Haaretz reports a different response to Obama's remarks:

[Eric] Cantor [R-VA] responded in a statement by saying, "The administration's troubling policy of manufacturing fights with Israel to ingratiate itself with some in the Arab world is no way to advance the cause of Mideast peace."

He added, "What kind of message is sent to the world when our country appears to turn its back on key strategic allies who share our values?"

Cantor went on to say that the list of grievances "supposedly stoking the hatred of Islamic terrorists is endless and evolving."

"The suggestion that terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan will lay down their weapons if we distance ourselves from Israel is blindingly naïve," he said.

Haartz also fleshes out Obama's remarks quite differently than the right wing Jerusalem Post, are we surprised? no.. :

Obama on Tuesday urged all countries, including Israel, to sign the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, or NPT.

"Whether we're talking about Israel or any other country, we think that becoming part of the NPT is important," Obama said. "And that, by the way, is not a new position. That's been a consistent position of the United States government, even prior to my administration."

Obama also said that unresolved conflicts, such as the Arab-Israeli conflict, affect the United States.

"It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce these conflicts because whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower," Obama said. "And when conflicts break out, one way or another, we get pulled into them. And that ends up costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure.‬"

We welcome you to Democracy Now! Professor, lay out your criticism of what took place, this largest gathering of world leaders held by the United States since FDR.
JOHN MUELLER: Well, much of it, I think, is fine. Locking up fissile material, the uranium and plutonium, is certainly a worthy objective. But what I object to is sort of this sense that there's this huge urgency. Terrorists are extraordinarily unlikely to be able to get a nuclear weapon...

And you forgot this:

SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: And John Mueller, you also say that terrorists exhibit only a limited desire to obtain these nuclear weapons, which goes contrary to what most intelligence reports are telling us. Why do you say that?
JOHN MUELLER: Well, I looked at those intelligence reports, and, of course, Obama said the same thing. The indication of interest is extraordinarily small.

AMY GOODMAN: John Mueller, do you think that the gathering in Washington, this largest gathering the US has ever hosted of world leaders since FDR, was completely unproductive? You say that countries, not to mention groups, will not use nuclear weapons. The US used nuclear weapons, right? They bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
JOHN MUELLER: Yeah, I don't think it's completely unproductive, but what it does is sort of speed up a process that's been going on for at least twenty years--in fact, many, many years, in fact, sixty years. That is, to make sure that nuclear weapons are secure and the materials that you need to make a nuclear weapon are also secure. It's not a very complicated process. It will take a while. It'll take a remarkably small amount of money, overall. And I think that's basically good. ...

Can I add one thing, by the way, about the Obama statement this morning that's really quite remarkable? He said basically that we can't do anything about the situation between Israel and Palestine until they get their act together. And that's one of the most realistic things I ever heard by a president say.

Nuclear weapons  will play an important role under Obama. But What else is new.

NUCLEAR INSANITIES

New START Treaty is a Slow Start Toward Disarmament

"Regime change" in an armed-to-teeth country, twice the size of Iraq, with terrain that makes Iraq look like the back nine at Pebble Beach; with a significantly sizable sector imbued with circle-the-wagons militancy AND the U.S already bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq and with a still unstable economic situation at home? We wont even talk about the effect on oil prices and the high degree of ambivalence expressed by Russia and China about the possibility of further destabilization in that part of the world..

Not gonna happen, no matter how much the neocon types and their terriers in the media foam at the mouth about it.

And as far as dejavu, only teabaggers and cultists are having the  kind of game leg feeling in their memory circuits you are experiencing, because there is zero fearmongering coming out of the WH aimed toward the voting public. This was all coming from an international summit on a specific issue, which has a goal quite different than the neocon fearmongers you evoke.

But then again, I bet you believe that Obama is secretly hooking up with Daniel Pipes to figure out how to boost his ratings, by bombing Iran... lol

That must have been where he was the other day when Obama secretly went missing... now we know he was sneaking out to do something nefarious to do with ...   Daniel Pipes... lol

But I guess it is part of your faction's agenda to twist any event so that Obama is painted as the same or worse than Bush. Maybe the name for your faction could be neo nestea baggers..

Anyone with a handy-dandy code book knows to be very afraid of talk like this.  He's got the committee set up, co-chaired by one of the all-time Social Security haters - Alan Simpson - so all the pieces are falling into place.  Health "reform" was the template - and one of the reasons I worried that template would be successful is that I know they will be using it on something even bigger: Social Security and Medicare.