and a Israeli ex military suggests that maybe the Hamas tunnel people did not know of the cease fire because they were entrenched ready to carry out a prearranged plan, which you de bunk because even you have heard of the cease fire?

Well my thought is that the ex military person is FOS and is one more white person to bolster the certainty that Hamas broke the cease fire, but it may have been a mistake... hahahahahah..

Seems to me that no one knows what happened but it did present a nice excuse to bomb and kill lots of women and children.

Seems to me that the biggest problem Israel has is the Arab birth rate killing the women and children is a great way to level the 5 to 1 disparity of future arab citizens being born v future Israslie's

Journalists for foreign news organizations must agree in writing to the military censorship system to work in Israel.

Wiki:

In 1966, the Censorship Agreement was signed between media representatives and the IDF. The media agreed to abide by the orders of the Military Censor, while the IDF agreed not to misuse its role.

From Constitutional Rights Foundation:

When U.S. military units went to Saudi Arabia in the fall of 1990, about 1,000 journalists eventually joined them. The Pentagon set ground rules for the press.

The Pentagon accredited all American journalists and required them to observe the following battlefield press rules:

1. No reporters could visit any U.S. military unit or travel outside of Dhahran or Riyadh except in a press pool.

2. No pool was permitted in the field without an escort, usually a U.S. military public-affairs officer (PAO).

3. No interviews of U.S. military personnel were permitted without an escort present.

4. All pool dispatches must first pass through the "military security review system." (PAOs at each pool location reviewed all dispatches and could delete or change any "military sensitive information." Reporters could appeal any censorship to the military pool coordinating office in Dhahran and then to the Pentagon.)
   
5. Violations of the above rules could result in arrest, detention, revocation of press credentials, and expulsion from the combat zone.

Iraq War Embedded Journalists:

On June 14, 2014, The New York Times published an opinion piece critical of embedded journalism during both the U.S. military occupation of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan. It was written by PVT Chelsea Manning, the former U.S. Army intelligence analyst now serving a 35-year prison sentence for leaking the largest set of classified documents in American history.

At no point during his 2009-10 deployment in Iraq, Manning wrote, were there more than a dozen American journalists covering military operations--in a country of 31 million people and 117,000 U.S. troops. Manning charged that vetting of reporters by military public affairs officials was used "to screen out those judged likely to produce critical coverage," and that once embedded, journalists tended "to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags" out of fear having their access terminated.

"A result," wrote Manning, "is that the American public's access to the facts is gutted, which leaves them with no way to evaluate the conduct of American officials." Manning noted, "This program of limiting press access was challenged in court in 2013 by a freelance reporter, Wayne Anderson, who claimed to have followed his agreement but to have been terminated after publishing adverse reports about the conflict in Afghanistan. The ruling on his case upheld the military's position that there was no constitutionally protected right to be an embedded journalist."