home

Gibbons v. Ogden

Scott Lemeiux finds this "dramatization" of Gibbons v. Ogden:

What is this [Commerce] power? It is the power to regulate, that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.

Later, a dramatization of McCulloch v. Maryland.

< Keynes Rejected | Happy Valentine's Evening Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I wonder why this series was made. (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Maryb2004 on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 01:44:00 PM EST
    It starts with Marbury v Madison but doesn't seem to go further than than a few cases.  Or at least that's what's available on youtube.

    At first I thought it was a creative way to teach the subject because it would get non-lawyers more engaged in the arguments.

    Then I noticed there are no comments on this post. :)

    But I enjoyed it.

    Democrats should adopt the last (none / 0) (#2)
    by oculus on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 03:25:35 PM EST
    paragraph of Marshall's opinion as their mantra.

    Parent