home

Sen. Feinstein On Right Wing Judicial Activism

Excellent work from Senator Feinstein.

Speaking for me only

< Senator Russ Feingold's Opening Statement In Sotomayor's Hearings | Sen. Whitehouse's Opening Statement On Sotomayor Nomination >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    DiFI (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 10:51:10 AM EST
    was fantastic.

    whatd'ya know (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Dadler on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:04:16 AM EST
    DiFi actually does something good, worthless war profiteer that she is.

    Whitehouse: (5.00 / 2) (#13)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:12:17 AM EST
    "Pretense that Republican nominees embody restraint"

    Great stuff (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:15:28 AM EST
    Whitehouse has truly been a terrific Senator. To thihnk I supported his opponent in the primary. Boy was I wrong.

    Parent
    Sure hope the Dems. hone in on (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by oculus on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24:14 AM EST
    "judicial philosophy."  But don't think they will.

    Up to bat, Cornyn (none / 0) (#2)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:01:13 AM EST
    he has a real needle to thread.

    And he's doing bad originalism (none / 0) (#3)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:02:56 AM EST
    Hey John, why were the bill of rights added by amendment?

    Parent
    "micromanaged the death penalty" (none / 0) (#4)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:03:54 AM EST
    Um, what does "unusual" mean, pal???

    Parent
    Yes (none / 0) (#6)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:04:35 AM EST
    Thos d@mn 13th and 14th amendments....

    Parent
    "judge made laws. . .veer off course" (5.00 / 0) (#8)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:06:23 AM EST
    Uh, John Cornyn, meet John Marshall.

    Crappy originalism really makes me angry.

    Parent

    I heard a winger argument that Marbury (5.00 / 0) (#28)
    by MKS on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 12:30:38 PM EST
    was wrongly decided....No stopping them from their own wacked-out excesses.

    Parent
    That would be a consistent position, but actually (5.00 / 1) (#30)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 12:38:50 PM EST
    it's wrong as a matter of original understanding. If you read the Federalist papers, you know that the framers expected that the courts would exercise judicial review.

    Parent
    The argument was that Congress (none / 0) (#29)
    by MKS on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 12:31:43 PM EST
    should be allowed to override what the Supreme Court says is constitutional....Wrap your mind around that one....

    Parent
    Well, that's later (none / 0) (#7)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:05:25 AM EST
    But I'll betcha Cornyn doesn't want to talk about their original purpose either.

    Parent
    How could I forget (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:06:49 AM EST
    That d@mn 19th Amendment since the "written constitution" is the most important?

    Parent
    I bet Conryn wishes (none / 0) (#14)
    by Cream City on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:13:54 AM EST
    that the original Constitution had included gender -- as the word "male" didn't enter into it for decades.

    Parent
    And Cornyn's extreme understanding of the 14th (none / 0) (#10)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:09:09 AM EST
    is now, I think, the majority opinion on the Court.

    He wants to axe government affirmative action.

    Parent

    Only Written Rights Exist? (none / 0) (#15)
    by Sumner on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:14:49 AM EST
    Professor Orin Kerr is advising Cornyn? How the blazes did the 9th Amendment slip through the cracks of Cornyn's view of the Bill of Rights?

    Parent
    Whitehouse should be interesting (none / 0) (#11)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:11:07 AM EST


    I think Iove him (5.00 / 3) (#17)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:15:58 AM EST
    Whitehouse smacks down the Roberts court.

    Parent
    Here it comes (none / 0) (#12)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:11:33 AM EST
    Whitehouse will talk about right wing judicial activism.

    Excellent.

    Parent

    He was very good ... (none / 0) (#24)
    by Robot Porter on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:24:06 AM EST
    though I did laugh at his characterization of Toobin.

    Parent
    Whitehouse gets an award (none / 0) (#18)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:16:12 AM EST
    for being the first to quote John Marshall.

    An award for best presentation (5.00 / 3) (#19)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:22 AM EST
    First rate stuff.

    Parent
    Yup (none / 0) (#20)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:51 AM EST
    He stands up for representation reinforcement (none / 0) (#21)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:19:00 AM EST
    More (none / 0) (#22)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:19:50 AM EST
    "A courtroom is a place where the status quo is SUPPOSED to be upended."

    Parent
    Yup (none / 0) (#23)
    by andgarden on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:20:38 AM EST
    And now we get stupid from Tom Coburn.

    Parent
    My ears are ready to bleed (5.00 / 3) (#26)
    by jbindc on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:25:10 AM EST
    listening to Coburn.

    Wonder if what he says here is going to be protected by doctor/priest privilege, like his conversations with Ensign?  <snark>

    Parent

    I found it to be a perfect time (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by nycstray on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 11:48:10 AM EST
    to go in the kitchen and rustle up some lunch, out of earshot. {grin}

    Parent