home

Cyber Monday Open Thread

There really are good deals out there. I'm glad I have to go go to work, otherwise I'd spend the whole day buying things I don't really need but are just too cheap to pass up. The prices vary widely though. I recommend doing a google search for the exact item you want and finding the best price, and then checking it against Amazon. Then look for a free savings coupon for the seller and apply it.

If you found something awesome, let us know.

This is an open thread, all topics welcome.

< Internal Devaluation | Justice For Some, Again >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    British Involvement - UK Halts Export Lethal Drug (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by lawdex on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 11:45:11 AM EST
    The Associated Press reports that the UK by order has halted the export of lethal injection drugs.  This is good news but the prohibition arrives one month too late to prevent the Arizona execution of Mr. Landrigan.  

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/nov/29/eu-britain-us-death-penalty/

    Howie is right (none / 0) (#1)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 10:57:41 AM EST

    Palin's 2012 Media Game

    As the old-school press mocks Sarah Palin for her swaggering reality-show antics and chatty tweets, she may be beating them at their own game. Howard Kurtz on why Palin's unfiltered message may be the perfect setup for her 2012 run.


    If the media (none / 0) (#5)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:09:50 PM EST
    started to ignore her, she would fade away.  Unfortunately, they just can't seem to do it.  I've never understood her appeal.  The only explanation that I can come up with is that conservative-leaning males want to f**k her, and conservative-leaning females want to be her.  She's not exactly an intellectual powerhouse (to say the least), but she's certainly smart and savvy enough to use the power of the media to her benefit.

    Parent
    not exactly an intellectual powerhouse (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:47:46 PM EST
    that is the key to her success.  she is not threatening to the rubes.  like Hillary is.  she clubs fish to death for fun.

    this made me laugh:

    Chris Matthews Flatteringly Compares Sarah Palin to Bill Clinton


    CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Before we break, there's one unlikely Democrat you might compare to Sarah Palin when it comes to being a natural: the generally incomparable Bill Clinton.

    yeah exactly
    except for the whole, you know, Rhodes Scholar thing


    Parent

    I wonder if the "natural" (5.00 / 0) (#45)
    by brodie on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:34:08 PM EST
    comparison was triggered by Joe Klein being on the panel.

    Wow.  Tweety seems to really play up to the GOP on his weekend show.  I guess that's what his huge corporate sponsors expect.

    Btw, even someone as dim as Klein knows, or at least suspects, that besides the Rhodes thing, Bill Clinton actually had to work hard to get to the presidency.  You know, work his way up the elected office food chain, suffer a few defeats, endure a few embarrassments on the stump and on the campaign trail.  Never quit mid-way through his terms either, even after being impeached.

    Too bad Tweety doesn't have a call-in feature on his regular weekday show so I could dial through and remind him and his audience of some of the utter nonsense he spews for GE on the weekends.

    Parent

    Not to mention his numerous election (none / 0) (#32)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:14:48 PM EST
    victories.  But, other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, . . ?

    Parent
    Yes, well (none / 0) (#43)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:27:48 PM EST
    We all know that Tweetie gets a "tingle up his leg" at the drop of a hat.  I do think that you may have hit upon something though, Cap- she's "not threatening to the rubes."

    Parent
    my coffee barista (none / 0) (#7)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:40:02 PM EST
    said this morning that watching Sara Palins Alaska it was clear she was running.

    I told him I would rather put out a campfire with my face than watch Sara Palins Alaska.


    Parent

    LOL! (none / 0) (#11)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:48:51 PM EST
    Me, too, Captain.  I couldn't even watch Dancing With the Stars because of Sarah's cub's involvement.

    Parent
    heh (none / 0) (#19)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:33:10 PM EST
    Once again... (none / 0) (#34)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:16:13 PM EST
    animal rights whackadoos to their animal friends more harm than good.

    Would they rather the halibut flap on the deck and suffocate?  Oh that's right, they rather we didn't eat halibut...good luck with that, lol.

    Parent

    I dunno (none / 0) (#39)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:19:22 PM EST
    did you see the video?  I think I might prefer suffocating.

    Parent
    Not me... (none / 0) (#46)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:36:38 PM EST
    bash me and knock me out if I can't breath...please.  Suffocating is an awful way to go.

    Parent
    Is she? (none / 0) (#12)
    by waldenpond on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:54:10 PM EST
    She is completely media made.  If they turned against her (they won't because journalism has gone completely reality and she is more fun than pushing Obama was) and started noting the reality that is her negative personality, her limited ability to comprehend and retain even the most basic facts... (you know, ho hum, there she goes again) no, I doubt she could survive it.

    Parent
    working behind the scenes? (none / 0) (#2)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 11:00:11 AM EST
    Two separate explosions killed a nuclear scientist and injured another in the Iranian capital Monday morning, official news outlets reported.
    No one claimed responsibility for the attacks and no arrests have been made, Iranian officials said. But they prompted a stern warning by the normally cool-headed head of Iran's atomic energy agency, Ali Akbar Salehi, who described Shahriari as a former student.


    Interesting (none / 0) (#8)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:40:33 PM EST
    This was a fascinating story about that computer virus that infected their facility there.

    Parent
    saw that (none / 0) (#9)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:41:58 PM EST
    very interesting.

    Parent
    more curiouser still (none / 0) (#62)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:07:29 PM EST
    It just gets deeper and deeper (none / 0) (#72)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:20:15 PM EST
    I'm amazed that we have as much detailed information as we do.

    Parent
    It's the stuff of spy novels (none / 0) (#89)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:07:43 AM EST
    It certainly read that way didn't it? (none / 0) (#100)
    by republicratitarian on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 09:57:19 AM EST
    Hey did you ever get your husbands uniform done?

    Parent
    We finally did find a local (none / 0) (#101)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 10:19:37 AM EST
    seamstress that we felt we could trust.  It seems like she has done the best job that could be done.  She agrees that the new jackets were made to accomodate a fatter military.  It is hard to fit them on guys with a waist now.  I'm still very grateful though that we had another option thanks to you.

    Parent
    No problem (5.00 / 1) (#107)
    by republicratitarian on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 12:17:40 PM EST
    Every time I drive by that place I wonder if y'all came down. I have to wear my blues in a couple of weeks and they are experiencing closet shrinkage, lol. So I have to get mine redone.

    Parent
    Happy to report... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 11:34:14 AM EST
    my moms and sister's clan had no TSA issues on their Thankgiving trip...no bodyscans or pat downs at all, just the old standard metal detector.  

    The treatment seems to vary so wildly by airport, it appears JFK is not amongst the airports gone batsh*t crazy.  

    Very good, Dog (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:14:26 PM EST
    I'm glad for your family.  It does seem to depend upon the airport.  I also wonder if the TSA at some of the busiest airports, at least, were told to "step back" their body scans and pat downs during the holiday travel, just to avoid further negative publicity.

    Parent
    You're telling me... (none / 0) (#24)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:58:47 PM EST
    I was sweating out a problem phone call to see if the knuckledraggers were gonna pull me in the game yet...groping my loved ones is the proverbial line in the sand for this turkey. I left strict instructions with the fam.

    Relieved to still be on the sidelines livin' under the radar free... though on second thought I wonder if moms would lie to protect me...knowing her she would:)  

    Parent

    If I were (none / 0) (#44)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:29:56 PM EST
    your mom, I'd sure lie (or at the very least, obfuscate until their heads were spinning and flying off of their shoulders) to protect you, sweetie.  ;-)

    Parent
    That is good (none / 0) (#10)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 12:44:19 PM EST
    I've been trying to see if there were any issues in travel and security this weekend but it doesn't seem like there were any of significance.

    I wonder if the TSA went easy on scans and gropes on purpose.

    Parent

    Not all airports even have the equipment (none / 0) (#13)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:07:06 PM EST
    and even then you only get selected for that or the patdown if you flunk the metal detector or have some other red flag, with a degree of randomness thrown in.

    I bet people are extra careful to pass the metal detector if the choice of scanner or patdown is the punishment for flunking. And maybe the TSA did not pull as many random numbers as they normally will.

    Parent

    when I was at logan (none / 0) (#15)
    by CST on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:15:31 PM EST
    a few months ago, they had two lines, one for metal detectors, and one for the scanner.  You had to make a decision about what line to go in before you could see the scanner (or knew it existed), so people were already in line when they found out.

    At that point, if you decided not to go through the scanner you get a pat down.  But it was basically chance as to whether or not you were destined for that.

    Parent

    oh wow (none / 0) (#27)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:01:12 PM EST
    I think at Orlando it is a secondary screening - for now anyway until they get more.

    Parent
    Last night the Amtrak conductor (none / 0) (#37)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:18:00 PM EST
    revealed his methodology re "randomly selected" passenger's carry ons being inspected by sd. conductor.  Now the whole car of passengers has this previously confidential info!

    Parent
    Will you share? (none / 0) (#50)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:02:26 PM EST
    Take it easy... (none / 0) (#53)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:14:51 PM EST
    there Julian "ruffian" Assange, you'll get oculus busted for revealing state secrets.

    Which begs the question, if we the people are the state, why are we keeping secrets from ourselves and only harassing the poor people trying to fill us in on what we do?  Seems backwards.

    Parent

    Ha- you found me out (none / 0) (#60)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:00:19 PM EST
    Now I must flee again!

    Parent
    Just got an e-mail from a conspiracy- (none / 0) (#79)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:01:01 PM EST
    theorist friend.  Who benefits by the federal gov't. not shutting down WikiLeaks?  The federal government.  See how the Saudi government pushes the U.S. to do something re Iran developing nuclear capacity.  See China re U.S. timidity on North Korea.  Boggles the mind.

    Parent
    Dear Lord (none / 0) (#92)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:12:50 AM EST
    the anti-stimulus (none / 0) (#14)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:09:07 PM EST
    Obama freezes pay for civilian federal workers. Way to pre-give-in to the Republicans. Does he think they will reward him now? No - they will either come out against that step or say it is not nearly enough.

    Stupid stupid stupid.

    freezing is for 2 years (none / 0) (#16)
    by CST on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:24:46 PM EST
    Even if you want to argue that you have to freeze pay to save jobs (and lets face it, there is a lot of "pay freezing" going on in every sector) 2 years is really excessive.

    In the mean time: "House members and senators now are paid $174,000 a year."

    Seems like some people could take a pay cut before they put others on the chopping block.

    Parent

    Or you let the Republicans demand a cut in the (none / 0) (#20)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:34:13 PM EST
    work force, which they will, publicize the heck out of it, and 'compromise' to a pay freeze if you must. I just don't see an upside to doing it like this.

    Parent
    Proving his conservative ideology (none / 0) (#21)
    by waldenpond on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:43:02 PM EST
    He's reaching out to the chamber, giving billions to billionaires and freezing the pay of the middle class schmucks and improving the banks ability to eff over the people.

    He's proving he's more conservative than your average Repub.  He's going tea party now.

    Parent

    You're right (none / 0) (#26)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:59:37 PM EST
    There I go again - thinking he might not really want to do the more conservative action.

    Parent
    House members (none / 0) (#117)
    by NYShooter on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:26:52 PM EST
    have put their pay raises into a bill, the raises are automatic, no debate, no publicity.

    Who says Congress critters are incompetent?


    Parent

    Yup (none / 0) (#90)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:08:53 AM EST
    It isn't even Christmas, unless you are a Republican :)

    Parent
    An extraordinary cache (none / 0) (#17)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:26:40 PM EST
    of Picasso's art has just been made public, from the BBC:

    Picasso's electrician reveals artist's 'treasure trove'

    The works include a portrait of the late artist's first wife, Olga

    A retired electrician in southern France who worked for Pablo Picasso says he has hundreds of previously unknown works by the artist.

    The treasure trove of 271 pieces includes lithographs, cubist paintings, notebooks and a watercolour and is said to be worth about 60m euros (£50.6m).

    Pierre Le Guennec, 71, reportedly says Picasso gave him the works as gifts.

    But the estate's administrators have filed a case for alleged illegal receipt of the works of art.

    According to French newspaper Liberation, the lost Picassos include a watercolour from his Blue Period. Experts say the nine cubist works in Mr Le Guennec's possession are worth 40m euros alone.

    Legal battle

    The electrician installed burglar alarm systems at Picasso's numerous houses in France, including his villa in Cannes, during the three years before the artist died in 1973.

    In September, Mr Le Guennec approached the artist's estate in an attempt to get the canvases authenticated by Picasso's son, Claude.

    But Claude Picasso dismissed Mr Le Guennec's explanation about how he came into possession of the art works.

    He said his father would never have given so many works to a single person.

    "To give away such a large quantity, that's unheard of. It doesn't add up," he told Liberation. "It was a part of his life."
     

    Click Me

    I had a philosophy professor who thought that Françoise Gilot, who lived with Picasso for some years and had two children by him, was one of the most beautiful women on the planet.

    damn (none / 0) (#18)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:32:22 PM EST
    and I was considering selling some of my pathetic art overstock for a little windfall.

    think its true?  it sounds like one of those things that sound impossible but are probably true.

    sounds like the estate is simply greedy.


    Parent

    It wouldn't be the first time (none / 0) (#31)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:13:53 PM EST
    someone who wasn't part of the art world had some pieces from an artist that were worth something down the road because they befriended said artist but this takes it to a whole new level.

    Because Picasso has so many works that aren't documented, he's a favorite target of forgers and grifters who presumably don't quail at the prospect of scamming people in the name of one of the colossus of 20th Century art.


    Parent

    My first thought--hey, I am about to have (none / 0) (#40)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:21:12 PM EST
    an alarm system installed!   But no Picassos to steal from me.

    Parent
    Have you checked your cellars (none / 0) (#84)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:41:23 PM EST
    or attics recently?  :-)

    We had a similar incident with a fellow who claims to have some 'missing' works by Ansel Adams here in the Central Valley, from McClatchy News Services:

    A group representing Ansel Adams is suing to stop a Fresno man from selling prints and posters made from garage-sale negatives that the man says are the work of the famed photographer.

    The Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust claims the work in the photographs is not that of the iconic Ansel Adams, but possibly Fresno photographer Earl Brooks.

    The 28-page suit said that the man who bought the negatives, Rick Norsigian, is violating the trust's trademark and "damaging Ansel's reputation and the integrity of his work," said William Turnage, managing trustee of the Ansel Adams Publishing Rights Trust. "They are using Ansel's name illegally, so even if they were Ansel's photographs, they aren't allowed to do it."


    Click Me


    Parent

    I had some thousands of baseball (none / 0) (#91)
    by jeffinalabama on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:09:08 AM EST
    football and basketball cards from the 50s -70s... MY mom got fed up in the 70s and threw them out during one of my deployments. Sigh. Hall of famers in all of them, and some in surprisingly good condition. One remains-- somehow she missed throwing out my Nolan Ryan rookie card.

    Oh well, that's life. I do have a first-edition Hemingway and a heck of a lot of stamps...

    And some fine memories!

    Parent

    I agree with Claude, it doesn't add up. (none / 0) (#23)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:56:56 PM EST
    dont you think its odd (none / 0) (#25)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 01:59:25 PM EST
    that he approached the estate at all if he had stolen them or something?

    Parent
    and, to me anyway, there doesn't seem to be much of a chance that anyone can prove he got them illegally.

    Parent
    if it had been a couple of pieces (none / 0) (#30)
    by nycstray on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:12:13 PM EST
    I could see them being gift, but 271? And he did wait for a bit . . . .

    Parent
    well (none / 0) (#35)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:17:25 PM EST
    IF he got them legitimately I sure hope he can work it out.   what a nightmare.  sitting on a fortune in art that you cant sell!

    Parent
    The "Blue Period" work (none / 0) (#38)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:18:55 PM EST
    is 106 to 109 years old.  That's early Picasso, and worth a bundle by itself.

    Parent
    "Wait a bit" (none / 0) (#42)
    by brodie on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:27:05 PM EST
    indeed.  He waits 37 years to inform the son about his treasure trove of Picassos?  Uh huh.

    Call me skeptical of the guy's story, though getting the artist's son to sign off on the transfer would have been a nifty way of selling off some dubiously obtained items.

    Now on the upside, I do see some movie possibilities here, a sort of sequel to Melvin and Howard.  Call it Pierre et Pablo.  Starring Paul Le Mat as Pierre l'électricien, Mary Steenburgen as his wife, Harrison Ford as l'artiste Picasso, and Juliette Binoche as his widow.  Jonathan Demme can direct, or if he's not around and since this one should be shot in France, we could bring in Roman Polanski.

    Parent

    Picasso was (none / 0) (#49)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:00:22 PM EST
    89-92 years old during the last three years of his life.  It's entirely possible that he gave the electrician these works willingly, but it's also entirely possible that he was suffering from some form of dementia at the time and could not make a "reasoned" judgment .  So, what then?  I sure don't know.

    Parent
    exactly what I thought (none / 0) (#51)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:05:21 PM EST
    he was pretty eccentric even in his younger days.

    Parent
    He was (none / 0) (#55)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:25:39 PM EST
    indeed "pretty eccentric even in his younger days," to put it mildly, Cap.   ;-)


    Parent
    in any way:

    The day before he died had been a day like many others at Notre-Dame-de-Vie, his hilltop villa at Mougins on the French Riviera.

    Late in the afternoon the artist had taken a walk in the little park that surrounds his sprawling stone house overlooking the reddish foothills of the Maritime Alps. He liked now and then to gather flowers and vegetables in the garden, often taking them inside to draw.

    "That day I showed him the anemones and pansies, which he particularly liked," recalls Jacques Barra, Picasso's gardener.

    Later that evening Picasso and his wife Jacqueline entertained friends for dinner.

    Picasso was in high spirits. "Drink to me; drink to my health," he urged, pouring wine into the glass of his Cannes lawyer and friend, Armand Antebi. "You know I can't drink any more."

    At 11:30 he rose from the table and announced: "And now I must go back to work." In recent weeks, he had been working especially hard, preparing for a big show of his latest paintings at the Popes' Palace in Avignon in May.

    On this night, before he went to bed, he painted until 3 a.m.

    On Sunday morning Picasso awoke at 11:30, his usual hour, but this time he could not rise from his bed. His wife Jacqueline rushed in and then called for help.

    At 11:40, before a doctor could get there, Pablo Picasso was dead. Dr. Georges Ranee, who arrived shortly afterward, attributed his death to a heart attack brought on by pulmonary edema, fluid in the lungs.



    Parent
    wow (none / 0) (#58)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:53:35 PM EST
    he painted until 3 a.m.


    Parent
    Ya, not bad for a 92 y/o. (none / 0) (#59)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:57:52 PM EST
    Cap, did you see this? (none / 0) (#66)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:10:40 PM EST
    wow (5.00 / 1) (#68)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:11:51 PM EST
    nothing much surprises me anymore.  but wow.


    Parent
    I found this from the NYT (none / 0) (#83)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:31:49 PM EST

    His absolute refusal to make a will, the result of a lifelong superstition about the mere mention of death or its practical consequences, resulted in a much publicized legal squabble, involving his wife, his son by a prior marriage, the children of former mistresses. His estate, recently estimated at $750 million, included a series of villas, chateaus, Parisian apartments, cluttered with the accumulations of a lifetime, a horde of masterpieces by such artists as Cezanne, Matisse, Braque and Gris, to say nothing of his private stock of his own paintings and sculptures, now valued at $260 million, which he rightfully regarded as money in the bank.

    A poignant story I read about him was that he had an aviary, and because of the way he felt about death, if any of the inhabitants died, the body was silently disposed of and a replacement bought and released into its next home.

    One day, Picasso was in this aviary with a friend and he remarked to said friend: "Have you noticed something remarkable?  The birds here never die."

    I'm sure it was almost impossible to fool the eye of someone like Picasso.

    Click Me

    Parent

    What????? (none / 0) (#87)
    by Zorba on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 06:18:19 PM EST
    Absolutely insane.

    Parent
    new favorite animated gif (none / 0) (#28)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:07:57 PM EST
    My favorite non-cyber gift: (none / 0) (#41)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:22:30 PM EST
    J.S. Bach bobble-head doll.  Really funny.

    Parent
    I'm underwhelmed by the cyber-Monday deals (none / 0) (#33)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:15:53 PM EST
    Nothing has grabbed me so far.

    10% off a Scarface boxed set on Amazon for a lightning deal? No thanks.

    catch (none / 0) (#36)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:17:44 PM EST
    Dexie last night?

    Parent
    of course! (none / 0) (#47)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:38:15 PM EST
    I was just going to ask you - why do I find even the teaser for the graphic arts webisodes 100 times more creepy than the actual show? Maybe it was the still drawings.

    Anyway, great episode. It is really starting to come together - still waiting to see what the nanny did with Harrison though. As usual, I have no predictions, except I'm afraid of some sort of Deb vs Lumen choice that will hurt me.

    Parent

    yeah (none / 0) (#48)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 02:48:32 PM EST
    I dont really get the whole webisodes thing.  and I ever worked on one.

    two more episodes.  its gonna be good.  they have a lot of ends to tie up in two hours.

    Parent

    I loved the scene (none / 0) (#52)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:06:11 PM EST
    with Dexter and...character name escapes me...actor Johnny Lee Miller at the police station when he swabs the cheek, knowing it won't show anything. That was great.

    Parent
    I think that guy is one of the best villans ever (none / 0) (#54)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:16:09 PM EST
    IF there is a next season and IF Lumen is involved in it I can see him being held over till next season.
    they have not done that so far.  but it would be cool.

    major cliffhanger involving him, Lumen and possibly the kids.  coooool

    Parent

    I was thinking along those lines (none / 0) (#61)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:06:26 PM EST
    They have never had a season-to-season cliffhanger (have they?), for which I have been grateful so far. I'm not sure how I would feel about it. I suppose if it were well done I would approve, but I like they way they usually tie up the lose ends instead.

    Finally his name popped into my head...Jordan Chase.  I'm a little slow after the long weekend.

    I liked that Deb figured out it might be a victim-vigilante. I really love the way they follow her thought process. Such good writing.

    Parent

    best writing in TV (none / 0) (#65)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:10:09 PM EST
    IMO.  and I cant think of big screen that I think is better.

    I love the weird relationship between him and the first victim.  whats THAT about?  I torture you, you launch my career.  we are friends forever!  I wear your blood around my neck?!

    yikes.

    Parent

    yeah, ick (none / 0) (#76)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:32:30 PM EST
    the whole twisted group is beyond words.

    I was trying to place the actor that played the guy that Lumen killed. Seems like I know him from some other show but I couldn't get it. He was a good choice.

    One writing failure IMO - that whole LaGuerta-Batista relationship. I have no time for that!

    Parent

    yeah (none / 0) (#77)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:47:11 PM EST
    I think it is supposed to be trying our nerves.  I think they want to make us feel like we are in the department dealing with it.  I almost do.

    the thing will be how it ends.  and what happens to her now that the Barrel Girls have been reopened.  not a good career move for her.  


    Parent

    also (none / 0) (#78)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:49:29 PM EST
    I think Dexters attempt to "keep Harrison safe" will come to naught.  not sure how.  but its a feeling.  after all, this guy has connections.  how long would it take him to find out where the grandparents are?


    Parent
    I came up with one prediction (none / 0) (#88)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:50:47 PM EST
    Deb will put it together that the barrel girls look like Lumen, who she met. Maybe she will meet her again with Dexter and get reminded, or come up with it on her own.

    Parent
    you could see from the look on her face (none / 0) (#95)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:25:13 AM EST
    when she found a small footprint that "looked like a womans" that she as putting it all together.

    Parent
    I know (none / 0) (#93)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:14:48 AM EST
    It was so cool, adversaries eye to eye and only they knew what was really going on.

    Parent
    I'm getting to the age (none / 0) (#81)
    by CST on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:06:48 PM EST
    where my parents get better gifts from their kids than vice-versa.

    My dad said that a new tv was probably going to be his first purchase whenever he gets a full time job again - since they still have an old school crt.

    With this economy... my sister and I decided to buy it for them.

    Pretty good deals at amazon on tvs.

    Parent

    tonight on NatGeo (none / 0) (#57)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 03:51:15 PM EST
    'Restrepo' comes to National Geographic Channel

    The filmmakers spent 15 months embedded with a platoon of U.S. soldiers station in Afghanistan's Korengal Valley, with the tour of duty yielding "Restrepo," Junger's "War" and an upcoming collection of photographs from Hetherington.

    "Restrepo" is intentionally devoid of context. We're told through opening titles that the Korengal is considered one of the most dangerous outposts in Afghanistan, but no effort is made to explain the area's strategic value  in our larger war effort or to lay out the specific mission entrusted to these young men. They're plunked down in inhospitable terrain and asked to hold a nearly imaginary line. When they advance said imaginary line and set up a new outpost -- named, like the film itself, after their medic, an early casualty -- it's a point of pride, but not a triumph that could ever be celebrated by cuing the strings section for a melodic swell. For these soldiers, completing the tour will be a victory.



    I have a friend that has been highly recommending (none / 0) (#63)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:07:59 PM EST
    Restrepo for months. I set my Tivo yesterday on his orders. Looking forward to seeing it.

    Parent
    odd place for that to show up (none / 0) (#69)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:14:42 PM EST
    it seems to me now that the network is owned by newscorp. from the piece:

    If your prism is left-leaning, you'll note the confused authority figures lacking in cultural awareness or sensitivity, tasked with no particular mission and turning young soldiers into killing machines often incapable of telling enemy combatants from civilians. You'll see a war apparatus that dehumanizes its key components and that also thinks nothing of sacrificing our boys in uniform without any end in sight. You'll watch and go, "See? What was the point?"

    If your prism is right-leaning, you'll see a love letter to our troops and a validation that their mission is a just one, even if it's fuzzy. You'll see a humanizing portrait of individual soldiers standing out from the war machine and trying to fight for a cause that they believe in. And even if there are civilian casualties on the Afghani side, you'll see that those mistakes weren't preventable within the fog of war. With the bumbling politicians and clueless officers in clean, starched uniforms out of the picture, you'll see patriots who only want to defend the nation.



    Parent
    That makes sense, knowing this friend (none / 0) (#74)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:23:49 PM EST
    He does look at all military related things from both sides, especially since a few of us argued him to death about the Iraq war in the early years, and he eventually came to agree with us.

    Parent
    did you see t his? (none / 0) (#96)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:32:55 AM EST
    I recorded it but did not watch it yet

    Parent
    I started watching but it was kind of late (none / 0) (#104)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 11:03:06 AM EST
    so I went to read something more relaxing. It does look good - some great camera work there, and the servicemen are very insightful in their commentary.

    The little bit I saw does not give me any more optimism on our chances for long term success in Afghanistan. I don't know how we can hope to compete for hearts and minds in these remote places with generations of deep-seated loyalties.

    Parent

    I popped in and out for a while (none / 0) (#106)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 11:15:56 AM EST
    one of them had a comment that struck me.  they were talking about the guy the show was named after and how he died and the guy said something like "he bled out on the way to the emergency room.  or, where ever they take you when you are shot".

    do they really not know where they go if they are wounded.

    just hit me as odd.  probably be the first thing I would want to know.


    Parent

    Just in time for the Commander-in-Chief (none / 0) (#80)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:03:21 PM EST
    to freeze military pay for two years.  Disgraceful.

    Parent
    military pay (none / 0) (#82)
    by CST on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:08:09 PM EST
    was not included in the pay freeze.

    Parent
    See what happens when I rely on blogs (none / 0) (#85)
    by oculus on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:41:52 PM EST
    for accurate reporting?

    Parent
    FWIW I have come around to the (none / 0) (#64)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:09:29 PM EST
    viewpoint of the 'Boardwalk Empire' detractors. I still watch it, but it really is not very good.

    it kinda lost me (none / 0) (#67)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:10:42 PM EST
    too.  dont remember where I was when it stopped being fun.

    Parent
    Yeah...it just got really slow at some point (none / 0) (#71)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:18:35 PM EST
    and there is no humor to speak of. Very stilted dialogue too, especially between Nuchy and Margaret.

    Now it is relegated to 'have the replay on when I'm cooking' rather than sit and watch it intently.

    Parent

    good point (none / 0) (#73)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:21:28 PM EST
    humor deficit.  that is one of the things I love about Dexter.  they find humor in the most inappropriate places.
     

    Parent
    They try a little with the guys like Capone (none / 0) (#75)
    by ruffian on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:26:38 PM EST
    but I don't think the 'dumb gangster' type jokes are that good. Not like the great writing in that vein on 'The Sopranos'. I guess I got spoiled.

    Parent
    That's Right (none / 0) (#86)
    by Blue Jean on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 05:48:47 PM EST
    There's been a lot of hype about "BE", but I just don't buy the premise.  It seems to be about a lot of dull, unpleasant people doing (mostly) dull, unpleasant things.  There's nobody to like or identify with; even the police agent is a creepy sado-masochist and the bereaved widow is a lying thief.   Organized crime has never been so boring.

    Parent
    gawd, this is so true. (none / 0) (#70)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 04:18:10 PM EST
    "Dancing With the Stars," which finished its 11th season last week, is not exactly the first place you would go for political prognostication. Yet this season provided a veritable model of how our political system operates.

    This wasn't just because Bristol Palin, a daughter of GOP tea party spitfire Sarah Palin, was a contestant and millions of viewers, presumably Sarah Palin supporters, kept voting for the young woman week after week -- in spite of her obvious grace deficits and dancing inferiority compared with many of her celebrity competitors.

    It was because the dynamics of that vote on America's most popular TV show are so like the dynamics of contemporary politics.




    I bought nothing on Cyber Monday (none / 0) (#94)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 08:16:35 AM EST
    I did not do Black Friday either.  I'm just flat sick of it all.  I want a future for my kids and grandkids that holds a tangible stability, I'm sick of the insanities.

    NOW we are getting interesting (none / 0) (#97)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 09:10:37 AM EST
    In a rare interview, Assange tells Forbes that the release of Pentagon and State Department documents are just the beginning. His next target: big business.


    Yes, I saw that too (none / 0) (#105)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 11:04:41 AM EST
    I think we see the real reason the authorities are after him.

    Parent
    you know (none / 0) (#108)
    by CST on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:17:18 PM EST
    I honestly think it's the classified state department documents...

    I'm kind of surprised by how much people are "ok" with that.  This strikes me as the type of thing that's less likely to prevent war due to a complete breakdown in diplomacy.  "Transparancy" on what the Chinese really think of the North Koreans is not something that I think will help the world avoid a war.  But it might keep the Chinese from talking to anyone about North Korea.

    Parent

    the Drudgeosphere is abuzz (none / 0) (#109)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:20:38 PM EST
    with Hillary bashing for her "spying" on diplomats.

    Parent
    I like her response to all the furor (none / 0) (#110)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:24:51 PM EST
    over the leak of diplomatic communications.  Guess what.  The world won't end tomorrow.

    Parent
    sounds like something I would love to see (none / 0) (#98)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 09:12:24 AM EST
    actually

    Smithsonian Christmas-Season Exhibit Features Ant-Covered Jesus, Naked Brothers Kissing, Genitalia, and Ellen DeGeneres Grabbing Her Breasts
    WARNING: This story contains graphic photographs of items on display in an exhibit at the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery.


    Where is the hue and cry of certain (none / 0) (#111)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:42 PM EST
    members of Congress, the media, the Christian right, etc.?  

    Parent
    as far as I can tell (none / 0) (#113)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:27:53 PM EST
    that article from CNS was it.

    Parent
    Kind of surprising given Mapplethorpe (none / 0) (#114)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:29:03 PM EST
    uproar and the fact U.S. taxdollars support this institution.  I guess time passes.

    Parent
    fourth amendment underwear (none / 0) (#99)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 09:16:57 AM EST
    4TH AMENDMENT UNDERCLOTHES
    Now there's a way to protest those intrusive TSA X-ray scanners without saying a word.
    4th Amendment Metallic ink-printed undershirts and underwear.

    Assert your rights without saying a word.

    from the norml site (none / 0) (#102)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 10:44:09 AM EST
    DEA says it will make `fake pot' products illegal
    via The Fort Worth Star Telegram

    [excerpt] Within 30 days, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will criminalize the possession and sale of "fake pot" products and the chemicals they contain for at least a year while it considers whether to ban them permanently.

    The DEA announced Wednesday that it will temporarily control five chemicals used in products such as "K2″ and "Spice," as well as the products themselves, according to a press release from the agency.

    In 30 days the agency will publish a final notice making the products illegal for at least one year, with the possibility of a six-month extension while the Department of Health and Human Services studies whether the chemicals should be permanently controlled, according to the release.



    So, is oregano now against the law? (none / 0) (#115)
    by jeffinalabama on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 02:58:34 PM EST
    If someone thinks about marijuana is that enough to be charged?

    Patchiouli smells like pot somewhat-- is it next?

    Oh well, the batsh!t insanity continues.

    Parent

    well no (none / 0) (#116)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 03:47:20 PM EST
    this stuff is real.  I actually happened to pick up a bag at the local head shop yesterday.  I noticed the price had dropped.  I did not understand why.

    now I do clearance.  I may go again today after work.
    but this stuff works.  absolutely.  trust me on this.

    Parent

    and from the illinois norml site (none / 0) (#103)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 10:46:33 AM EST
    for locals.  please call. voting tomorrow.

    Potential SB1381 Vote this Week  
    Lawmakers will be returning to Springfield this week for the veto session.  Medical cannabis patients and supporters once again will be in Springfield at the Capitol lobbying lawmakers to pass Senate Bill 1381.  For those who cannot make it to Springfield please call your State Representative everyday this week and politely and kindly tell them to "Vote Yes on Senate Bill 1381."  By calling 217-782-2000 you'll be connected to the Capitol switchboard and the operator will be able to connect you with your State Representative's office in Springfield.  The Illinois General Assembly website offers live streaming of floor debates and votes for legislation in House of Representatives and that would be the best way to stay up to date for when this bill will be called for a vote.  If the bill is not called for a vote this week then the next chance will be November 29, 30 or December 1.  

    Surprised Wikileaks isn't a subject (none / 0) (#112)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 30, 2010 at 01:27:11 PM EST
    of discussion here.  See Glenn Greenwald re Bill Keller (NYT) admitting his paper solicited U.S. government input before publishing.