home

Early Election Results Thread

Kentucky and Indiana are mostly closed and votes are being counted. Should be easy Senate wins for the GOP in those 2 states. Dems have vulnerable House seats in both.

Florida mostly closes at 7 but stays open until 8 in the Panhandle (Central time there.)

I'll update periodically.

Rubio wins in FL. Coons wins in Delaware. Paul wins Kentucky. Coats wins in Indiana. No early surprises.

Blumenthal beat the WWE in CT.

Manchin wins in West Virgina.

< Tuesday Afternoon Open Thread | U.S. Senate Results >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    My TV was tuned to PBS when I turned it on (5.00 / 2) (#30)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:13:56 PM EST
    So I thought fine, I'll leave it here. How bad can it be? Two words: David Brooks

    Just say no! (none / 0) (#32)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:16:48 PM EST
    to TV election coverage.

    Your blood pressure is up, but you don't know anything more than if you'd simply refreshed this page.

    Parent

    Exactly (5.00 / 2) (#50)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:10:40 PM EST
    I'm watching my tivod new Sherlock Holmes episodes that I have not had a chance to watch yet. Very good. Love both the actors. Martin Freeman playing Watson was in the BBC Ricky Gervais version of The Office, playing the character Jim Krazinsky plays on NBC. Different type- I like his underdog style better. Anyway, glad to see him turn up in something like this. I read he is going to play Bilbo Baggins in the Peter Jackson 'Hobbit' too.

    OK,that is the extent of my non-election coverage!

    Parent

    Love the new Sherlock Holmes series. (5.00 / 2) (#54)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:18:55 PM EST
    I was wary at first, not sure how it would be updated for the 21st century. It's really well done. Both Martin Freeman and Benedict  whats-his-name who plays Holmes are perfect in their respective roles.

    Parent
    Ditto, and I am a Holmes (5.00 / 2) (#56)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:23:37 PM EST
    fanatic -- read them all, again and again, watched them all from films to teevee series, etc.  And I am especially a Holmes fanatic about authenticity.

    But this series is wonderful in somehow seeming more authentic to the characters of Holmes and Watson (and Lestrade, the landlady, etc.,) by taking it into our times.  The plots do seem a bit dated when brought forward, and that ought to be bothersome because I would have said that Conan Doyle was plot-driven . . . but this makes clear how much the Holmes series became character-driven.

    Parent

    I'm not at all an aficionado (5.00 / 2) (#59)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:29:11 PM EST
    but I am really enjoying the first episode. I like they way they wrote the words on the screen showing his thoughts during one of the crime scene scenes. That was clever...but then he had to explain it anyway to the other guys.

    Parent
    Watson's military service (5.00 / 2) (#62)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:31:01 PM EST
    How very convenient for the producers that Britain is currently engaged in hostilities in Afghanistan, allowing them to keep Watson's recent return from war in that country as part of the story.

    Did you catch the small reference to Moriarty in the first episode?

    Parent

    Yes, that worked out well for someone anyway (none / 0) (#78)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:47:13 PM EST
    Great line - "Frankly a bloody awful cabbie"

    Parent
    I've got it on tap for a lavish marathon-treat (none / 0) (#69)
    by Ellie on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:40:34 PM EST
    ... to fill the post-sports potato void of one of the Best. Sports years. Evah.

    I'm a Holmes nut and even have the hat to prove it (because true Holmes fans would accept no less than solid evidence.)

    Parent

    Elementary, my dear Ellie. (5.00 / 1) (#73)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:43:08 PM EST
    :-)

    Parent
    radio (none / 0) (#104)
    by noholib on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 10:27:17 PM EST
    I just listen to the local public radio station and check newspaper sites and blogs on line.  No TV tonight at all.  
    It does help to be in Massachusetts tonight.
    But I'm especially sad about Feingold -- and of course, the overall trend.

    Parent
    Whiskey has been poured (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:16:22 PM EST
    over ice of course.

    One episode of bones to go... then I'll deal with the results.

    Early returns may favor Feingold (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:20:26 PM EST
    owing to what looks like low turnout in Milwaukee, from hundreds of reports from the state's major paper's readers that I've been reading -- and from my look-out-the-window test to the polling place down the block in the most populated part of the state . . . . but for the first time in a long time, there was no need for police to look the other way about illegal parking there.  The good news is that there looks to be better turnout in some Dem cities such as Kenosha, but they're much smaller.

    The only long lines reported in Milwaukee were for same-day registration on a large campus -- but unfortunately, the conservative and Catholic Marquette campus.  No waits at all at the larger, public university in Milwaukee, so we'll have to see if Ben Masel reports in as to whether his prediction of a lot of students registering to vote today in Madison, the other major Dem stronghold, came true.  Still, I see no signs that the counts would be slow in those areas.

    But returns will come in more slowly from the very red outer burbs in Milwaukee County -- watch especially for Waukesha County, just west of Milwaukee, as well as the burbs to the north -- where reports are of lines for as long as an hour, ballot shortages because of 60 to 75% turnout . . . and machine problems and ballot mixups in Waukesha County, which will mean hand-counting and late reporting.

    So it may look good for Feingold for a while.  As for the governorship, the Dem gov now, Doyle, really did in any remaining hope for the Dem candidate for gov with the story that topped the front page of the state's major paper this morning.  The Dems are a mess here.

    Hope Feingold pulls it off. Where is Ben (none / 0) (#40)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:31:43 PM EST
    when we need him?

    Parent
    He tweeted... (5.00 / 1) (#43)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:36:45 PM EST
    earlier today that Feingold would win by 5.  Votes.

    Parent
    John King on CNN (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:14:32 PM EST
    Was showing his famous interactive map.  He showed my state of Virginia - at the beginning of the evening, it was a mixture of blue and red.  As of now (not necessarily wins, but votes so far), almost the entire state is red.  Same for Indiana.

    Tim Ryan wins... (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:15:53 PM EST
    and James Traficant's political comeback is delayed another two years!

    But Wisconsin's Paul Ryan (none / 0) (#92)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:19:15 PM EST
    now will chair the House Budget Committee.

    That is not, not, not good for America.

    Parent

    Tom Brokaw. Why? (5.00 / 1) (#76)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:46:33 PM EST
    I thought Brokaw retired after the last election. Why is he talking on my TV screen? And why isn't he saying anything worth hearing?

    It's Official (5.00 / 2) (#93)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:38:24 PM EST
    BARNEY WINS!!!

    Doesn't even look that close.

    I think this is gonna be a good night in MA.

    Globe just called for Patrick (none / 0) (#99)
    by gyrfalcon on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:17:57 PM EST
    ok I lied (5.00 / 1) (#102)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:32:01 PM EST
    one last comment.  I really love Barney Frank.

    "Lemme say, people will advise me sometimes to be more judicious, and sometimes I will be... but with the election of all 10 Democratic congressmen, it appears, and Governer Patrick, one of the things we can acknowledge tonight, is that Massachusetts has reaffirmed the complete political irrelevance of the Boston Herald"

    Cicilline wins... (5.00 / 1) (#103)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 10:21:03 PM EST
    in Rhode Island.  I believe that makes him the 4th openly gay member of Congress, along with Barney Frank, Tammy Baldwin and Jared Polis.

    They can (none / 0) (#105)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 10:34:17 PM EST
    Have their own caucus now!

    Parent
    Hearing bad things about FL turnout (none / 0) (#1)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:36:06 PM EST
    (anecdotal so keep the salt handy).

    Fingers crossed for Sink.

    my polling (none / 0) (#7)
    by Madeline on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:51:12 PM EST
    place, in Delray Beach, was packed.  Steady stream of people, every polling station being used.   I don't know what that means but people here sure got out to vote tonight.

    Parent
    I don't (none / 0) (#2)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:43:29 PM EST
    think I really want to watch tonight. I might check in tomorrow.

    I'll repeat here (5.00 / 6) (#4)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:45:13 PM EST
    that I will not be watching TV news. They don't have any special knowledge, and they just tend to aggravate me in situations like this.

    Parent
    Yeah. (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:49:20 PM EST
    I won't watch.  You couldn't pay me to watch.  I've just got my laptop with Twitter, a couple liveblogs, and Politico's results map, which is the best I've found so far.  Pandora in the background.

    Parent
    I have (5.00 / 2) (#24)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:09:39 PM EST
    hated election night coverage since 2000.

    Parent
    I have been extremely sceptical (none / 0) (#37)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:28:59 PM EST
    of election night coverage since the same date.  

    Parent
    Watch regular TV (none / 0) (#5)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:47:22 PM EST
    Or TNT or USA or something else.

    Parent
    I'll probably stay up for Craig (none / 0) (#8)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:53:34 PM EST
    but I doubt if I'll watch anything else.

    Parent
    Stewart and Colbert (5.00 / 3) (#10)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:57:25 PM EST
    are having live shows tonight to cover the election

    Parent
    I feel like... (none / 0) (#3)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:44:44 PM EST
    throwing up.  Gonna be a long night.

    The first exit polling (none / 0) (#9)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:56:54 PM EST
    From MSNBC

    Early data from pollsters' interviews with voters suggested that the electorate was turning out be more conservative than in previous elections.

    SNIP

    Early data from pollsters' interviews with voters as they left their polling places appeared to confirm that the economy remains the No. 1 concern of American voters.

    With 14.8 million Americans unemployed -- 4.5 million more than on Election Day 2008 -- 62 percent said the economy was the top factor in their vote, and 56 percent said the country was off on the wrong track.

       1.
             1.
             2. National overview
             3. Full Senate results
             4. Key House results
             5. Full Gubernatorial results

    That looked like it would favor the Republicans, as a relatively high 41 percent of voters identified themselves as conservatives. A fifth called themselves liberals, and two-fifths identified themselves as moderates

    By contrast, 32 percent of the electorate identified itself as conservative in the 2006 midterm elections, in which the Democrats took control of Congress, and in 2008 only 34 percent called themselves conservative.

    And after a stimulus program and bailouts of banks, most voters seemed to want a less activist government: 56 percent of voters said they wanted government to do less, while 39 percent said government should do more to solve the nation's problems.



    Because govt only serves the rich 4 of 5 psychics (none / 0) (#46)
    by Ellie on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:54:52 PM EST
    ... ether-sniffed ...:

    after a stimulus program and bailouts of banks, [that] most voters seemed to want a less activist government: 56 percent of voters said they wanted government to do less, while 39 percent said government should do more to solve the nation's problems.

    Sheesh and a half.

    Parent

    Remember.... (none / 0) (#11)
    by trillian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 05:58:47 PM EST
    Always look on the bright side of life....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlBiLNN1NhQ

    Frank Luntz says... (none / 0) (#12)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:00:02 PM EST
    based on exit poll data, that Harry Reid will win.  For whatever that is worth.

    It's almost as bad as "Zogby says." (5.00 / 0) (#13)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:02:53 PM EST
    Well (5.00 / 1) (#26)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:11:25 PM EST
    for once I hope he is right. I'm not a fan of Harry but Angle is just psycho.

    Parent
    They are still voting in Nevada (none / 0) (#47)
    by MKS on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:06:47 PM EST
    But the GOTV apparatus there is awe-inspiring....

    Parent
    Anyone care to express an opinion on (none / 0) (#14)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:03:23 PM EST
    the effect of recent high-death rate violence in Iraq on election outcome?

    Is anyone really paying attention? (none / 0) (#15)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:04:28 PM EST
    I don't think so. (none / 0) (#17)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:04:56 PM EST
    Sad. (none / 0) (#19)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:05:39 PM EST
    But expected.

    Parent
    Roughly zero effect IMO (none / 0) (#18)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:05:34 PM EST
    Iraq Election? (none / 0) (#23)
    by squeaky on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:08:59 PM EST
    Looks like Al Makaki will get a leading coalition out of it.

    It was looking as if he would have enough seats after al-Sadr joined but after the Wikileaks he was looking like a criminal, and his chance of getting enough seats seemed nill.

    Now, the winds have changed and he is only 21 seats short...  

     

    Parent

    Al Maliki (none / 0) (#25)
    by squeaky on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:10:08 PM EST
    Turnout (none / 0) (#16)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:04:34 PM EST
    At my polling place seemed high but I've only voted there once before - for a primary... so who knows.

    Supposedly Rand Paul was called (none / 0) (#20)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:05:46 PM EST
    the winner in KY.

    Jack Conway = Deeds II.

    Lexington, Kentucky... (5.00 / 2) (#22)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:06:29 PM EST
    elects openly gay mayor.  Silver linings!

    Parent
    Awesome! (none / 0) (#28)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:13:34 PM EST
    Good news!

    Parent
    Can we start the Rand Paul (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:12:22 PM EST
    self-destruct pool now? It's only a matter of time.

    Parent
    Maybe... (5.00 / 1) (#29)
    by Tony on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:13:48 PM EST
    Franken can get under his skin the way he did Thune.

    Parent
    What a wonderful thought... (5.00 / 2) (#48)
    by MKS on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:07:31 PM EST
    I doubt he serves 6 years (5.00 / 1) (#51)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:13:24 PM EST
    He'll get no support when he inevitably messes up. McConnell hates him.

    Parent
    Yep (none / 0) (#21)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:06:28 PM EST
    CNN calling Paul and Coats winners

    Parent
    That's what I hear too here (none / 0) (#33)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:18:21 PM EST
    Fricken terrible

    Parent
    The first numbers from the NH exit poll (none / 0) (#35)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:25:47 PM EST
    purport to have Hodes in the lead. I'm skeptical.

    OH exit poll (none / 0) (#42)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:34:34 PM EST
    has Strickland hanging on.

    Either this election proves for all time that exit polls have a Democratic bias, or. . .

    Parent

    NBC (none / 0) (#44)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:36:56 PM EST
    is reporting that Rob Portman will win the OH Senate seat, so we shall see how that translates to Governor....

    Parent
    Per NBC, Coons wins (none / 0) (#49)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:09:49 PM EST
    Delaware. Christine O'Donnell now off to make Sarah Palin-like money on the Tea Party circuit? Inquiring minds... actually, could not possibly care any less.

    Parent
    NBC again, Manchin tales W. VA. (none / 0) (#65)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:36:26 PM EST
    And the Dems take the Republican held House seat in Delaware as well.

    Parent
    TAKES, W.VA, not tales. n/t (none / 0) (#66)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:37:03 PM EST
    Alvin Greene loses in SC (none / 0) (#36)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:27:39 PM EST
    Big surprise.  Another term of Jim DeMint.

    BLEH (5.00 / 1) (#39)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:30:17 PM EST
    HBO is playing right this minute (none / 0) (#38)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:29:42 PM EST
    Recount on one station and Frost Nixon on another.  Sweet Aqua Buddha, am I going to have to watch reality TV?

    you could watch . . . . (5.00 / 1) (#41)
    by nycstray on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:31:59 PM EST
    LAO reruns all night long . . . .

    yes, i was just cruising for something to watch also  :)

    Parent

    Only now, an hour before polls close (none / 0) (#45)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 06:52:50 PM EST
    do we get our first call in memory this year from the national Democratic Party.  Take that, Feingold.

    By the way, the call was from Arizona, and the caller's script was:  Go to the polls to bring the races together.  That sounded oddly like the 2008 script.

    So I still am waiting, waiting -- after a lot of reading of coverage and campaign literature, calls from the state and local party and pols, as well as putting this call on blogs -- for someone to tell me the Democratic agenda for the next two years.  Not the agenda for two years ago. . . .

    boston.com (none / 0) (#55)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:21:56 PM EST
    says ayotte and lynch win in NH.

    Nothing yet on any of the MA races.  Afraid to turn on the TV...

    Is ayotte (none / 0) (#57)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:27:18 PM EST
    the Dem?

    Parent
    no... (none / 0) (#58)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:28:59 PM EST
    unfortunately not.

    Lynch is.

    Parent

    No (none / 0) (#60)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:29:33 PM EST
    I'm thinking of Kuster.

    Parent
    local news more about the (none / 0) (#61)
    by nycstray on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:30:54 PM EST
    Giants and tomorrows parade than the election here :) polls are still open . . . .

    Parent
    Top story in Wisconsin's major paper (none / 0) (#80)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:55:50 PM EST
    is the hiring of a new manager for the Milwaukee Brewers.

    Oh, and down the page:  There's an election.

    Parent

    As of 8:30 (none / 0) (#63)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:33:25 PM EST
    MA too close to call.

    Parent
    way too close (none / 0) (#68)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:37:55 PM EST
    and not enough reporting.

    I forsee a long night...

    Cahill doing better than I would have thought.

    Blumenthal projected winner in CT!!!!

    Parent

    I think Alex Sink is going down (none / 0) (#64)
    by andgarden on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:36:21 PM EST
    Still plenty to count, though.

    Blanche Lincoln goes down (none / 0) (#67)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:37:32 PM EST
    Per NBC.  That puts the Republicans +2

    Lawewnce O'Donnell mad about this... (none / 0) (#81)
    by sallywally on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:56:23 PM EST
    says the W.Va Dem who won is far more conservative than Blanche Lincoln was....very PO'd.

    Parent
    some possible good news for Barney (none / 0) (#70)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:41:15 PM EST
    Newton is going heavily for Deval so far...

    Newton is one of those high-turnout Boston suburbs in Barney's district.

    Alan Grayson conceding (none / 0) (#71)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:41:56 PM EST


    That's too bad. (5.00 / 1) (#74)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:43:27 PM EST
    I was hoping Grayson would pull it out.

    Parent
    Very disappointing (5.00 / 1) (#88)
    by ruffian on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:13:00 PM EST
     

    Parent
    Wisconsin exit polls -- first analysis (none / 0) (#72)
    by Cream City on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:42:28 PM EST
    Dissatisfaction with government captured in Wisconsin exit polls
    By Craig Gilbert of the Journal Sentinel

    It should surprise no one that a sense of political discontent runs through the early exit polling results, with a little over one-third of voters saying they are enthusiastic or satisfied with the way the federal government is working, and almost two-thirds either saying they are dissatisfied or saying they're angry.

    More than four in ten Wisconsin voters say that compared to two years ago, their financial situation is worse. Only one in ten say it's better.

    In the preliminary Wisconsin exit polls, support and opposition to the Tea Party are running about even. Slightly more people have unfavorable views of the Democratic Party than favorable views. But attitudes toward the Republican Party are quite similar. . . .

    More coming, graf by graf as exit poll analysis evolves, at jsonline.com -- while actual polls still are open for 15 more minutes.

    early good news (none / 0) (#75)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:43:58 PM EST
    Barney 66%  Patrick 51% Keating ahead at 47%

    3% reporting.

    Tom Perriello loses in Virginia (none / 0) (#77)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:46:41 PM EST
    Virginia is going mostly red tonight.

    Per exit polls, CA voters not (none / 0) (#79)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:55:00 PM EST
    motived to show up by Prop 19.  Interesing.  LAT

    Seems (none / 0) (#82)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 07:59:27 PM EST
    It is people 40-49 (mostly parents) who dropped their support in recent weeks for Prop 19.

    Proposition 19, which had been leading through much of the campaign, is now trailing in every survey. Support has declined fastest and hardest among those aged 40-49, the age demographic most likely to have children old enough to be thinking about -- or already -- smoking pot.

    When those parents answered the survey earlier in the election, pot legalization was more idea than reality. As an idea, voters between 40 and 49 supported legalization by a 15-point margin of 53-38 in a survey released by the Field Poll, the gold standard for public-opinion research in California, in September. At the end of October, as the idea came closer to becoming a reality, that demographic flipped. A 15-point margin turned into a 13-point deficit. Nine percent remained undecided in both surveys. The unheard-of 28-point swing among a fifth of the electorate explains roughly half of the overall drop in the polls. Support among baby boomers aged 50-64 stayed constant in the survey. Among those aged 18-39, support fell from 59-33 to 54-38 over the course of a month. And those 65 and older backed away from the initiative as well, where support dropped from 36-29.

    People in their 40s are most likely to have children who are teenagers. The question then for those parents when they head into the voting booth is, who they are thinking about: their kids or themselves?



    Parent
    Or perhaps they read Prop 19, which (none / 0) (#94)
    by oculus on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:52:45 PM EST
    provides each municipality and county may enact its own regulations.  Whilst feds continue MJ as Schedule I.

    Parent
    Maybe (none / 0) (#95)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:54:13 PM EST
    The ability to legally smoke pot isn't as big a deal in the greater country than it is around here.

    Parent
    Cuomo wins (none / 0) (#83)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:05:26 PM EST
    Thune wins in SD

    Moran wins in Kansas (none / 0) (#86)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:07:20 PM EST
    aaaaaand (none / 0) (#84)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:06:51 PM EST
    Martha Coakley WINS!! hahaha.  First one called.

    Things looking good for Barney, 64% with 35% of his district reporting.

    Patrick still running about 7-8 points ahead with about 15% in.

    Oregon voter turnout at 60%, with (none / 0) (#85)
    by caseyOR on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:07:07 PM EST
    the polls open for 2 more hours.

    Although we have vote-by-mail, voters have until 8 pm on election day to turn in their ballots at their county election office or one of the many ballot drop boxes located throughout the state. We won't have any results until after 8 pm, but they do count the total number of ballots as they come in.

    Big governors race here between former Democratic gov. John Kitzhaber (served 2 terms in the '90s), and Republican newcomer and former NBA (Trailblazers) player Chris Dudley. Republicans haven't won a governors race here since the mid-'80s, but Dudley has a real chance.

    Unfortunately, in addition to being a Republican who makes his money as an investment advisor to the very wealthy, Dudley is a total doofus who knows next to nothing about how the state works.

    North Dakota flips (none / 0) (#87)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:08:18 PM EST
    Hoeven is predicted to win.  

    Republicans +3

    North Dakota flips (none / 0) (#90)
    by daring grace on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:13:15 PM EST
    Will we really notice a difference?

    Parent
    Rick Perry (none / 0) (#89)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:13:04 PM EST
    wins a third term as Texas Governor

    So happy (none / 0) (#107)
    by Chuck0 on Wed Nov 03, 2010 at 08:05:18 AM EST
    that I evacuated from that **ithole of a state 4+ years ago. Tired of living amongst knuckle dragging troglodytes. Not happy about the results in PA. I'm gonna miss Ed.

    Parent
    They just called the house (none / 0) (#91)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 08:17:32 PM EST
    for the republicans.

    sigh...

    The Dean of the House (none / 0) (#96)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:03:41 PM EST
    Michigan Congressman John Dingell, who has served since 1955, is in trouble.  With 12% reporting, he is losing by 9.

    ABCnews.com reporting (none / 0) (#97)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:07:32 PM EST
    6 governorships (so far) have flipped for the Republicans - including Pennsylvania.

    woot woot (none / 0) (#98)
    by CST on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:17:40 PM EST
    its official.

    Deval wins!

    Barney wins!

    And it looks right now like Dems will win every other race.

    Alchohol might be cheaper, but sales tax will not go down, and the low-income housing law is here to stay.

    On that note.  Gnight folks.  Go RUSS!

    This sums it up (none / 0) (#100)
    by jbindc on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:18:08 PM EST
    From the WSJ

    Amid deep pessimism about the economy, the coalition of voters that gave Democrats control of Congress in 2006 appears to have fractured.

    Preliminary exit polls showed that the party lost ground to Republicans in Tuesday's midterm elections among women, middle-income workers, whites, seniors and independent voters.

    Driving the shift: broad anxiety over the economy, as well as skepticism of big government and opposition to signature Democratic Party policy achievements, such as President Barack Obama's economic-stimulus package and the health-care overhaul.

    The change, as portrayed by preliminary results of voter surveys conducted Tuesday, helps explain why Republicans were expected to retake the House Tuesday and make gains in the Senate.



    VT gov see-saw (none / 0) (#101)
    by gyrfalcon on Tue Nov 02, 2010 at 09:21:54 PM EST
    Not that anybody much cares, but VT results are seesawing back and forth between GOP lt. gov. and Dem. senate pres.

    I'm a bit surprised because the GOP lt. gov. ran a textbook GOP sliming flat-out lying campaign against the Dem, which is a widly un-Vermont way of campaigning.

    But like Mass., we have an overwhelmingly Dem. legislature, plus an all-Dem. Congressional delegation, so a lot of folks who should know better turn around and vote GOP for gov. for "balance."

    BTD (none / 0) (#106)
    by Chuck0 on Wed Nov 03, 2010 at 08:03:32 AM EST
    have you consumed your crow yet this morning regarding your comments about Harry Reid? Looks like Nevadans weren't willing to elect a psychopath to the US Senate after all.