home

Friday Night News Roundup and Open Thread

Update: They've got a "handshake deal" and will go for a one week continuing resolution. Great, so now we can listen to both sides spin victory all weekend?

10:38 p.m. ET - CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash reported there has been a handshake agreement on a framework to fund the government for the remainder of the fiscal year and a short term continuing resolution funding the government until Thursday.

****

Get ready for the last minute budget deal. How did Boehner do? Via CNN on Twitter:

9:20 p.m. ET - @teapartynation: Boehner is selling us out tonight. We will primary Boehner next year. #tcot #teaparty #GOP #TPN #TPP #SGP
[More...]

Or, maybe no deal? Maybe Boehner finally figured out he waited too long and a deal at the last second looks like he's the weak one, while the Dems held strong?

10:21 p.m. ET - @LisaDCNN: WAITING GAME: outside GOP mtng, hearing applause. Overheard GOP member I'm hall say "republicans will be happy"... But no final yet.

Politico says Boehner pitched a deal to his fellow Repubs tonight and due to time issues, the Senate may pass a one week continuing resoluton, but only if a deal is on the table in principle.

Moving on to other topics: Is anyone surprised there are still secret prisons in Afghanistan? The military confirms it to the AP, but it's okay, they're just "gray sites" not "black sites."

How's the trial going for Russian pilot Konstantin Yaroshenko and the other men snatched in Liberia and flown to NY by the DEA after an elaborate sting? Hard to say, since no one is covering it and the court has not posted any updated pleadings -- or even minutes of the proceedings -- on PACER. I've never seen a "blackout" on a court docket before, but that appears to be what's happened. Here's one account from a Russian news service after the first day. Scroll down to the video "RT's latest report on Konstantin Yaroshenko."

Via Sentencing Law and Policy, a federal judge in Iowa says he'll keep using the 1:1 crack powder cocaine ratio rather than the 18:1 contained in Fair Sentencing Act. Excellent opinion, available here.

No verdict today in the Barry Bonds trial. The jury asked to rehear a secretly recorded conversation that Steve Hoskins conveniently found at the last minute, and Monday, will re-hear the testimony of Kathy Hoskins, who testified she saw Gregg Anderson inject Bonds in the stomach.

Trainer Greg Anderson got to go home from jail.

And the defense scored a bit of a win today when it complained to the judge that Assistant U.S. Attorney Matt Parrella misrepresented some evidence to the jury during closing arguments. They said it was prosecutorial misconduct and the jury should be called back in and told to disregard his comments about it. The judge agreed to call the jury back in but she told them only there had been "a little glitch."

Parrella mistakenly told jurors that former San Francisco Giants head trainer Stan Conte testified that one of Bonds’s trainers used flaxseed oil on his legs and ankles and thus Bonds knew the difference between the oil and a designer steroid called the Cream.

Illston told jurors that Conte actually testified he didn’t know anything about flaxseed oil and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Nedrow had correctly stated in his portion of closing arguments that Conte testified he never saw Bonds using flaxseed oil at the Giants clubhouse.

This is an open thread, all topics welcome.

< "Some Say" Dems Prefer Spinelessness | Obama Confirms Budget Deal as The Spin Begins >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Ugh (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by Democratic Cat on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:09:24 PM EST
    Pres. Obama is on my tee-vee trumpeting what a great accomplishment it is to make historic levels of spending cuts and start to live within our means.

    Preordained (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:09:58 PM EST
    I know, but it's still frustrating (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by Democratic Cat on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:11:14 PM EST
    I'm so sick of all of these guys.  They are all maroons.

    Parent
    They got a deal (none / 0) (#1)
    by Saul on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 09:43:54 PM EST
    according to CNN

    The deal looks to be for a week (none / 0) (#2)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 09:47:54 PM EST
    i.e., another bridge. We're going to have groundhog day on this, I think.

    as long as they don't throw (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by nycstray on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 09:52:21 PM EST
    our women parts on the table again . . .

    this is getting old pretty d@mn quick.

    Parent

    I just read on Twitter (none / 0) (#12)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:43:52 PM EST
    they agreed to an up or down vote next week on the abortion spending. Anyone know if that's right?

    Parent
    How can they agree to a vote on abortion (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by nycstray on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 11:01:10 PM EST
    spending if the Hyde Amendment is in place?

    Let's start calling it what it is, removing funding for women's health and family planning, since NO fed $$$ go towards abortion.

    Parent

    Please, yes, let's call it what it is (none / 0) (#21)
    by Towanda on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 09:20:57 AM EST
    here, anyway:  It's the anti-women's health war.

    The war against abortion?  That one, the righties won a while ago, when they won ye olde "state's rights" in this new civil war, the one against women.  The limitations on abortion access in so many states made Roe v. Wade meaningless for many women years ago.

    Parent

    the senate will not pass that (none / 0) (#19)
    by hairspray on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 12:49:05 AM EST
    and if they do, Obama will not sign it. I hope not.  Nothing is riding on it if it is stripped from a bill and becomes a stand alone. We Democrats expect the president will not sign it. If it is a rider as the GOP made this, then of course it is blackmail, which is what this budget is all about.  

    Parent
    Boehner (none / 0) (#7)
    by Lil on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:11:46 PM EST
    played this pretty well, unfortunately for the Dem side, imo. But the tea party will never be happy.

    There is no "tea party" (5.00 / 2) (#8)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:12:24 PM EST
    It's just the Republican base. And yes, he won HUGE. Depressing.

    Parent
    I don't think Boehner won (none / 0) (#13)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:46:27 PM EST
    at all, let alone "huge."

    As I said in my newest post above, it's like the all too obvious final scene of a badly scripted movie. They all look bad.

    Parent

    Seems you're speaking of appearances (5.00 / 3) (#14)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:49:05 PM EST
    I'm talking about the substance of the agreement. $40B in cuts for one year is something like a quarter more than Boehner originally proposed. Today's drama was on the house's money for him.

    Parent
    Not just appearances (none / 0) (#15)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 11:00:46 PM EST
    Time:

    ... Tea Party groups are already making noises about mounting a primary challenge to Boehner for purportedly selling out conservative orthodoxy by dropping provisions that would have de-funded issues ranging from health-care reform to the EPA's ability to regulate emissions.

    ....In truth, neither party emerges from the episode looking good. Boehner spent months framing the budget debate as a crusade to cut spending, but in the end, it was abundantly clear that for some of the social conservatives in his conference, dollars and cents were less important than ideological fault lines like abortion, health-care reform and global warming. Democrats, meanwhile, didn't inspire confidence in their ability to haggle.



    Parent
    I do not agree with your view, then (5.00 / 2) (#18)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 11:01:51 PM EST
    Substantively, the $40B cut is a disaster.

    Parent
    SPAM (none / 0) (#26)
    by Edger on Thu Oct 20, 2011 at 01:06:00 PM EST
    Already on to the next round (none / 0) (#9)
    by Democratic Cat on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:16:25 PM EST
    Sen. McConnell asking for trillions in cuts as the price of agreeing to raise the debt ceiling.

    Yup (5.00 / 2) (#10)
    by andgarden on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:17:13 PM EST
    The other guys are just better at this.

    Parent
    Or they all have the same goals (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by mjames on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 10:33:34 PM EST
    and serve the same masters. After all, not a one of them lost anything. We did.

    Parent
    This is the best summary statement (none / 0) (#20)
    by Towanda on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 09:18:07 AM EST
    of the budget battle -- Boehner, Reid, Obama, et al., are like generals, and the public on the front lines of their wars?  Just "collateral damage."

    Parent
    *Facepalm* ugh n/t (none / 0) (#17)
    by lilburro on Fri Apr 08, 2011 at 11:01:16 PM EST


    I'm going to spend the rest of the day (none / 0) (#22)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 01:18:26 PM EST
    with the dogs since it feels like everything else has gone to the dogs.  Downloaded my camera yesterday, here's a photo of Digby from February when she was 14 mos old.  I think she is a very pretty girl. http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y169/Militarytracy/BeautifulDigby.jpg

    One baby eagle is out of the nest (none / 0) (#23)
    by MO Blue on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 01:56:21 PM EST
    Other two are looking out from under the parent. Oh, oh, another one looks like it might follow its sibling out of the nest to fight. So far it has knocked two down. Use to worry that it was doing permanent damage but I guess not since they keep getting up.

    Parent eagle's child control seems to be sitting on them when they get too out of control.  

    Parent

    Many long years ago, (none / 0) (#24)
    by Zorba on Sat Apr 09, 2011 at 02:12:00 PM EST
    when my kids were little, I often wished that I could literally "sit on them" as a method of child control.   ;-)

    Parent