home

Children of the Incarcerated Paying a Steep Price

Another legacy of the War on Drugs and the punitive lock-em-up mentality of the get tough on crime crowd is coming home to roost: Children of the incarcerated.

Federal data shows that 1.5 million kids have a parent in prison. Usually it's the father:

The chances of seeing a parent go to prison have never been greater, especially for poor black Americans, and new research is documenting the long-term harm to the children they leave behind. Recent studies indicate that having an incarcerated parent doubles the chance that a child will be at least temporarily homeless and measurably increases the likelihood of physically aggressive behavior, social isolation, depression and problems in school — all portending dimmer prospects in adulthood.

“Parental imprisonment has emerged as a novel, and distinctly American, childhood risk that is concentrated among black children and children of low-education parents,” said Christopher Wildeman, a sociologist at the University of Michigan who is studying what some now call the “incarceration generation.”

Sentencing laws are at least partially to blame. [More...]

Among those born in 1990, one in four black children, compared with one in 25 white children, had a father in prison by age 14. Risk is concentrated among black children whose parents are high-school dropouts; half of those children had a father in prison, compared with one in 14 white children with dropout parents, according to a report by Dr. Wildeman recently published in the journal Demography.

These numbers were far lower in 1978.

Also consider: when a kid's parent, particularly the dad, goes to jail, the family has a much harder time trying to survive:

While poor urban children had a 3 percent chance of experiencing a period of homelessness over the previous year, those with an incarcerated parent had a 6 percent chance, one study found.

Then there are the behavioral issues, some of which may carry life-long consequences:

Among 5-year-old urban boys, 49 percent of those who had a father incarcerated within the previous 30 months exhibited physically aggressive behaviors like hitting others or destroying objects, compared with 38 percent of those in otherwise similar circumstances who did not have a father imprisoned, Dr. Wildeman found.

While most attention has been placed on physical aggression, a study by Sara Wakefield, a sociologist following children in Chicago, found that having a parent imprisoned was a mental-health tipping point for some. Thus, while 28 percent of the children in her study over all experienced feelings of social isolation, depression or anxiety at levels that would warrant clinical evaluation or treatment, about 35 percent of those who had an incarcerated parent did.

Say hello to the "incarceration generation." We know how to fix it -- end the draconian sentences forced on us by the get tough on crime crowd in the 80's and 90's. If we don't, we'll be paying not just to house their parents, but to take care of them as well.

America, Prison Nation, needs to take a good look in the mirror and realize its sentencing policies aren't working. One size fits all justice does not work. As long as politicians think their tough-on-crime stance will garner them votes, they are going to keep it up. Conventional wisdom has it that being tough on crime is a magic carpet ride to re-election. And the taxpayer is footing the bill for the warehousing of these inmates. Add another generation of kids who need care, either in jail because they follow their parents' footsteps, not having been taught any alternative, or because they are suffering from mental distress and learning/concentration disabilities, and can't learn at school or hold a job once graduated, and it's an enormous financial drain on society.

We should save prison for the violent and dangerous criminals and impose punitive but not draconian sentences that emphasize rehabilitation, vocational training , drug treatment, anger management and social and parental skills for everyone else.

America cannot jail itself out of its crime problem. But it can address it far more wisely, and hopefully spare another generation, and our pocketbooks.

Related: What to an Imprisoned American is the Fourth of July, by Law Prof Doug Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy?

< FBI Says Sarah Palin is Not Under Investigation | Policing the Baltimore Police >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Did I mention (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by JamesTX on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 10:53:30 AM EST
    that Republicans are evil? Just in case not, that's an example. The next time they start peddling something "for the children", I think I will vomit.

    really too punitive? (none / 0) (#1)
    by diogenes on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 08:03:52 AM EST
    From Yahoo news 7/5
    Officer Dariel Firpo, 23, was leaving the midtown Manhattan ceremony when he saw a 79-year-old man being robbed of his wallet and thrown to the ground by a mugger, police said.
    The mugger tried to run away, but Firpo caught him without incident, they said.
    "Officer Firpo made us all proud," police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said. "He's off to a great start."
    The man Firpo arrested, Jeffrey Grant, was being charged with robbery. Grant, 47, has 48 previous arrests and was just released last week from Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Ossining, N.Y., after serving time for a robbery conviction, police said.
    Grant, of Manhattan, was in custody late Thursday and couldn't be contacted. The name of his attorney wasn't yet on record.
    The mugging victim was treated at a hospital for a broken wrist.

    If Grant were in prison for life on three strikes you're out then at least one 79 year old man wouldn't have a broken wrist today.

    Out of curiousity (none / 0) (#2)
    by Fabian on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 08:12:47 AM EST
    that's
    48 arrests
    and how many convictions?

    (DC comics created a very interesting character who was a child of an inmate.  Dear old dad did his time, came home and despite his claims of being on the straight and narrow, went back to his lawbreaking ways.  Stephanie Brown, furious at him for coming back into her and her mother's life with the same old sh_t, took it upon herself to help send him back to the pen.  Yeah, having an absent parent is tough, but there are worse options.)

    Parent

    Perhaps you missed (none / 0) (#15)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:45 PM EST
    this paragraph of my post:

    We should save prison for the violent and dangerous criminals and impose punitive but not draconian sentences that emphasize rehabilitation, vocational training , drug treatment, anger management and social and parental skills for everyone else.


    Parent
    devil is in the details (none / 0) (#20)
    by diogenes on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 09:45:26 PM EST
    Every defense lawyer's client seems to be a prime rehabilitation candidate.  I think that we could both agree on imposing punitive and draconian sentences on violent and dangerous criminals and punitive but not draconian sentences on everyone else.  How exactly does a defense lawyer define a "violent and dangerous criminal"?

    Parent
    Recently (none / 0) (#3)
    by Lil on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 09:58:41 AM EST
    I took a tour of our County jail and was rather impressed with the mental health services and drug rehab running right inside the jail. We met some inmates who talked about the rehab etc. I know the sherriff was invested in showing us a good picture, but I was impressed nonetheless. But I don't think jail should be the place providing this service, but at least it was service. I walked away thinking they were doing a better job than the county hospital (that is wrong and sick). In fact I have a relative that I was thinking too bad he doesn't get arrested so he can get into rehab while he's in there (chances are he will be arrested soon with his drug behavior). There should be good quality treatment on demand; that would be expensive too, but not as expenve as jail, I would think.

    Children of Promise provides services to children (none / 0) (#5)
    by JSN on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 10:45:14 AM EST
    of prison inmates. The web page is for the NY organization but
    there are similar groups in other states.

    http://www.childrenofpromisenyc.org/

    What a disgrace (none / 0) (#7)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 11:37:32 AM EST


    Read Mark Salzman's (none / 0) (#8)
    by oculus on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 11:48:59 AM EST
    True Notebooks (2003).  Salzman taught a writing class to juveniles awaiting trial for very serious crimes.  In their writings, many of the detainees described their young lives without fathers, most of whom were in prison.  

    But, what positive contributions would these fathers have made to their sons' growing-up years had the fathers been at home?  


    I noticed this as well (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:01:35 PM EST
    working probation.  In fact, I had a few kids who had created a whole tough guy dynamic out of surviving such childhoods and because we all desire to look up to our fathers....prison became a symbol of "manhood" for them.  First time I've seen a sociologists work on this, but I don't usually go hunting for it.

    Parent
    As far as what sort of impression (none / 0) (#10)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:07:13 PM EST
    these fathers would be on their children though, we are currently removing any possibility that any of them would have made positive ones.  I am tired of enabling and promoting subcultures that glorify prison time too.  Is there something that we can do about that?  If a father is a danger to society and his family and children, who is there for his children in his absence outside of the shame filled void?

    Parent
    I've read about young people who (none / 0) (#11)
    by oculus on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:07:43 PM EST
    were housed in the same correctional facility as their fathers, who tried to "make nice" after having been absent during those crucial years.  Kids weren't all that interested.

    P.S.  Mark Salzman isn't a sociologist.  He is a wonderful author.  First book:  "Iron and Silk" about his experiences teaching English in Western China and studying with a master of martial arts.

    Parent

    A Huge Contribution (none / 0) (#12)
    by squeaky on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:22:38 PM EST
    Your bias against people who sell drugs is astounding. Why shouldn't they be great fathers.

    Parent
    Do you aspire for your children to (none / 0) (#13)
    by oculus on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:41:47 PM EST
    be drug pushers?

    Parent
    what does one have to do (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 02:32:41 PM EST
    with the other? And "drug pusher?" I haven't heard that term since the 50's....or maybe Steppenwolf.

    Parent
    Huh? (none / 0) (#14)
    by squeaky on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 12:43:37 PM EST
    Not sure what you are talking about. Some stereotype no doubt.

    Parent
    Special treatment (none / 0) (#17)
    by nyjets on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 08:12:24 PM EST
    Does this mean that criminals will get preferential treatment if they commit crimes because they have children. WOuld that mean that if a criminal does not have children, they would have a longer term of prisonment.

    Also, if a criminal commits a horrendous crime which merits life, should they be let out of prison early just because they have children.

    None Of The Above (none / 0) (#18)
    by squeaky on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 08:41:57 PM EST
    Just additional collateral damage, as you would put it, as a result of ridiculously long prison sentences for non violent crimes. "Crimes" that should be taken out of the hands of the BOP and put in the hands of the Department of Health and Human services.

    Parent
    Fair point (none / 0) (#19)
    by nyjets on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 08:48:04 PM EST
    For non violent crimes or at least minor crimes (I will be honest, I have trouble see drug uses/ pushers as non violent but I concede that it could / should be. I am somewhat undecided on that point.) you would probable be right.

    However, I get the sense from the article, and based on other articles I have read, that some people would like to see violent criminals spend less time in prison just because they have children.

    Parent