When I worked there for Congresswoman Patsy Mink for a time in the mid-'90s, I shared an apartment in Alexandria with co-workers. But commuting twice monthly between D.C. and Honolulu, where my family still lived, proved quite problematic for me, which is why I ultimately quit what was otherwise a very good gig. The girls were still very young at the time, and my wife was really resistant to the idea of relocating to D.C., so I returned to the state legislature in Honolulu.

For house hunting, check out the areas around Silver Spring, Takoma Park, Cillum and College Park, which are north of the district. From people I know who live in D.C., those appear to be much more pleasant places to live, than is the area southeast of the city near Andrews AFB.

Anyway, good luck. I'm happy that you finally got a posting you wanted.

Back in my day the only good duty station was the one before the one you are at....and the one you were going to.

Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.

snip

Barristers for Mr. Steele and his Orbis Business Intelligence firm filed their first defense against a defamation lawsuit brought by Aleksej Gubarev, chief executive of the network solutions firm XBT Holdings.

Mr. Steele acknowledges that the part of the 35-page dossier that identified Mr. Gubarev as a rogue hacker came from "unsolicited intelligence" and "raw intelligence" that "needed to be analyzed and further investigated/verified.

snip

In his final December dossier memo -- his 16th -- Mr. Steele accused Mr. Gubarev and his web-hosting companies of hacking the Democratic Party computer networks with pornography and bugging devices. Mr. Gubarev calls the charge fiction and filed a lawsuit in February.

Mr. Steele's court filing portrays him as a victim of Fusion GPS -- the Washington firm that hired him with money from a Hillary Clinton backer.

But yeah, try to get the DNC to do anything for the state party -- other than see it as something from which all funding is to be drained.

For that reason, we in Wisconsin are in the throes of attempting to get a good candidate to run for governor against Walker.  But it is clear that, one after another, potential candidates are not getting any good answers from the DNC . . . and, one after another, they decline.

So, when amendments to the Constitution come our way, we will be in Walker's third term.

Kennedy was seen as weak.

linea: "there is no crisis of american democracy. president trump won the electoral college and he isnt going to stage a coup and overthrow democracy."

What, then, to make of Louis J. Marinelli, longtime right-wing gadfly, erstwhile "chairman" of the Californian National Party (not to be confused with the California National Party), and co-founder of the divisive "Yes, California" campaign which purportedly seeks to separate that state from the union.

Exposed as a Russian-paid operative -- and a not very bright one at that -- the 30-year-old Marinelli is now living in a self-imposed exile in Yekaterinburg, RU as the self-anointed California "ambassador" to Russia, and has most recently announced his intent to renounce his U.S. citizenship. To be sure, this guy's clearly a nutball who actually only lived in California from 2011 to 2016, before taking off to Russia.

But the public rise of seditious movements in this country like "Yes, California" and the California / Californian National Parties, whether Russian-funded or otherwise, and the massive and still-growing public resistance to the GOP agenda, very strongly suggests that we are likely heading toward a very real constitutional crisis under this president's so-called "leadership."

Yes, on the surface it all sounds totally outlandish. But frankly speaking, after enduring an election in which apparently extensive Russian interference (and perhaps collusion) likely helped a vainglorious trust fund baby and reality TV star with no practical political experience to gain the White House itself, nothing seems all that implausible to me any more.

So perhaps, as someone who is not originally from the United States, you really ought to first take it upon yourself to more closely examine what's really going here right now, and refrain from publicly making such value judgments without first knowing and understanding all the relevant facts.

McBain: "I don't believe Slager should have been tried for murder."

He corrected himself. The car was going in the opposite direction from what he had originally stated. Forward, backward, mere details, and the difference between self-defense and murder, for the purists who insist on such distinctions.

The obvious question, which was clearly not asked, is why he would make a statement exonerating the officer before knowing the facts.  It seems that once again, police are guilty of a "rush to exoneration."  It complicated the matter when they couldn't accuse the kid postmortem of being some kind of thug or drug user, i.e. personal failings on the part of the victim which are used to justify a police shooting even if the officer doesn't know about them.

So Chief Haber had to admit that he lied, which is a synonym for "misspoke."  He fired the officer.  No one, not even the most racist, gun cuddling moron, seems to find any reason that justifies the shooting.

I don't believe Slager should have been tried for murder.

There is no argument about these facts.  

He shot an unarmed, retreating man in the back five times.  He missed with three other rounds fired in a residential neighborhood.  He could not have been in fear of his life.

What, in your opinion, justifies shooting a fleeing man in the back, when the only known infraction was a minor vehicle code violation?  What justifies emptying the magazine in a residential neighborhood over a traffic violation?

(As you know, I have a friend who was shot under similar circumstances, but who lived and collected hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars.  The deputy was fired but did not face charges.)

Slager moved evidence from one location to another, thinking he was not being observed.

glad i live on a hill.

"The Civil War: A Heroic Defense of Southern Liberty -- or an Unconscionable Act of Northern Aggression?"

You don't seem to take a position either way.

And the impact of voter suppression on the "youth vote" has not been reported in the historical context of Wisconsin's longtime record as one of the top states for "youth vote" turnout -- second only to Minnesota . . . until 2016.  It has been reported that "youth vote" turnout dropped here.

(That said, it need be said that as much or more of a problem were the mad Bernie-or-Bust sorts, especially in Madtown aka Madison, with the largest campus in the state -- where the vote for Stein was heaviest.  And the votes for Stein alone, had they gone to Clinton, would have won Wisconsin.

And I wonder if she spoke with Dr Phil Jones, head of the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia U. If she did I'm sure he didn't tell her this:

This is from an Australian at BMRC (not Neville Nicholls). It began from the attached article. What an idiot. The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK it has but it is only7 years of data and it isn't statistically significant.

snip

As you know, I'm not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn't being political, it is being selfish.

The above taken from emails that a Russian hacked.

Donald, let me emphasize the obvious. If Dr Jones would like to see it to prove the science that means it hasn't happened.

Damn those Ruskies! Always outing things the author thought private.....and embarrassing the writer(s).

Donald, science is not about consensus. And you know that. To summarize Popper, science is about testability and predictability of theories.

The Man made global warming theory fails. You cannot test it and all the predictions have failed.

This summarizes my feelings.

First, your facts. If you stuck simply to the modest contention that the world has warmed very slightly in the last 130 years, and you theorized -- and admitted it was a theory -- that humans have contributed to it in some small way, I wouldn't take much of an issue with you. The problem is that you lie so much. You lie when you refuse to confess that the climate prediction models you use are extremely flawed. You lie when you scream about the "97 percent consensus" that doesn't exist. You lie when you act like the real scientists who doubt man-caused global warming are all kooks and lunatics.

Most of all, your overblown, hysterical doomsday prophecies are lies. The world is supposed to already be over by now, according to you. At the very least, New York City should be under water. We should have all been dead from global warming or global cooling or overpopulation dozens of times over. Around the time of the first Earth Day, we were told that hundreds of millions would be starving to death per year within ten years of that date. Human civilization should have crumbled into dust and the few remaining survivors should be floating through a vast water world, locked in a struggle of survival against Dennis Hopper. Yet, here we are, standing on dry land. How many times are you allowed to be wrong about the end of the world before we are justified in not taking you seriously anymore? I'd say that threshold, whatever it is, has long since been reached.

snip

Second, your sincerity. Here's the real issue I have with you. Even if you've been wrong about the Environmental Apocalypse 100 times, you still insist that this 101st prediction will surely pan out. ........This is all quite traumatizing, so it's good for your emotional well being that you don't really believe any of it.

I can only assume that you don't believe it because your actions do not at all resemble what one would expect from someone who does believe this sort of thing. With very rare exceptions, you continue living just like the rest of us..... You think the world is about to end, for God's sake. What are you doing sitting at Starbucks like the rest of us? Why haven't you renounced all modern technology? Why haven't you fled to the mountains before the sea engulfs your family? Why aren't you doing... anything?