home

California Execution Postponed to 2011

Albert Brown will not be executed Thursday in California. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals directed Judge Jeremy Fogel to re-examine his decision last week allowing it to go forward.

The stay came a day after California officials announced that the state’s supply of sodium thiopental, a barbiturate used in executions, was good only until Friday, a revelation that seemed to shock the appellate panel. “It is incredible to think that the deliberative process might be driven by the expiration date of the execution drug,” the panel wrote.

The 9th Circuit said Judge Fogel did not have the authority to allow the inmate to choose his lethal cocktail: [More...]

The court said the one-drug option was beyond Fogel's authority to offer and told him to review the state's new injection procedures, adopted in response to his 2006 ruling, and decide whether they were constitutional.

Judge Fogel said it will take months to review the constitutional implications -- and to get a new supply of the necessary drug:

Fogel said Tuesday evening that Brown's lawyers had raised substantial questions about whether the state's execution practices would be better than the ones he had criticized. He said it was both unfair and unnecessary to penalize Brown for the lack of time to conduct a full review before Thursday night's scheduled execution.

He blamed the state for setting the execution date so soon after enacting the new guidelines. But a bigger issue seems to be the lack of drugs. It will be early 2011 before the manufacturer has more available:

That is when the state is due to receive a new supply of the sedative Sodium Pentothal, the sedative injected first into condemned inmates. The prisons' current supply has an expiration date of Friday, and the manufacturer says it has no more available now.

How pathetic that a man's life hangs on whether or not the state has a drug to murder him in stock.

Brown's lawyers had accused the state of rushing to execute him while its Sodium Pentothal was still usable. In its order Monday night, the appeals court said it was "incredible to think that the deliberative process might be driven by the expiration date of the execution drug."

As to tho