When Protests Matter: "The Vocal Minority"
While the Dem blogs are intent on dismissing the Tea Party/Health Care protests as astro-turfing, I think the more interesting question is why the Media thinks these protests matter as opposed to say, the hundreds of thousands who protested the Iraq War? Indeed, as late as September 2007, the Washington Post was referring to war protesters as "the vocal minority."
Of course by 2007, opponents of the war were clearly the majority in the country. The 2006 election was proof of that. So how come a few dozen protesters (astro-turf or not) at selected town halls held by Congresspersons around the country is supposed to mean anything at all?
Proving yet again that Media's problem is not mainly bias, but rather the problem is its incompetence.
Speaking for me only
| < Bill Clinton in N. Korea to Negotiate for Jailed Journalists | Sotomayor Nomination Senate Floor Debate And Vote > |