home

Open Thread for College Campus Protests

I am not writing about the Israel-Hamas war, or as of yet, the protests on college campuses. But I know everyone has strong feelings about the protests. And many readers do want to discuss them. So here's an open thread for those of you who do want to discuss these topics.

Keep in mind TalkLeft is not the government and what you consider free speech may differ from my interpretation of acceptable speech. And since this is my site, my interpretation prevails. [More...]

As a related side-note, I still follow the Twitter feeds of several ISIS/Syria researchers, most of whom are now covering ISIS in Africa. One who has a different focus is Aymenn J. Al-Tamimi, who writes primarily about Syria, but may be best known for his multi-lingual abilities, and his translation of an encyclopedic amount of ISIS-created documents from Arabic into English.

He doesn't usually offer political opinions, he considers himself a researcher, not a journalist or pundit. The other day, he wrote a column about the pro-Palestinian campus protests and the concept of Cognitive Egocentrism, which I recommend as thoughtful reading.

The term ‘cognitive egocentrism’ was long ago coined by Richard Landes to describe the phenomenon of projecting one’s own assumptions and ideals about the world onto others.

...Leaving aside questions of rights and wrongs, it seems to me that any political cause needs to be understood and dealt with according to the realities on the ground, and not on the basis of wishful thinking on the part of outsiders. Thus, the Palestinian cause and what represents it are defined principally by the Palestinians themselves who are on the ground in the Palestinian territories and the Palestinian factions that represent them.

When this point is borne in mind, it becomes apparent that some of the discourse about the Palestinian cause in the pro-Palestine protests and wider advocacy in Western countries is well out of touch with those realities, and instead projects its own intellectual fantasies and ideals onto the Palestinian cause.

After providing a lot of examples of the intellecutal fantasies of outsiders, including ones he personally experienced during time he spent there, he concludes:

None of the above should be read as advocacy for one side or the other in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is simply an analysis of how some activism and advocacy for the Palestinian cause in the West reflects cognitive egocentrism described by Landes so long ago, as some project their idealised perceptions and pet causes onto the Palestinian cause in a way that is divorced from sober ground truths. In other words, there is an emotional and romanticised identification with the cause, but not one that has been well thought through.

On yet another different but related topic, you will not find me comparing the 1968 Vietnam War protests at Columbia and other colleges, or the actions of SDS and the Weather Underground or the 1970 Kent State tragedy, when members of the U.S. National Guard who had been called in to stop a campus protest killed four protesting students, to today's campus protests.

The 1960's were unique. No amount of magical thinking will resurrect them. Those of us who were fortunate to have lived in the midst of events of the decade, know that there will never be another Woodstock, another Richard Nixon, or another Hunter Thompson (RIP Hunter). There will never be another peaceful war protest with 500,000 college kids like the one at the Washington Monument, scenes from which are in the movie Forest Gump.

The 1960's were about peace, love, drugs, sex and freedom. What will always be missing from the current protests and future protests is love. Dissidence is the voice of the decade, not peace, hugs, or drugs that make you happy.

That said, there well may be another Altamont, which brought the 60's era to a crashing end.

From what I can tell, today's protests are rooted in hate and being run by professional groups of outside agitators who know all too well how to attract disaffected and naive college students, who care mostly about being socially accepted by their peers, and are not about to do any research on the underlying topic. They are fine picking up the phrase of the day they hear coming from a bullhorn.

Today's protests don't represent a free speech condundrum to me. All public speech has limitations, one of which is that you cannot call for the death, assault or banishment by force of any specific group within society.

If you wandered in here by accident, please read our comment policy. TalkLeft is a junkyard for you to dump your most hateful thoughts. Understand that any comment I view as anti-semitic will be deleted. And that in my view, a comment doesn't lose its anti-semitic character by substituting the word "Zionist" for "Israeli" or "Jewish person".

Hate, insults, personal attacks, name-calling, and calls for violence against any individual or group, will be deleted -- this includes referring to the Israeli-Hamas war as a genocide or a holocaust, which I personally find offensive.

If you take five minutes, you will find that you can express your position quite clearly without using profanity or emotionally charged accusations.

Please keep your comments in this thread related to the pro-Palestinian campus protests, the responses by the colleges, and the involvement of our police and military and comparisons to protests of other eras.

< Transcripts and More in Trump's Hush Money Trial
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    LIkely TYPO (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by jmacWA on Fri May 03, 2024 at 05:10:23 AM EST
    TalkLeft is a ^^^ junkyard for you to dump your most hateful thoughts.

    I am quite certain the word NOT is missing.

    you are quite right and quite the eagle eye today. (none / 0) (#4)
    by Jeralyn on Sat May 04, 2024 at 04:34:09 AM EST
    Thanks, I'll fix it in the a.m.

    Parent
    What student protestors want (5.00 / 3) (#5)
    by john horse on Sat May 04, 2024 at 10:31:25 AM EST
    From what I can tell, today's protests are rooted in hate. . .

    The Israeli government has killed over 34,000 Palestinians in Gaza, the vast majority of whom were civilians, including many women and children.  They have destroyed hospitals, mosques, schools and homes.  They have killed hundreds of aid workers and journalists.  They have hindered the delivery of food, water, and humanitarian aid.  What the Israeli government is doing in Gaza is rooted in hate.  What Hamas did on October 6 was rooted in hate.  I fail to see how criticism of Israeli policies in Gaza is "rooted in hate".

    From what I can tell, today's protests are . . . being run by professional groups of outside agitators who know all too well how to attract disaffected and naive college students, who care mostly about being socially accepted by their peers, and are not about to do any research on the underlying topic.

    Do you believe that students don't have the agency to think for themselves?  Who are these "outside agitators"?  To be clear, I'm not saying that some of the protestors on campuses aren't students but that is not the claim you are making.  Your claim is that the student protest is being "run by professional group of outside agitators."  What evidence do you have for this?

    What campus protestors want varies, but from what I could gather what they generally want is divestment by colleges from companies that are aiding Israelis war effort.  (not dissimilar to the divestment movement against the apartheid South African government in the 70s)
    I think many of these students also favor a ceasefire in Gaza (as does President Biden) and the end of US military aid to Israel (which Biden doesn't favor).

    By the way I think Jeralyn's suggestion that students "research the underlying topic" is good advice.  I would just also apply it to those of us who aren't students.

    I agree almost entirely with this comment (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by Peter G on Sat May 04, 2024 at 12:42:56 PM EST
    and unfortunately must disagree in several respects with our host, my old friend J. Today is May 4, the anniversary of the shootings at Kent State. That indelible memory should teach a never-to-be-forgotten lesson about why calling out armed police -- or worse, the National Guard -- to quell a nonviolent (even if angry) demonstration will almost always make matters worse, not better.
       On May 1, 1970, I was a college junior, but I had been at home for six weeks, in bed, a hundred miles from my campus, on a semester's medical leave recovering from mononucleosis. (The mono was brought on by the prior three months of two all-nighters a week as editor-in-chief of our college newspaper, along with a full load of classes, social life, antiwar political activity, etc.) I was deeply disturbed by the news of Nixon's expansion of the Vietnam War into Cambodia, but it was not until May 4 that I was jolted out of bed, compelled to return to campus to join my peers in protest. But those protests (like me as an individual) were antiwar, not pro-Vietcong or pro-Ho Chi Minh, much less anti-American. Even though some of the many demonstrations I joined included individuals, who I tried to stay away from, who were pro-Vietcong and did root for America's military defeat.
       Likewise, I understand today's protests (to the limited extent I can understand them as a much-older outsider) as sympathetic to the Palestinian victims of an excessive and criminal military assault and the unreasonable and cruel policies of the Netanyahu regime in Israel toward the territories seized by Israel after the 1967 War that was launched against it. The protesters believe, as I do, that the United State can and should do more to pressure Israel to change course, and should do less to support Israel militarily. I do not understand the demonstrations as pro-Hamas, pro-violence, or as excusing the horrific atrocities perpetrated on October 7 (even though there are surely individuals within those encampments and demonstrations who do excuse Hamas). Likewise, speaking as someone whose ancestry is 100% Eastern European Jewish, I do not confuse opposition to Israeli policy or even to Israel's existence, as inherently antisemitic (although such views could stem in some cases from antisemitism), any more than I would describe Israel's current illegal and indefensible policies and behavior as being (agreeing with Jeralyn on this point) a form of genocide.
       Finally, I would and do defend the free speech rights of those who disagree with me on any of these points, including calls for the elimination of Israel as a Zionist state. Speech that is hateful or makes other uncomfortable (or "feel unsafe") is still mostly protected by free speech principles, as long as it does not amount to harassment of individuals or incitement to imminent lawless action that is likely to produce such action.

    Parent
    One sided coverage (none / 0) (#7)
    by john horse on Sat May 04, 2024 at 07:53:15 PM EST
    I do not understand the demonstrations as pro-Hamas, pro-violence, or as excusing the horrific atrocities perpetrated on October 7

    However I can understand why some people would come to this conclusion if they watched the mainstream media.

    For example, you would think that if you wanted to understand the protests you might want to ask some of the students or professors involved.

    You also often see Israeli government officials or Israel supporters on MSNBC but rarely do you see those who support Palestine.  MSNBC commentators who have pushed back against some of the erroneous claims of Israeli officials, like Mehdi Hasan, have been  purged.

    I'm not saying that the views of Israeli government officials, or Israel supporters should not be represented, just that the coverage should be more balanced and critical.  

    Since coverage is so one sided, you can understand why some people see protestors as "pro-Hamas, pro-violence, or as excusing the horrific atrocities perpetrated on October 7."  There are people on both sides who believe in human rights and coexistence.  The tragedy is that these are the people that the MSM ignores.  

    Parent

    Well said, Jeralyn (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by The Addams Family on Sun May 05, 2024 at 11:48:29 PM EST
    . . . today's protests are rooted in hate and being run by professional groups of outside agitators who know all too well how to attract disaffected and naive college students, who care mostly about being socially accepted by their peers, and are not about to do any research on the underlying topic. They are fine picking up the phrase of the day they hear coming from a bullhorn.

    The protests are going to put (none / 0) (#2)
    by Chuck0 on Fri May 03, 2024 at 01:34:44 PM EST
    Orange Jesus in the White House. These protests are going to kill Biden at the polls in November. These kids blame the current administration for aiding the mass killings in Gaza. They will stay home in November. We need their votes. Biden needs to take these protests seriously and change course in Israel.

    The case for voting for Biden (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by john horse on Mon May 06, 2024 at 07:28:47 AM EST
    Chuck,

    I too share your concern that these protests may tip the election to Trump.  Four years ago Biden won because of higher than expected turnout from the youth vote and because of the strong support he received from the Palestinian community in Michigan.  So who can blame student protestors and Palestinian Americans if they feel a sense of betrayal.  As the late great Molly Ivins once wrote "You've got to dance with them what brung you."  

    Despite this, I am supporting and will vote for Joe Biden.  The Democratic party is a big tent party.  It includes those who support Netanyahu but also those who sympathize with the Palestinians.  This includes Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Rashida Tlaib.  Polls have shown that there has been a significant shift among Democrats towards Palestinians.  On the other hand, Trump and the GOP are uniform in their support for Netanyahu and Netanyahu makes no secret of his support for Trump.

    On Palestine I trust Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Tlaib.  They have been tireless in their support of Palestinians.  I think they have achieved some success in pushing Biden away from his blind support of Israel.  If they support Biden, so will I.  Not voting for Biden only helps the candidate that Netanyahu supports.

    Parent

    Political (none / 0) (#3)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri May 03, 2024 at 07:03:02 PM EST
    "What is happening in Gaza (none / 0) (#8)
    by jondee on Sat May 04, 2024 at 08:15:59 PM EST
    is genocide because the level and pace of indiscriminate killing, destruction, mass expulsion, displacement, famine, executions,the wiping out of cultural and religious institutions, the crushing of elites (including the killing of journalists), and the sweeping dehumanization of the Palestinians - create an overall picture of genocide, of a deliberate conscious crushing of Palestinian existence in Gaza."

    - Amos Goldberg, Professor of Holocaust History, Hebrew University, Jerusalem

    Defund the War (none / 0) (#9)
    by john horse on Sun May 05, 2024 at 09:43:19 AM EST
    Most Americans do not support what Netanyahu is doing in Gaza.  So why are we funding it?

    In the past, military funding to Israel was thought necessary to ensure Israel's existence.  However, that is not the situation anymore.  Militarily, Israel is much more powerful than any of its neighbors.   They are in no danger of being invaded. They alone have nuclear weapons.

    Netanyahu and his right wing government see America as paper tigers and they are right.  Our government threatens to cut funding if Israel doesn't stop killing Palestinian civilians in Gaza or stop building settlements on the West Bank but we never do.   If there are no consequences for bad behavior, then that behavior will not only continue but get worse.

    What Netanyahu and his rightwing extremist supporters have counted on is America's blind loyalty and support of Israel. Americans have viewed Israel as occupying the moral high ground.  This was in large part due to the Holocaust.  But no more.  You can't cede the moral high ground to a nation that is acting immorally.  If they want to continue their immoral extremist policies, that is their choice.   Just not on our dime.

     

    Current Protests Versus Those of 1968 (none / 0) (#10)
    by RickyJim on Sun May 05, 2024 at 11:22:10 AM EST
    I have seen comments online from 1968 protestors that they occupied buildings, interfering with students attending classes, while the current protestors just erect tents on campus, a comparatively minor annoyance. I assume like 1968, there will be disruptions at the political conventions.

    Just erecting tents? (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by coast on Sun May 05, 2024 at 12:41:16 PM EST
    There are plenty of vidoes showing these protesters doing all the things listed, so I'm not sure where "just erecting tents" comes from.  Maybe I'm reading the comment incorrectly.

    The key difference IMO is that the protestors of today have made other students, specifically Jewish students, feel unsafe.  I don't think that the protestors of the late 60's related to the war made a group of students feel unsafe.  Could be wrong though as that was slightly before my time.

    Parent

    The (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by FlJoe on Sun May 05, 2024 at 03:21:21 PM EST
    ROTC guys weren't happy campers.

    Parent
    Likewise, the handful of students on (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by Peter G on Sun May 05, 2024 at 04:31:21 PM EST
    my campus who supported the U.S. position in Vietnam (we had no ROTC program) were generally ostracized and made to feel uncomfortable. Even though my fellow students at the small, Quaker-founded college I attended were no doubt among the kindest and most considerate of our generation. Honestly, I have no sympathy at all for this "feel unsafe" crap, which as far as I can tell means nothing other than "forced to confront the fact that some people disagree with me on things I care deeply about, and for that reason many of them seem not to like me." It has nothing to do with actual "safety" in the physical sense, as best I can tell.

    Parent
    Yeah (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by FlJoe on Mon May 06, 2024 at 07:30:45 AM EST
    but the most grievous injury they suffered was their inability to get laid.
     

    Parent
    There was a while (none / 0) (#20)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon May 06, 2024 at 09:15:42 AM EST
    I was attending demonstrations and IN ROTC.

    the first semester it was required before we got that changed.

    I never saw a single instance of ROTC vs hippies,  not one. One even a verbal one.

    The comparison is irritating,

    Parent

    Here are a couple of images (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon May 06, 2024 at 09:32:24 AM EST
    From my 1971 college year book.  They are facing images in the book and are taken at a emergency meeting called by the college when we the students said we are not taking ROTC.  Which was a graduation requirement.
    In the pic of the crowd the person standing being described as " looking on in disbelief" is me.

    We won that particular thing.  ROTC became voluntary.  I'm surrounded by my friends who were also ROTC/hippy protesters.

    one

    two

    Parent

    I (none / 0) (#23)
    by FlJoe on Mon May 06, 2024 at 01:09:10 PM EST
    was in ROTC a  2 semesters couple of years before the protests really hit, I knew some hotheads who verbally assaulted some of them and eventually ransacked the offices on my campus.

    Ironically the most fervent ROTC guys I knew drew a 360 on the draft lottery and immediately quit his last year in school to void his commission then proceed to become a leader of the radicals...go figure.

    Parent

    You mean Hippie hotheads (none / 0) (#26)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon May 06, 2024 at 03:30:13 PM EST
    and ROTC offices?  This was not to target ROTC members. It was to protest the requirement of ROTC. Yeah, that happened.  I remember it being discussed in my presence but it was not necessary in the end because the requirement was dropped.

    ROTC did not want us any more than we wanted them.  All those guys around me in the meeting, and me, had been ordered to get haircuts.

    We said we don't want to be here and we are damn sure not getting a haircut.  Deal with it.  We also disrupted "drills".  I enjoyed that.

    Parent

    This is right around the time (none / 0) (#27)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon May 06, 2024 at 03:39:19 PM EST
    the military was figuring out that conscription was the problem.  And if they could just get enough poor kids to join voluntarily it would solve all their problems.

    Parent
    To give a balanced picture (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by jondee on Sun May 05, 2024 at 04:14:29 PM EST
    of what's going on, they should ask some of the Many Jewish students participating in the pro-Palestine demonstrations what's occurring that would make Jewish students feel unsafe.


    Parent
    Reports Differ (none / 0) (#12)
    by RickyJim on Sun May 05, 2024 at 01:04:16 PM EST
    There are plenty of comments from Jewish students, who are taking part in the protests, that they don't feel uncomfortable.  Does anybody reading this have first hand knowledge of how anti-Jewish the demonstrations are?  Is there more bigotry than is found in a typical MAGA rally?  

    Parent
    First hand knowledge? (5.00 / 1) (#29)
    by coast on Mon May 06, 2024 at 04:06:28 PM EST
    Why is this necessary when there are ample videos and pictures?  Its not as if there was very little coverage and people are only hearing about this through print media.  I think having protestors chanting "we are Hamas" and hanging signs calling for intifada is pretty clear intimidation and unacceptable.

    As for the Jewish students participating in the protests, why would they feel uncomfortable?  They are participating in the protests.  I can't wrap my head around this logic that because a group of Jewish students were a part of the protests, then no Jewish students, or any other students for that matter, should fear for their safety.  

    Parent

    Can't wrap my head around (none / 0) (#30)
    by jondee on Mon May 06, 2024 at 06:06:47 PM EST
    at all, for the life of me, people seemingly more concerned about the way some students 'feel' than about thousands of children being blown to bits.

    It's truly perverse. On every imaginable level.

    Parent

    AXIOS (none / 0) (#16)
    by CaptHowdy on Sun May 05, 2024 at 04:55:50 PM EST

    U.S. Put Hold on Ammunition Shipment to Israel
    May 5, 2024 at 2:29 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 61 Comments

    "The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel," Axios reports.

    "It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held



    People Are Hoping That Israel Nukes Us (none / 0) (#22)
    by john horse on Mon May 06, 2024 at 11:07:44 AM EST
    To understand what Israel is doing in Gaza please read this article by Nicholas Kristof `People Are Hoping That Israel Nukes Us So We Get Rid of This Pain'

    Why can't these students (none / 0) (#24)
    by KeysDan on Mon May 06, 2024 at 03:04:11 PM EST
    protest in their dorm rooms?  These protests are unpopular and make us uncomfortable. They create chaos on college campuses that we heard about, but have never seen or plan to set foot upon. Or, ever let our children attend because they would get all those funny ideas in their heads. In fact, we should follow Governor DeSantis' and just make colleges into Christian outposts.

    Importantly, it just shows how bad Biden is and that we must elect the lawless Trump to insure law and order. --based on interviews with ten unvaccinated MAGAts in Thelma"s diner in downtown Ada, Ohio.

    The little wisdom that there is in these diner's sentiments is that the student protests are being manipulated and exploited by the Republicans and media to elect Trump.

    A handy---  "caravans are coming"  which will quickly fade away after the issue has done its work. And, of course, Trump would have to be restrained from nuking Palestine and deporting Muslims from this country, if elected.

    The priority for thinking Americans is to elect Biden and to defeat Trump.  The student protesters do not help.

    The student protestors  rightly call for an end to the warfare in Palestine by the Israeli government. However, the underpinnings to the conflict are seemingly intractable since the Balfour Declaration during the First World War. A cease fire for just 90 days appears an herculean task.

    The heinous attack on Israel on Oct 7 generated a response from the Israel government, as would be expected from any government sustaining such a monstrous affront. Bibi and his extremist right wing gove0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000rnment acted disproportionately with outcomes that have resulted in near destruction of Palestinian society and have made Israel less secure.

    But over-reaction and disproportionate actions  are not unique, even when circumstances may differ.  After 9/11, the Bush Administration reacted by invading Iraq and Afghanistan, at great  human and material cost. And these countries were 7,000 miles away, rather than being separated by a fence.

    The student protests are, in largest part, peaceful. The claims of some students feeling unsafe need to be addressed by University Administrators. Also, some of the protest issues have, such as at the University of Chicago, become a potpourri--Freedom for Palestine to grievances about campus police. It is disappointing that more protests do not call attention to the hostages held by Hamas.

    After over 50 years of difficult student protests, you would think that University presidents would have a better handle on such matters. Maybe, the wiser presidents of Brown and Northwestern Universities could start a continuing education program for University administrators--Management of Students 101.

    Regret (none / 0) (#25)
    by KeysDan on Mon May 06, 2024 at 03:19:08 PM EST
    all those ooooooo's.  Don't know how that happened. It is not as if that typo was hard to spot.

    Parent
    Helluva bumper sticker (none / 0) (#28)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon May 06, 2024 at 03:45:39 PM EST

    Trump Says the GOP Is the `Party of Fertilization'
    May 6, 2024 at 11:19 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 292 Comments

    Donald Trump called the Republican party the "party of fertlization because we are for the women" when talking about abortion rights in an interview with Fox Detroit.