home

Where's the Real Left Flank?

I was very pleased to read BTD's post earlier today on the lack of a meaningful and effective left flank of the Democratic party and the importance of pushing policies instead of specific politicians.

It's always amazed me how bold the right is on both foreign and domestic policy in contrast to the timidity of the left.

Where are the strident, prominent voices on, for example, criminal justice system which should be a classic left issue? While a prominent left blogger mocks proponents of marijuana legalization for supposedly espousing "Cheech and Chong mathematics," a centrist Democrat from Virginia (!) pushes for reform of our vast system of prisons and jails. For all the jokes made by left bloggers about faux moderates and "seriousness" they mock and marginalize the left flank every chance they get. [More...]

Now, one could argue that the hard right flank of the right has led the right to its minority party status. And that's true. But the right still controls the dialogue and better still keeps its right flank furious and well-funded.

And while the Dems have spent months mocking right-wing activists for their tea parties, they've missed an enormous opportunity to criticize the bailouts from a genuine populist perspective. Indeed, as Jane Hamsher tellingly noted in a discussion of Barry Ritholtz's book Bailout Nation:

"One of the things I really like about the financial blogosphere is that they are — and I’m going to struggle with the right words for this — issue driven, and therefore aren’t locked in a zero sum battle for political ascendency.

Meaning, they manage to hold the same yardstick up to everyone, and aren’t playing for party advantage. The liberal blogosphere has largely defined itself as locked in a steel-cage death match with the GOP, which has value, but that means they’re reticent about applying the yardstick they use for Republicans to their own, lest they cede some territory.

There’s value too in making sure that the house stays clean no matter who’s in charge. Those two things shouldn’t be antithetical, but sadly they often seem to be."

Exactly right. Which is why the preeminent voices of the moment are financial bloggers such as Nouriel Roubini, Ritholtz and Yves Smith. With a very few exceptions, the "left," sadly, is nowhere to be found.

< R.I. Legislature Overrides Gov. Veto on Marijuana Dispensaries | House Passes $106 Billion Funding Bill >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    See it differently (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by koshembos on Tue Jun 16, 2009 at 09:46:50 PM EST
    First, our left is a policy left and not a progressive left. That is, they take political stands on different issues but don't have a progressive world view. Unions, underclass and the poor are relegated to the basement of their MacMansion.

    The political left is tied in knots to a president who who happens to be a centrist centrist. This muzzles that left and makes it appear poodlish.

    The GOP is fascistic and reactionary, but they are true believers, which out left isn't.

    The left (none / 0) (#7)
    by lentinel on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 04:39:43 PM EST
    pushed for Obama's election out of fear of the alternative.
    That's how we will continue to be manipulated.

    Parent
    Sibelius: Obama to block single payer permanently (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by lambert on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 07:33:08 AM EST
    Sibelius on single payer on NPR:

    "Asked if the administration's program will be drafted specifically to prevent it from evolving into a single-payer plan, Sebelius says: "I think that's very much the case...."

    Yay!

    Nice to know that everything is on the table, except what isn't, and everything is open and transparent, except what's not.

    Sad thing is... (none / 0) (#4)
    by gtesta on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 09:26:45 AM EST
    I don't even consider single payer to be the most progressive policy position.  Single provider, where the government owns the hospitals, pays the doctors, owns the clinics, etc. is the most "left" position. Some may call it socialized medicine, but it seems to work quite well for the Veterans Admininstration.
    Anyway, we are back to fighting on the conservative half of the football field and with single payer off the table, it's more like fighting betweeen the 10 and 25 yard line of the conservative side.

    Parent
    Sure, I agree (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by lambert on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 03:49:31 PM EST
    But would I settle for Canadian health care? In a heart beat. I mean, sure, I understand it's my duty as a patriotic citizen to pay more, for less, so the insurance companies can stay in business. But you can only get so much blood from a stone. Or, in this case, flesh.

    Parent
    The timidity of the Left in the U.S. (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by MsExPat on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 09:25:57 AM EST
    goes back to the early 20th century, really. To the demonization of Communism, and the tarring of progressives and socialists with the "communist" label.

    Progressives were persecuted and lumped in with the Communists, even if they weren't followers of the CP. For many, the real life repercussions were horrible--job loss, blacklisting, imprisonment.

    Everytime a wingnut brands some pol a "socialist", it echoes with the force of nearly a century of persecution.

    But calling someone a "conservative" has no such baggage attached.

    So the Right has a built-in advantage over the Left. Which it uses, as we've seen time and again.    

    The symbol (none / 0) (#6)
    by lentinel on Wed Jun 17, 2009 at 04:37:48 PM EST
    of the powerlessness of the American left is Obama.