Yes, I can tell here that climate is and will be changing, we've had windy days that remind people of the weather in OK and TX, as well as days when the humidity approached levels I've only experienced in the Southern USA.

Or course, it looks like the global warming scam proceeds afoot, now that Gore et al have co-opted the Antarctic ice cap and the Greenland ice sheet onto their side as well:

The rate of melting by the ice sheets covering Greenland and Antarctica may throw existing projections for sea level rise out the window. Unfortunately for Maldivians and other idyllic, but altitude-challenged islands, the ice sheets are melting faster than anyone expected.

Sea levels have been rising nearly unabated since the late 19th century, but rates have been increasing in recent years. The bulk of the change has been attributed to water expanding due to rising ocean temperatures, while melting ice in Greenland and Antarctica was considered to contribute a relatively small amount. But a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters reports the ice sheets may be contributing to sea level rise at a rate three times that which was previously suspected. The result? Sea levels could reach predicted heights 50 years earlier than experts thought, and total sea level rise may exceed previous estimates.

Ice is primarily lost from the Greenland and Antarctic sheets when it calves into the ocean. When ice sheets move faster toward the ocean, they shuck more ice into the water. And if snowfall over the ice sheets fails to replenish the amount lost, the sheet shrinks in size over time, transferring the water it once held into the ocean.

Ars Technica Link

So what does Obama propose? Well nothing so simple as his own party's highly popular political platform for this president. He's too smart for that. Rather, as Ezra Klein points out,, Obama's deficit reduction plan, while not quite as brutal as the Republican Ryan plan, is even more conservative than the Simpson-Bowles plan, which was itself deeply conservative. He calls for raising less money in new taxes and far smaller cuts in the defense budget, chasing the Republicans into territory that is well to the right of anything even Ronald Reagan dared propose before his 1980 shellacking of Jimmy Carter.

In essence, they merely said the NFLPA's de-certification was a sham to give them leverage in CBA negotiations. As Judge Nelson demonstrated in her decision, deciding to de-certify and pursue an antitrust case was completely within the rights of players, even if their intent was only to gain leverage. By electing to de-certify, the players give up the right to strike and also have the former union perform various other functions including regulating agents and representing players in administrative ruling disputes with the league.

She also spent a few dozen pages politely destroying the NFL's argument that the Court couldn't rule on the injunction before the NLRB responded to the league's contention that the NFLPA is continuing to operate as a union.