00 / 0) (#9)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:26:14 AM EST
    it odd if he was MC for the Newport Jazz Festival.

    Now that would be odd.

    Football is a Military Industrial Corporate Sport so he fits right in.

    Parent

    If football is a Military Industrial Corporate (none / 0) (#13)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:30:37 AM EST
    Sport how come I didn't know?  Sheesh, in the Army I thought the Military Industrial Complex sport of choice was ultimate frisbee.

    Parent
    Makes sense to me.... (none / 0) (#10)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:27:32 AM EST
    Both war/occupation and football are as American as apple pie.

    It used to be just football, and war was only a last resort, occupations not our style...not no more.

    Parent

    Football (none / 0) (#12)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:29:14 AM EST
    prepares you for "real life".

    That's what I was told anyway.

    Parent

    I love me.... (none / 0) (#20)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:41:17 AM EST
    some football, I was bummed my beer rec league games were cancelled yesterday due to ice covered fields.

    I take a lotta joy out of trying to knock the other guy coming over the middle's block off when I'm playing the deep zone, and catching a ball over the middle while getting my block knocked off...yet I'm as anti-war and violence as they come...I believe the reason is I get these natural competitive agressive tendencies outta me during football games with willing participants, so I don't use those instincts in real life.  A very healthy release, imo.  My two cents.

    Parent

    How'd your squares work out? (none / 0) (#18)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:37:49 AM EST
    Got that safety--did it do you any good?  

    Parent
    Bubkis my man.... (none / 0) (#22)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:46:55 AM EST
    the safety and all, still a conventional 7-3 box hit the final.  Hit a few props during the game though.

    A wise man, I believe Dostoevsky, said "There are two joys in gambling, the joy of winning and the joy of losing."  It's all about the action, win or lose...winning obviously preferred:)

    And like my old man taught me at a young age at Aqueduct and Belmont..."never bet what you can't afford to lose".  Can't get hurt if you follow that simple rule...if you bet it, assume you are gonna lose it.  Be it the track or the casino or Wall St.

    Parent

    That's too bad you didn't... (none / 0) (#27)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:00:15 AM EST
    ...hit the big pay-off.  At least it was an entertaining game and I didn't have to hear Khristian Kwarterback Kurt prattle on afterwards.

    "Never bet what you can't afford to lose"--change the "bet" to "spend" and it applies to more than gambling.  I think we've both got that lesson down.

    Parent

    Yes we do... (none / 0) (#28)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:03:31 AM EST
    two poor sclubs like us...while the masters of the universe let such a simple truth fly right over their head.

    Money can't buy common sense, and greed can cloud it.

    Parent

    He doesn't even get a day off? (none / 0) (#11)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:28:06 AM EST
    He works in Tampa now :)  I'm certain he had his blackberry with him.

    Parent
    We tuned in just about as (none / 0) (#32)
    by brodie on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:23:24 AM EST
    the ridiculously overdone Coin Toss was about to occur.

    Military jet fly-over.  Have they always done this, or is this just something seen since 9/11?  If memory serves, what they had in Super Bowl I was merely the poor guy on the "futuristic" jet-pack, which we were all presumably supposed to be using to commute to work by now, here in the 21st C, who did however manage to avoid disaster and land on the playing field, as opposed to the stands.

    Then we saw 3 "dignitaries" walk out for the toss with Gen Petraeus.  Two other Repugs -- John Elway and Lynn Swann -- with a token SF librul, ex-Niner running back Roger Craig.

    Yep, far too much MIC flavor to the SB.  Eisenhower is probably rolling over in his grave.

    Thankfully though, the team owned by the Obama supporter prevailed over the McCain-backing team owner.

    Parent

    How about this? (none / 0) (#15)
    by jbindc on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:33:23 AM EST
    Banks that sought bailout money hired foreign workers as Americans were getting laid off

    SANTA CLARA, Calif. - Major U.S. banks sought government permission to bring thousands of foreign workers into the country for high-paying jobs even as the system was melting down last year and Americans were getting laid off, according to an Associated Press review of visa applications.

    The dozen banks now receiving the biggest rescue packages, totaling more than $150 billion, requested visas for more than 21,800 foreign workers over the past six years for positions that included senior vice presidents, corporate lawyers, junior investment analysts and human resources specialists. The average annual salary for those jobs was $90,721, nearly twice the median income for all American households.

    As the economic collapse worsened last year -- with huge numbers of bank employees laid off -- the numbers of visas sought by the dozen banks in AP's analysis increased by nearly one-third, from 3,258 in the 2007 budget year to 4,163 in fiscal 2008.

    The AP reviewed visa applications the banks filed with the Labor Department under the H-1B visa program, which allows temporary employment of foreign workers in specialized-skill and advanced-degree positions. Such visas are most often associated with high-tech workers.

    It is unclear how many foreign workers the banks actually hired; the government does not release those details. The actual number is likely a fraction of the 21,800 foreign workers the banks sought to hire because the government only grants 85,000 such visas each year among all U.S. employers.

    During the last three months of 2008, the largest banks that received taxpayer loans announced more than 100,000 layoffs. The number of foreign workers included among those laid off is unknown.

    Foreigners are attractive hires because companies have found ways to pay them less than American workers.



    As the sponsor on a visa request (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by Cream City on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:17:59 AM EST
    right now, one that will take almost a year (at best) before my future daughter-in-law finally can come here -- since the job just disappeared that she had hoped to have that could expedite this down to two weeks' time -- I would point out that we need a lot of these workers who bring skills that we need.  Other countries are well ahead of us in her field, clean energy.  And we need more docs, nurses, etc., to serve where ours won't.

    In banking, it is possible that these international hires were for international banking positions.  And I know that we provincials are woefully behind in pushing international relations in our education.  So I'm withholding castigation on this count against the banks until we know more about these hires.

    Parent

    Well (none / 0) (#34)
    by jbindc on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:27:36 AM EST
    I would guess we could find junior investment analysts and HR specialists and such right here in the US (hey - I have a degree in HR and an MBA - think they would want to hire me?)

    Parent
    Maybe, but are they multilingual? (5.00 / 1) (#37)
    by Cream City on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:55:34 AM EST
    That, from what I see at my campus and in the job market, is the payback we are seeing from so many years of shorting U.S. kids on education in foreign languages.  (I'm glad to report that my campus, like many of late, led some years ago in increasing its requirement for years of foreign languages -- meaning impact on high schools).

    Parent
    You said it (none / 0) (#43)
    by Spamlet on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:43:03 AM EST
    As far as I can tell, the only tangible thing "won" from the student protests of the late 1960s was abolishment of the foreign language requirement at many universities. Interesting how the "authorities" tend to let you "win" only what they wanted to "give" you anyway, for their own purposes.

    Parent
    You missed the other field lost (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by Cream City on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:50:56 PM EST
    by my generation's attack on academe in the '60s:
    The American history survey course requirement.

    Remember, we all used to have to take two semesters of American history?  So we actually could (at least those of us who got better than C's:-) understand how the past shapes our present -- and vote from a basis of shared cultural and political literacy?

    Gone for decades now.  And witness the result (not only at the college level but, again because that sets lower-level graduation requirements, gone from the high school level, too).  Instead, the req that remains may look like American history credits, but it's not survey courses; it's met by specialized courses.  Those are great, and I love to teach them, but they cannot replace survey courses that cover large issues across the centuries -- and those specialized courses rarely require prereqs anymore, like ye olde prereq of American history survey courses.

    So I see students wonderfully grounded in very narrow areas of historical knowledge but with no basis to understand them in larger context.  Sigh.

    Parent

    I beg your pardon? (5.00 / 0) (#60)
    by gyrfalcon on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:36:51 PM EST
    Somehow I don't remember abolishing foreign language studies as part of the SDS demands, but maybe I was paying too much attention to the war in Vietnam to notice.

    Parent
    I don't know about that, specifically; (5.00 / 1) (#63)
    by ThatOneVoter on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:42:41 PM EST
    however, it was considered important to pass students so they wouldn't go to Vietnam.
    Getting rid of language requirements would have fit in.

    Parent
    Student protests of the 1960s (5.00 / 1) (#94)
    by Spamlet on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:15:11 PM EST
    were hardly limited to SDS. I was talking about the widespread insistence that academic studies be "relevant" to "real life."

    Parent
    Microsoft (5.00 / 2) (#100)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:40:01 PM EST
    disclaimer: personal experience only here, I have a totally biased view

    On the software engineering side I have YET to meet an H1B visa holder that had ANY skills the American worker they replaced did not, aside from working for less than half the pay, putting in an extra 20 hrs a week free, and not requiring health insurance.

    My husband TRAINED his replacement at 3 different companies

    for more FUN on outsourcing, see Satyam COmputer of India, which just had its own little ENRON meltdown, their financial reports were MADE UP, they had LOADS of contracts replacing American workers

    and these are jobs for which Americans, such as myself, have paid thru the nose to get Degrees for, so as we struggle to pay our student loans for the job we needed to be 'edumacated' for, they say we arent educated enough..and keep cutting what? education

    I call BS, and Gates who does NOT have a degree whines to Congress to lift the cap so he can pay less to engineers..

    India subsidizes their education, we do not.

    For those who do not know the ONLY reason an H1B visa is supposed to be granted is when an American worker can not be found who is qualified to holdthe job, if Americans HAD those jobs and they are replaced, how can they not be qualified for jobs they had already and when they are training their replacements who work for half?

    BS...some requests like Cream City;s are I am sure legitimate, in the software engineering gig they arent

    Chuck Grassley of all people sent a letter to MS telling them not to layoff Americans and replace them with more H1B visa workers right now and there is an uproar, but open all our trade agreements with BUY AMERICAN and that flys through..whadda world....

    Parent

    Btw, note it's a fiance visa (none / 0) (#103)
    by Cream City on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 08:40:58 PM EST
    for a future daughter-in-law, as I said back at the start of this thread -- but a very skilled woman with years of experience in a field we need in this country, since hers is well ahead us in alternative energies.  

    But with that industry here cancelling job calls (she had an offer until it was cancelled) because of the economy, the precarious projections of funding without clarity on the stimulus bill, etc., we decided to not keep waiting for the work visa route.  

    So we're going for the fiance visa.  Compared to as little as two weeks for a request from a business, young love has to wait about a year.  So we hope that they'll be together for a Happy Valentine's Day a year from now, anyway.

    At least we have gained a lot of skills, too -- in filling out interminable, redundant forms and checks and making maximultiple copies and more.  And hours and hours spent in deciphering our gummint's websites filled with gummintspeak.  From all this, I can attest that our immigration laws are absolutely abominable -- and no wonder that our tourism from overseas is down.  

    Parent

    Anybody win any dough.... (none / 0) (#17)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 09:35:52 AM EST
    on the biggest gambling day of the year?

    Not I said the blind man...

    little one did (none / 0) (#99)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:33:28 PM EST
    My son won 5 bucks off me :0)

    we are Arizonans now so I had to take the Cards :0)


    Parent

    Cool jedimom... (none / 0) (#102)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:49:02 PM EST
    just make sure you make the little guy pay up if and when he loses a wager...I had to take a dollar off my niece on a bet, felt terrible about her busting open her piggy, but it's important they learn to keep their word.

    I won't stand for any welchers in my fam, at any age:)

    Parent

    As I read this (none / 0) (#33)
    by sj on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:25:44 AM EST
    Although entertainers can perform live, Minor insisted that Hudson and Faith Hill, who sang "America the Beautiful" before the national anthem, use the tracks the NFL requires them to submit a week before the game.

    The national anthem is lip-synched at the superbowl.  Is that right?

    The music was canned... (none / 0) (#35)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:30:43 AM EST
    ...not the singing.  

    Parent
    Okay, thanks (none / 0) (#36)
    by sj on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 10:36:46 AM EST
    That makes sense.

    Parent
    Having worked on a super bowl (none / 0) (#38)
    by CoralGables on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:13:08 AM EST
    show in 1995, I can tell you that all music and singing for the national anthem and halftime show for that game were in the can several days before the game. All recorded in advance at Gloria Estefan's studio, I believe called Crescent Moon Studios, in South Miami.

    Parent
    er... (none / 0) (#47)
    by sj on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:23:08 PM EST
    So it was lip-synched, yes/no?

    Parent
    Great Question (5.00 / 1) (#49)
    by CoralGables on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:32:27 PM EST
    all I can confirm is it was all pre-recorded. Only a network exec could confirm what switch they hit. I'm putting my money on all pre-recorded. It eliminates any potential bugs which makes producers happy.

    Parent
    Nah, it's almost certain (5.00 / 1) (#92)
    by brodie on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:47:36 PM EST
    that only the musical backing was pre-recorded.  

    The downside risk of being caught cheating with the Milli Vanilli-ing of a song, and all that would mean to a career, just overwhelmingly exceeds the risk of hitting a few false notes with a truly live performance.

    And, though I've never done it myself, I'd imagine it's not all that easy to be precisely in synch on each syllable of the words if you're lip synching, especially with tricky songs like The Star Spangled Banner.  

    And with 40 billion people watching, some of them even sober,  someone somewhere is bound to quickly notice there's a "problem" in the transmission ...

    Parent

    thinking (none / 0) (#39)
    by nellre on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:13:30 AM EST
    Because 46% voted for McCain in November, I am wondering what they were thinking as they did that.

    The GOP and radio wing nuts are going after Obama big time over the stimulus package and pretty much everything else. Truth seems to be missing in their arguments.

    Right wing nuts are also pooh poohing climate change, which I believe will start claiming a significant number of lives within the next few years.

    Have we really split into two species?

    It's not just the right wing (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by BernieO on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:23:26 PM EST
    I am hearing a lot of their propaganda points being spouted by people in the so-call mainstream media. This morning I heard a lot of outrage against money going to people who "don't pay taxes" - wording right out of the R's playbook. These people pay all kinds of taxes, just not income taxes. And no mention was made of the fact that money that goes to these people is one of the most effective ways to stimulate the economy since they will spend it all. Ditto for food stamps. This was on Morning Joe and Mika and Joe were both trashing this idea.

    John Podesta was a guest but he didn't correct them. What is wrong with Democrats?

    Parent

    Dems are in on it.... (none / 0) (#50)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:33:46 PM EST
    it is your classic "good cop/bad cop" routine on a national scale.  Who the good and bad cops are all depends on your personal political leanings...but make no mistake, it's all for show.

    Parent
    It's all about education. (none / 0) (#40)
    by ThatOneVoter on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:21:18 AM EST
    What's the name of that idiot on the View who doesn't even know if the earth is flat or round?
    How can she possibly grasp the idea of global climate change?

    Parent
    I wonder what... (none / 0) (#41)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:34:04 AM EST
    the 95-99% who voted for Mccain or Obama were thinking....doing the same thing (D or R) over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity, is it not?

    We're one species and we are all insane.

    Parent

    I think we've split up (none / 0) (#46)
    by SOS on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 11:57:19 AM EST
    into way to many different cultural groups (tribes) and we really got our work cut out for us if it's even possible at this point to compromise on just reviewing and shoring up the basics.

    Parent
    Here's an Obama appointment I like (none / 0) (#53)
    by esmense on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 12:52:14 PM EST
    "SEATTLE -- President Barack Obama announced Monday that he will nominate King County Executive Ron Sims to be deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development."

    I hoped Sims would be our Governor some day -- but the sensible tax reform he proposed in his 2000 primary run probably put an end to those ambitions.

    Comcast Super Bowl telecast interrupted by porn (none / 0) (#54)
    by lobary on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:09:19 PM EST
    This is amazing. During last night's Super Bowl telecast, Comcast customers in Arizona were subjected to a half minute of graphic pornography shortly following Larry Fitzgerald's long touchdown reception late in the fourth quarter. The feed abruptly switched from the game in Tampa to a video clip from Club Jenna, a cable porn channel.

    Wow. Nipplegate has nothing on this.

    http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/fromcomments/278448.php

    Coulda been worse... (5.00 / 2) (#57)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:27:27 PM EST
    they could have been subjected to a half minute of an old state of the union address or the like:)

    Parent
    lol (none / 0) (#61)
    by squeaky on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:38:01 PM EST
    Wow, (none / 0) (#55)
    by andgarden on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:14:16 PM EST
    talk about a windfall for Club Jenna.

    Parent
    And a costly mistake for Comcast? (none / 0) (#58)
    by lobary on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:32:23 PM EST
    If they are at fault, this could land them a rather stiff penalty. :)

    Parent
    I'm not so sure (none / 0) (#59)
    by andgarden on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:35:24 PM EST
    I think the cable companies can show pretty much whatever they want, though there might be some special rules related to what they can do to a broadcast channel rebroadcast.

    Probably they'll owe an apology, and not much more. I suppose someone might sue them, but I'm not sure what the cause of action would be.

    Parent

    Illegal shift, maybe...get it??? (none / 0) (#62)
    by easilydistracted on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:39:37 PM EST
    Okay it was bad best I could come up with

    Parent
    Gosh (none / 0) (#56)
    by squeaky on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 01:20:50 PM EST
    I thought that the Superbowl was porn. Only difference than the run of the mill stuff is that the superbowl variety has a gigantic budget.

    Parent
    Hmmm ... (none / 0) (#88)
    by Robot Porter on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:01:08 PM EST
    For the lovers of puns among you:

    his station has received no complaints from viewers who watched the game on Cox


    Parent
    I could see that.... (5.00 / 1) (#91)
    by easilydistracted on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 03:05:42 PM EST
    what's one tight end from another???

    Parent
    Mmm (none / 0) (#65)
    by NJDem on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:09:14 PM EST
    I thought there was only one president at a time?

    "However, even before winning the November 4 election, Obama unofficially used what experts call "track two" discussions to approach America's two foes in the region."...

    "Obama has begun discreet talks with Iran, Syria"

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for dialogue and dramatically changing Bush's FP--but is it normal to start before you're even elected, let alone sworn in?  

    After what we've seen with Citigroup and BofA.. (none / 0) (#71)
    by Elporton on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:26:03 PM EST
    one wonders if BTD still has this opinion.  Both are commercial banks undone by non-commercial banking activities.

    That is just wrong (none / 0) (#18)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Nov 06, 2008 at 09:19:05 AM EST

    Glass Steagal repeal had nothing to do with the crisis today.

    I defy you to make the case that it was. I have made the case at this web site that it was not.

    well... (none / 0) (#98)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:30:26 PM EST
    I am no economist, lol, but Paulson when he was at Golden Slacks and testified to allow them to expand their ability to lever up, that MOST DEFINITELY contributed..

    it was the CDOs and MBS and CDS that did this, the leverage is the issue that brought Bear down, and the ripple emanated form Lehman after Bear

    AIG is bailed out weekly by the NY Fed b/c of the MASSIVE leverage on the CDS in which GS is the counterparty, they alone can bring the entire system down

    because they are SO levered up...

    the Davos World Economic Forum bigwhigs seem to have concurred this week the overleverage was a large part of the issue...

    Parent

    F'ing Pigs (none / 0) (#72)
    by squeaky on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:27:42 PM EST
    And Bloomberg is condoning this outrageous behavior while laying off school teachers because of budget problems.

    Seems to me that these cops have too much time on their hands and should be fired well before even thinking of laying off any school teachers.

    You know me man.... (5.00 / 1) (#76)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:32:50 PM EST
    I've been saying we've got way Way WAY too many cops on the streets of NY for years...its the only way to explain it, too many cops with too little real crime to try and prevent.

    Parent
    Now I'm hearing the Dubya pardoned the (none / 0) (#73)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:29:41 PM EST
    turd blossom.  Tea anyone........scone?

    You Mean (none / 0) (#77)
    by squeaky on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:36:08 PM EST
    That there may be some truth to Jason Leopold's story about Rove getting indicted?

    Parent
    Have no idea (none / 0) (#80)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:39:54 PM EST
    Still waiting to hear what's up.  It was a news teaser.

    Parent
    Yes (none / 0) (#86)
    by squeaky on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:57:15 PM EST
    I googled it after seeing your comment and all I could think of is the Leopold story. That is when he would have gotten a pardon.

    And evidentially presidential pardons do not have to be public.

    Parent

    Gov. Lynch says Gregg won't go to Commerce (none / 0) (#84)
    by jbindc on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 02:46:23 PM EST
    unless a Republican is appointed to fill his seat.

    New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch said Monday that Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) told him he won't leave the Senate to become secretary of commerce unless a Republican fills the vacated seat.

    And Lynch hinted for the first time publicly that he may be open to doing just that if Gregg joins the Obama administration.

    "If President Obama does nominate Senator Gregg to serve as commerce secretary, I will name a replacement who will put the people of New Hampshire first and represent New Hampshire effectively in the U.S. Senate," Lynch said in a statement issued Monday afternoon.

    Lynch's words, though vague, are being seen by New Hampshire political insiders as a signal he's willing to abide by Gregg's wishes and install a Republican caretaker in the seat.

    Bonnie Newman, a former Gregg aide, academic and official in the Reagan and George H. W. Bush administrations, is the top contender to take Gregg's seat. A moderate Republican, Newman endorsed Lynch in his 2004 gubernatorial run.




    Senate Dems drop STD and HIV provisions from stim (none / 0) (#95)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:24:18 PM EST
    and the countdown removing provisions continues...
    I hope these things are added to the regular spending bill,

    CNN has story

    Senate Democrats have dropped two controversial spending programs in the Senate economic stimulus bill: $75 million dollars for anti-smoking programs, and $400 million for STD and HIV prevention. -snip- Republicans, and even some Democrats, have been pointing to both of these items as prime examples of "excess spending" that doesn't belong in this stimulus bill.


    big losers (none / 0) (#96)
    by jedimom on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:26:15 PM EST
    between the House dumping Contraception and the Senate dropping HIV/STD prevention I think single people seem to be the biggest losers in negotiations on the Hill so far...

    /sarc off

    AND THE SMOKERS!!
    they took out the smoking cessation money and the SCHIP is raising cigs 61 cents a pack, poor bastids, I quit already :))

    hey and what about the AFTER SEX CIGARETTE?!

    THE DOUBLE WHAMMY!

    Parent

    I'd love to find out... (5.00 / 2) (#101)
    by kdog on Mon Feb 02, 2009 at 04:43:42 PM EST
    what me and my people did to piss Uncle Sam off so...smokers and assorted recreational drug users seem to be only a hair below Al Qaeda on our enemies list.

    Here I am thinking I'm doing my part to save social security and address over-population by voluntarily shortening my life span and this is the thanks I get...how rude:)

    Parent