home

Terror Threat Perceived as "Wild Goose Chase"

A senior official says the NYC al Qaeda terror threat now appears more like a wild goose chase. The information has not been able to be corroborated and the plot details don't add up.

< Saturday Afternoon Open Thread: Won't Get Fooled Again | Sunday Afternoon Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I will be very glad if this turns (5.00 / 3) (#1)
    by MO Blue on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 05:16:01 PM EST
    out to be nothing but a wild goose chase. Having said that and I sincerely mean it, I have to ask:

    Does that mean that I can keep my Social Security and Medicare rather than sacrifice them so that not a penny is cut from defense and Homeland Security?

    And that the focus can go back (5.00 / 4) (#2)
    by Towanda on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 06:53:17 PM EST
    to JOBS, as this seemed to fortuitously timed as to distract us from that focus yet again?  

    Honestly, our so-called leaders act like my cat, who cannot focus for more than seconds.  So when we need as a nation to concern ourselves with the plight of the unemployed, who . . . SQUIRREL! . . . look for leadership, and . . . LEAF FALLING FROM TREE! . . . apparently are supposed to just shut up and think of the 9/11 victims and their families, then . . . DUST MOTE!  SUNBEAM! . . . oh, forgeddaboudit, our so-called leaders don't want to deal with us ungrateful survivors of 9/11.

    Parent

    well, (none / 0) (#18)
    by bocajeff on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 11:30:33 AM EST
    considering jobs has been an issue for close to 3 years and this terror threat is a week, your comment regarding fortuitous timing seems rather weak at best and ignorant at worse.

    Parent
    Well, you must have missed (none / 0) (#24)
    by Towanda on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 12:39:58 PM EST
    Obama's jobs speech this week.  Pretty weak of you.

    Parent
    I am glad the wild goose chase (none / 0) (#29)
    by MKS on Mon Sep 12, 2011 at 02:44:23 PM EST
    involved no more than questioning a few more people and a greater visibility of law enforcement.

    It could have been worse--we could invaded an entire country that had nothing to with 9/11.

    Parent

    It is so hard not to feel used. Again. (5.00 / 6) (#3)
    by Anne on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 07:03:58 PM EST
    I don't think I will ever forget that day, and I didn't even know anyone who died in the attacks.  

    I don't need wall-to-wall media coverage to remind me what happened on 9/11, any more than I need the media to remind me of what happened on 11/22/63.  

    And I sure don't need the intelligence agencies to yank my chain every year at this time, nor do I need these manufactured stings every so often so that the FBI can announce the break-up of a major terrorist cell.

    I'm tired of being treated as if I have the IQ of a cantaloupe, tired of being manipulated, and jerked around.  Tired of the "Report Suspicious Activity" reminders over the highway.  Tired of the campaigns to frighten people into surrendering their rights.

    It was a terrible day, but the way it has been used as justification to erode our rights, to frighten people into submission, the way it has used the deaths of innocents to impose an authoritariam agenda that is antithetical to the principles that formed the foundation of this country - well, it makes me feel sick inside.

    Enough already.

    Great post. (none / 0) (#14)
    by lentinel on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 06:20:37 AM EST
    Great post, indeed. (none / 0) (#17)
    by easilydistracted on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 10:56:54 AM EST
    well, (none / 0) (#20)
    by bocajeff on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 11:37:17 AM EST
    there are some abuses and stupid things, and we should be doing things smarter. But to bury your head in the sand isn't the answer. There are at least 3,000 people in NYC, 160 people in OKC, , Bali, London, Madrid, Berlin, Israel, Argentina, Chechnya, that have felt first hand what is going on.

    Again, I agree with some of the stupidity in how we are dealing with the issue. But there is a major issue that can not nor should not be ignored.

    Parent

    How do you know? (none / 0) (#25)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 01:18:09 PM EST
    And I sure don't need the intelligence agencies to yank my chain every year at this time, nor do I need these manufactured stings every so often so that the FBI can announce the break-up of a major terrorist cell

    Could you please tell me just that.

    How do you know?

    And if they miss one and we have an attack, will you forgive them for missing it and what will you say to the friends and families of the dead?

    Parent

    How do you know? (none / 0) (#26)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 01:18:30 PM EST
    And I sure don't need the intelligence agencies to yank my chain every year at this time, nor do I need these manufactured stings every so often so that the FBI can announce the break-up of a major terrorist cell

    Could you please tell me just that.

    How do you know?

    And if they miss one and we have an attack, will you forgive them for missing it and what will you say to the friends and families of the dead?

    Parent

    Here We Go Again (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by The Maven on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 08:30:37 PM EST
    It would appear that after ten years and countless decapitations of al-Qaeda's leadership ranks and decimation of their rank-and file members, all it takes is for some nonsensical threat to be referenced on a wiretapped phone for us to go once again into major mobilization mode.

    For a decade now, we've had our political leaders creating a schizophrenic sense of unease among the populace, telling us on the one hand to go about our regular everyday activities, while simultaneously reminding us to be afraid of the boogeymen who are constantly out to get us.  And with each iteration, the desire to establish scapegoats grows and grows.

    The well-documented effect of this is also turning us into a paranoid, suspicious and ever less free nation, retreating from the ideals that those same leaders keep claiming make us "better" or more "special" than others.  It's that kind of manufactured delusion that then ends up playing a large part in our degraded political process.  And thus we are building the primrose path to our own diminished future.

    Well, (none / 0) (#21)
    by bocajeff on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 11:38:39 AM EST
    At least we are not rounding up all Muslims and putting them in concentration camps like FDR did...so we are making progress.Oh wait, he gave us social security so that was ok.

    Parent
    Yep, no one is perfect (none / 0) (#30)
    by MKS on Mon Sep 12, 2011 at 02:45:53 PM EST
    failed stimulus (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by The Addams Family on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 12:06:48 AM EST
    because we were supposed to go shopping after the attack

    at this point, i regard (none / 0) (#4)
    by The Addams Family on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 08:15:26 PM EST
    everything coming out of Homeland <retch> Security as disinformation, whether they're reporting "chatter," issuing a warning or calling one off

    'Homeland' (none / 0) (#10)
    by robert72 on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 12:31:03 AM EST
    is almost as retch-worth as 'loved ones'. That seemed to become popular after 9-11, too. I don't know why 'loved ones' bugs me so much - it is just so sugary, perhaps. 'Family and friends' is so much classier - not all of them are loved ones but it is more meaningful.
    Homeland always makes me think of Motherland and Fatherland - a bit totalitarian for my liking.

    Parent
    I hate (none / 0) (#13)
    by lentinel on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 06:19:34 AM EST
    "loved ones" also.

    Because, the way our "loved ones" are treated by the government is like so much rubbish.

    The way it treats survivors.
    The way it treats families of survivors.
    The way it treated and treats the first responders.

    For the government, and much of the media, our "loved ones" are the ones they like to either ignore, caricature, despise, marginalize or use as best they can for their political advantage.

    And "homeland" is an evocation of the "good war" WW2. As you said, for me it evokes a fascist connotation reminiscent of der Vaterland.

    It should be retired along with "overseas" and "over there".

    Parent

    Duh (none / 0) (#6)
    by Mr Natural on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 08:53:57 PM EST


    Timing (none / 0) (#7)
    by Dick Durata on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 09:50:23 PM EST
    The threat may have been a wild goose chase, but its timing was impeccable.

    I'm SHOCKED... (none / 0) (#11)
    by lentinel on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 05:59:04 AM EST
    that information dispensed by such worthy representatives of the common good - the likes of one Joseph Lieberman - a stout-hearted gent who laments the passing (if indeed it has passed) of waterboarding - that information from such credible and disinterested sources could be not worth the hot air upon which it depends for circulation.

    Can't speak for anyone else, but when (5.00 / 4) (#15)
    by Anne on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 09:46:32 AM EST
    I hear the name "Joe Lieberman," my brain pretty much just hits the "mute" button if I don't hear some form of the word "resign" within the first sentence or so; if he's not leaving office, he has nothing to say that interests me.

    Parent
    Don't discount HolyJoe too soon (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by MO Blue on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 10:02:59 AM EST
    He is a very useful tool for being on being the front person to promote upcoming agenda items and to kill any and all elements of legislation that might help the average citizen.

    Parent
    Too true. (none / 0) (#19)
    by KeysDan on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 11:33:52 AM EST
    My hopes for a post-senate Joseph Lieberman are that he enters a lobbying area that is very specialized, hugely lucrative and keeps him extremely busy.  Specialized so as to circumscribe the damage that he will inevitably do, lucrative so as to lessen temptation to accept a Cabinet position and busy so as minimize his proclivity to meddle disastrously in public affairs. And, my fears for his continued public contributions apply to future Democratic or Republican administrations, either of which he would be equally comfortable with, and they with him.

    Parent
    My hope (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by MO Blue on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 12:02:03 PM EST
    is that I never have to see or hear from or about a post-senate Joseph Lieberman ever again.

    I realize that is totally unrealistic since he is one of those people who is almost always totally wrong about the issues. This by current media standards qualifies Joe to be  one of the very serious people that they must use for "expert opinion" on every issue that they got wrong. Once again, that means Joe gets to talk about a lot of issues.  

    Parent

    I like (none / 0) (#12)
    by lentinel on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 06:07:51 AM EST
    your post, and agree with most of it, but I certainly do NOT wish
    for a return of W.

    I wish that W. would be retired to a cave somewhere.
    Failing that, I wish that Obama would cease trotting the old s.o.b. out for curtain calls.

    But there's another reason I don't support bringing back W. again, and that is because, unfortunately, his presence would be redundant.

    The way I could agree with you is that it sometimes occurs to me that if we had elected McCain, the so-called wishful-thinkingly-called "Democratic Left" would be up in arms against the current policies being pursued by the executive and legislative branches of government.

    Instead, the Democratic Left is in a deep coma, waiting for it's fanciful creation, Obama the breathe of air, to awaken from his.

    Black Helicopters and the pro-Obama hit squad (none / 0) (#32)
    by MKS on Mon Sep 12, 2011 at 02:50:19 PM EST
    Sometimes paranoia goes too far.

    I have no objection to the security measures for this last weekend (that we know about.)

    Parent

    idiotic (none / 0) (#22)
    by bocajeff on Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 11:40:47 AM EST
    the fact that you are free to post what you just did shows you have no knowledge of the old East Germany. In fact, you are free to travel to Germany and ask old Germans about that. Something they couldn't do either.

    Now that you mention it, (none / 0) (#31)
    by MKS on Mon Sep 12, 2011 at 02:48:06 PM EST
    have you seen the new movie Debt?

    Great plot and actors imo.....

    Also, set in 1965 East Germany.

    Parent

    Site Violation - spam (none / 0) (#28)
    by MO Blue on Mon Sep 12, 2011 at 10:57:16 AM EST